Category: Conflict Averse

Trump Delays Iran Strikes Claiming Talks Iran Denies

Trump postponed threatened strikes against Iranian power plants for five days, claiming “productive conversations” with Iranian officials about ending the month-long war. Iran’s parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf rejected Trump’s account as fabrication designed to manipulate oil markets, stating on X that “no negotiations have been held with the U.S.” and characterizing the claim as an attempt to “escape the quagmire in which the US and Israel are trapped.” Trump’s envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner allegedly engaged in late-night talks Sunday, though the Iranian Foreign Ministry acknowledged only regional mediation efforts through intermediaries like Oman, Turkey, and Egypt.

Trump claimed the U.S. and Iran had reached 15 points of agreement, including that Iran cease nuclear weapons development and allow joint control of the Strait of Hormuz. He acknowledged killing Iran’s former Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and said he was negotiating with “a top person” whom he believes is the most respected leader, though he expressed uncertainty about whether current Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei remains alive after U.S. military operations destroyed telecommunications networks. Trump also stated the U.S. would confiscate Iran’s remaining enriched uranium and threatened to “keep bombing our little hearts out” if negotiations fail.

The war has killed more than 2,000 people in its fourth week and severely damaged 40 energy assets across nine countries, destabilizing global oil supplies through the Strait of Hormuz. Oil prices plummeted after Trump’s announcement, which he attributed to market relief, and European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas emphasized that infrastructure attacks were “escalating this war even further.” The International Committee of the Red Cross warned that deliberate attacks on essential services and civilian infrastructure can amount to war crimes.

Trump’s de-escalatory rhetoric contradicted his simultaneous military buildup, as the Pentagon deployed three California-based warships and approximately 2,500 Marines to the Middle East—the second major deployment in one week. Senator Adam Schiff criticized the troop surge as raising “alarm bells” about another “forever war.” When asked about the deployment, Trump refused to discuss strategy, stating “Do you really believe I’d give you an answer? Crazy question.”

Trump previously declared Iran ceased to exist as a threat while simultaneously requesting $200 billion in additional military funding from Congress, and he assailed NATO allies as “cowards” for refusing to deploy troops to the Strait. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Trump indicated the U.S. war objectives had been met but confirmed Israel would continue striking targets in Iran and Lebanon with “more to come.”

(Source: https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2026-03-23/trump-iran-strait-of-hormuz-deadline)

Ex-Counterterrorism Chief Says Trump Blocked Iran War Concerns

Joe Kent, former director of the National Counterterrorism Center, resigned this week over abuse of power in Trump’s decision to strike Iran on February 28. Speaking on Tucker Carlson’s program, Kent stated that he and other senior officials opposed to the airstrikes were deliberately prevented from presenting their concerns directly to Trump, who relied instead on a narrow circle of advisers.

Kent, who led an agency responsible for analyzing terrorist threats, said no intelligence supported claims that Iran posed an imminent threat to the United States or was developing nuclear weapons. He alleged that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other Israeli officials personally lobbied Trump with information that contradicted U.S. intelligence channels, effectively forcing the American decision to attack.

Kent’s statements underscore divisions within the Trump administration over the Iran war and highlight the authoritarian decision-making process that excluded qualified officials from deliberation. His resignation and public criticism indicate that concerns about the strikes existed at senior levels but were systematically suppressed, demonstrating Trump’s preference for unquestioned loyalty over informed counsel on matters of national security and military action.

Trump dismissed Kent’s concerns on Tuesday, calling him “weak on security” and stating that anyone in his administration doubting Iran’s threat status had no place in government. The White House did not respond to Kent’s allegations about being blocked from accessing the president or about the Israeli influence on the war decision.

Kent, a 45-year-old former Green Beret with 11 combat deployments and prior CIA service, decided to resign after concluding his objections would be ignored. His decision to resign “in good conscience” rather than participate in what he viewed as a flawed military decision reflects the cost of Trump’s demand for absolute loyalty over expertise and deliberative governance.

(Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/ex-counterterrorism-official-says-wasnt-004218298.html)

TACO strikes again: Italian pasta becomes the latest product to have tariffs slashed by Trump

President Donald Trump’s administration slashed proposed tariffs on Italian pasta manufacturers in January 2025, reducing rates from 92 percent to between 2 and 14 percent for specific companies and 9 percent for others. The Department of Commerce had initially accused 13 Italian pasta makers of unfair trade practices and “dumping” products below market rates, with La Molisana and Garofalo cited for failing to cooperate with pricing investigations. Italy’s government contested these allegations through its embassy in Washington, D.C., and the companies’ cooperation prompted the dramatic reversal.

Italy’s Foreign Ministry characterized the tariff reduction as recognition of the companies’ “constructive willingness to cooperate,” according to Reuters. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni had expected her alignment with Trump to shield Italian companies from steep levies, making the initial high tariff proposal a source of political embarrassment. Italy’s pasta exports totaled approximately $4.7 billion in 2024, with the United States accounting for roughly $800 million of that revenue.

The pasta tariff reversal represents another rollback in Trump’s tariff regime, following a pattern critics label “Trump Always Chickens Out” (TACO). The administration delayed furniture and kitchen cabinet tariffs for one year on New Year’s Eve, removed tariffs from over 200 agricultural products in November, and announced a 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs affecting Canada and Mexico earlier in 2025.

National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett defended the reversals to CNBC and ABC News in November, claiming the policy shifts do not indicate failure and attributing price increases to factors beyond tariffs. The Trump administration maintains its tariff strategy remains intact despite the recurring delays and rollbacks.

Polling data demonstrates widespread consumer concerns about pricing: more than one-third of Trump’s own voters reported the cost of living as the worst they have experienced, according to a November Politico survey. The Supreme Court is currently reviewing whether Trump’s claim of emergency powers to impose tariffs by executive order is constitutional, with Trump warning the court in November against “serving hostile foreign interests” ahead of its ruling.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-tariffs-italy-pasta-taco-b2893225.html)

Trump’s Anti-Immigrant Rhetoric Fuels Fear and Division in Europe

During a recent visit to Scotland, President Donald Trump made alarming comments regarding immigration, asserting that a “migrant invasion” is causing severe consequences in Europe. This rhetoric plays into his pattern of inflammatory claims aimed at furthering a xenophobic agenda. Trump’s remarks included harsh advice for European leaders to “get your act together” and defend their nations against what he described as an existential threat from immigration.

Upon his arrival at Glasgow Prestwick Airport, Trump was received by thousands, including Scottish Secretary Ian Murray. He met with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, whom he praised, while simultaneously promoting his own business interests, including his luxury golf resorts. This underscores the troubling mixture of personal gain and national dialogue that has characterized much of Trump’s public engagement.

Trump’s ongoing fixation on immigration is not just rhetoric but aligns with the authoritarian trends seen in Republican policies, creating an atmosphere of fear and division. By framing migrants as an invasion, he signals support for extreme and inhumane immigration measures that threaten the rights and dignity of individuals seeking refuge or a better life.

Additionally, Trump made disparaging comments about windmills, falsely claiming they are damaging the environment. Such statements illustrate a disregard for factual information and demonstrate his enduring commitment to denying climate change—a stance that has dire implications for environmental policy and public health.

This visit serves as a stark reminder of Trump’s persistent divisive tactics and the dangerous political discourse he champions, benefiting from fearmongering in an attempt to solidify his political influence while undermining democratic values across the globe.

Trump Faces Backlash from Conservatives over Iran Military Strategy and Media Allegiances

Donald Trump is increasingly relying on traditional media sources, like Fox News, as he contemplates potentially escalating U.S. military involvement in Iran. This strategy occurs amid growing tensions within his supporter base regarding interventionist foreign policies. Influential figures, including Tucker Carlson and various podcasters, are raising objections to Trump’s aggressive stances, urging him to reconsider his approach.

Tucker Carlson has been particularly vocal, recently criticizing Trump for the administration’s perceived complicity with Israeli actions against Iran in a newsletter that warned of possible imminent conflict. Although Carlson has a massive following on social media, Trump dismissed his critiques, telling him to “go get a television network” if he wishes to be heard, emphasizing a rift between Trump’s administration and his more nationalist supporters who are skeptical about war.

As Trump makes rhetoric suggesting military action, figures on Fox News, such as Mark Levin, are openly advocating for U.S. involvement in Israel’s operations against Iran. The support for military strikes from prominent conservatives appears to contrast sharply with sentiments from younger and more anti-interventionalist segments of the Republican party, which are gaining prominence.

This ideological schism has been highlighted by podcasters like Joe Rogan and Theo Von, who are questioning the motives behind U.S. foreign policy and the alliances with countries like Israel. Von expressed doubts about trusting Israeli leadership, reflecting a growing sentiment in this “manosphere” against the narrative that supports military action, signaling a shift among previous advocates of Trump’s policies.

Republican divisions on foreign military interventions are worsening, with some members publicly breaking from the party’s establishment backing pro-war sentiment. Representatives like Tim Burchett have openly criticized the push for military action, emphasizing the risks involved in a potential war—the very same war many believe could undermine Trump’s broader agenda, including his hardline immigration policies.

Trump Administration’s Isolationist Shift Threatens Ukraine’s Security and NATO Alliances

In a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth announced that NATO membership for Ukraine is not realistic, and the responsibility for Ukrainian security must largely fall on European nations. Hegseth indicated that amid growing tensions with China, the Trump administration is refocusing its priorities towards securing American borders, effectively sidelining commitments to European allies.

Hegseth’s comments came during a meeting of the Ukraine Defense Contact Group in Brussels, where he also emphasized that U.S. troops would not be sent to Ukraine and that European forces should take the lead in securing the region post-conflict. This statement highlights the Trump administration’s shift towards an isolationist stance, diminishing U.S. involvement in European security matters.

The announcement is likely to alarm Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who has previously expressed that American leadership is essential for any meaningful security guarantees. Hegseth’s assertion that a return to pre-2014 borders is unrealistic further complicates the situation, as it disregards Ukraine’s territorial integrity in the face of ongoing Russian aggression.

Moreover, the implications of Hegseth’s statements highlight a stark contrast to the foreign policy established under President Biden, which centered around strengthening transatlantic alliances and supporting Ukraine against Russian threats. The rhetoric from Hegseth and the Trump administration indicates a dangerous pivot that could leave Ukraine vulnerable to further Russian incursions.

Furthermore, Hegseth’s push for NATO allies to increase their defense spending to 5% of GDP, rather than the current 2%, suggests an attempt to shift financial burdens to European nations while simultaneously diluting U.S. responsibility for international security. This approach not only raises questions about the U.S.’s commitment to NATO but also highlights the ongoing authoritarian and isolationist tendencies within the Republican party, notably reminiscent of the Trump administration’s retreat from global cooperation.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/12/politics/hegseth-ukraine-rules-out-nato-membership/index.html)

Trump’s Dangerous Request to Murdoch: Censor Negative Ads and Free Speech

Donald Trump recently declared his intention to ask Rupert Murdoch to intervene at Fox News, demanding that the network stop airing negative advertisements against him for 21 days leading up to the election. This request, made during his appearance on the Fox & Friends show, exemplifies Trump’s continued efforts to control the narrative surrounding his campaign. Trump, who claimed to be ‘the most stable human being’ during the segment, expressed his frustration over the perceived unfairness of negative ads from opponents, particularly those targeting him.

In his complaints, Trump noted that he has seen a surge of advertisements attacking him while his own campaign is underrepresented. He indicated that he believes this imbalance in advertising could harm his chances in the upcoming election. Trump’s plea to Murdoch to halt negative ads highlights a troubling trend of political figures seeking to censor dissenting views, a move that undermines the fundamental principles of free speech.

The irony of Trump’s request is striking, particularly considering the Republican Party’s long-standing narrative about protecting free speech. Their hypocrisy is evident when contrasting Trump’s demands with their previous claims regarding the censorship of conservative voices. For instance, the uproar over the purported suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story demonstrates how Republicans selectively champion free speech only when it aligns with their interests.

Trump’s desire to control what the media reports about him extends beyond Fox News. He has previously suggested shutting down networks like CBS, ABC, NPR, and CNN, all of which have been critical of his actions and statements. This alarming trend shows a blatant disregard for journalistic integrity and an authoritarian approach to governance, as he attempts to silence critics and control the flow of information.

As Trump continues to express his grievances regarding media coverage, it becomes increasingly clear that his agenda involves not just winning an election but also shaping the media landscape to serve his narrative. This manipulation of media and free speech raises significant concerns about the future of democratic discourse in the United States.

(h/t: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/politics-news/donald-trump-rupert-murdoch-negative-fox-news-ads-1236035125/)

Fox News Town Hall with Trump Lacks Transparency and Factual Integrity

Fox News recently aired an all-women town hall featuring former President Donald Trump in Georgia, presenting it as a platform for female voters to engage with the Republican candidate. However, the network failed to disclose that the audience was largely composed of local Republican supporters. This omission raises questions about the integrity of the event and the network’s transparency.

The Georgia Federation of Republican Women claimed on social media that they helped host the event, which Fox News later denied. The group’s president, Pam Lightsey, contradicted earlier statements by asserting their role had been misrepresented. Despite this, Fox News maintained that the event was solely theirs and did not clarify the audience’s partisan makeup in their communications.

During the event, many attendees expressed their support for Trump through their questions and comments. For instance, one woman thanked Trump for engaging with a “room full of women the current administration would consider domestic terrorists.” Notably, Fox News edited her statement to remove her declaration of voting for Trump, raising concerns about selective editing aimed at downplaying overt political support.

Furthermore, Trump made numerous false claims during the session, yet Fox News host Harris Faulkner did not fact-check any of these statements on-air. The audience responded enthusiastically to Trump’s criticisms of President Biden, emphasizing their alignment with his views. This suggests that the event was less a town hall and more a rally, with Fox News presenting it as a straightforward discussion.

The Independent reported that many attendees were members of local Republican groups, contradicting the narrative promoted by Fox News. Overall, this lack of transparency and factual accuracy at the town hall underscores the network’s ongoing pattern of misleading its audience and fostering a politically biased environment.

(h/t: https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/10/16/media/fox-news-women-town-hall-supporters)

Trump Declines Fox News Debate Invitation Against Kamala Harris

Former President Donald Trump has declined an invitation from Fox News to participate in a debate against Vice President Kamala Harris. The proposed debate was scheduled to take place in Pennsylvania on either October 24 or October 27, with Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum serving as moderators.

In a call to Fox & Friends last month, Trump expressed ambivalence about facing Harris again but indicated that he would consider it if a Fox host who often praises him were to moderate. However, after Fox News officially extended the debate invitation, Trump took to Truth Social to declare himself the victor of their previous debates, asserting he would not engage with Harris again.

Trump’s all-caps message emphasized his belief that he had decisively won the last two debates, both against Harris and President Joe Biden. He claimed he accepted a prior invitation to debate Harris on September 4, which she allegedly declined.

In his statement, Trump dismissed the notion of a rematch, arguing that Harris’s recent comments indicated she would not diverge from Biden’s policies, thereby rendering the debate unnecessary. He also claimed to be leading in polls, suggesting an increasing advantage over his competitors.

Despite Trump’s assertions, Harris had a strong performance in their previous debate, contrasting with Trump’s continued spread of misinformation regarding various topics, including immigration.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/trump/trump-rejects-fox-news-debate-invitation-there-will-be-no-rematch/)

Trump says he went to White House bunker for ‘inspection,’ not because of protests

President Donald Trump said Wednesday he went to an underground bunker at the White House last week to inspect it, not because of security concerns over protests outside the executive mansion’s gates.

Trump dismissed as “false” reports that the Secret Service rushed him into the bunker Friday night as protests inspired by the death of George Floyd escalated across the street.

“I went down during the day, and I was there for a tiny little short period of time,” he said during an interview with radio talk-show host Brian Kilmeade. “It was much more for an inspection. There was no problem during the day.”

Multiple news outlets – including CNN and The New York Times – reported that Trump was briefly moved to the White House’s underground bunker Friday night as a precaution while tensions escalated in Lafayette Park, across the street from the White House. 

Trump went down to the bunker at the behest of the Secret Service in an abundance of caution, said one official familiar with the incident, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss internal matters. The official said he was only in the bunker for a short period of time.

Asked by Kilmeade if the Secret Service told him he needed to head to the bunker, Trump said, “No, they didn’t tell me that at all. They said it would be a good time to go down, take a look because maybe some time you’re going to need it.”

Trump also claimed he went to the bunker during the day before the protests escalated.

“There was never a problem,” he said. “We never had a problem. Nobody ever came close to giving us a problem. The Secret Service, it does an unbelievable job of maintaining control in the White House.”

The bunker reports preceded Trump’s much-criticized walk from the White House to nearby St. John’s Episcopal Church on Monday.

Trump wanted to pay his respects to St. John’s, which suffered minor damage when it was burned by protesters Sunday, but he also wanted to leave the White House grounds to prove he was not “in the bunker” because of the protesters, said one official who requested anonymity to discuss the president’s communications strategy.

Critics hammered Trump for the St. John’s visit because police used smoke canisters, pepper spray and shields on protesters in Lafayette Park, clearing a path for the president to walk to the historic church.

Church officials protested that Trump did not call them about his plans to visit the church. Mariann Budde, bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Washington, which includes St. John’s, said she was outraged by the use of force to get people out of the way for a photo op.

Trump defended his visit to the church, saying he did not ask law enforcement officials to clear out Lafayette Park in advance.

“I didn’t say, oh, move them out – I didn’t know who was there,” he said.

Trump called his visit to St. John’s “very symbolic” and said “many religious leaders loved it.”

“Why wouldn’t they love it?” he said. “I’m standing in front of a church that went through trauma, to put it mildly.”

[USA Today]

1 2 3 … 5