Stop The Donald Trump

He's a fascist, authoritarian, racist, sexist, and the former Republican President of the United States of America.

This site is a database of over 4,000 articles of every controversial statement made by Donald Trump and to help you when debating family, friends, and strangers on why this man is the most dangerous candidate and president this country has ever seen.

You can search for articles, or find a set of articles from a categorized list.

Under "Rebuttals" you can also find in-depth articles reviewing the policies of Donald Trump and how they can help or (most likely) harm you.

Trump Administration Appoints Climate Change Contrarians Undermining Scientific Consensus

The Trump administration has appointed three prominent climate change contrarians to positions within the Department of Energy, raising alarm among scientists and environmental advocates. The appointments include John Christy and Roy Spencer, who have long rejected the scientific consensus on climate change, and Steven E. Koonin, known for questioning mainstream climate science. These hires are part of a broader strategy by the Trump administration, under Secretary Chris Wright, to influence government policy in favor of the fossil fuel industry.

Each appointee brings a history of undermining established climate science. Koonin, who previously served in the Department of Energy during the Obama administration and worked for BP, is known for pushing fringe ideas regarding climate science. Christy and Spencer have questioned the validity of surface temperature data, aligning themselves with a small minority of scientists who downplay the impact of human activity on climate change. The appointments are seen as an attempt to tilt federal research and policy towards contrarian views.

As the Trump administration aims to dismantle existing climate regulations and scientific findings, hiring these contrarians appears to be an effort to produce favorable outcomes for their agenda. Notably, they plan to overturn a critical 2009 finding that recognized greenhouse gas emissions as a threat to public health. This reflects a shifting priority towards protecting corporate interests over public welfare and environmental safety, as evidenced by proposed budget cuts to agencies crucial for climate science.

Concerns have been voiced by leading climate scientists regarding the potential for these appointments to lead to skewed interpretations of climate data, which could result in a misleading version of the National Climate Assessment. Andrew Dessler, a climate scientist at Texas A&M, criticized the administration’s approach, stating that the appointed scientists are selected not for their expertise but for their willingness to provide desired conclusions. This trend signifies a troubling disregard for legitimate scientific inquiry in favor of political objectives.

The ongoing undermining of climate research, including recent disbanding of crucial assessment teams and the removal of informative resources, highlights an alarming commitment to climate denialism that threatens public health and safety. The positions of Koonin, Spencer, and Christy signal a broader strategy that seeks to promote fringe perspectives at the expense of scientifically-backed evidence, ultimately endangering vital climate action while favoring the interests of the fossil fuel industry.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/08/climate/doe-climate-contrarians-trump)

Trump’s Radical Rhetoric Targets NYC’s Zohran Mamdani with Unfounded Communist Claims

During a recent rally in Iowa, President Donald Trump launched a vehement attack against Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic nominee for New York City mayor. Trump characterized Mamdani as a “communist” and expressed his belief that the candidate aims to “destroy” New York, a city Trump claims to love. This hyperbolic language is consistent with Trump’s strategy of labeling his opponents with extreme ideologies to rally his base.

Trump’s incendiary remarks included a declaration that the sacrifices of past generations should not be in vain, warning against what he termed “Marxist lunatics” threatening America as it approaches its 250th anniversary. He claimed America will “never be communist,” a statement that reflects his attempts to stoke fear and division within the political landscape.

The rhetoric directed at Mamdani is telling of the broader Republican tactic to demonize perceived leftist figures to fortify their own political power. Mamdani, who immigrated to the U.S. from Uganda as a child, has become a focal point for GOP attacks, highlighting how Trump is willing to extend threats beyond mere rhetoric. The conflation of Mamdani’s policies with radical ideologies serves to misinform voters and distract from substantive policy discussions.

Adding another layer to the tension, Trump threatened legal action against Mamdani, claiming he would investigate his immigration status if Mamdani obstructs ICE operations in New York. This blatant intimidation tactic underscores the authoritarian tendencies within Trump’s rhetoric and his administration’s immigration policies, which target vulnerable communities.

In response, Mamdani has denounced Trump’s statements as an affront to democracy and a threat to anyone who speaks up against government actions. He has positioned himself as a defender of the rights of all New Yorkers, particularly those who may fear reprisals for their political beliefs. This confrontation is emblematic of the ongoing struggle between progressive and far-right ideologies as the mayoral election approaches.

Trump’s UFC Proposal at the White House Signals a Disturbing Shift from Governance to Entertainment

Donald Trump has proposed hosting a UFC match on the White House grounds to commemorate the 250th anniversary of American independence in 2026. This suggestion, announced during a rally in Iowa, highlights Trump’s continued close ties with UFC President Dana White and his interest in mixed martial arts. Trump specifically stated that the event could accommodate 20,000 spectators, emphasizing the “lot of land” available at the White House.

The event is part of a broader celebration that includes a culminating festival on the National Mall and athletic competitions for high school athletes across the nation. Trump’s push for a UFC fight reinforces his penchant for blending politics with entertainment, echoing the troubling normalization of spectacle over substantive governance.

This proposal follows a trend of Trump’s increasing participation in UFC events, indicating a troubling intertwining of sports and politics. His attendance at recent fights has been marked by enthusiastic receptions, but these moments serve to distract from the significant political challenges and democratic responsibilities he faces as a sitting president.

The lack of detail from White House officials raises questions about the feasibility and appropriateness of such an event on government property. Critics argue that hosting a UFC fight at the White House exemplifies Trump’s tendency to prioritize personal interests and entertainment over the solemn responsibilities of the presidency.

The idea underscores a broader narrative where Trump, much like other authoritarian figures, uses public spectacle to consolidate power and engage his base. This proposed event further blurs the line between presidential duties and personal entertainment, reflecting a concerning trend away from traditional norms of leadership and governance in America.

Trump’s Antisemitic Rhetoric: The Dangerous Implications of Using ‘Shylocks’ at Iowa Rally

During a rally in Des Moines, Iowa, on July 3, 2025, President Donald Trump employed the antisemitic term “shylocks” while denouncing bankers, a usage that echoes a long-standing ethnic slur rooted in Shakespeare’s portrayal of Jewish moneylenders. Trump’s remarks not only revive harmful stereotypes but also serve to manipulate racial and ethnic narratives for political gain.

The term “shylock,” originating from Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice, represents a grotesque caricature of Jewish people as greedy and vengeful, portraying them as exploitative financial figures. By invoking this slur, Trump disregards the serious history of antisemitism associated with it, further stoking prejudices amidst a climate of increased violence against Jewish communities.

In his speech, Trump shifted from attacking bankers to unleashing vitriol towards congressional Democrats, whom he claimed universally opposed his spending bill. He asserted, “I hate them,” expressing a dangerously divisive rhetoric that reinforces political antagonism and undermines democratic discourse.

This spending bill, containing cuts to Medicaid and food assistance for millions, has drawn criticism for its potential to exacerbate poverty while adding significantly to the national debt. The bill also includes provisions extending tax cuts benefiting the wealthiest, demonstrating Trump’s alignment with elite interests rather than the working class.

Trump’s rhetoric is symptomatic of a broader trend within Republican politics, characterized by divisiveness and exploitation of historical prejudices. Such language not only erodes democratic norms but also reflects an adherence to fascistic tendencies that threaten the foundational principles of equity and justice in America.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/trump-denounces-shylock-bankers-and-says-of-democrats-i-hate-them/)

EPA Employees Punished for Speaking Out Against Trump Administration’s Environmental Policies

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has placed approximately 140 employees on administrative leave following their signing of a public letter that criticized the agency and the Trump administration’s detrimental policies on climate and public health. The letter, which was signed by over 270 individuals, expressed grave concerns that the Trump administration was systematically dismantling the EPA’s research and development capabilities, canceling vital environmental justice initiatives, and creating a culture of fear aimed at suppressing dissent among federal workers.

Scarlett VanDyke, an EPA employee from the Research and Development office, recounted her unsettling experience of being escorted out of the building after signing the letter. She highlighted the surreal nature of her termination, especially as she is regarded as a top-performing employee. The overt retaliation against her and her colleagues showcases the chilling atmosphere fostered by leadership under Trump’s administration, which openly punishes those who dare to dissent.

EPA administrator Lee Zeldin has categorically defended this punitive action, framing it as necessary to protect the agency’s integrity against what he claims is sabotage. He has stated the agency adheres to a zero-tolerance policy towards employees undermining the administration’s agenda. This aggressive response to employees’ expression of concerns about ethical governance raises serious questions about the treatment of federal workers under an administration that has repeatedly undermined scientific consensus in favor of corporate interests.

Internal communication from the EPA conveyed that the ongoing investigation into the employees’ actions was not disciplinary, despite the public branding of their dissent as an act of sabotage. This contradiction, coupled with a similar incident at the National Institutes of Health where employees faced no repercussions for dissent, further highlights the oppressive measures implemented by Zeldin’s administration to silence critical voices within the agency.

As cautionary tales emerge about the environment of fear that inhibits transparency and accountability, employees like Amelia Hertzberg have expressed disappointment in the perceived failure of whistleblower protections. They assert that the agency’s leadership interprets dissent as hostility rather than constructive criticism, further endangering the fundamental mission of the EPA to uphold environmental and public health standards amidst a landscape characterized by political manipulation and ethical breaches.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/03/climate/epa-letter-employees-suspended-investigation)

Trump Demands Powell’s Resignation Amid Accusations of Misleading Congress

Former President Donald Trump has escalated his ongoing feud with Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, calling for Powell to resign immediately. This call comes on the heels of accusations from Bill Pulte, Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), who alleges Powell provided misleading testimony to Congress regarding renovations at the Federal Reserve’s headquarters.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump, referring to Powell by the nickname “Too Late,” echoed the sentiments of Pulte, who claimed Powell’s statements during a Senate Banking Committee hearing were deceptive. Pulte specifically criticized Powell for his comments about a $2.5 billion renovation plan, suggesting it was indicative of serious misconduct warranting Powell’s dismissal.

This recent turmoil highlights Trump’s persistent frustration with Powell’s leadership. Since he appointed Powell in 2017, Trump has repeatedly criticized the Fed’s monetary policy decisions, particularly its reluctance to implement aggressive interest rate cuts, which he believes would stimulate the economy.

Trump’s demands for Powell’s resignation reflect broader tensions regarding the independence of the Federal Reserve in managing economic policies free from political influence. Critics argue that Trump’s insistence on controlling the Fed’s actions represents a significant threat to its autonomy, an essential feature for maintaining economic stability.

As Trump’s public animosity towards Powell continues, the implications for U.S. monetary policy and market stability grow increasingly worrisome. Lawmakers, including Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio, have indicated they may pursue an investigation into Powell, further entrenching the political turmoil surrounding this critical economic institution.

Trump’s Chaotic West Wing Management Threatens Effective Governance and National Security

The current operational dynamic within President Donald Trump’s West Wing has been characterized by an alarming lack of structure and oversight, leading to significant concerns about effective governance. Trump’s personal style of management, described as freewheeling and informal, fosters an environment where cabinet members frequently converge, undermining the essential need for longer-term strategic focus within their respective departments. Instead of focusing on their agencies, which are crucial for national functioning, cabinet secretaries often spend excessive time in Trump’s office, vying for attention in a setting akin to “Grand Central Terminal,” according to insiders.

This chaotic atmosphere was exemplified during a meeting where unexpected visitors, including tech giant Mark Zuckerberg, wandered into discussions, raising serious concerns about potential security breaches and the integrity of sensitive deliberations. Trump, who is known to interrupt meetings for casual phone calls to friends, including media moguls like Rupert Murdoch, further exemplifies the unprofessionalism that prevails in this administration, potentially jeopardizing critical decisions affecting national security and governance.

Despite Trump supporters claiming that this approach yields tangible results, most notably in passing significant legislation aimed at tax cuts and immigration reforms, the implications of such a management style are troubling. Current and former officials underscore that the informal nature of meetings can lead to a breakdown in the careful vetting of information, which is essential when crafting policies that impact millions of lives and the stability of international relations.

Moreover, Trump’s constant interaction with cabinet members in the West Wing creates an environment where ideas and policies can be influenced not by professional insight but by personal relationships and informal networks. This reality raises serious ethical questions about the decision-making process inside the administration, where decisions may pivot on unverified exchanges rather than informed counsel.

Ultimately, as Trump persists in operating with a decidedly nontraditional, impulsive style, the risks associated with this management approach only grow. The failure to prioritize structured governance could yield far-reaching repercussions, detracting from the administration’s foundational mandate to govern effectively and responsibly. With alarms over national governance only becoming louder, Trump’s method of blending personal whims with official duties poses a grave threat to the principles of democratic governance and due process in America.

(h/t: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/fox-news-maga-hats-cookies-trump-west-wing-rcna214754)

Trump’s Illegal Suspension of $6 Billion for Education Disrupts Schools and Hurts Students

The Trump administration is suspending over $6 billion in federal funding designated for crucial education programs as the new school year approaches. This decision, which comes without the normal approval process, reflects the administration’s ongoing attempts to dismantle the Department of Education and disrupt established funding protocols in clear defiance of legal norms.

A memo from the Department of Education indicated that decisions regarding funding for after-school programs, teacher training, and English language assistance have been postponed, creating uncertainty for many schools. Educators and administrators are now left scrambling in a funding landscape marked by severe shortages and pressing needs.

Missy Testerman, the 2024 National Teacher of the Year, lamented the potential impacts of losing these funds, emphasizing that schools already face tight budgets and that withholding authorized funds could lead to budget cuts that directly affect students. This sentiment was echoed by Rep. Bobby Scott, who deemed the halt of these essential funds a violation of federal law, asserting it would negatively impact students, teachers, and educational quality.

State attorneys general and parent advocacy groups plan to challenge the administration’s decision through lawsuits, emphasizing the detrimental effects on low-income and rural school districts. National Education Association President Becky Pringle condemned the decision as a betrayal of public education, warning that it exacerbates the existing teacher shortages and resource gaps.

The White House claims the funding pause is part of a review process, suggesting that many programs allegedly misused funds to advance a radical agenda. This rationale only further demonstrates the administration’s long-term objective to undermine the educational infrastructure that supports millions of students and families across the country.

CBS Settlement with Trump Signals Urgent Threat to Press Freedom and Journalistic Integrity

Paramount Global has agreed to a surprising $16 million settlement with Donald Trump after he sued the network over a “60 Minutes” interview with Kamala Harris. This lawsuit and its outcome highlight Trump’s troubling pattern of using his influence to intimidate media companies. Trump’s claims stem from accusations that CBS had manipulated the interview footage to politically disadvantage him, an assertion that CBS vigorously denied throughout the legal proceedings.

While Paramount admitted no fault in this case, the settlement is particularly alarming for advocates of press freedom. In exchange for the payout, CBS will now be required to release transcripts of future interviews with eligible presidential candidates, a decision seen as an effort to avoid protracted legal battles that could affect its upcoming multibillion-dollar merger with Skydance. This capitulation raises concerns regarding the integrity of journalistic practices under pressure from federal authorities.

Press freedom organizations have condemned the settlement, warning it sets a dangerous precedent. Critics, including figures from the Knight First Amendment Institute and PEN America, have argued that Paramount’s choice to settle reflects a failure to stand up against what they describe as Trump’s extortionate legal tactics. This move not only emboldens Trump but threatens the media’s ability to operate independently without fear of repercussions for its coverage.

The settlement has drawn parallels to a previous incident involving Trump and Disney, where a similar payout was made to dismiss a defamation case. This continuation of lawsuits from Trump not only indicates a sustained attack on journalistic integrity but also suggests a systematic effort to create a chilling effect on press freedom over time.

In response to the settlement, politicians like Elizabeth Warren have raised ethical concerns, suggesting it could reflect bribery and calling for investigations into the decision. As Trump’s administration increasingly stifles dissent and promotes a media environment marked by fear, it becomes evident that such predatory tactics are part of a larger strategy to undermine democratic principles and maintain control over national narratives.

Kristi Noem Pushes Trump-Backed Purge at Homeland Security

Kristi Noem, the Secretary of Homeland Security, has announced intentions to purge her department of employees who do not align with the Trump administration’s hardline deportation policies. During a meeting of the Homeland Security Advisory Council, she discussed with leadership strategies to dismiss staff deemed undesirable, expressing frustration with what she described as a bureaucracy filled with individuals who do not support their agenda.

Noem’s remarks reveal a troubling commitment to an ideological purge within a critical federal agency. She openly questioned how to terminate personnel who oppose the administration’s policies and suggested that many within the DHS workforce had become complacent under previous leadership, implying their lack of support for Trump’s agenda as a justification for their removal.

This move reflects a broader strategy by Trump and his allies to consolidate power within government agencies by placing loyalists in key positions. Noem, who has previously called for the elimination and reorganization of FEMA, continues to push for drastic changes within the DHS, signaling a willingness to prioritize loyalty to the Trump administration over functional governance.

The consequences of this purge could be severe, undermining the operational integrity of the DHS and prioritizing political loyalty over professional competence. Such actions further demonstrate an overt attempt to enforce an authoritarian approach to immigration policy, marginalizing voices within the department that advocate for due process and humane treatment of individuals affected by immigration laws.

As Noem’s efforts proceed, the implications for civil rights and the fundamental values of American democracy could be significant. The focus on loyalty purges highlights a dangerous trend within the Trump administration, emphasizing a culture of fear and suppression over constructive policy-making.

(h/t: https://www.rawstory.com/kristi-noem-2672557812/)

1 2 3 … 451