Smith College: Department of Education opens investigation into all-women’s college for admitting trans women | CNN

The Department of Education launched a Title IX investigation into Smith College, an all-women’s liberal arts institution in Massachusetts, for admitting trans women as students. The investigation, initiated in response to a complaint filed by Defending Education, a conservative nonprofit, accuses Smith of violating Title IX by “admitting biological men and granting them access to women-only spaces, including dormitories, bathrooms, locker rooms, and athletic teams.” Smith College clarified that it “considers for admission any applicants who self-identify as women; cis, trans, and nonbinary women are eligible to apply to Smith” and stated it remains “fully committed to its institutional values, including compliance with civil rights laws.”

The Department of Education claims that Smith’s admissions policy violates the single-sex exception under Title IX, arguing that “an all-girls college that enrolls male students professing a female identity would cease to qualify as single sex under Title IX.” Shannon Minter, an attorney with the National Center for LGBTQ Rights, characterized the investigation as government overreach into private institutions. Minter stated that women’s colleges “should be able to do freely without being worried about persecution by the federal government” when they admit transgender students. He described the investigation as reflecting a broader strategy by the current administration to eliminate any inclusion of transgender people in American society.

This investigation exemplifies Trump administration efforts to restrict transgender rights across multiple policy areas. Trump has implemented sweeping measures including banning trans people from the military, suing states for allowing trans athletes on high school sports teams, restricting trans and nonbinary children’s access to gender-affirming care, and issuing a Day 1 executive order redefining gender as “sex” determined by biology at conception. These actions target a demographic representing just 1% of the U.S. population ages 13 and older, according to the Williams Institute.

Smith College adapted its admissions policies in 2015 to explicitly include trans students after denying admission to trans woman Calliope Wong in 2013, which triggered campus activism. The college provides trans-affirming healthcare, peer support, single-occupancy all-gender restrooms, and an all-gender locker room with private changing and showering areas. Nicholas Hite, a senior attorney at Lambda Legal, noted that the complaint did not originate from anyone at Smith College and that trans students chose these institutions specifically for their inclusive policies.

Minter argued that the investigation constitutes “misuse and weaponization of anti-discrimination laws to do the very opposite of the thing those laws were enacted for,” stating that Title IX was meant to protect people against all forms of sex-based discrimination, including discrimination against transgender people. He warned that the investigation would likely cause fear and anxiety for trans students, describing the administration’s actions as “seeking to destroy every single safe place for transgender young people in this country” and characterizing them as “a vicious vendetta against a small vulne(Source: https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/04/us/smith-college-title-ix-trans-students?Date=20260504&Profile=CNN,CNN+International&utm_content=1777937654&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwdGRjcARm0KRleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEe36UO6J33TOcE7wi1oenXSP3QdfbmnHil1wErZeyTQL11CBaq92qix64Zbj0_aem_WB4yfWOoKwkZg3ewFGLJdw)rable group of kids.”

Trump Nominee Refuses to Confirm 22nd Amendment Bars Third

Trump’s judicial nominee John George Edward Marck refused to answer Senator Chris Coons’ direct question about what the 22nd Amendment states during a federal court confirmation hearing for the Southern District of Texas on May 4, 2026. The 22nd Amendment explicitly prohibits any person from being elected President more than twice. When Coons asked whether Trump is eligible to run for a third term, Marck claimed he needed to “review the facts” rather than confirming the constitutional bar, and sat silently while another witness answered.

Marck’s evasion violated constitutional duty by dodging a foundational legal question that judges must understand. Former Republican Representative Adam Kinzinger labeled the response “DISQUALIFYING,” and former GOP analyst Tara Setmayer called it “UNEQUIVOCALLY DISQUALIFYING.” The silence from other Trump nominees when asked to confirm the constitutional two-term limit demonstrated coordinated refusal to acknowledge clear constitutional limits on Trump’s power.

Trump has threatened to run for a third term, contradicting the explicit language of the 22nd Amendment. Republicans in Congress have offered only minimal resistance to this threat. Trump has a documented history of surrounding himself with advisers willing to abandon constitutional norms and reshape federal institutions according to his personal agenda.

Author Nick Bryant described Marck’s response as “really chilling” and “like a scene from a dystopian movie.” The nominee’s refusal to answer a basic constitutional question revealed Trump’s intention to pack federal courts with judges unwilling to enforce constitutional limits on executive power. This nomination exemplifies Trump’s systematic dismantling of institutional independence through loyalty-based judicial appointments.

(Source: https://www.rawstory.com/trump-judiciary-2676849914/)

Trump Talks About Leaving Office in ‘Eight or Nine Years’

Trump declared at a White House small business summit on Monday that he would remain in office “eight or nine years from now,” drawing applause and laughter from supporters. The statement functioned as a joke about the ten-year window for business tax deductions included in Republican legislation, but it articulated his intention to extend his presidency far beyond constitutional limits. This rhetoric aligns with Trump’s pattern of signaling indefinite retention of power, consistent with his attacks on constitutional constraints he has previously called an “archaic system” and a “bad thing for the country.”

During the same event, Trump made false economic claims, asserting that analysts predicted his Iran military conflict would drive oil prices to $300 per barrel and that he has secured $18 trillion in foreign investments. He also falsely credited himself with leading China in artificial intelligence and boasted about auto and AI manufacturing expansion across the country. These disproven statements demonstrate Trump’s routine use of fabricated statistics to manufacture a false record of economic success.

Trump’s comment about staying in office reflects the authoritarian trajectory of his presidency, which involves dismantling institutional independence and consolidating executive power. His willingness to joke about violating term limits before a supportive audience normalizes the elimination of democratic constraints, particularly as he has already installed loyalists in the Justice Department to obstruct investigations into himself and his associates.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/white-house-crowd-applauds-as-trump-talks-about-leaving-office-eight-or-nine-years-from-now/)

Acting AG Blanche Defends Weak Comey Indictment

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche defended the second indictment of former FBI Director James Comey on NBC’s Meet the Press on Sunday, claiming the prosecution extends beyond Comey’s Instagram post displaying seashells arranged as “86 47” from November 2025. Blanche asserted that career prosecutors, FBI agents, and Secret Service agents investigated the case thoroughly, though he refused to disclose what additional evidence exists. Experts and even some Republicans have declared the case meritless, and Judge Colm Connolly previously dismissed Comey’s first indictment in September 2025 for lying to Congress, ruling that Trump’s appointee leading that prosecution was illegally appointed.

Comey’s second indictment violates prosecutorial norms by following Trump’s direct demand for indictments posted on Truth Social in September 2025. Trump publicly ordered his then-Attorney General Pam Bondi to indict Comey, Adam Schiff, Letitia James, and others, describing them as “guilty as hell.” This represents an unprecedented weaponization of the Justice Department as Trump’s political enforcement mechanism. Comey’s second indictment stems from allegations that his social media post suggested harm to Trump, though Comey removed the post and apologized months before charges were filed.

Senator Adam Schiff, a former prosecutor with nearly six years of experience, stated directly that he had never encountered such a weak case and predicted dismissal before trial. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell cited Trump’s unprecedented legal assault against him, along with political investigations targeting Schiff and New York Attorney General Letitia James, as justification for remaining on the Federal Reserve board until the investigation concluded transparently. The Trump Justice Department ended its investigation into Powell last month to secure a key Republican senator’s vote for Powell’s replacement, demonstrating the politicized nature of these prosecutions.

Blanche’s defense of the indictment occurred within Trump’s documented pattern of using the Justice Department to target political enemies, following the framework established by Trump’s personal attorneys now leading the DOJ. Career attorneys and officials have departed the Justice Department in significant numbers due to its increased political manipulation, undermining the agency’s prosecutorial capacity. Comey responded via Substack video, stating he expects further Trump administration attacks but remains convinced of his innocence and an independent justice system’s eventual restoration.

Blanche acknowledged on Sunday that thousands of Americans who have used the phrase “86 47,” widely available on Amazon merchandise, should not face prosecution, directly contradicting the reasoning behind Comey’s indictment and exposing the selective, politically motivated nature of the prosecution. The Trump administration has already fired prosecutors who refused to pursue the Comey prosecution, illustrating the coercive pressure within the Department of Justice to secure convictions against Trump’s identified enemies regardless of evidence quality.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/todd-blanche-nbc-comey-indictment-b2969764.html)

Trump Demands GOP ‘TERMINATE’ Filibuster to Combat Democrats

Trump demanded Republicans eliminate the Senate filibuster to prevent Democrats from investigating election integrity, according to a Truth Social post on Saturday. Trump accused Democrats of hiring “sleazebags” like former Attorney General Eric Holder to probe voter integrity, framing the task force as part of a conspiracy to rig the 2026 midterms and 2028 election. Trump falsely claimed Democrats “rigged” the 2020 election he lost to President Joe Biden and called Democratic efforts to investigate election security “treasonous” and a “War” against the United States.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer announced a new task force days earlier to protect the 2026 midterms from what he described as threats posed by Trump and his supporters. Schumer stated Trump has “stacked his administration with election deniers” and accused Trump of using the SAVE Act, which requires proof of citizenship to vote, to disenfranchise millions of Americans. Holder is participating as an expert advisor to the group of senators.

Trump has repeatedly demanded filibuster elimination since returning to office in 2025, claiming it “hurts” Republicans. Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin) joined Trump’s demand last week, telling Fox News it is imperative to eliminate the filibuster during what he called a “moment of national danger,” following an assassination attempt on Trump at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner. Some Republican lawmakers have signaled they support eliminating the procedural rule.

Trump’s demand to terminate the filibuster reflects his broader push to consolidate power and remove institutional checks on his authority, consistent with prior threats against Republicans resisting filibuster elimination. The SAVE Act, which Trump championed, has stalled in the Senate where Democrats oppose it, making filibuster elimination central to Trump’s legislative agenda.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-demands-gop-terminate-the-filibuster-with-dems-hiring-sleazebags-to-probe-voter-integrity-get-tough-republicans-theyre-coming/)

Trump Demands No Judge Stop His Military Ballroom

President Donald Trump posted inflammatory messages on Truth Social attacking Judge Richard Leon’s ruling on his $400 million White House ballroom project, characterizing the structure as militarily essential and declaring “no Judge can be allowed to stop” its construction. Trump’s posts came after Leon issued a revised order allowing underground construction of bunkers, bomb shelters, and military installations while prohibiting Trump from finalizing the above-ground ballroom design without Congressional approval, which the project still lacks.

Trump accused Leon of undermining national security and engaging in “illegal overreach,” claiming the ballroom is vital for presidential safety during events, inaugurations, and global summits. In his lengthy Truth Social rant, Trump detailed the ballroom’s purported military features, including missile-resistant steel, drone-proof ceilings, blast-proof glass, and military-grade venting, framing these specifications as necessary for protecting future presidents and world leaders.

Trump insisted the underground and above-ground portions are inseparable, claiming the underground sections serve no purpose without the upper structure and that the entire project is “tied together as one big, expensive, and very complex unit.” He further asserted that material worth hundreds of millions of dollars has already been ordered and partially paid for, suggesting the court order threatens investments already committed to the construction.

The ballroom remains funded through private donations and Trump’s personal cash rather than taxpayer money, yet Trump has framed judicial oversight as obstructing national defense. Trump previously attacked the court halt, and his administration appointed an unqualified receptionist to the Commission of Fine Arts, illustrating his pattern of circumventing institutional expertise and oversight on the project.

Trump’s assertion that judges cannot stop the project defies judicial authority and the requirement for Congressional approval, establishing a precedent for executive defiance of court orders. His characterization of legitimate legal review as “Trump Hating” and a “mockery to our Court System” exemplifies his broader pattern of attacking judicial independence when rulings oppose his interests.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-drops-wild-post-about-his-militarily-imperative-ballroom-no-judge-can-be-allowed-to-stop-it/)

Trump DOJ Seeks to Vacate Seditious Conspiracy Convictions

Trump’s Department of Justice, led by U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro, filed motions on Tuesday to vacate convictions against members of the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys who were convicted of seditious conspiracy and related crimes for their roles in the January 6 Capitol attack. The filing seeks to erase convictions for Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes, militia members Kelly Meggs, Kenneth Harrelson, and Jessica Watkins, and Proud Boys members Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs, Zachary Rehl, and Dominic Pezzola. This escalates Trump’s earlier mass pardons and commutations issued on his first day in office.

Stewart Rhodes, convicted of seditious conspiracy and sentenced to 18 years in prison, had his sentence commuted to time served by Trump in January. Enrique Tarrio, former Proud Boys leader also convicted of seditious conspiracy and sentenced to 22 years, was similarly pardoned. The remaining defendants had their sentences commuted to time served, though convictions technically remained until these new motions. Federal prosecutors argue that continuing prosecution is not in the interests of justice, according to the filed motions.

Rhodes founded the Oath Keepers anti-government militia group in 2009 and coordinated extensive preparations for armed conflict before January 6, including weapons caches and encrypted messaging discussions about a violent response to the 2020 election. Similarly, Proud Boys members including Nordean, Biggs, and Rehl were convicted after evidence demonstrated they orchestrated a violent plot to stop the peaceful transfer of power. Rehl called for “firing squads” for election “traitors,” and Pezzola was filmed using a stolen Capitol riot shield to break windows during the assault.

The Trump administration is systematically dismantling accountability for the January 6 attack through mass pardons, sentence commutations, and now attempted erasure of convictions. Stewart Rhodes appeared at Trump’s Las Vegas rally in January following his sentence commutation. Additionally, the administration has targeted federal prosecutors involved in January 6 cases and is identifying FBI agents involved in investigations while removing evidence and public statements about the attack from government websites.

Convicted rioters are now suing the federal government alleging excessive force by law enforcement, and the Justice Department has already settled with the family of Ashli Babbitt, who was fatally shot by Capitol police. Trump pledged to review the shooting decision. At least one rioter who called for police to be killed now works for the Trump administration, and a newly launched White House website attributes blame to law enforcement for “deliberately escalating tensions” during the Capitol breach.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-jan-6-oath-keeper-proud-boys-doj-b2957740.html)

Trump Pushes Automatic Draft Registration After Five Dodges

Trump, who evaded the military draft five times during the Vietnam War era through student deferments and a bone spur diagnosis at age 22, is now directing his administration to implement automatic draft registration for 18-year-old males. The Selective Service System has proposed eliminating voluntary self-registration and instead automatically populating its lists from federal databases, a policy Trump approved in December and which awaits regulatory review.

The automatic registration proposal arrives as Trump pursues aggressive military expansion abroad, contradicting his 2024 campaign promises and his self-styled “President of Peace” branding. He has launched wars against Iran and Venezuela, threatened military action against U.S. allies including Mexico, Colombia, Panama, and Greenland, and stated intentions to erase Iran’s “whole civilization.” These actions signal potential reliance on emergency draft measures unused since the 1973 end of the Vietnam War.

Trump has a documented pattern of disrespect toward military personnel, reportedly calling veterans “losers” and “suckers” in private conversations. Additionally, he is exploring whether to award himself the Congressional Medal of Honor, which would make him the first recipient since its 1861 establishment to receive the honor without military service. Despite attending the New York Military Academy, a military-style boarding school, Trump never served in any capacity in the armed forces.

The hypocrisy is stark: the president who avoided mandatory military service five times now seeks to bind teenagers to automatic enrollment in a draft system he himself circumvented. This policy deepens the double standard inherent in forcing working-class youth to assume obligations the wealthy and politically connected have historically evaded.

(Source: https://www.thedailybeast.com/draft-dodging-peace-president-donald-trump-to-register-boys-for-military-draft-at-18/)

Trump Calls America Stupid After Leaving Supreme Court Birthright Citizenship Hearing

President Donald Trump attended Supreme Court arguments regarding his administration’s attempt to eliminate birthright citizenship through executive order, then departed midway through proceedings. Trump’s Solicitor General John Sauer was completing his presentation when Trump left the chamber, and multiple justices appointed by Trump himself voiced skepticism about the administration’s constitutional arguments to strip automatic citizenship rights.

After the hearing concluded, Trump posted on Truth Social attacking the United States as “stupid” for permitting birthright citizenship, falsely claiming America stands alone in this practice. According to Pew Research Center data, 32 other nations maintain substantially similar birthright citizenship laws, predominantly in the Western Hemisphere, while approximately 50 additional countries employ more limited variations of the same principle.

The Supreme Court is currently deliberating whether Trump possesses unilateral executive authority to redefine citizenship standards through presidential order. The justices’ apparent reservations about the administration’s legal position, coupled with Trump’s public contempt for the nation’s founding constitutional framework, underscore the stakes of this proceeding, which will produce a decision by July.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/bulletin/news/trump-supreme-court-birthright-citizenship-debate-stupid-b2950293.html)

Trump Posts Third Term Image on Truth Social Defying 22nd Amendment

Donald Trump posted an image on Truth Social on Sunday depicting himself with text reading “3RD TERM FOR TRUMP AS A REWARD FROM STOLEN ELECTION,” continuing his pattern of promoting a third presidential term despite the constitutional ban imposed by the 22nd Amendment. The post references his false claims about the 2020 election, the same disinformation that motivated supporters to storm the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.

This marks the latest instance of Trump openly discussing a third term while simultaneously selling “Trump 2028” merchandise and discussing the possibility of serving a fourth term. Trump has floated the concept of a “president for life” since at least 2018 and told NBC News in March 2025 that he was “not joking” about seeking a third term, stating “a lot of people want me to do it.”

Trump ally Steve Bannon declared in March 2025 that he and others were “working” to secure Trump a third term, telling NewsNation “I’m a firm believer that President Trump will run and win again in 2028.” Last month, Trump claimed he was “entitled” to a third term, despite the constitutional restriction preventing any president from serving more than two terms.

This persistent focus on extending Trump’s time in office reflects broader authoritarian aspirations, mirroring rhetoric about Trump’s designation of Democrats as America’s “greatest enemy” and his pattern of using Truth Social to communicate directly with supporters while bypassing traditional media scrutiny. Trump’s approval rating averaged approximately 41% according to The New York Times reporting on Sunday.

(Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-once-again-posting-third-173638956.html)

1 2 3 6