Category: Look Out for the Little Guy

Trump Commutes Meth Dealer Son’s Sentence Amid Crime

President Donald Trump commuted the sentence of James Womack, son of Arkansas Republican Rep. Steve Womack, a longtime Trump ally, on January 17, 2026. Womack had pleaded guilty in 2023 to distributing more than five grams of methamphetamine and was serving an eight-year federal prison sentence. The White House cited humanitarian factors including James’s mother’s cancer diagnosis and his brother’s seizure disorder, along with his clean prison record.

The commutation contradicts Trump’s public tough-on-crime stance, particularly as his administration simultaneously conducts aggressive crackdowns on drug-related offenses and immigration violations. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has defended recent ICE raids targeting what she called “criminal illegal aliens,” while Trump has publicized the capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro as evidence of his drug enforcement commitment. Rep. Womack publicly thanked Trump for the “gracious and thoughtful action” the day after the commutation.

Trump’s pardon activity this week extends beyond Womack. The president also pardoned Venezuelan banker Julio Herrera Velutini, who faced bribery and wire fraud charges tied to former Puerto Rico Governor Wanda Vázquez Garced, whom Trump also pardoned. Herrera’s daughter donated $2.5 million to the Trump-aligned super PAC MAGA Inc. during the 2024 election cycle, though White House officials stated the donation played no role in the pardon decision. Trump additionally re-pardoned Adriana Camberos, convicted of running a multimillion-dollar grocery scam, after previously pardoning her for selling counterfeit 5-hour Energy shots.

White House pardon czar Alice Marie Johnson, herself pardoned by Trump in 2020, announced Friday that the president pardoned 21 people during the week. Trump’s pattern of clemency favoring political allies contradicts his administration’s stated commitment to law enforcement and demonstrates unequal application of justice based on political proximity.

Senate Democrats have condemned the pardon wave as corruption and abuse of executive power. Senator Chris Murphy labeled the clemencies “bread-and-butter corruption” and criticized the president for issuing “audaciously politically toxic pardons” for individuals convicted of serious crimes including drug trafficking and fraud, underscoring the disconnect between Trump’s public rhetoric and his executive actions.

(Source: https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-frees-maga-reps-meth-dealer-son-in-pardon-spree/?utm_medium=socialflow&source=TDB&via=FB_Page&utm_source=facebook_owned_tdb&utm_sf_post_ref=653728041&utm_sf_cserv_ref=37763684202&utm_campaign=owned_social&fbclid=IwdGRleAPY8WlleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeVTTo6poU-uaUkpbQTMz7uI-_-MmHzKkUkJa6ZJvNoyzDaMBmlNmlsW7hd0w_aem_KUQOWsxxPl8Bgtfid5RJ5g)

Trump Denies $2K Tariff Check Promise Despite November Announcement

President Trump denied making a promise to distribute $2,000 tariff rebate checks to Americans when questioned by The New York Times on January 11, 2026, asking “When did I do that?” despite having publicly introduced the idea in early November 2026 on Truth Social. Trump later acknowledged the checks were planned, stating the tariff revenue collected is “so substantial” that he would issue $2,000 checks “toward the end of the year,” and claimed no Congressional approval would be required.

In November, Trump announced Americans would receive “a dividend of at least $2000 a person (not including high-income people!)” funded by tariff collections he claimed would reach “Trillions of Dollars.” The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimated the government would need approximately $600 billion to issue such checks. However, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told ABC News on November 12 that he and Trump had not discussed the tariff rebate possibility, and later advised Americans to save the funds to avoid inflation.

Trump’s tariff policy faces legal scrutiny, with cases pending before the Supreme Court regarding whether the tariffs violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). Trump previously falsely attributed $1,776 “Warrior Dividend” payments to service members to tariff revenue, when the funds actually derived from Congressional appropriations. If the Supreme Court rules the tariffs illegal, the Treasury Department would refund approximately $774 billion collected, with repayment potentially spread over weeks or a year.

Trump’s claim to unilaterally distribute tariff revenue without Congressional approval contradicts established fiscal law requiring legislative authorization for government expenditures. The shifting timeline—from an undefined date in November to “toward the end of the year” in January—and his initial denial of the promise demonstrate the absence of a concrete plan. Trump has similarly made unilateral economic directives without legislative or procedural authorization, including ordering representatives to purchase $200 billion in mortgage bonds to lower housing costs.

The discrepancy between Trump’s initial November announcement and his January denial, combined with the absence of a detailed distribution mechanism and Bessent’s explicit contradiction, indicates the tariff rebate remains an unfulfilled campaign-style promise dependent on uncertain tariff collections and unresolved legal challenges to the tariff policy itself.

(Source: https://people.com/trump-asks-when-did-i-do-that-when-asked-about-sending-americans-2k-tariff-checks-11884184?utm_campaign=peoplemagazine&utm_content=photo&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_term=6965c2e5490dd2000189e8c3&fbclid=IwdGRleAPS4wpleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeFyrAxSrIgq2CeX5Yw6brG7rJkPekajqBm2cQ5dveBEOMvcqnR6VLAQwzp3M_aem_ljbHllP-Gcm_wwfEaMjG6Q)

Trump wants US taxpayers to reimburse oil firm donors for Venezuela investment

President Donald Trump stated that US taxpayers could reimburse oil companies for reconstructing Venezuelan infrastructure to extract and export oil following the ouster of Nicolás Maduro. Trump declared that “a tremendous amount of money” would be required and suggested his government would compensate energy firms through direct reimbursement or revenue sharing, explicitly linking military intervention to corporate profit.

US Energy Secretary Chris Wright is scheduled to meet executives from Chevron, ConocoPhillips, and ExxonMobil at a Goldman Sachs conference in Miami this week to discuss increasing Venezuelan oil production. These meetings represent the administration’s strategy to restore US oil company operations in Venezuela after nearly two decades of government control of the industry, contradicting Trump’s earlier claims that he had already held talks with “all” major US oil companies regarding Maduro’s removal.

Trump acknowledged no prior briefing of oil companies before military action but claimed companies were aware of discussions about intervention. When asked if he personally contacted top executives, Trump stated it was “too soon” to confirm direct conversations, saying “I speak to everybody,” despite Reuters reporting that no representatives from the three major firms had engaged with the White House on Venezuela operations before or after Maduro’s seizure.

Trump’s blockade announcement of Venezuelan oil tankers exposed the operation’s economic objectives beyond stated anti-drug rationales. Venezuela’s crude production has collapsed to approximately 1.1 million barrels daily from 3.5 million in 1999 due to underinvestment and sanctions, and industry analysts warn that reconstruction requires years of work and billions in investment amid political uncertainty and unclear US policy direction.

Stock markets responded immediately to Trump’s Venezuela initiative, with the S&P 500 energy index reaching its highest level since March 2025 on Monday, as ExxonMobil gained 2.2% and Chevron jumped 5.1%. The White House claimed US oil companies were “ready and willing” to make large investments to rebuild Venezuelan oil infrastructure, while the targeted companies declined to comment on their involvement or commitment to Trump’s stated plans.

(Source: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jan/06/trump-us-taxpayers-oil-firms-venezuela-investment?utm_term=Autofeed&CMP=fb_us&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwdGRleAPKh-pleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEe_-yezUeRoVFdugcD1nvSw5XtSl1m5n_0dygqy2cYQq8J1z-O6-KB_zPL_K4_aem_UlldULbmcvRIeiE8DDl0jg#Echobox=1767698755)

HHS freezing child care payments to all states after Minnesota fraud allegations: Official – ABC News

The Trump administration halted child care funding to all states following fraud allegations centered on daycare centers in Minnesota, with HHS officials stating funds will resume only when states demonstrate legitimate spending. Deputy HHS Secretary Jim O’Neill characterized the alleged fraud as “blatant” and “rampant” across the country, demanding Minnesota Governor Tim Walz conduct a comprehensive audit of identified facilities. The freeze expanded requirements for all child care funding recipients nationwide, mandating administrative data submission and additional documentation including attendance records, licensing reports, and inspection findings.

The federal action was triggered by an unverified online video posted by conservative influencer Nick Shirley alleging fraud in Somali community child care centers in Minneapolis. ABC News has not independently verified Shirley’s claims, which included footage of allegedly empty facilities during business hours. Minnesota state officials disputed the video’s methodology and findings, with Department of Children, Youth and Families Commissioner Tikki Brown questioning whether the footage was captured during operational times.

Minnesota officials documented that state unannounced visits to all facilities named in the video found children present and confirmed each site had been inspected within six months as part of routine licensing procedures. Governor Walz characterized the federal freeze as part of Trump’s strategy to defund assistance programs, stating Minnesota has actively pursued fraud investigations independent of the administration’s pressure. The state emphasized it takes fraud concerns seriously while questioning the video’s investigative standards.

FBI Director Kash Patel and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced expanded investigations into alleged child care fraud and other federal program abuses, with Patel citing a $250 million fraud scheme involving federal food aid uncovered during the COVID-19 pandemic. U.S. Attorney’s Office prosecutor Joe Thompson described the scale of alleged Minnesota fraud as “staggering,” though unrelated fraud investigations in the state predated the viral video and Trump administration’s current response.

The funding freeze applies to all states despite allegations being localized to Minnesota, with HHS tightening documentation requirements for the Administration for Children and Families across the nation. The Trump administration has linked the child care fraud allegations to broader claims of systematic fraud nationwide, though the specific evidence supporting nationwide fraud in child care funding remains unsubstantiated beyond the Minnesota video.

(Source: https://abcnews.go.com/US/hhs-freezing-child-care-payments-minnesota-after-fraud/story?id=128793851&fbclid=IwdGRleAPD_AxleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeAlKtCzgHaZqiNF57R8QpvrDOu-xIFNjYML4K4McqSDWlBx43ljfzHBipd90_aem_FzrHH7CVhYuJlkcgzRqBeg)

US watchdog says paycheck advances no longer subject to lending law | Reuters

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau reversed its position on paycheck advance products under Trump’s administration, determining that earned wage advances no longer qualify as consumer loans subject to the Truth in Lending Act. This reversal eliminates disclosure requirements that companies previously had to provide to workers, including information about credit costs and terms. The CFPB stated the advisory opinion offers clarity to industry participants, though it carries no legal binding force.

Under President Joe Biden, the CFPB had issued interpretive guidance in 2024 classifying paycheck advances as equivalent to consumer loans, establishing federal safeguards intended to increase transparency for workers using these products. Companies like digital bank Chime, which offers customers access to up to $500 of their wages interest-free before payday with no mandatory fees, operate in a market that has grown significantly in recent years. Several states including Nevada and Wisconsin have already specified in state law that such products are not loans, but federal clarification had remained absent until Biden’s guidance.

Under Trump, the CFPB has systematically dismantled regulations from the previous administration, framing deregulation as relief for businesses. The agency last month also proposed narrowing civil-rights-era anti-discrimination requirements for the financial industry, following Trump’s executive order to eliminate disparate-impact liability enforcement. This pattern demonstrates Trump’s effort to restrict oversight mechanisms designed to protect workers and consumers from predatory financial practices.

The removal of lending protections for paycheck advances disproportionately affects low-wage workers who depend on early access to earned wages and lack alternative credit sources. Without mandatory disclosures, companies face no obligation to inform workers about the actual financial terms or risks associated with these advances, creating conditions favorable to exploitation. The decision eliminates transparency requirements that served as a baseline consumer protection regardless of whether products were classified as loans.

(Source: https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/us-watchdog-says-paycheck-advances-no-longer-subject-lending-law-2025-12-22/?link_source=ta_first_comment&taid=6949b879e698f200017a2f57&utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Trending+Content&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwdGRleAO31mdleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeDiG48GBBantZYI16IVBsLaHQKJNEK11cXEC22AFjNA8nGSP92bD_N_aUEG4_aem_kJ_apUkt961CfAzlBgEzNg)

Trump Accused of Denying Aid For Flood Victims to Punish Dem

President Trump denied federal disaster assistance to Colorado on Saturday night following devastating wildfires and flooding that affected the state in fall 2025, triggering accusations he weaponized aid to punish Democratic Governor Jared Polis. Governor Polis stated Trump was “playing political games” and announced Colorado would appeal the decision, noting that both disasters exceeded FEMA criteria for major presidential disaster declarations under the Stafford Act.

Senator Michael Bennet (D-CO) directly accused Trump of weaponizing disaster relief, calling the denial “malicious and obscene” and stating that Trump “continues to use Coloradans for political games.” Bennet vowed to exhaust all available avenues to reverse the decision alongside Governor Polis and the Colorado delegation.

The White House offered no specific justification for denying aid but claimed the administration “responds to each request for Federal assistance under the Stafford Act with great care and consideration.” Spokesperson Abigail Jackson asserted there was “no politicization to the President’s decisions on disaster relief,” citing Trump’s mobilization of aerial firefighting resources during the actual fire response.

Trump had attacked Governor Polis the previous week over his refusal to release Tina Peters, a former county clerk convicted of tampering with voting machines to leak voter data. Peters is a Trump supporter who claimed to be acting on Trump’s 2020 election fraud allegations; Trump issued a pardon for Peters this month that carried no legal effect since she was not convicted in federal court.

Trump has a documented pattern of withholding or delaying federal funds to states and cities governed by Democratic officials, including Virginia and Maryland earlier in 2025, establishing a practice of conditioning disaster aid on political alignment.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/malicious-and-obscene-senator-accuses-trump-of-withholding-help-for-states-flood-and-fire-victims-to-punish-dem-governor/)

Trump Administration Forces SNAP Reapplication Amid Fraud Claims

The Trump administration is mandating all Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients to reapply for benefits due to unfounded claims of widespread fraud. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins announced this move during a Newsmax appearance, asserting that the program is rife with issues, including payments to 186,000 deceased individuals, a claim critics argue is exaggerated and misleading.

Rollins, speaking on “Rob Schmitt Tonight,” suggested that more troubling data will emerge once information from blue states is analyzed, indicating a targeted approach to dismantling vital social safety nets that countless Americans rely on. Such proclamations serve to distract from actual issues affecting program integrity and the food security of millions.

Despite the USDA’s existing periodic recertification process which already demands recipients to update their information, Rollins insists that a complete overhaul is necessary. This narrative promotes an unfounded perception of fraud while undermining the trust in essential services meant to support vulnerable communities, further showcasing the administration’s penchant for scapegoating those in need.

Further amplifying the chaos surrounding SNAP, Rollins outlined that approximately 120 individuals were arrested for fraud, a figure that appears trivial compared to the substantial number of legitimate beneficiaries. Critics within advocacy circles contend that such enforcement measures ignore the broader context of financial hardship faced by many families that depend on these benefits to survive.

As the government grapples with an ongoing shutdown and budgetary constraints, reliance on misleading statistics and dramatizing fraud highlights Trump’s administration’s failure to prioritize the needs of everyday Americans. Rollins’ assertions that the program is “corrupt” reflect a troubling trend of stigmatizing aid recipients while disregarding the structural issues that lead to food insecurity across the nation.

Trump Organization Requests 200 Foreign Visas Amid Backlash

The Trump Organization has requested nearly 200 foreign worker visas this year, marking the highest total in its history. This increase, detailed in data from the Department of Labor, reveals that the company sought 184 foreign workers for temporary roles at its Mar-a-Lago resort, two golf clubs, and a winery in Virginia. These roles included positions such as cooks, waiters, and housekeepers, with hourly wages ranging from $15.58 to $27.91.

This rise in visa requests comes at a time when the Trump administration is undertaking what it claims is the most extensive deportation operation in recent history. Despite his wealth, estimated at $6.5 billion primarily through cryptocurrency ventures, Trump’s focus on hiring foreign labor has drawn ire from his base. MAGA supporters have expressed discontent, viewing this move as a betrayal of his “America First” rhetoric aimed at prioritizing U.S. jobs.

Trump’s hiring plans starkly contrast with his administration’s hardline stance on immigration, as he recently faced questions from Fox News host Laura Ingraham regarding the need for foreign workers over domestic talent. In response, Trump argued that certain specialized skills can’t be filled by individuals from the unemployment line, a statement that has inflamed tensions among his supporters who remember his earlier pledges to support American workers.

The Trump Organization’s visa applications have been on the rise since 2021, when they sought to hire 121 foreign workers. The latest figures indicate a troubling trend of reliance on foreign labor, as citizens from approximately 90 countries remain eligible for these visa positions.

Vocal critics like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene are notably opposed to Trump’s stance on H-1B visas, underscoring a growing rift within his support base. She publicly condemned the approach of replacing U.S. workers with foreign labor, demonstrating the divisiveness of Trump’s immigration policies even within his own ranks. As this situation unfolds, it raises significant questions about the sincerity of Trump’s commitment to American workers.

Trump Threatens SNAP Benefits Amidst Ongoing Government Shutdown

Donald Trump has stated that he will withhold SNAP benefits until the government shutdown ends, demonstrating his contempt for the 42 million Americans who rely on this crucial support. Despite a recent court order mandating the administration to continue paying out SNAP benefits, Trump’s proclamation on Truth Social seems aimed at manipulating the situation for political gain. He has expressed that the funds would only be disbursed once the “Radical Left Democrats open up government,” showcasing a blatant disregard for the judiciary and the welfare of struggling families.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt immediately contradicted Trump, clarifying that the administration is indeed complying with the court order. Leavitt’s remarks underscore a significant disconnect within the Trump administration, as she had to reassure the public that funds would eventually be released, albeit with a delay, due to the ongoing government shutdown. This highlights the chaos and instability that accompanies Trump’s leadership, wherein the president’s own statements raise confusion amid a crisis.

The ongoing government shutdown, which began on October 1, has led to dire consequences for low-income families who depend on SNAP for their basic nutritional needs. Due to this political stalemate, federal assistance for new applicants may be significantly impacted as emergency funds are being drained to provide for those currently enrolled. The ramifications of this shutdown might extend beyond immediate funding issues, particularly if it drags on to set a record as the longest shutdown in U.S. history.

Trump’s administration initially intended to halt SNAP funding altogether starting November 1, further exacerbating the challenges faced by families already struggling to make ends meet. Although a federal judge intervened, ordering the resumption of benefits, Trump’s attempt to sway public opinion against Democrats illustrates his strategy of using vulnerable Americans as pawns in his political maneuvering.

The prospect of this shutdown becoming a historical event reflects Trump’s inability to govern effectively, as he prioritizes political posturing over the well-being of millions. It is crucial to highlight the direct effects of Trump’s actions: he is perpetuating a war on the poor, further deepening the vulnerabilities of those who require assistance during challenging times.

Trump Hosts Gatsby Halloween Bash While Americans Lose SNAP Benefits

Donald Trump hosted a lavish “Great Gatsby”-themed Halloween party at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach just hours before millions of Americans lost their Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits due to a government shutdown. The event took place on October 31, 2025, amidst grave economic challenges for many Americans, reflecting Trump’s blatant disregard for those in need.

The party, which featured guests dressed in 1920s attire and included prominent figures such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio and members of the Trump family, was criticized by Democrats who pointed to its extravagant nature as emblematic of Trump’s indifference. Democratic National Committee chair Ken Martin lambasted Trump for prioritizing a meaningless celebration over the well-being of Americans facing food insecurity.

Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy also weighed in, remarking on how Trump’s ostentatious display seemed to flaunt his lack of empathy towards the average American struggling with reduced assistance. Murphy’s comments reflect a growing frustration among lawmakers who perceive Trump’s actions as disconnected from the challenges faced by ordinary citizens during the prolonged shutdown.

White House Press Secretary Anna Kelly responded to the backlash by dismissing these criticisms, asserting that Trump has consistently urged Democrats to work toward reopening the government. However, many feel these statements ring hollow in light of the timing of the extravagant celebration.

In the midst of ongoing legal challenges regarding SNAP funding, with judges ordering continued funding amid lawsuits, Trump’s focus on a party rather than addressing urgent legislative needs raises serious questions about his leadership priorities during this critical period.

1 2 3 … 10