Category: Violence

Ashli Babbitt Settlement Highlights Trump’s Martyrdom Narrative for Capitol Rioters

The family of Ashli Babbitt, a rioter who was shot during the January 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, is set to receive a $5 million settlement from the Trump administration. This payout resolves a lawsuit filed by her estate and the conservative group Judicial Watch, which claimed negligence by the Capitol Police officer who shot her as she attempted to breach a barrier. The initial suit sought $30 million in damages. Reports from trusted news sources confirm the settlement details.

Following a thorough investigation, the Justice Department determined that U.S. Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd acted lawfully in self-defense during the incident, clearing him of any criminal wrongdoing. The investigation concluded that Byrd had a reasonable belief that his actions were necessary to protect members of Congress and others within the chambers. The Capitol Police reiterated that Byrd’s actions were consistent with department policies designed to protect against the violent mob that stormed the Capitol.

Despite the findings supporting the officer’s actions, Capitol Police Chief Tom Manger expressed disappointment with the settlement, emphasizing that it sends a troubling message to law enforcement across the nation regarding accountability. The legal resolution does not require the Justice Department to admit any fault for Byrd’s actions, leaving the official stance intact while compensating Babbitt’s family.

Donald Trump has frequently highlighted Babbitt’s death to rally support for those involved in the Capitol attack, framing her as a martyr in the ongoing battle over the legitimacy of the 2020 election. Despite facing significant backlash, he has continued to downplay the violence of the insurrection and characterize her actions in a sympathetic light, juxtaposing them against the culpability of law enforcement.

Trump has also utilized Babbitt’s narrative to strengthen his base, asserting that she was unjustly treated. This case exemplifies the broader context of Republican attempts to legitimize the violent insurrection and to position themselves as defenders of individuals they deem heroes, regardless of the fact that their actions threatened democratic processes.

Trump’s Alliance with Oath Keepers Exposes Dangerous Extremism and Anti-Democratic Sentiments

Stewart Rhodes, founder of the right-wing militia Oath Keepers, made a notable appearance at a recent rally for Donald Trump in Las Vegas. Freshly released from an 18-year prison sentence for his role in the January 6 Capitol insurrection, Rhodes stood behind Trump as he delivered remarks at Circa Resort and Casino.

Rhodes’ attendance underscores the troubling alliance between Trump and extremist groups that engaged in a violent attempt to overturn the 2020 election results. Despite the serious nature of Rhodes’ conviction for seditious conspiracy, Trump has leveraged his executive powers to commute the sentences of Rhodes and 13 other individuals affiliated with far-right organizations, promoting the narrative that they were unfairly treated by the justice system.

Trump’s actions have sparked severe backlash, with critics pointing to his continued support for violent insurrectionists as a further descent into dangerous authoritarianism. He has repeatedly claimed that the sentences handed down to January 6 defendants are overly harsh, even comparing their treatment to that of murderers, which reveals a disturbing attempt to rehabilitate the image of those who actively participated in undermining democracy.

In a further twist of irony, U.S. District Court Judge Amit Mehta issued an order prohibiting Rhodes from approaching the Capitol. However, this directive was challenged by Trump’s Justice Department, which sought to nullify the judge’s authority, showcasing a contempt for judicial processes that contradicts the principles of law and order that Republicans claim to uphold.

This incident reveals the escalating normalization of extremist rhetoric and behavior within the Republican Party, where figures like Trump provide a platform for insurrectionists and make room for fascist ideologies to gain traction. As democracy continues to be threatened by their actions, it is essential to raise awareness of the troubling implications of such alliances and the anti-democratic sentiments they perpetuate.

(h/t: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2025/01/25/oath-keepers-founder-stewart-rhodes-attends-trump-rally-in-vegas/77952616007/)

Trump Pardons January 6 Defendants Including Violent Attackers

In a shocking display of loyalty to insurrectionists, Donald Trump has issued sweeping pardons for nearly 1,500 individuals convicted of participating in the violent January 6th attack on the U.S. Capitol. This announcement, made during a televised event in the Oval Office, underscores Trump’s continued allegiance to those who attempted to overturn the democratic process. Among those pardoned were individuals guilty of assaulting law enforcement officers, further highlighting Trump’s embrace of violence and disregard for law and order.

Trump’s proclamation painted the pardons as a necessary step in healing a purported national injustice, while in reality, these actions reflect a dangerous undermining of accountability for a violent coup attempt. He described the pardoned individuals as “hostages,” indicating a dismissive attitude towards the gravity of their crimes and the threat they posed to democracy. With these pardons, Trump is not just absolving individuals of their legal consequences; he is sending a message that violence against democratic institutions is condoned.

This latest move is part of a broader strategy by Trump and his Republican allies to legitimize and recruit support from extremist factions within their base. Their desperate deflection from accountability reveals a party increasingly willing to embrace authoritarianism and violence in pursuit of power. Instead of addressing the serious implications of the January 6th insurrection, Trump and the Republican Party are capitalizing on the chaos they instigated.

The immediate implications of these pardons are profound: they erode trust in the legal system while empowering citizens who believe that violence can be a legitimate route to achieve political goals. Trump’s actions represent an alarming shift towards normalizing aggression against the democratic process, a hallmark of fascism that threatens the very foundations of American democracy.

As Trump continues to manipulate the narrative surrounding the January 6th events, it becomes increasingly clear that the Republican Party is complicit in this undemocratic agenda. By fostering a climate where violence is viewed as noble and those who engage in it are celebrated, Trump’s leadership not only endangers democracy but invites further unrest, setting a dangerous precedent for the future of the nation.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/news/breaking-trump-pardons-1500-jan-6-defendants-gives-commutations-to-violent-offenders-we-hope-they-come-out-tonight-frankly/)

Trump Says OK If An Assassin Shoots Through The Press

During a recent rally in Lititz, Pennsylvania, former President Donald Trump made shocking remarks suggesting he would not mind if someone attempted to shoot through the media to reach him. This statement, made while he was critiquing the bulletproof glass shielding him, raises serious concerns about his attitude towards violence and the press.

Trump, who has a history of inflammatory rhetoric, referred to the media as “fake news” and “bloodsuckers” while gesturing towards the protective glass. His comments come in the wake of multiple assassination attempts against him, including a recent incident where a bullet grazed his ear and resulted in the death of an audience member.

The former president’s reckless comments not only trivialize the threats against his life but also serve to incite his supporters against the press. By implying that the media is a barrier to him, he dangerously promotes the idea that violence against journalists is acceptable.

Trump’s spokesperson attempted to clarify his remarks, claiming he was trying to protect the media. However, this belies the reality of Trump’s consistent pattern of hostility towards journalists who challenge him. His rhetoric has been known to embolden extremist behavior among his followers, leading to increased violence against the press.

This incident is a stark reminder of the toxic environment Trump has cultivated, where incitement and division take precedence over respect and dignity. As he continues his campaign for the presidency, the implications of his words and their potential effects on public safety and discourse cannot be overstated.

(h/t: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-trump-lititz-pennsylvania-rally-shoot-through-media-bulletproof-glass/)

Trump’s Threatening Remarks Against Liz Cheney Reveal Dangerous Political Rhetoric

During a recent rally in Glendale, Arizona, Donald Trump escalated his attacks against former Representative Liz Cheney, referring to her as a “war hawk” and suggesting she should be fired upon. Trump’s inflammatory language, which included remarks about having guns aimed at Cheney, represents a troubling continuation of his trend of using violent rhetoric against political opponents. This incident comes just days before an election where Trump is already facing scrutiny for undermining public confidence in the electoral process.

Cheney, a prominent critic of Trump, had previously condemned his actions regarding the 2020 election and the January 6th Capitol riot. In response to Trump’s comments, she warned that such threats are characteristic of dictators who aim to suppress dissent. Cheney emphasized the dangers of allowing a “petty, vindictive, cruel, unstable man” like Trump to wield power, highlighting the risks to democracy posed by his rhetoric and actions.

Trump’s remarks have drawn significant backlash, with many viewing them as a dangerous escalation that normalizes violence in political discourse. His campaign attempted to defend his comments by labeling Cheney as a warmonger, yet this defense fails to address the alarming implications of his call to violence against those who criticize him.

The former president’s history of violent language dates back to his first campaign and includes past suggestions of shooting protesters. His insistence on using military force against political dissenters further illustrates his authoritarian tendencies, raising concerns about his suitability as a candidate.

Vice President Kamala Harris has pointed out the implications of Trump’s rhetoric, noting that he is not focused on improving the lives of American citizens but rather on consolidating power through intimidation. As the election approaches, the stakes are high, and it remains crucial for voters to recognize the threat posed by Trump’s continued embrace of violent and divisive language.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/01/politics/donald-trump-liz-cheney-war-hawk-battle/index.html)

Trump’s Dangerous Misinformation Threatens FEMA Workers and Disaster Relief Efforts

In a recent press conference, Donald Trump failed to condemn threats made against Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) workers who are crucial in aiding victims of Hurricane Helene. Instead of addressing the alarming situation, he opted to repeat false claims regarding the agency’s funding and its management of disaster relief efforts. This troubling response raises serious concerns about Trump’s commitment to the safety of relief workers and the integrity of disaster response efforts.

After a man was arrested for threatening FEMA workers, Trump was asked whether his rhetoric was harming recovery efforts. He deflected and rather than expressing concern for the safety of these workers, he perpetuated the narrative that FEMA was mismanaging funds, alleging that disaster relief money was being diverted to assist undocumented immigrants. These claims have been debunked, as FEMA has separate funding streams for disaster relief and immigrant services, with no funds allocated from disaster relief for migrant housing.

Trump’s statements not only undermine the hard work of FEMA agents but also embolden those who may feel justified in threatening them. Ian Sams, a spokesperson for Vice President Kamala Harris, criticized Trump for exploiting public fear and pain for political gain, arguing that his behavior incites potential violence against those working tirelessly to help others in distress.

Moreover, Trump’s misinformation campaign has broader implications, as public officials, including members of his own party, have warned that such rhetoric complicates relief efforts for those affected by natural disasters. White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre emphasized the harmful nature of Trump’s conspiracy theories, labeling them as dangerous and un-American.

As Trump continues to spread falsehoods and neglect the pressing issues facing disaster relief efforts, it becomes increasingly clear that his actions are not only irresponsible but also detrimental to the safety and well-being of Americans in crisis.

(h/t: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/10/21/trump-fema-threats-misinformation-hurricane-helene/)

Trump’s Controversial Remarks on Transgender Athletes During Podcast

Donald Trump engaged in a contentious discussion regarding transgender athletes during a recent appearance on the Barstool Sports podcast, Bussin’ With The Boys. Hosted by former NFL players Will Compton and Taylor Lewan, the episode included Trump expressing his weariness from a packed media schedule while still enjoying the conversation.

As the podcast neared its conclusion, Compton inquired about Trump’s vision for uniting the country. Trump diverged into a critique of transgender participation in sports, specifically stating, “they want men playing in women’s sports” and expressing discomfort with the idea, claiming to have seen athletes get hurt in such circumstances.

During the discussion, Trump erroneously asserted that two Olympic female boxers were actually men. Compton did not challenge Trump’s misinformation but did suggest that one of the boxers should have continued fighting rather than quitting during a match. This statement prompted a back-and-forth between Compton and Trump about the expectations of athletes in high-pressure situations.

Compton argued that a fighter trains their entire life for such moments and should push through injuries, to which Trump sarcastically questioned if the boxer should have “gotten the sh*t knocked out of her.” This comment highlighted the tension between Trump’s views and Compton’s stance on athletic perseverance.

The exchange showcased Trump’s controversial opinions on transgender athletes, which align with a broader narrative among conservative circles that oppose transgender participation in women’s sports. The podcast concluded with Trump shifting topics, reiterating the theme of his earlier comments.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/sports/exhausted-trump-gets-in-tense-spat-with-barstool-sports-hosts-about-trans-athletes-she-should-have-gotten-the-sht-knocked-out-of-her/)

Trump Advocates Violence Against Heckler at California Rally

Former President Donald Trump made controversial remarks during a rally in Coachella, California, suggesting that a heckler should receive violent treatment. In his speech, Trump referred to the upcoming election as an opportunity to deliver a message, and upon noticing the heckler, he said, “She gets the hell knocked out of her,” indicating a disturbing pattern of promoting violence against dissenters.

This incident is not isolated; Trump has a history of using aggressive language towards hecklers. In previous rallies, he has encouraged supporters to physically confront those who interrupt him, contributing to a culture of hostility at his events.

During the rally, Trump painted a grim picture of the United States, labeling it as an “occupied country” and continuously spreading misinformation about undocumented immigrants. He falsely asserted that the nation was overrun by criminal gangs, despite evidence showing that the majority of immigrants do not have criminal backgrounds.

Trump’s rhetoric included plans for a deportation initiative dubbed “Operation Aurora,” aimed at dismantling alleged criminal networks linked to undocumented immigrants. However, local officials disputed his claims about gangs taking over communities, highlighting the disconnect between Trump’s statements and factual reality.

The rally concluded a week filled with Trump’s controversial remarks, including disparaging comments about Vice President Kamala Harris and various Democratic figures. His speeches have increasingly focused on anti-immigrant sentiments while downplaying the complexities of crime statistics related to undocumented immigrants.

(h/t: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/10/12/trump-heckler-violence/)

Trump Attacks Harris and Podcast Host Cooper at Pennsylvania Rally

Former President Donald Trump, during a rally in Scranton, Pennsylvania, criticized Vice President Kamala Harris and podcast host Alexandra Cooper following Harris’s recent interview on the ‘Call Her Daddy’ podcast. In the interview, Harris engaged with a broader audience, particularly emphasizing her response to Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders regarding motherhood and humility.

Trump’s comments focused on his disdain for Cooper, whom he labeled as ‘dumber than Kamala.’ He expressed this sentiment by calling Cooper ‘one dumb woman’ and apologized to women for his remarks. His statement indicates a targeted attack on both women involved in the discussion, reflecting a pattern of dismissive rhetoric.

The backlash against Trump’s comments was swift on social media, with various commentators highlighting his history of misogynistic remarks. Attorney and activist Aaron Parnas expressed that ‘millions of Call Her Daddy fans will not forget this moment,’ signaling the potential impact on Cooper’s audience.

Veteran and commentator Allison Gill remarked on Trump’s perceived animosity toward women and other groups, questioning the competitiveness of his political race. Michelle Kenney, a women’s rights advocate, referenced former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson’s derogatory comment about Trump, adding to the critique of his intelligence and character.

Activist Olivia Julianna pointed out that Trump declined an invitation to join Cooper’s show, suggesting a reluctance to discuss women’s issues, further asserting that his comments stem from a deep-seated hatred toward women.

(h/t: https://www.rawstory.com/donald-trump-2669368749/)

Trump’s Rally Remarks Draw Parallels to ‘The Purge’, Spark Outrage

 

Donald Trump proposed a controversial policy during a rally in Pennsylvania, which many critics have likened to legalizing “The Purge.” This remark drew significant backlash on social media, with commentators and journalists drawing parallels to the dystopian film series that portrays a government-sanctioned free-for-all of crime for a 12-hour period.

At the rally, Trump expressed dissatisfaction with current policing practices, claiming that police are not permitted to effectively perform their duties. He suggested that to curb crime, a singular day of extreme violence would be necessary, stating, “one really violent day” would send a message to deter criminal activity.

Responses to Trump’s comments were swift and critical. Political analysts and media figures noted the alarming nature of his suggestion, with some questioning whether he had been inspired by the film series itself or independently arrived at such an idea.

Among the critics was University of Texas law professor Lee Kovarsky, who highlighted the distinction between asserting hard truths and making reckless statements. The overall sentiment on social media reflected deep concern about Trump’s call for what many interpreted as an endorsement of police brutality.

Former presidential speechwriter Dan Cluchey remarked on the gravity of the situation, suggesting that a presidential candidate calling for a violent day of police action should warrant significant media attention. The implications of Trump’s rhetoric sparked discussions about law enforcement practices and the potential consequences of such extreme proposals.

The rally further illustrated the challenges Trump faces in maintaining audience engagement, as reports indicated that some attendees were leaving during his speech, suggesting a disconnect between his messaging and public interest. Overall, the incident raised serious questions about the direction of political discourse in the United States.

 

1 2 3 … 15