Author: Stop the Donald Trump

Trump mocked as ‘feeble’ after confusing Jimmy Kimmel and Al Pacino in bizarre rant

 

Former President Donald Trump faced mockery and criticism after confusing late-night host Jimmy Kimmel with actor Al Pacino in a social media rant. Trump’s error-filled diatribe on Truth Social claimed Kimmel stumbled during the Oscars, which was actually presented by Pacino. The confusion led to Trump being labeled ‘feeble and confused’ by opponents.

Despite Trump’s claims of Kimmel’s poor performance, reviews of the 96th Academy Awards were generally positive, with ratings climbing for the third consecutive year. Al Pacino, not Kimmel, announced the Best Picture winner, and the actor’s odd delivery was due to producer instructions to skip reading all nominees again.

The Biden-Harris campaign quickly seized on Trump’s misstep, highlighting it as another example of his confusion and flubs. The incident underscores the former president’s tendency to make complete misstatements, providing ammunition for his critics.

Trump’s mix-up between Kimmel and Pacino was widely criticized, with the incident showcasing his penchant for errors and misinformation. The confusion further fueled the ongoing narrative of Trump’s struggles with accuracy and his opponents’ efforts to capitalize on his missteps.

 

Donald Trump posts video of truck showing hog-tied Joe Biden

The Biden campaign team accused Mr Trump of “regularly inciting political violence” ahead of November’s election.

A spokesman for the Trump campaign said Democrats have been calling for “despicable violence” against Mr Trump.

Mr Trump posted the video on his social media site Truth Social on Friday.

According to the caption, it was filmed in Long Island, New York, on Thursday when the former president attended the wake of a New York City police officer who was killed during a traffic stop.

The video shows two passing trucks on the road, both covered in US flags and flags claiming support for the police.

The second truck was emblazoned with the words “Trump 2024”, and the rear of the vehicle features an image of Mr Biden with his hands and feet tied.

Mr Trump’s promotion of the video drew criticism from Mr Biden campaign’s team.

“Trump is regularly inciting political violence and it’s time people take him seriously – just ask the Capitol police officers who were attacked protecting our democracy on 6 January,” spokesman Michael Tyler said, referring to the storming of Congress by the former president’s supporters after he falsely claimed the 2020 election had been stolen from him.

Judge Rejects Trump Dismissal Effort in Classified Documents Case

A federal judge rejected former President Donald J. Trump’s attempt to dismiss charges of mishandling classified documents by arguing he converted them into personal property under the Presidential Records Act. Judge Aileen M. Cannon ruled that the act does not provide a pretrial basis to dismiss the case, a victory for special counsel Jack Smith. The judge requested proposed jury instructions on how the act might impact the case. Smith argued against it, emphasizing the act’s irrelevance. Judge Cannon agreed the act wasn’t enough to dismiss the case but hinted discussions on its impact would continue.

Trump’s lawyers claimed the act allowed him to designate sensitive materials as private records, which was legally questioned by Judge Cannon and the appeals court. The ruling may affect another attempt by Trump’s lawyers to have the case dismissed based on presidential immunity from prosecution. The Supreme Court will consider this assertion in another case involving Trump’s alleged election interference. Trump’s lawyers argue that his immunity stems from converting the removed documents into personal property under the act.

Uncategorized

One question both Republican job applicants and potential Trump jurors must answer

There is a prevalent question in both job interviews for Republican positions and potential jurors in Trump’s upcoming trials: ‘Do you believe the 2020 election was stolen?’ Job applicants in key states are being tested for loyalty to Trump, while prosecutors aim to assess juror impartiality. Trump’s first criminal trial, involving ‘hush money’ payments to Stormy Daniels, is set for April. The prosecution sees questioning jurors on the election as a way to gauge impartiality. Trump’s attorney disputes the need for the question, calling it irrelevant to the case. The former president faces 34 felony counts related to covering up an alleged affair with Daniels.

Donald Trump Rages at Judge, Calls for Immediate Recusal

Donald Trump criticizes Judge Merchan for imposing a gag order before his hush-money trial in April, calling for the judge’s immediate recusal and sanction. The case involves allegations that Trump falsified payments to lawyer Michael Cohen, which Trump denies. Trump insists the case is a political witch hunt to interfere with the election. He accuses the DOJ of bias and coordination against him to aid Joe Biden’s reelection. Trump’s attacks on Merchan and his daughter have escalated, claiming a social media post aimed at his imprisonment.

Judge Merchan recently imposed a gag order on Trump, prohibiting public comments about the trial’s participants, except for Merchan and prosecutor criticism. The judge cited Trump’s history of inflammatory remarks as the reason for the order. Trump’s campaign to discredit the case and the judge continues, with accusations of political bias and unjust legal actions.

Trump’s denial of the charges and insistence on the case’s dismissal reflect his ongoing fight against the legal challenges he faces. The upcoming trial is crucial as it marks the first of four criminal cases against Trump. The former president’s rhetoric on the case is central to his campaign narrative as he seeks to regain the presidency.

Despite the gag order, Trump remains vocal on his Truth Social platform, using it as a tool to rally supporters against what he perceives as biased legal proceedings. The escalating conflict between Trump and Judge Merchan underscores the contentious nature of the upcoming trial and its potential implications for Trump’s political future.

Trump Mocks Paul Pelosi, Undermines Attack’s Severity at Rally

During a recent rally in Anaheim, California, former President Donald Trump made controversial remarks mocking Paul Pelosi, the husband of former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who was injured in a hammer attack last year. Trump questioned the well-being of Paul Pelosi, stating, ‘How’s her husband doing, anybody know?’, in a context that appeared to trivialize the severity of the violent incident he endured.

Paul Pelosi suffered serious injuries, including a skull fracture, after an assailant broke into their home and attacked him while looking for Nancy Pelosi. Despite initially calling the attack a ‘sad situation’, Trump later indulged in far-right conspiracy theories surrounding it, undermining the attack’s seriousness.

At the California Republican Party fall convention, Trump also criticized the state’s Democratic leaders and referred to Nancy Pelosi as ‘crazy’, further escalating the hostility towards the former Speaker and her family. His comments were met with laughter from the audience.

Amidst these remarks, Trump asserted that he would work to reverse California’s perceived decline, labeling it a ‘dumping ground’. He emphasized his intent to engage with the state’s Republican base, which is significant for the upcoming GOP nomination process, despite acknowledging his unlikely chances of winning California in a general election.

Trump’s comments reflect ongoing tensions within U.S. politics, particularly regarding the aftermath of the Pelosi attack, which has been a focal point for discussions about political rhetoric and violence. The incident has drawn attention to the impact of misinformation and its potential consequences on public safety and political discourse.

(h/t: https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-paul-pelosi-hammer-attack-b2421604.html)

Trump Mocks Paul Pelosi Hammer Attack

During a recent rally in Anaheim, California, former President Donald Trump targeted Rep. Nancy Pelosi and her family, referencing the violent attack on her husband, Paul Pelosi. Trump questioned the status of Paul Pelosi, who suffered significant injuries in the assault, stating, “We’ll stand up to crazy Nancy Pelosi, who ruined San Francisco — how’s her husband doing, anybody know?” This comment drew cheers from the crowd of California Republicans.

Trump’s remarks included a mix of criticisms aimed at prominent Democrats in the state, including Vice President Kamala Harris and Rep. Adam Schiff. While he expressed a somewhat positive sentiment about California Governor Gavin Newsom, he labeled him a “crooked Joe Biden’s top surrogate” without providing evidence to support his claims.

Despite the recent death of Dianne Feinstein, a significant figure in California politics, Trump refrained from mentioning her during his speech. Instead, he focused on the perceived decline of California, describing it as a “dumping ground” and expressing a desire to reverse its current trajectory.

The rally served as a platform for Trump to solidify his support among California Republicans ahead of the GOP primary, scheduled for March 5, 2024. Although Trump faces multiple legal challenges, including indictments related to the 2020 election, he remains a dominant figure in Republican primary polling.

Other candidates scheduled to speak at the state party convention included Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and businessman Vivek Ramaswamy, but Trump’s ability to energize the audience at the event highlighted his continued influence within the party.

(h/t: https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/29/trump-mocks-pelosi-family-as-he-rallies-conservative-support-in-california-00119243)

Trump’s Baseless Election Contest in Georgia Undermines Democracy

Donald Trump’s campaign has filed an election contest in Georgia, seeking to undermine the results of the November 3, 2020 presidential election. This legal maneuver comes despite the absence of credible evidence supporting his claims of widespread voter fraud. In a troubling display of defiance against democratic norms, Trump’s campaign alleges that tens of thousands of illegal votes were counted, a claim that has been repeatedly debunked by numerous sources.

Ray S. Smith III, the lead counsel for the Trump campaign, echoed the unfounded narrative of election irregularities, stating that the Georgia Secretary of State orchestrated an ineffective election process. This rhetoric not only seeks to delegitimize the election but also stirs public distrust in the electoral system, a dangerous precedent for American democracy.

Accompanying the lawsuit are affidavits from Georgia residents, which Trump’s team claims support their allegations. However, many of these affidavits lack the necessary scrutiny and verification required to substantiate such serious accusations. Claims of voter fraud, including those involving underage voters and individuals casting ballots from out-of-state addresses, have been thoroughly examined and dismissed by election officials.

In the face of overwhelming evidence confirming the legitimacy of the election results, Trump’s insistence on pursuing this course of action has raised alarms about his commitment to democratic principles. Instead of accepting the will of the voters, he continues to rally his supporters around baseless conspiracies that threaten to erode trust in future elections.

This latest move is part of a broader strategy by Trump and his allies to overturn a free and fair election. The implications of this lawsuit extend beyond Georgia, as it reflects a national trend among some Republicans to challenge the integrity of the electoral process. Such actions not only undermine the democratic foundation of the United States but also set a troubling precedent for future political contests.

(h/t: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/trump-campaign-press-release-trump-campaign-files-election-contest-georgia)

William Barr’s Misleading Claims on Voter Fraud Undermine Democracy

Attorney General William Barr has recently echoed the baseless claims of voter fraud and mail-in voting irregularities that have been propagated by President Donald Trump. His misleading assertions have alarmed civil rights advocates who are concerned about the potential erosion of public confidence in the electoral process. Barr’s statements, which include unfounded fears about widespread fraud and foreign interference in mail-in voting, have been thoroughly debunked by election experts. The rhetoric not only mirrors Trump’s unfounded allegations but also jeopardizes the integrity of the Justice Department’s role in protecting voting rights.

In a disconcerting interview, Barr claimed that mail-in voting would lead to the loss of a ‘secret vote’ and suggested that postal workers could be bribed to commit election fraud. This assertion is fundamentally flawed; mail-in ballots are secured through identity verification processes that prevent such misconduct. Experts have pointed out that ballots are tracked and audited to ensure their legitimacy, thus nullifying Barr’s claims of rampant fraud.

Furthermore, Barr’s suggestion that foreign entities could counterfeit mail ballots is equally unfounded. Numerous safeguards are in place to protect the integrity of American elections, including specific paper stock for ballots and signature verification processes. Experts have overwhelmingly dismissed the idea that foreign powers could easily infiltrate the voting system, emphasizing that such operations would be complex and easily detectable.

Additionally, Barr’s claim that the U.S. has not previously engaged in widespread mail voting ignores the reality that several states have successfully conducted elections primarily through mail for years without significant issues. Misleading statements about the reliability of voter rolls and the prevalence of fraud undermine the progress made in expanding voting access, particularly during a pandemic.

The damage done by Barr’s rhetoric is compounded by the fact that it aligns with disinformation campaigns previously launched by foreign adversaries aimed at destabilizing U.S. democracy. As civil rights advocates rally against these baseless claims, they stress the importance of maintaining public trust in the electoral system, which is currently threatened by the Attorney General’s unfounded assertions.

(h/t: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1240144)

Trump’s Dangerous Misinformation About Election Fraud Continues Unchecked on Twitter

In a recent display of his refusal to accept the 2020 election results, former President Donald Trump took to Twitter to falsely proclaim that he had won the election against Joe Biden, despite widespread media confirmation of Biden’s victory. This latest episode is just one in a long line of Trump’s baseless claims regarding election fraud, which he has continuously propagated since the election ended.

Twitter responded to Trump’s misleading tweet by labeling it as ‘disputed,’ but failed to take significant action to restrict its spread among his vast follower base. This inaction raises serious concerns about the platform’s responsibility in combating misinformation, especially from a figure who has repeatedly disseminated falsehoods regarding election integrity.

By asserting that he won despite the official results, Trump is laying the groundwork for future unfounded allegations against any election outcome that does not favor him. This tactic mirrors his comments made at a rally in Michigan, where he suggested that his potential defeat would be the result of widespread cheating, further entrenching his narrative of a rigged electoral system.

Trump’s relentless pursuit of this false narrative not only undermines public trust in democratic institutions but also poses a threat to the political landscape as he continues to promote division and misinformation. His rhetoric has incited both support and backlash, leading to an increasingly polarized environment.

The implications of Trump’s actions are severe, especially as he hints at military action against political adversaries and calls them ‘the enemy within’, suggesting an alarming view of dissent in a democratic society. This dangerous mindset, coupled with the spread of disinformation, threatens the very fabric of American democracy.

(h/t: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/11/07/trump-election-outcome-tweet-label/)

1 … 64 65 66 67 68