Category: Transparency

White House App Exposes Users to Data Theft Via Undisclosed Third Parties

The Trump White House's official app collects and shares user data with third-party vendors without proper disclosure, according to cybersecurity researchers who analyzed its code. The app's privacy manifest on Apple's App Store is blank despite the fact that it transmits IP addresses, time zones, device identifiers, and mobile carrier information to companies including OneSignal and Elfsight, a Russia-founded software vendor. Philip Fields, a cybersecurity researcher and former FBI intelligence analyst, stated that "having an amateur WordPress developer running the White House's public presence puts everybody who visits it at risk," especially while the U.S. is engaged in military conflict.

The app fails to meet federal security standards and bypasses established oversight mechanisms. Federal apps and websites are required to use certified cloud services such as FedRamp or GovCloud, which have been vetted and certified by Congress for security compliance. Instead, the White House contracted with 45Press, an Ohio-based WordPress development company with no disclosed mobile app experience, which was awarded over $1.4 million in February. The app lacks basic security protections including code obfuscation and certificate pinning, making its code and network traffic vulnerable to reverse engineering.

Data sharing with third parties violates the app's stated privacy disclosures to users. Apple's app store requires developers to declare all data collection in privacy manifests; the White House app's manifest is completely blank, falsely indicating no data collection occurs. Cybersecurity researcher Thereallo noted that "users downloading an official government app would reasonably expect their data to stay within the US government systems, not flow to commercial third-party platforms." OneSignal's chief marketing officer acknowledged the company collects functional data but stated it is Apple's responsibility to ensure developers disclose this collection accurately.

The White House defended the app's security practices, claiming third-party vendors underwent full IT review and that data sharing is "standard" for applications. However, Sen. Dick Durbin, ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, criticized the administration's cybersecurity failures, stating "in true Trump White House fashion, their lackluster app appears to pose a cybersecurity threat to its users," particularly as the administration simultaneously cuts funding from cybersecurity agencies. The app ranks as the third-most downloaded news app on Apple's App Store after its launch last week, with Trump promoting it as providing "front-row access" to his administration.

The White House has deployed four updates to the app within one week of its release, with developers attributing two updates to "minor bug fixes." Initial versions included inactive location-tracking permissions that were subsequently removed. Cybersecurity expert Adam Enger warned that state-sponsored attackers possess far more sophisticated analysis capabilities than independent researchers and are actively monitoring the app for vulnerabilities, stating "if I could find this by myself in an hour on Friday night, then how far along are our adversaries with this?"

(Source: https://www.notus.org/technology/trump-white-house-app-cybersecurity)

Pentagon Bans Press Office Access via Classified Room

The Pentagon eliminated journalist access to its press office by redesignating the space as a "Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility" (SCIF), according to Acting Pentagon Press Secretary Joel Valdez's announcement Monday. The Trump administration justified the ban by claiming Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's speechwriters require access to classified material and SIPRNet (Secret Internet Protocol Router Network), making the office incompatible with reporter presence. Valdez dismissed concerns by stating "There's nothing controversial about that" while claiming the Pentagon operates with unprecedented transparency.

This escalation follows a pattern of Pentagon press restrictions under Hegseth. In October, dozens of journalists surrendered their Pentagon press badges after the Defense Department imposed rules requiring pre-approval of all reporting and mandatory escorts for reporters moving through the building. Major news outlets, including Fox News and Newsmax, rejected these restrictions. In December, The New York Times sued the Pentagon, arguing the rules violated freedom of speech and due process rights.

A federal judge ruled in March that key security provisions were unlawful, forcing the Pentagon to revise its policy. Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell announced a compromise allowing press access to an annex facility outside the building with mandatory escort requirements. The New York Times filed a second lawsuit last month, contending that mandatory escorts for Pentagon access violate the Constitution.

Mark Schoeff Jr., president of the National Press Club, characterized the SCIF redesignation as a "remarkable and troubling escalation in the Defense Department's ongoing effort to restrict independent reporting." Parnell defended the latest restrictions by claiming the New York Times lawsuit "is nothing more than an attempt to remove the barriers to them getting their hands on classified information," asserting the policy is "completely lawful and narrowly designed to protect national security information."

The Pentagon's progressive elimination of press office access mirrors broader efforts to suppress information flows to journalists through federal employee NDAs and reflects the administration's hostility toward independent oversight of military operations and defense policy.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/pentagon-bans-reporters-press-office-b2987592.html)

White House proposes NDAs for federal workers to crack down on leaks to journalists | Trump administration | The Guardian

The Trump administration's Office of Personnel Management released a draft nondisclosure agreement on Tuesday requiring federal employees to sign NDAs designed to prevent them from sharing information with journalists. The proposed agreement allows the government to pursue civil and criminal penalties against employees who disclose information deemed confidential, and grants the administration rights to all royalties employees receive from such disclosures. Former government employees would need written permission from an authorized agency official to speak to journalists about confidential information after leaving their positions.

This proposal is part of Trump's broader campaign to control the flow of information from federal agencies. Since taking office, Trump has attacked news outlets as "fake news," filed lawsuits against media organizations, banned the Associated Press from the White House press pool, and restricted reporter access at the Pentagon. The administration also enacted a September media policy requiring Pentagon reporters to sign pledges to report only officially released information.

Federal employee unions directly oppose the NDA proposal. Steve Lenkart, executive director of the National Federation of Federal Employees, stated the move is part of an effort to weaken unions that function as internal accountability mechanisms and to silence dissent within government. Everett Kelley, national president of the American Federation of Government Employees, characterized the proposal as an attempt to purge career civil servants and replace them with political loyalists unwilling to report waste, fraud, and abuse. Both union leaders emphasized that federal employees retain constitutional rights and protected whistleblower protections under existing federal law, including the ability to report misconduct to Congress and inspectors general.

The draft NDA explicitly states it would not apply to lawful disclosures of fraud, abuse, and misconduct to internal government watchdogs and Congress, as prohibited by federal law. However, legal experts and union leadership argue that agreements designed to suppress lawful disclosures lack legitimate governmental purpose and are constitutionally suspect. Federal employees do not surrender First Amendment rights upon accepting government employment, according to union statements.

The OPM spokesperson McLaurine Pinover justified the proposal as addressing concerns that unauthorized disclosures disrupt agency operations, but the timing aligns with Trump's pattern of attacking press freedom and independent government institutions. Trump has previously attempted to silence government insiders through litigation, using legal threats against former officials who published accounts of his conduct, illustrating the administration's longstanding hostility toward public disclosure of government activities.

(Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/may/26/federal-workers-ndas?utm_term=Autofeed&CMP=fb_us&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwdGRjcASC05NleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEe5Rmh4RqgHIrUPmZ6FJZ2vQkc06d102xkDcnGTwBel7cXhDDcM71T8WPqHAo_aem_F2rmbphOg6PMqplupHvCBw#Echobox=1779812330)

Trump DOJ Shredded Huge Epstein Document Cache After Death

Shortly after Jeffrey Epstein’s death in a New York jail in 2019, the Justice Department under Trump’s first administration ordered the destruction of extensive documentation. A Bureau of Prisons “After-Actions team” systematically shredded files at the facility, according to an FBI report with a redacted official’s name. The unnamed official stated they had never witnessed such volume of shredded documents being disposed of at the jail’s rear gate.

The shredding operation occurred within days of Epstein’s death and involved what the report characterized as “huge amounts of paperwork.” This action took place while the Trump administration maintained control of the DOJ, which oversees federal detention facilities and investigative protocols. The destruction of these materials raises questions about what records were eliminated and whether they contained evidence relevant to ongoing investigations.

Details of the document destruction emerged when the DOJ released Epstein-related files earlier this year. The FBI report’s documentation of the shredding contradicts any claim that records were preserved for investigative or accountability purposes. The timing and scale of the operation suggest a coordinated effort rather than routine waste management.

Trump has repeatedly denied any connection to Epstein and has attacked those who suggest otherwise, including threatening legal action against comedian Trevor Noah over an Epstein joke at the Grammys. The destruction of federal records under Trump’s DOJ administration contradicts his claims of transparency and his self-portrayal as uninvolved in Epstein matters. Trump has also threatened to sue author Michael Wolff over Epstein-related allegations.

This destruction of evidence represents abuse of power by Trump’s DOJ to conceal potentially damaging information. The shredding of federal records violates standard document preservation protocols and obstructs the public’s right to understand the full scope of Epstein’s criminal network and any connections to powerful figures, including those within the Trump administration.

(Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/videos/know-epstein-groomed-america-corrupt-041542936.html)

Trump White House Blocks Iran Terror Threat Warning to Police

Trump’s White House blocked a joint intelligence bulletin from the FBI, Department of Homeland Security, and National Counterterrorism Center warning law enforcement nationwide of elevated terrorist threats linked to his military operation against Iran. The five-page report detailed specific threats from Iranian government targets, proxies, and radicalized individuals motivated by the conflict, along with guidance for local law enforcement response. Trump ordered the bulletin placed on hold hours before release, violating standard protocol that keeps intelligence communications neutral and fact-based rather than subject to White House political control.

A senior DHS official stated the White House imposed new restrictions requiring all unclassified Iran-related information to be reviewed by Trump before distribution to law enforcement. The official characterized this as having a chilling effect on threat communication, saying Trump does not want information released showing his Iran war is raising domestic terrorism risk. DHS broke protocol by alerting the White House before release, actions taken against FBI leadership’s wishes, according to the official.

Trump launched Operation Epic Fury one week prior in a joint US-Israeli military campaign that killed Iranian senior leadership including Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The conflict has since expanded across the Middle East, with Iran retaliating against US military bases and allied Gulf nations, killing six American troops and injuring more than a dozen others.

Iran operates proxy militant networks including Hezbollah and the Houthis for attacks on Western targets. Days after Trump’s war began, a gunman killed three people and wounded 15 others at an Austin bar before police killed him; investigators found he had expressed online support for the Iranian regime. Trump was warned by military advisers that Iran could respond with proxy terror attacks on US soil.

White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson denied blocking the bulletin, claiming the White House coordinates with agencies to ensure information is accurate and properly vetted. FBI counterterrorism teams were placed on elevated alert nationwide following Trump’s military operation, though the duration of the alert remains unstated.

(Source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15622933/White-House-blocks-warning-rising-threat-linked-Iran-war.html)

NSA Detected Foreign Call About Trump Associate Gabbard Blocked

Last spring, the National Security Agency detected a phone call between two foreign intelligence operatives discussing a person close to Donald Trump. Rather than following standard protocol to distribute the intelligence report, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard delivered a paper copy directly to White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and subsequently instructed the NSA to transmit the classified details to her office instead of publishing the report.

On April 17, a whistleblower contacted the inspector general alleging that Gabbard blocked the classified intelligence from routine distribution. The whistleblower filed a formal complaint on May 21 detailing Gabbard’s actions. The NSA does not monitor individuals without justification, and the person discussed in the call is not understood to be an administration official or special government employee, according to sources familiar with the matter.

The intelligence community inspector general dismissed the complaint after a 14-day review on June 6, stating the office “could not determine if the allegations appear credible.” The watchdog’s independence may be compromised after Gabbard assigned one of her top advisers, Dennis Kirk—a co-author of Project 2025 and a first Trump administration official—to work in the inspector general’s office on May 9, two weeks after the whistleblower’s initial contact.

For eight months, the complaint remained classified and withheld from congressional intelligence committees, violating the law requiring agencies to relay whistleblower complaints to Congress within 21 days. Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Mark Warner stated the months-long delay reflected an effort to “bury the complaint.” Members of the “gang of eight” received a heavily redacted version on Tuesday night, with much of the complaint withheld under claims of executive privilege—a move Gabbard’s attorney said flags presidential involvement in the underlying intelligence concerns.

Gabbard’s office denied all allegations, stating “every single action taken by DNI Gabbard was fully within her legal and statutory authority.” House Oversight Committee Democrat Stephen Lynch warned that Kirk’s appointment raised “troubling questions about the independence” of the intelligence community inspector general’s office, compromising the agency’s ability to serve as an independent watchdog against weaponization of intelligence for political purposes.

(Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/07/nsa-foreign-intelligence-trump-whistleblower)

Outrage and legal threats: Trump justice department slammed after limited Epstein files release | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian

Trump’s justice department released a limited, heavily redacted batch of Jeffrey Epstein files on Friday, violating the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which mandated near-complete disclosure by December 19 with only narrow exemptions for ongoing investigations, national security, and victim protection. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, Trump’s former criminal defense lawyer, announced in advance that the department would withhold documents and release materials piecemeal over weeks, directly contradicting the law’s requirements.

Representative Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie, the bipartisan co-authors of the transparency legislation, publicly condemned the release as non-compliant. Khanna stated they are exploring all legal options, including possible impeachment of justice department officials, finding them in contempt of Congress, and referring obstructionists for prosecution. Massie emphasized that future administrations could prosecute current Attorney General Pam Bondi and others, as the transparency act’s obligations do not expire with Congressional sessions.

At least 16 files disappeared from the justice department’s public webpage without explanation, including a photograph showing Trump alongside Epstein, Melania Trump, and Ghislaine Maxwell inside a drawer. House Democrats noted the removal of this image and questioned what else was being withheld, demanding transparency.

Democrats across both chambers condemned the rollout. Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Robert Garcia called the release a coverup, with Ocasio-Cortez demanding Bondi’s resignation. The House oversight committee Democrats, led by Garcia and Jamie Raskin, stated Trump’s administration is violating federal law by continuing to conceal facts about Epstein’s sex trafficking operation and announced they are examining all legal options.

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said the release violated both the transparency law’s spirit and letter, pledging to pursue every option to ensure the truth emerges. The justice department defended itself on social media, claiming no politically exposed persons were redacted and pointing to released Clinton photographs as proof of compliance, despite the law’s explicit mandate for comprehensive disclosure absent narrow statutory exceptions.

(Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/dec/20/trump-justice-department-legal-threats-epstein-files-release)

trump cancels October Jobs Report

The U.S. Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has announced the cancellation of its October jobs report due to the ongoing government shutdown, marking a significant and troubling departure from standard protocol. This decision means that vital employment situation data for October will not be published, which is the first such occurrence since 2013. The BLS confirmed on its website that the inability to collect necessary household data led to this unprecedented move.

Originally scheduled for release on November 7, the jobs report was expected to provide critical insights into the nation’s employment landscape. However, the BLS cited the government shutdown as the reason for not being able to gather the requisite data for both the establishment and household surveys. As it stands, the household survey data will not be retroactively collected, further complicating the situation and diminishing transparency in economic reporting.

The announcement was made shortly after White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt indicated that the likelihood of the jobs report being released was slim, attributing blame to Democrats for the impasse. This politically charged environment has cast a shadow over the figures that are crucial for understanding economic trends and the overall labor market health.

Market analysts and observers, including the global tracker The Kobeissi Letter, have expressed alarm at the implications of this cancellation, which undermines public trust in economic data that the administration should be providing. The absence of these statistics leaves many unanswered questions about employment trends and economic recovery, especially as other key economic data is set to release under uncertain conditions.

Following the cancellation, the BLS plans to include the October data with the November report, which may prolong the wait for clarity on employment statistics. As the administration continues to grapple with the effects of the government shutdown, the fate of future reports hangs in a precarious balance, leaving the public and analysts with limited information on America’s economic recovery.

Trump Endorses Epstein Files Release, Shifts Blame to Democrats

Donald Trump has shifted his stance on the release of the Epstein files, expressing willingness to sign a bill that facilitates their disclosure. This reversal comes on the heels of growing pressure from House Republicans advocating for transparency regarding Jeffrey Epstein’s associates, with Trump accusing Democrats of having deeper connections to Epstein.

During a recent interview, Trump downplayed his association with Epstein while attempting to underscore the alleged complicity of Democratic figures like Bill Clinton and others, attempting to frame the issue as a partisan problem. “All I want is for people to recognize a great job that I’ve done,” he proclaimed, attempting to divert attention from the implications of Epstein’s past connections.

In his typical evasive style, Trump stated, “Sure, I would [sign the bill]. Let the Senate look at it,” while still insisting that the issue is predominantly a Democratic concern. He predominantly focused on distancing his party from Epstein, despite numerous prominent Republicans also facing scrutiny for their past affiliations.

Trump’s comments reflect a broader strategy of deflection and blame-shifting, a tactic that has characterized much of his political narrative. By labeling Epstein as a “Democrat problem,” he aims to protect himself and the Republican Party from potential implications of their connections to the convicted sex offender.

This latest development demonstrates Trump’s ongoing attempts to manipulate narratives to his advantage, prioritizing self-preservation over accountability, despite calls for transparency regarding matters involving Epstein. His willingness to sign the bill may serve as a political maneuver rather than a genuine action toward justice.

Kevin Hassett Claims October Jobs Data May Remain Unknown

Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council under Donald Trump, expressed grave concerns over the release of October jobs data amidst an extensive government shutdown, suggesting it may never be available. Speaking on Fox News, Hassett highlighted that the ongoing political impasse has severely disrupted the essential federal statistical system, with White House officials like press secretary Karoline Leavitt pointing fingers at Democrats for the issue.

During the Fox News segment, Hassett explained the data collection process, mentioning that one of the primary surveys—the household survey—was not conducted in October. Consequently, while some employment figures may be produced, a complete unemployment rate will remain elusive. Hassett stated, “We’ll probably be able to concoct something, but we’ll never actually know for sure what the rate was in October,” reflecting the detrimental impact the shutdown has had on accurate economic reporting.

Further elaborating on the economic ramifications, Hassett remarked that the Council of Economic Advisors estimated the daily losses to be about $15 billion, leading to a significant decline in jobs—specifically referencing a loss of around 60,000 American jobs due to depressed economic output. Such fallout raises awareness regarding how deeply intertwined government operations are with the overall economy and how partisan conflicts can exacerbate dire economic conditions.

Hassett’s insights offer a sober view of the historical context, as Trump previously dismissed significant jobs data that did not align with his administration’s narratives. He notably fired the head of the Bureau of Labor and Statistics, reflecting a broader pattern in which valid economic analyses are suppressed or dismissed if they fail to support Trump’s agenda.

This situation underscores an alarming trend where political maneuvering directly impacts economic stability and the integrity of crucial data sets, which should ideally be free from partisan influence. As the shutdown continues, the prospect of reliable economic metrics diminishes, with long-term implications for policymakers and citizens alike.

1 2 3 … 10