Category: Not Factual

Trump Spreads New Election Lies Linking China and License Plates

During a recent routine event, President Donald Trump unleashed a new conspiracy theory concerning his 2020 election loss, bizarrely tying it to “license plates.” This unexpected rant occurred while Trump conducted a photo opportunity to announce the installation of flagpoles at the White House. His statements, filled with unverified accusations, reflect a disturbing trend of spreading falsehoods and conspiracy theories that undermine trust in the democratic process.

In his rant, Trump alleged that a new autopen used by certain political groups allowed for a “subversion” of government, implying that election integrity was compromised due to unproven methods. He hinted at an elaborate scheme involving “tens of thousands of cards” supposedly used to cast illegal votes in the 2020 election, without providing any credible evidence to support these claims. Trump’s baseless assertions showcase not only a disconnection from reality but also a continued effort to delegitimize the electoral process.

Trump’s claims drew on unverified allegations from FBI Director Kash Patel, who mentioned a fictitious plan by China to produce counterfeit driver’s licenses. However, Patel himself stopped short of stating that any such licenses had been produced or misused in voting. This highlights the reckless nature of Trump’s rhetoric, which can easily sway public opinion despite lacking factual accuracy.

The president’s rhetoric aligns with a broader pattern of historical disinformation propagated by his administration and its allies, which is intended to distract from legitimate concerns and grievances within the country. By diverting attention to outlandish conspiracies, Trump aims to bolster his own narrative, further solidifying his grip on a significant portion of the Republican base despite outright lies.

This incident reflects the alarming trend of misinformation that not only poses risks to democratic institutions but also creates division among the populace. As Trump continues to spread fabricated claims about the 2020 election, there is a critical need for the public and the media to verify facts and push back against the normalization of such dangerous rhetoric that threatens the integrity of American democracy.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-blurts-out-brand-new-bonkers-conspiracy-rant-on-losing-election-based-on-license-plates/)

Trump Ignores National Intelligence on Iran’s Nuclear Threat, Undermines Credible Sources

President Donald Trump has openly dismissed the assessment of his own Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, regarding Iran’s nuclear capabilities. During a press conference aboard Air Force One, Trump insisted that Iran is “very close” to acquiring a nuclear weapon, contradicting Gabbard’s earlier statement that the intelligence community assessed Iran was not building such a weapon. CNN’s Kaitlan Collins challenged Trump on this point, reminding him of Gabbard’s position on the issue.

When questioned about Gabbard’s assertion in March that Iran was not pursuing nuclear weapon production, Trump responded dismissively, stating, “I don’t care what she said.” This blatant disregard for factual testimony further illustrates Trump’s tendency to reshape reality to suit his narrative, undermining credible intelligence sources. In her original remarks, Gabbard affirmed that the intelligence community had confirmed that Iran was not engaged in constructing a nuclear weapon, casting significant doubt on Trump’s claims.

Trump’s ongoing conflict with Gabbard reflects a broader pattern of rejecting verifiable information in favor of his fabricated narratives. Gabbard’s comments, reaffirming that the Iranian Supreme Leader Khomeini had suspended the nuclear weapons program since 2003, stood in stark contrast to Trump’s fear-mongering rhetoric. This incident exemplifies the dangers of wielding power without regard for truth, potentially inciting unnecessary tensions in foreign relations.

Additionally, Trump’s comments come in the wake of criticism from factions within his own party regarding his foreign policy strategy, particularly concerning military intervention in Iran. Key voices, including Tucker Carlson, have urged Trump to reconsider his hawkish stance, highlighting a divide within the MAGA base. The discontent from conservative commentators and party members reinforces the idea that Trump’s aggressive foreign policy may alienate factions of his own support.

This latest chapter in Trump’s presidency underscores a dangerous disregard for facts and expertise in favor of personal opinion. His administration’s approach to Iran not only compromises credibility but also threatens to escalate tensions in an already volatile geopolitical landscape, raising concerns about the ethical implications of such reckless rhetoric.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/i-dont-care-what-she-said-trump-rebukes-his-own-dni-tulsi-gabbard-insists-iran-very-close-to-getting-a-nuke/)

Musk’s Misinformation and Trump’s Cuts Threaten Social Security Stability

The Trump administration’s appointment of Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has unleashed a wave of misinformation at the Social Security Administration (SSA). In March 2025, Musk falsely claimed that 40% of calls to SSA’s customer service were fraudulent, a claim disregarded by agency employees who sought to correct the record.

In a shocking display of power, a White House aide insisted on perpetuating Musk’s flawed narrative, directing SSA employees to prioritize the administration’s agenda over facts. This led to the significant thinning of the SSA workforce, with thousands departing amidst rampant staff cuts, igniting public concern about the integrity and reliability of the agency responsible for the retirement benefits that millions of Americans depend on.

DOGE’s aggressive pursuit of personal data on Social Security recipients, driven by Musk’s misinterpretation of federal data, prompted a significant shake-up within the agency. Senior SSA executives voiced serious concerns over the handling of sensitive information, yet were pressured to comply with DOGE’s demands. Musk and his team’s reckless approach has not only endangered employee stability but has also raised alarms about the security of citizens’ data.

The fallout from DOGE’s mismanagement has left millions facing delays in their benefits due to artificial backlogs. The ongoing staffing crisis, fueled by a push for reassignments that threatened job security, exacerbated the situation, illustrating the administration’s hostility towards public workers and their vital roles within the government.

Amid this turmoil, the narrative pushed by Musk, which suggested massive fraud within Social Security, has only served to distract from real challenges the agency faces. The reckless policies introduced under Trump and Musk symbolically strip away the essential governance designed to protect and support the aging population, echoing a broader agenda aligned with the interests of wealthy elites rather than working-class Americans.

(h/t: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/16/us/politics/doge-social-security.html)

Trump’s Historical Ignorance Exposed: Confusion Between Revolutionary War and Civil War Raises Alarming Concerns

President Donald Trump recently demonstrated a troubling lack of historical knowledge by confusing the American Revolutionary War with the Civil War during a press conference in the Oval Office. While discussing US military strategy regarding Iran, Trump made a reference to the Declaration of Independence, suggesting its connection to the Civil War and downplaying its significance in the context of independence from British rule. This glaring error, highlighting Trump’s ignorance, follows a pattern of misstatements that raise concerns about his grasp of American history.

Trump’s assertion that the Civil War could have been avoided, resulting in fewer casualties, reveals not only a misunderstanding of the war’s complexities but also an insensitivity to the profound implications of slavery that fueled the conflict. His comments were met with derision, as critics quickly pointed out the fundamental disconnect in his reasoning. Prominent voices on social media and in the press mockingly questioned how a president could fail to distinguish between two pivotal events in American history.

The backlash underscores a wider issue regarding Trump’s approach to leadership—his tendency to minimize the lessons of history while suggesting simplistic solutions to complex geopolitical situations. This lack of depth in understanding historical events plays into a broader narrative of his administration, which often trivializes serious matters in favor of reductive rhetoric. Critics argue that such attitudes contribute to dangerous decision-making, particularly in matters of war and peace.

In a more alarming context, Trump’s statements perpetuate a narrative that downplays the consequences of war, suggesting an underlying inclination toward militarism without adequate reflection. His comments that many wars “had no reason” reflect an alarming casualness regarding military conflict, which stands starkly at odds with the impacts of the wars he references.

This continued historical misrepresentation serves as a powerful reminder of Trump’s dysfunctional relationship with truth, raising questions about his credibility and competence. With the presidency wielding significant influence over domestic and foreign policies, such blunders highlight an administration seemingly detached from the very reality it governs, fostering a dangerous environment that undermines democratic discourse.

(h/t: https://www.rawstory.com/trump-war-2672397316/)

White House Distorts Gabbard’s Iran Testimony to Align with Trump’s Misleading Narrative

The White House has engaged in deceptive editing of a video featuring Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s testimony regarding Iran’s nuclear capabilities. In the edited clip, Gabbard appears to warn that Iran is nearing the development of nuclear weapons, stating, “Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile is at its highest levels and is unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons.” However, this alarming statement omits critical context from her preceding remarks, where she clarified that U.S. intelligence does not assess Iran to be building a nuclear weapon.

In her original testimony, Gabbard emphasized that the U.S. intelligence community (IC) has determined that Iran “is not building a nuclear weapon” and that Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has not authorized the resumption of the country’s nuclear weapons program, which was suspended back in 2003. Despite this, the White House chose to selectively showcase her words to paint a picture consistent with Donald Trump’s alarmist positions on Iran.

When questioned about Gabbard’s remarks that directly contradicted his claims, Trump dismissed her statements, stating, “I don’t care what she said. I think they were very close to having one.” This interaction highlights Trump’s disinclination to acknowledge facts that contradict his narratives, reinforcing concerns regarding his potential to mislead the public on critical national security issues.

Gabbard has been vocal in her concerns about escalating tensions and the dangers posed by warmongering rhetoric, warning that such actions bring the world closer to nuclear conflict. Her criticism of the political elite resonates as she asserts that the climate of fear could have dire consequences for global peace.

Despite claiming they are aligned on issues regarding Iran, Gabbard’s recent video has reportedly caused friction with Trump, suggesting that dissent within the Republican ranks is seen as intolerable. This incident underscores the ongoing manipulation of information by the Trump administration and the risks of prioritizing political agendas over accurate intelligence.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/white-house-deceptively-edits-tulsi-gabbards-testimony-to-make-it-look-like-she-was-warning-iran-was-close-to-nukes/)

Trump Justifies LA National Guard Mobilization with Paid Protester False Claims

President Donald Trump has justified the mobilization of the National Guard and Marines in Los Angeles by claiming that “violent demonstrators” are financially motivated. This assertion has not been backed by credible evidence, and law enforcement figures, like LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell, have explicitly denied the need for military intervention, stating that the police have adequate resources to handle the protests.

Trump’s comments mirror his historical pattern of labeling protesters as “paid,” a tactic he has employed repeatedly without substantiation. During recent interviews, he referred to the demonstrators as “paid insurrectionists” and indicated that Attorney General Pam Bondi’s staff would investigate these claims. However, this narrative lacks any factual basis, with administration officials failing to provide concrete evidence supporting the idea that large crowds are being compensated to protest.

The alleged connection between the protests and paid actors has attracted attention from Republican officials, including Senator Josh Hawley, who called for information from groups he speculated might be financing civil unrest. However, the supposed claims about “credible reporting” made by Hawley’s office remain unsubstantiated, raising doubts about the legitimacy of these allegations. Meanwhile, civil rights advocates criticize these claims as distractions from legitimate social justice efforts.

As tensions in Los Angeles escalate, Trump’s rhetoric serves to exaggerate the nature of the protests, framing them as organized violence orchestrated by sinister groups. This narrative aims to justify a heavy-handed federal response against demonstrators who are predominantly gathered to voice their concerns over immigration enforcement practices. Critics argue this characterization is both manipulative and incendiary, undermining genuine democratic expressions of dissent.

Overall, Trump’s unfounded assertions about paid protesters and the violence in Los Angeles exemplify a dangerous strategy of conflating legitimate civil unrest with radical, organized aggression. This serves not only to discredit peaceful activism but also to create an environment in which the federal government can exert excessive force, reinforcing authoritarian tendencies in his administration.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/12/politics/trump-paid-protester-claim-analysis)

Trump’s Partisan Manipulation at Fort Bragg Undermines Military Neutrality

During a recent event at Fort Bragg, President Donald Trump addressed soldiers, delivering a politically charged speech that blurred the boundaries between the military and partisan politics. Instead of a customary presidential morale-boosting visit, Trump incited the troops to boo California leaders and the media, underscoring a troubling normalization of political partisanship within the armed forces.

The event drew attention not just for Trump’s inflammatory rhetoric but also for how the 82nd Airborne Division curated the optics of the gathering. Internal communications revealed that soldiers selected to be visible during the event were handpicked based on political views, with instructions stating that dissenters should be swapped out. This manipulation of personnel raises significant concerns about the integrity and neutrality of the military.

Responses from military leadership have largely been absent, which is seen as a missed opportunity to affirm the military’s nonpartisan ethos. While some military officials expressed dismay at the event’s tone, the Pentagon’s hierarchy defended Trump’s actions, portraying inquiries into potential violations of Pentagon policies as “disgraceful.” This dismissal not only trivializes the situation but also potentially emboldens further political exploitation of military settings.

Adding to the controversy, a vendor selling Trump campaign merchandise operated on military grounds during the event, which is likely a violation of the Defense Department’s regulations barring overt political activity in military environments. The presence of such partisan merchandise underscores the ongoing conflation of military service with political allegiance under Trump’s administration.

Experts argue that Trump’s rhetoric and the military’s tacit approval of his actions represent a dangerous shift in the relationship between the military and politics. Their concern is that allowing such behavior may open the door to more blatant violations of the military’s longstanding commitment to neutrality, undermining the professional ethics expected of such a vital institution.

(h/t: https://www.military.com/daily-news/2025/06/11/bragg-soldiers-who-cheered-trumps-political-attacks-while-uniform-were-checked-allegiance-appearance.html)

Trump’s Distorted History and Threats to Protesters

During a recent press conference, President Donald Trump made a series of notable blunders that highlight his incompetence and lack of basic historical knowledge. First and foremost, he conflated World War I and World War II, boasting about the United States’ supposed sole victory while omitting the significant contributions of allied nations like Britain and France. Trump inaccurately claimed that without the U.S., the world would be speaking German, disregarding the coalition efforts crucial to both global conflicts.

In addition to his distorted historical claims, Trump exhibited a troubling lack of understanding regarding current communication timelines. He asserted that he had spoken to California Governor Gavin Newsom “a day ago,” when, in fact, it was three and a half days prior, further showcasing a troubling disconnect from reality. This confusion raises questions about his cognitive state and whether he can accurately engage with state responsibilities amid chaos in his administration.

Trump’s statements on protest have also raised alarms about his disregard for the First Amendment. He warned that any individuals participating in protests against his upcoming military parade would face “very heavy force.” This declaration is a clear violation of the constitutional protections for peaceful assembly and raises concerns about the administration’s ongoing authoritarian tendencies.

Strikingly, Trump did not differentiate between violent protestors and peaceful demonstrators, threatening any individual who dares to oppose his agenda. His rhetoric feeds into a broader trend of Republican fascism, which seeks to intimidate dissenting voices and stifle civil rights. Such undemocratic behavior plays into fears that the GOP is increasingly willing to employ violence and heavy-handed tactics to maintain power.

As Trump continues to misrepresent historical events and disregard civil liberties, his leadership raises dramatic concerns about the trajectory of democracy in America. His administration’s refusal to uphold the foundational principles of free expression and honest discourse directly threaten the rights of citizens and signal a disturbing shift toward authoritarianism.

(h/t: https://www.rawstory.com/trump-world-war/)

Trump’s Distorted Claim on WWII Ignoring Britain’s Role

During a recent press conference, President Donald Trump claimed that the United States “won World War II,” omitting any recognition of Britain’s crucial role in the conflict. In his remarks, he emphasized conversations with various world leaders celebrating VE Day but failed to acknowledge the sacrifices of British forces, even while he prominently displayed a bust of Winston Churchill in the Oval Office.

Trump’s comments included a distorted reference to Russian casualties, suggesting that they lost “51 million people,” a figure that significantly inflates historical estimates. Most historians agree that the total number of Soviet casualties during the war was between 22 and 25 million. Additionally, he reiterated a previously debunked claim that Adolf Hitler delivered a speech from the Eiffel Tower, further minimizing the efforts and sacrifices of the French. His selective recounting of history underscores a troubling tendency to distort facts for personal narratives.

This incident raises concerns about Trump’s commitment to truthful discourse regarding historical events. Ignoring Britain’s sacrifice in World War II not only disrespects the memory of countless individuals but also reflects a broader pattern of his administration, which consistently undermines international alliances. By focusing solely on American achievements while disregarding allies’ contributions, Trump reinforces a nationalist agenda that alienates U.S. partners.

Trump’s rhetoric is part of a larger trend among Republican leaders who often reject collaborative narratives in favor of divisive ones. This approach not only simplifies complex history but also fosters an environment that thrives on misinformation. Instead of promoting unity, such statements risk deepening divides both at home and aboard, emphasizing an isolationist view that disregards the importance of global partnerships.

(h/t: https://www.independent.co.uk/tv/news/video-world-war-2-trump-britain-us-b2766802.html)

Trump’s National Guard Troop Threat Against LA Protesters

Donald Trump has intensified his assault on protests in Los Angeles, threatening demonstrators after deploying National Guard troops in response to opposition against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) actions. This militarized response followed militant raids where officers employed crowd control measures, including CS gas and rubber bullets, against activists who were advocating for immigrant rights. Trump’s administration has shown itself willing to escalate tensions rather than engage in constructive dialogue.

In a bizarre overnight rant on Truth Social, Trump applauded the actions of the National Guard while simultaneously criticizing California’s leadership, including Governor Gavin Newsom and Mayor Karen Bass. He labeled them as incompetent in managing the protests and invoked the specter of violence to justify his heavy-handed approach. Instead of addressing the root causes of unrest, Trump resorted to incendiary claims that users of masks among protesters were hiding something, implying malicious intent.

The president’s rhetoric underscores a broader trend of authoritarian tactics employed by the Trump administration, where dissent is increasingly met with militarization rather than negotiation. By discouraging the wearing of masks at protests, Trump is attempting to further intimidate those who dare to oppose him, perpetuating a cycle of fear and repression that aligns with his agenda of silencing opposition. His framing of protests as radical and organized by ‘troublemakers’ further delegitimizes legitimate social movements seeking change.

This deployment of National Guard troops serves as an alarming reminder of how the Trump administration manipulates national security rhetoric to suppress dissent and ensure that the voices of marginalized communities remain unheard. While claiming to act in the name of safety, the reality is the administration is eroding civil liberties and undermining the right to protest, which is a fundamental aspect of American democracy.

The continued militarization of public protests not only reflects Trump’s disdain for democratic principles but also serves the interests of wealthy elites who seek to maintain the status quo. As such, Trump’s recent actions represent a significant threat to the principles of democracy and justice, indicating a clear trajectory toward authoritarianism where dissent is quelled, and power remains consolidated in the hands of a privileged few.

(h/t: https://www.rawstory.com/trump-protesters-2672330516/)

1 2 3 … 171