Category: Racist: Middle-Eastern

Trump administration urges White men to file discrimination claims

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, chaired by Andrea Lucas, publicly solicited discrimination claims from White men this week, stating the agency is “committed to identifying, attacking, and eliminating ALL race and sex discrimination – including against white male employees.” This call aligns with the Trump administration’s characterization of diversity, equity, and inclusion programs as “unlawful” and “woke” discrimination against White workers.

Vice President JD Vance described DEI as a “deliberate program of discrimination primarily against White men” and promoted an essay claiming DEI policies harmed White male millennials’ careers. Lucas responded by tweeting the essay contained “unlawful discrimination,” framing the EEOC’s new direction as enforcement against bias rather than investigation of structural inequities. The agency now operates under Lucas’s pledge to enforce civil rights laws without regard to what she termed the notion that only certain “charging parties” merit access.

White workers comprise approximately two-thirds of the U.S. workforce but file only about 10% of race-based discrimination claims with the EEOC, according to 2023 data. However, “reverse discrimination” lawsuits have increased, including a recent case by a money manager at Carl Icahn’s firm alleging denial of a board seat because of his race. Conservative commentators, including Christopher Rufo of the Manhattan Institute, framed the EEOC’s explicit recruitment of White claimants as federal recognition of “anti-White racism.”

DEI advocates, including David Glasgow of NYU’s Meltzer Center, stated that diversity programs aim to remove bias and create equal opportunity, not to disadvantage any group. Glasgow noted that White households possess 9-10 times the wealth of Black households, White men comprise 74% of Fortune 50 CEOs, and Black Americans remain outnumbered 12 to 1 by White people in executive roles. Corporate rollbacks of DEI initiatives following Trump’s campaign promises already impacted Black Americans’ career advancement across major companies.

Trump campaigned against DEI for fostering “anti-White feeling” and on his first day in office moved to eliminate such programs from the federal government and military while threatening to strip billions in federal funding and grants from universities and contractors. Companies across corporate America accelerated efforts to dismantle or scale back DEI initiatives to avoid losing federal contracts, directly eroding representation gains achieved by women and people of color in executive positions.

(Source: https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2025/12/18/trump-anti-dei-eeoc-discrimination-white-men/87830694007/?utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwdGRleAOy7WZleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeRHC4Edio8cwGzlZP8ujagqeqZ3JpBY5B3gPLAOtiLaOJr7Cj2gNPJEsSMDk_aem_Nn4gYA96S6kn3bgF0f3ALA#eyb73jsweqjc32ytxzjwrdmvqs6shjnp)

Noem Urges Trump for Nationwide Travel Ban on Immigrants

Kristi Noem, U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security, pressed President Donald Trump to implement a comprehensive travel ban targeting countries she labels as “flooding our nation with killers, leeches, and entitlement junkies.” In a post on social media, she expressed her view that America’s ancestors built the nation for its citizens, not for foreign individuals, stating, “WE DON’T WANT THEM. NOT ONE.”

Noem’s call for a travel ban reflects Trump’s recent promises to “permanently pause migration from all Third World Countries,” particularly following violent incidents attributed to immigrants, including a shooting involving a suspected Afghan national. Trump has criticized existing immigration policies, insisting they undermine American society and finance, stating that migrants benefit disproportionately from U.S. resources.

Noem’s focus on immigration policies aligns with Trump’s broader immigration agenda, which features extreme measures such as denaturalizing migrants deemed detrimental to national cohesion, ending federal benefits for non-citizens, and aggressive deportation policies. Both officials are vocal about viewing immigration as a central issue affecting national security and social stability.

This rhetoric from Noem and Trump echoes an intensifying trend in Republican politics, wherein immigration is depicted as a significant threat. Their comments play into a narrative that directly targets specific nationalities while advocating measures that many deem as xenophobic and divisive.

As their statements draw further attention, they contribute to an ongoing dialogue about the future of immigration in the U.S. amid rising tensions and increasing calls for stricter enforcement of immigration laws. Their extreme posturing reinforces a culture of fear and aggression toward immigrants in American political discourse.

Pentagon Grants Press Credentials to Extremist Laura Loomer

The Pentagon has credentialed Laura Loomer, a divisive right-wing activist, to cover President Trump’s Department of Defense. Loomer announced her credentialing on social media, claiming her work has significantly influenced personnel decisions within the Executive Branch and intelligence agencies. This decision is part of the Pentagon’s recent media policy shifts aimed at promoting more conservative and alternative media.

Loomer is known for her controversial attacks against even some of Trump’s allies, a fact that has drawn criticism from multiple quarters, including within the Republican Party. Her influence raises alarms about the Pentagon’s increasing alignment with extremist viewpoints. Loomer had previously criticized Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth over plans to host a Qatari air force facility in Idaho, arguing it was opposed by Trump supporters.

The credentialing follows reports that major news outlets, such as The Hill and The New York Times, have declined to accept the Pentagon’s new press policy. This policy drastically restricts media access and aims to control the flow of information from the Department of Defense, indicating a troubling trend in governmental transparency and press freedoms.

This development occurs against the backdrop of the Trump administration’s ongoing transformation of media engagement, notably favoring voices that align with far-right ideologies. Critics view this as a threat to journalistic integrity and an attempt to marginalize traditional news organizations that uphold independent reporting standards.

As Loomer’s credentialing illustrates the growing influence of extremist figures in the realm of American politics, it poses serious questions about the future of military and governmental media relations under Trump’s administration.

Trump’s ‘Third World’ Immigration Ban Threatens Rights

Donald Trump announced a plan to “permanently pause” immigration from what he refers to as “third world countries” following a shooting incident involving National Guardsmen in Washington, D.C. This announcement came just hours after the tragic death of Guardsman Sarah Beckstrom and escalated Trump’s already inflammatory rhetoric on immigration. His proposal includes the “reverse migration” of millions of migrants currently residing in the U.S.

In a lengthy social media post, Trump vowed to eliminate Biden’s immigration policies and deport individuals he deems “non-compatible with Western Civilization.” He specifically indicated that visa issuance for Afghan nationals has been stopped, tying the pause to national security concerns despite the context of ongoing conflicts in those regions.

The president also threatened to strip federal benefits from noncitizens and to reassess the u.s. status of green card holders from 19 countries, particularly focusing on Somalia. Previous remarks directed at the Somali community in Minnesota had incited concern and drawn reactions of criticism from various advocacy groups.

Critics, including U.N. officials and migrant advocacy organizations, have condemned Trump’s actions and rhetoric as harmful and unconstitutional. They warn that using one tragic event to justify a crackdown on all immigrants, especially Afghan refugees, undermines fundamental American values and legal protections. These proposals are likely to face significant legal challenges if pursued.

Trump’s language and policies hark back to previous attempts to ban visas from majority-Muslim countries, which faced substantial opposition and legal scrutiny during his first term. The increasingly aggressive stance against immigrants reflects broader authoritarian tendencies and has sparked alarm among civil liberties organizations.

Trump Attacks Jewish Voters Supporting Zohran Mamdani as ‘Stupid’

President Donald Trump launched a shocking tirade on Election Day against Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic candidate for New York City mayor. Trump labeled Mamdani a “Jew hater” and controversially remarked that any Jewish individual voting for him is “stupid.” This inflammatory rhetoric adds to Trump’s history of targeting Jewish voters, previously asserting that they should be ashamed for supporting Democrats.

Trump’s tirade signals a desperate attempt to bolster support for former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, who is running as an independent. Trump criticized Mamdani’s stance towards Israel and the Jewish community, citing his failure to condemn Hamas and his controversial statements surrounding the October 7 terrorist attacks. These accusations reflect a troubling trend in Trump’s continuous use of anti-Semitic language and baseless claims against his political opponents.

In a similar vein, Trump has previously implied that Jewish voters should reconsider their affiliation with the Democratic party, suggesting that their loyalty is misplaced. His recent comments not only reflect a blatant disregard for the complexities of political identity but also serve to further polarize the electorate in a deeply sensitive and divided political climate.

Trump’s warning about the consequences of a Mamdani victory struck fear into the hearts of New Yorkers, as he threatened to withhold federal funding should Mamdani be elected. He painted a grim picture of the city’s future under Mamdani, claiming that it would devolve into a “Complete and Total Economic and Social Disaster.” This kind of scorched-earth political rhetoric aims to intimidate voters and eliminate support for Mamdani based on fear rather than factual concerns.

As the election unfolds, it is imperative for voters to analyze the substance of Mamdani’s platform rather than succumb to Trump’s incendiary remarks. Engaging in constructive dialogue and dispelling misinformation is essential for promoting a more informed electorate in the face of blatant manipulation and divisive tactics from Trump.

Trump’s Anti-Immigrant Rhetoric Fuels Fear and Division in Europe

During a recent visit to Scotland, President Donald Trump made alarming comments regarding immigration, asserting that a “migrant invasion” is causing severe consequences in Europe. This rhetoric plays into his pattern of inflammatory claims aimed at furthering a xenophobic agenda. Trump’s remarks included harsh advice for European leaders to “get your act together” and defend their nations against what he described as an existential threat from immigration.

Upon his arrival at Glasgow Prestwick Airport, Trump was received by thousands, including Scottish Secretary Ian Murray. He met with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, whom he praised, while simultaneously promoting his own business interests, including his luxury golf resorts. This underscores the troubling mixture of personal gain and national dialogue that has characterized much of Trump’s public engagement.

Trump’s ongoing fixation on immigration is not just rhetoric but aligns with the authoritarian trends seen in Republican policies, creating an atmosphere of fear and division. By framing migrants as an invasion, he signals support for extreme and inhumane immigration measures that threaten the rights and dignity of individuals seeking refuge or a better life.

Additionally, Trump made disparaging comments about windmills, falsely claiming they are damaging the environment. Such statements illustrate a disregard for factual information and demonstrate his enduring commitment to denying climate change—a stance that has dire implications for environmental policy and public health.

This visit serves as a stark reminder of Trump’s persistent divisive tactics and the dangerous political discourse he champions, benefiting from fearmongering in an attempt to solidify his political influence while undermining democratic values across the globe.

Trump’s Radical Rhetoric Targets NYC’s Zohran Mamdani with Unfounded Communist Claims

During a recent rally in Iowa, President Donald Trump launched a vehement attack against Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic nominee for New York City mayor. Trump characterized Mamdani as a “communist” and expressed his belief that the candidate aims to “destroy” New York, a city Trump claims to love. This hyperbolic language is consistent with Trump’s strategy of labeling his opponents with extreme ideologies to rally his base.

Trump’s incendiary remarks included a declaration that the sacrifices of past generations should not be in vain, warning against what he termed “Marxist lunatics” threatening America as it approaches its 250th anniversary. He claimed America will “never be communist,” a statement that reflects his attempts to stoke fear and division within the political landscape.

The rhetoric directed at Mamdani is telling of the broader Republican tactic to demonize perceived leftist figures to fortify their own political power. Mamdani, who immigrated to the U.S. from Uganda as a child, has become a focal point for GOP attacks, highlighting how Trump is willing to extend threats beyond mere rhetoric. The conflation of Mamdani’s policies with radical ideologies serves to misinform voters and distract from substantive policy discussions.

Adding another layer to the tension, Trump threatened legal action against Mamdani, claiming he would investigate his immigration status if Mamdani obstructs ICE operations in New York. This blatant intimidation tactic underscores the authoritarian tendencies within Trump’s rhetoric and his administration’s immigration policies, which target vulnerable communities.

In response, Mamdani has denounced Trump’s statements as an affront to democracy and a threat to anyone who speaks up against government actions. He has positioned himself as a defender of the rights of all New Yorkers, particularly those who may fear reprisals for their political beliefs. This confrontation is emblematic of the ongoing struggle between progressive and far-right ideologies as the mayoral election approaches.

Trump Threatens Arrest of NYC Candidate Mamdani Over ICE Removal Proposal

President Donald Trump has issued a bold threat to New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, stating he intends to arrest Mamdani if he acts on his promise to expel Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from the city. During a press conference in Florida, Trump uttered this alarming warning while labeling Mamdani a “communist,” a claim the candidate vehemently denies.

Trump’s remarks followed a question on how he would respond if Mamdani fulfilled his vow to remove ICE. He dismissed Mamdani’s credibility while insinuating that he may not even be a legitimate U.S. citizen, echoing a sentiment previously expressed by a Republican congressman who called for Mamdani’s denaturalization and deportation. Notably, Mamdani, born in Uganda, has been a naturalized citizen since 2018.

The President’s incendiary language about Mamdani underscores a larger pattern of targeting political opponents with accusations bordering on xenophobia. By repeatedly questioning Mamdani’s citizenship status, Trump is deploying a well-known tactic used to sow doubt and fear, especially aimed at leaders from minority backgrounds.

In stark contrast, Trump has praised incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, canvassing for him ahead of the upcoming election. Adams, a Democrat, symbolizes the party’s stronghold in New York City, and Trump’s comments seem to highlight his own challenges as a Republican candidate in a predominantly blue state.

This latest threat from Trump not only reflects his divisive political strategy but raises significant concerns about the increasing normalization of authoritarianism in American politics. Trump’s approach attempts to intimidate dissent while promoting a narrative rooted in fear and mistrust, a move that aims to dismantle democratic norms in favor of fascist overtones.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-vows-to-arrest-zohran-mamdani-if-he-resists-ice-as-new-york-mayor/)

Trump’s New Travel Ban Targets 12 Countries Citing Security

In a recent proclamation, U.S. President Donald Trump has banned nationals from 12 countries, asserting that these measures are essential for national security. The countries affected by this prohibition include Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. Additionally, Trump has imposed partial travel restrictions on seven other nations: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. The order goes into effect on June 9, 2025, at 12:01 am EDT, although visas issued prior to this date will not be revoked.

In a video announcing the ban, Trump declared, “We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm.” The newly restricted countries were chosen based on their alleged “large-scale presence of terrorists,” lack of cooperation on visa security, and deficiencies in verifying the identities of travelers. Trump’s rationale reflects a continuity of his administration’s hardline immigration stance, harking back to his earlier bans on travelers from predominantly Muslim countries.

The decision follows a recent incident in Boulder, Colorado, where a gasoline bomb was thrown at pro-Israel demonstrators by an Egyptian national, underscoring Trump’s claim of a national security threat, despite Egypt not being on the restricted list. Trump’s broader immigration policies aim to intensify security vetting of foreigners seeking admission to the U.S. and suggest additional potential restrictions could come in the future.

In response, countries like Somalia and Venezuela have expressed concern. Somalia’s ambassador indicated a desire for dialogue to address the security issues raised by the ban. Conversely, Venezuelan officials accused the U.S. of pursuing a fascistic agenda and warned their citizens of the dangers they could face in the U.S., highlighting the broader implications Trump’s policies have not only on travel and immigration but also on international relations.

This latest prohibition reflects Trump’s ongoing focus on a security-first approach to immigration, a policy style that has been criticized as reactionary and inherently discriminatory. Critics argue that these moves reaffirm a pattern of exclusion and discrimination against countries that do not align with Trump’s political narrative, exacerbating divisions and fostering anti-immigrant sentiment in the United States.

(h/t: https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/trump-signs-proclamation-banning-travel-12-countries-cbs-news-reports-2025-06-04/)

Trump’s English-Only Executive Order Threatens Multicultural Trucking Workforce

President Donald Trump has signed a controversial executive order mandating that all commercial truck drivers in the United States must demonstrate proficiency in English. This move follows his earlier proclamation designating English as the country’s official language and effectively dismantles multilingual support systems that were previously in place. The order prioritizes English over any other language, presenting a clear message that undermines the country’s multicultural fabric.

In his order, Trump emphasizes the necessity for drivers to understand and communicate in English sufficiently to interact with traffic safety officials, border patrol, and other regulatory bodies. He argues that this requirement is a matter of public safety, a claim that seems to mask an underlying prejudice against non-English speakers—often immigrants and people of color—who are targeted by these policies. Such rhetoric perpetuates divisive attitudes while trivializing the genuine contributions of diverse drivers who navigate complex logistics in their native languages.

The order further categorizes drivers who fail the English proficiency requirement as “out-of-service,” severely impacting their livelihoods. This punitive approach raises immediate concerns about the essential role these workers play in the U.S. economy, especially given the ongoing workforce shortages in sectors reliant on commercial driving. Trump’s adherence to a monolingual policy does little to address real productivity issues and instead prioritizes ideological conformity.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated that communication difficulties between truckers and officials represent a risk to public safety, reinforcing an unfounded narrative that casts drivers who speak languages other than English as incapable. The lack of evidence substantiating this claim undermines the logical foundation of the executive order and promotes an irrational fear of non-English speakers.

Ultimately, this executive order is indicative of Trump’s broader anti-immigrant agenda that seeks to fracture the multicultural identity that has long characterized America. By stripping away important language support and targeting working-class individuals based on language proficiency, Trump’s administration actively works against the nation’s diverse character and democratic values.

1 2 3 … 10