Category: Unpresidential

Trump Believes Own Fabricated MS-13 Claims

President Donald Trump recently showcased a digitally altered image on social media, claiming it proves that convicted felon Kilmar Abrego Garcia has a tattoo affiliated with the gang MS-13. During an ABC News interview, Trump insisted this photo depicted real evidence of gang ties, despite it being widely acknowledged as a fake. This incident highlights Trump’s alarming detachment from reality and his willingness to endorse fabricated narratives to bolster his anti-immigrant agenda.

In the April 18 post, Trump brandished a photograph where “MS-13” had been superimposed over real tattoos on Abrego Garcia’s hand, which featured designs unrelated to the gang. The U.S. Supreme Court had mandated that Abrego Garcia, who was wrongfully deported to El Salvador, should be returned to the U.S., but Trump refuses to comply. Instead, he continues to misrepresent facts, portraying Abrego Garcia as guilty by association with the notorious gang, further escalating the ongoing immigration crisis.

During the interview, Trump’s baseless claims were met with skepticism from journalist Terry Moran, who asserted that the image had been altered. Trump, however, persisted in his belief, emphasizing that the only reason such narratives spread is due to “fake news.” The inability of Trump to acknowledge the truth behind the digitally manipulated image is a commentary on his disconnect from factual information and paves the way for further misinformation campaigns.

The situation is exacerbated by Trump’s historical disregard for both the rule of law and the findings of judicial bodies. His administration’s refusal to adhere to the Supreme Court’s directive not only undermines the judicial system but also deepens the ongoing constitutional crisis. Trump unabashedly flaunts his disdain for established legal procedures, reinforcing his authoritarian instincts under the guise of immigration enforcement.

Overall, this episode sheds light on the broader implications of Trump’s rhetoric and the dangerous precedent it sets for legitimate discourse. By spreading misinformation, he fuels xenophobia and undermines democratic principles. Trump’s repeated dismissal of the truth in favor of narrative control exemplifies the troubling inclinations within current Republican leadership that threatens the very foundation of American democracy.

(h/t: https://gizmodo.com/trump-really-believes-his-fake-ms-13-tattoo-photo-is-real-2000596365)

Trump Falsely Claims ‘60 Minutes’ Admitted to ‘Crime’ of Editing Harris Interview

Former President Donald Trump has made false claims regarding CBS’s “60 Minutes,” alleging that the program admitted to a crime by editing an interview with Kamala Harris. This assertion comes alongside his $20 billion lawsuit against Paramount Global and CBS, which he insists is a “true WINNER.” Trump accused the network of deceitfully editing Harris’ response to a question, stating that this act undermined the integrity of the American electoral process and cheated the public.

Both Paramount and CBS have categorically denied Trump’s allegations, labeling his lawsuit as a direct attack on the First Amendment. They argue that Trump’s claims lack any foundation in law or fact. CBS News has stood firm, asserting that the “60 Minutes” broadcast of the Harris interview was neither manipulated nor deceptive.

According to reports, Trump’s legal team is entering mediation with Paramount Global to explore a possible resolution to his lawsuit. Previously, Trump expanded his claims under the federal Lanham Act, demanding at least $20 billion in damages, asserting that the editing of the interview could have affected the outcome of the election.

In a post on his social media platform, Truth Social, Trump claimed that the edited response from Harris was disgraceful, suggesting it would have significantly hampered her electoral performance had it been aired in full. He described the actions of CBS and its parent companies as a “Giant FRAUD against the American People,” insisting they should be held accountable for their alleged misconduct.

The New York Times reported on legal experts regarding the frivolity of Trump’s case, prompting him to lash out at the publication, suggesting it too could face consequences for “tortious interference” in elections. The lawsuit and resulting commentary reveal Trump’s ongoing crusade against media institutions he perceives as adversarial, undermining journalistic integrity while striving to consolidate power and control over the narrative.

(h/t: https://variety.com/2025/tv/news/trump-60-minutes-cbs-admitted-crime-harris-interview-mediation-1236382562/)

Trump’s Loyalty Purge Targets Doug Emhoff From Holocaust Museum Board

In a move that underscores his authoritarian tendencies, President Donald Trump unceremoniously removed Doug Emhoff from the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum board. Emhoff, the former second gentleman, was told of his dismissal on Tuesday, a decision reflective of Trump’s disturbing pattern of purging individuals deemed disloyal. This firing not only disregards the historical significance of Holocaust education but also politicizes a subject that should remain above partisan disputes.

Emhoff condemned his removal, stating, “Holocaust remembrance and education should never be politicized.” His dedication to combating antisemitism and promoting awareness about the Holocaust sets him apart from the current administration’s troubling practices. Emhoff emphasized the importance of maintaining the integrity of commemorating the six million Jews murdered during the Holocaust, a stance that directly challenges the moral bankruptcy of Trump’s politically motivated decisions.

During Emhoff’s tenure on the board, he actively worked to counter rising antisemitism, a commitment evidently clashing with Trump’s divisive political maneuvers. The decision to oust Emhoff aligns with Trump’s prior rhetoric that has been labeled racist and intolerant. The council’s composition includes over 50 presidential appointees, and Trump’s actions suggest a willingness to replace those with political ties to the previous administration.

Alongside Emhoff, other Biden-era appointees—including former chief of staff Ron Klain and domestic policy adviser Susan Rice—were also removed, highlighting a systematic effort by Trump to reshape the board to better align with his administration’s ideology. Trump’s terminations, executed without regard for the qualifications or contributions of those dismissed, further erode public institutions and their integrity.

The White House’s announcement regarding these removals, which included a formal email to affected members, illustrates a disturbing trend of loyalty purges reminiscent of authoritarian regimes. As Trump continues to dismantle the foundations of American democracy, it is evident that his administration prioritizes allegiance to his agenda over the preservation of historical memory and moral truth.

White House Calls Amazon’s Tariff Transparency a Hostile Act Against Trump Policies

The White House has labeled Amazon’s potential decision to disclose tariff costs as a “hostile act.” During a press briefing, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt criticized the company for considering a display feature that would inform consumers about price markups due to tariffs implemented by President Donald Trump. This aggressive stance highlights the Trump Administration’s attempts to shield itself from negative consequences arising from its economic policies.

Leavitt’s remarks came after a news report indicated Amazon was exploring a checkout feature to inform buyers about additional charges stemming from Trump’s trade policies. She openly questioned why Amazon had not shown similar transparency regarding inflation during Joe Biden’s presidency, framing the situation as politically motivated and biased against the Trump administration.

In response, Amazon refuted the report, clarifying that any discussion of listing import charges was limited to a specific ultra-low-cost store initiative and had not been implemented on their main platform. This rebuttal emphasizes Amazon’s distancing from the narrative being crafted by the Trump Administration, which seeks to control the narrative surrounding economic impacts on consumers.

During the same briefing, Leavitt attempted to redirect attention by referencing a past collaboration between Amazon and Chinese propaganda, suggesting that the company had ulterior political motives. However, she was criticized for using outdated information from a partnership that had been ended for over two years, casting doubt on her credibility and motivations.

Furthermore, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent echoed the administration’s views on tariffs, claiming they would result in significant job losses in China. This aligns with the administration’s broader strategy of deflecting criticism of its tariffs by exaggerating their international impacts, while failing to address the negative consequences for American consumers and businesses.

(h/t: https://www.tmz.com/2025/04/29/white-house-accuses-amazon-hostile-act-tariff-costs-on-orders-site/?adid=social-fb&fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR6W4vRlAj8wiySZVYSi6nNwavhwdxPIwFByIjWZELNUL9zt7bYoDZ3YHtBLPw_aem_zdFlhhwktU4FAflLtXW-BA)

Trump’s Pressure Forces Amazon to Conceal Tariff Costs from Consumers

President Donald Trump recently contacted Amazon founder Jeff Bezos to voice his disapproval over a report that Amazon was considering revealing the tariff costs from Trump’s trade policies beside product prices. This communication exemplifies Trump’s aggressive tactics to mitigate any negative reflection on his administration’s policies that impact consumers directly.

The White House reacted strongly against Amazon’s alleged plan, branding it a “hostile and political act.” Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt characterized the decision as an affront to both the administration and the American consumer, despite any transparency that might have benefited shoppers faced with inflated prices due to Trump’s tariffs.

Shortly after Trump’s call, Amazon retracted the proposal, asserting it had “never approved” the plan. This rapid change highlights potential pressure from Trump’s administration in response to any moves perceived as critical of their economic strategy. Amazon clarified that the tariff listing was a consideration solely for its budget shopping section, Amazon Haul, and ultimately dismissed as unnecessary.

Leavitt’s remarks also implicated Bezos in a broader narrative of collaboration between billionaires and the Republican establishment, suggesting Bezos’ previous criticisms of Trump have morphed into an unwarranted allegiance. This relationship raises eyebrows, particularly given Bezos’s recent decisions to limit dissenting viewpoints in the editorial section of the Washington Post, a publication he owns.

As Amazon’s pricing policies become ever more entwined with the effects of Trump’s 145% tariff on goods primarily sourced from China, the implications on consumer prices are severe. Bezos’s interactions with Trump and concessions to his policies exemplify how corporate interests often compromise consumer welfare in the pursuit of profit, aligning with the troubling patterns of greed and discrimination prevalent in the current political landscape.

(h/t: https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2025/04/29/white-house-blasts-amazon-over-tariff-cost-report-hostile-and-political-act.html)

Trump’s Title VI Investigation Targets Harvard Law Review for Alleged Racial Bias

The Trump administration has initiated a Title VI investigation into Harvard University and the Harvard Law Review, citing alleged discriminatory practices in the selection of academic articles. This move is seen as part of a broader campaign against prominent institutions by an administration that uses the guise of civil rights enforcement to impose its political agenda.

According to Craig Trainor, the acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights at the Department of Education, the investigation stems from reports alleging that editorial decisions at the Harvard Law Review were made based on the author’s race, rather than the merit of their work. Trainor emphasized that no institution, regardless of its reputation, is exempt from adhering to federal civil rights laws.

Specific claims have surfaced, including that a Harvard Law Review editor suggested that a submission warranted expedited review solely because the author was a minority. This incident reflects a concerning trend of prioritizing racial identity over qualification, raising questions about the integrity of academic standards.

This investigation aligns with previous actions taken by the Trump administration against Harvard, including the controversial freezing of $2 billion in federal funding due to disagreements over the university’s policies on diversity and inclusion. Harvard has since launched legal action against the administration in response to these budgetary cuts, further escalating tensions.

The ongoing investigation serves as both a warning to other academic institutions and an example of the administration’s authoritarian approach to silencing dissenting voices within the educational realm. By targeting institutions like Harvard, Trump aims to reshape the landscape of higher education, enforcing compliance to his narrow ideology at the expense of academic freedom and equity.

Pastor Barber Arrested for Praying in Capitol Protest

A prominent North Carolina pastor known for his advocacy on social justice was arrested inside the Capitol rotunda while praying, just days after Donald Trump’s administration initiated a controversial task force focusing on alleged anti-Christian bias in government. Reverend William Barber, the leader of the Poor People’s Campaign, was apprehended alongside two other activists despite the nonviolent nature of their gathering. This incident occurred amid heightened tensions regarding the Trump administration’s policies, particularly its budget cuts impacting social programs.

Barber previously delivered a sermon at the Capitol and expressed his intention to protest against the Republican administration’s fiscal decisions that undermine low-income communities and essential services. Following his arrest, he questioned the implications of being penalized for praying, asserting that such actions should not be seen as violations of the rules governing the public areas of the Capitol. His arrest has drawn attention to the broader consequences of increasingly authoritarian measures utilized by the Trump administration against dissenting voices.

Known for his longstanding commitment to progressive causes, Barber has been vocal about the need for civil rights and economic justice, emphasizing the importance of direct action in response to government policies that disproportionately harm marginalized populations. His ongoing efforts focus on various pressing issues, including healthcare accessibility, living wages, and voting rights, particularly in response to Republican-led threats against these fundamental rights.

This event unfolded less than a week after the Justice Department’s task force meeting, which aims to address what they claim to be anti-Christian biases. Critics have pointed out that this is part of a larger trend of trying to undermine the principle of separation of church and state while fostering an environment conducive to conservative ideologies. Barber’s activism counters this narrative by highlighting the detrimental effects of such policies on social and economic justice in communities nationwide.

The actions taken against Barber, including the arrests of peaceful protesters, exemplify the increasing intolerance for dissent under the Trump administration. The implications of these actions extend beyond this singular event, reflecting a broader strategy to suppress political opposition and reinforce a narrative that marginalizes those advocating for social justice in the face of systemic inequality perpetuated by Republican policies.

(h/t: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/william-barber-trump-christian-task-force-b2741146.html)

FBI Director Posts Controversial Arrest Photo of Judge Dugan

The FBI Director Kash Patel recently posted a photo on X showing Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan being taken into custody, which raises significant concerns about adherence to established Justice Department policies. Dugan was arrested on charges of obstructing federal immigration efforts, specifically for allegedly aiding an undocumented immigrant evade arrest. Patel’s caption, “No one is above the law,” underscores a chilling message amidst a climate of intimidation against judicial officials.

According to the Department of Justice’s own guidelines, personnel are prohibited from disclosing photographs of defendants unless it serves a legitimate law enforcement purpose or is already part of the public record. Former Attorney General Eric Holder, who implemented these guidelines during the Obama administration, highlighted that Patel’s post appears to violate these protocols, suggesting the intent was more about intimidation than justice.

Dugan’s attorney, Craig Mastantuono, criticized the FBI’s approach, stating that there was no immediate threat that warranted such a public display. The lack of a genuine safety concern emphasizes that the arrest and subsequent media portrayal serve more to target and intimidate judges who may not align with the current administration’s immigration policies rather than to uphold the law impartially.

This incident illustrates the deeper fractures within the judicial system fostered by the Trump-era rhetoric that often undermines the independence of the judiciary. The implications of such public shaming through social media posts not only affect the individual involved but also send a broader message to others in the judiciary about the potential repercussions of their decisions regarding controversial policies.

The failure of current Attorney General Pam Bondi to clarify or modify this policy following Patel’s post signals a troubling trend that threatens to further politicize the judiciary. Such actions could result in severe consequences for the impartial administration of justice—an alarming reality in the context of ongoing partisan tensions exemplified by Trump’s anti-judiciary vitriol.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/26/politics/patel-wisconsin-judge-photo-violate-conduct/index.html)

FBI Director Kash Patel sparked controversy by posting a photo on X of Wisconsin Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan’s arrest, described as a “perp walk,” which may violate Justice Department policy regarding the treatment of defendants. Dugan was arrested for allegedly obstructing immigration enforcement by helping an undocumented immigrant evade arrest, signifying escalating tensions within U.S. immigration law enforcement.

The photo showcased Dugan handcuffed and being escorted by law enforcement officials, accompanied by Patel’s caption stating, “No one is above the law.” Former Attorney General Eric Holder criticized the post, arguing it contradicts DOJ guidelines that discourage the release of such images unless they serve a legitimate law enforcement purpose. Holder emphasized that the post’s intent appears to promote intimidation rather than uphold justice.

Dugan’s arrest raises significant questions about the current direction of the DOJ under the leadership of Attorney General Pam Bondi. Following Patel’s post, there are concerns regarding whether Bondi has revised the department’s photo release policy, which historically aimed to protect the integrity of judicial proceedings and the presumption of innocence.

This incident reflects broader issues surrounding the politicization of the judiciary, particularly under a Republican-led administration that has shown a willingness to manipulate legal proceedings for political gain. The FBI’s action, alongside Patel’s social media activity, demonstrates a troubling trend of undermining judicial fairness and likely aims to intimidate those who oppose the current administration’s harsh immigration policies.

Dugan faces multiple charges of obstruction and concealing an individual from arrest, but initial court proceedings led to her release from detention. As the legal proceedings unfold, the implications of this case extend beyond Dugan herself, signaling potential dangers to judicial independence and a fair trial in a politicized environment.

Pam Bondi Erodes Press Protections, Reviving Trump-era Threats to Journalism

The U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi has retracted critical protections for journalists put in place during the Biden administration, allowing federal investigators to access communications from media organizations in leak investigations. This move signals a troubling shift in the Justice Department’s stance, corresponding with the Trump administration’s continued hostility towards news outlets it perceives as adversarial.

In a memo obtained by CNN, Bondi claims that the previous administration offered excessive protections to media outlets and accused them of engaging in selective leaking. She stated, “Safeguarding classified, privileged, and other sensitive information is essential to effective government and law enforcement,” further asserting that unauthorized disclosures undermine Trump’s policies and harm the American people.

This policy reversal comes after the Trump administration had previously engaged in aggressive actions against journalists and their sources, signaling a return to tactics reminiscent of that era. Under Bondi, the Justice Department is expected to pursue inquiries into individuals leaking documents to the press, which could further threaten journalistic independence.

While Bondi assures that procedural protections will remain to limit the pursuit of news organization records, the implications of her memo suggest a reinvigorated approach to investigating media leaks. Advocates for press freedom, including the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, emphasize that historical significant journalism depended on the protection of confidential sources, which is now at risk.

Journalistic integrity is under siege as this shift underscores the ongoing struggle between a free press and an administration that seeks to silence dissenting voices and manipulate news coverage to its advantage. The ramifications for investigative journalism and the broader implications for democracy are grave, as trust in the media continues to be undermined by authoritarian tendencies.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/25/politics/justice-department-journalists-leaks/index.html)

Trump Smiles As Pastor Tells Him ‘God Assigned An Angel’ To Save Him From Assassin

During a recent Easter event at the White House, President Donald Trump beamed as Pastor Jentezen Franklin proclaimed that “God assigned an angel” to protect him from an attempted assassination. This assertion has become a central theme among Trump’s supporters, amidst a growing mythos surrounding his supposed divine protection. The event served as a platform for evangelical leaders to express their unwavering support for Trump, further blurring the lines between faith and politics.

As Trump introduced Pastor Franklin, he highlighted the significant backing he has received from religious communities, claiming it has been unprecedented. Franklin, a long-time ally, took the opportunity to thank Trump for his leadership, suggesting that divine intervention played a role in safeguarding him from violence, implying that he is a target due to his political stance.

Such rhetoric not only feeds into the narrative that Trump is somehow divinely ordained but also raises concerns about the dangerous intertwining of politics and religious extremism. The normalization of this discourse reflects the Republican Party’s alignment with radical religious ideologies, manipulating faith for political gain while fostering a culture of victimhood among its followers.

This public display of reverence towards Trump and his repeated claims of divine protection underscores a troubling trend within the Republican base, as they continue to embrace myths that disregard factual reality in favor of sensationalism. The implications are severe, as they not only seek to insulate Trump from accountability but also perpetuate a worldview that is increasingly hostile to dissent and critical thought.

By promoting the idea that God directly intervened to save him, Trump and his supporters further alienate the democratic principles of accountability, transparency, and reasoned debate. Instead, they foster an environment of exclusion and antagonism towards opposing voices, a hallmark of authoritarian regimes, and ultimately jeopardize the future of American democracy.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/news/trump-smiles-as-pastor-tells-him-god-assigned-an-angel-to-save-him-from-assassin/)

1 … 30 31 32 33 34 … 416