Category: Attack Law Enforcement

FBI Agent Resigns as DOJ Blocks Renee Good Shooting Probe

FBI supervisor Tracee Mergen resigned from the Minneapolis field office after Washington leadership pressured her to abandon a civil rights investigation into ICE officer Jonathan Ross, who fatally shot 37-year-old Renee Good on January 7. Such inquiries are standard procedure following officer-involved shootings. The Trump administration weaponized the Justice Department by instead investigating Good and her partner for alleged ties to left-wing protest groups, prompting at least six senior prosecutors in the Minneapolis U.S. attorney’s office to resign in protest.

Senior Justice Department officials have stated there are no plans to investigate whether Ross used excessive force when he fired multiple shots at the unarmed mother sitting in her vehicle. Federal investigators refused to cooperate with state and local Minnesota prosecutors seeking to open their own inquiry into the shooting. The New York Times video analysis found no evidence supporting Trump administration officials’ claims that Good attempted to ram Ross with her Honda Pilot, yet they publicly labeled her a “domestic terrorist.”

The Justice Department simultaneously opened investigations into Minnesota Democratic elected officials, including Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, scrutinizing whether they conspired to obstruct Trump’s immigration enforcement through public statements. Subpoenas were issued this week to their offices and St. Paul Mayor Kaohly Her’s office as part of this effort.

The department prosecuted three protesters—Nekima Levy-Armstrong, Chauntyll Louisa Allen, and William Kelly—charging them with conspiracy for interrupting a church service to protest a pastor’s apparent ICE work, alleging they “intimidated, harassed, oppressed and terrorized the parishioners.” Federal judges denied prosecutors’ requests to detain the three while awaiting trial.

These actions reflect a coordinated strategy by the Trump administration’s Justice Department to shield federal immigration enforcement from oversight, punish Democratic critics of ICE operations, and criminalize protest activity opposing deportation policies, while Trump falsely claimed protesters were paid agitators.

(Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/23/us/fbi-agent-ice-shooting-renee-good.html)

Patel Purges FBI Agents Tied to Trump Criminal Investigations

FBI Director Kash Patel has orchestrated a systematic removal of senior agents from the bureau’s field offices, targeting officials directly involved in investigations of Donald Trump. The special agents in charge in Atlanta and New Orleans were ousted, along with the acting assistant director of the New York field office, while approximately six agents in Miami were forced out for their role in the Mar-a-Lago search that recovered classified documents stored at Trump’s Florida resort. Additional agents were removed for involvement in the Arctic Frost investigation into Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

The scale of these removals is unprecedented in FBI history, an agency traditionally staffed by non-political civil servants operating as an independent law enforcement body. Patel and his staff informed conservative media outlets they are committed to purging anyone involved in authorizing payments to confidential sources who identified January 6 insurrectionists, making clear the political targeting of personnel based on their prior investigative work.

The timing of these firings coincided with former special counsel Jack Smith’s Capitol Hill testimony defending his prosecution decisions in both the classified documents case and the election interference investigation. Smith testified that his investigative approach was legally sound, but Republican lawmakers attacked him for alleged bias while Trump demanded Attorney General Pam Bondi investigate Smith during the hearing itself.

The FBI Agents Association has stated that firing agents without evidence of misconduct or proper legal cause violates proper procedure, yet Patel has proceeded without restriction. Prior to these removals, Patel fired a dozen agents for kneeling during a racial justice protest following George Floyd’s death, demonstrating a pattern of personnel decisions based on political alignment rather than professional standards.

The Trump Justice Department had already removed most senior FBI leadership in Washington before Patel took office, establishing the institutional groundwork for this continued dismantling. Some terminated agents, including former acting FBI Director Brian Driscoll, are pursuing legal action against Patel, challenging the legality of dismissals conducted without documented cause.

(Source: https://www.ms.now/news/kash-patel-fbi-senior-agents-ousted-trump-jan-6-mar-a-lago)

Trump Demands Jack Smith Prosecution After Election Conspiracy Testimony

President Donald Trump demanded prosecution of former special counsel Jack Smith on Truth Social following Smith’s House Judiciary Committee testimony on Thursday, labeling him “Deranged” and accusing him of perjury and destroying lives. Smith had testified that he possessed evidence “beyond a reasonable doubt” that Trump conspired to overturn the 2020 election, investigating both the January 6 Capitol riot and classified documents stored at Mar-a-Lago.

During his public testimony, Smith stated he anticipated the Trump Department of Justice would attempt to indict him, characterizing Trump’s social media attacks as intimidation tactics and warnings to others who challenge the president. Smith declared he would not be intimidated and affirmed his team followed department policy, facts, and law in their investigation, which produced proof of serious crimes.

Attorney General Pam Bondi has already acted on Trump’s prior social media suggestions to prosecute perceived enemies, initiating charges against New York Attorney General Letitia James, former FBI Director James Comey, and former National Security Advisor John Bolton. Trump continues to falsely claim the 2020 election was rigged, repeating this assertion at the World Economic Forum in Davos this week while predicting prosecutions of unspecified individuals responsible for the alleged fraud.

Smith’s testimony directly contradicted Trump’s assertions, with the former prosecutor explaining that his investigation followed established legal procedures and produced substantial evidence of criminal conduct. Trump’s demand for Smith’s prosecution exemplifies his pattern of weaponizing the Justice Department against adversaries and leveraging federal power to silence critics and investigators.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/deranged-jack-smith-should-be-prosecuted-trump-calls-for-special-counsels-indictment-in-angry-truth-social-post/)

Leavitt Defends ICE Shooting, Dismisses Renee Good Protesters

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt dismissed Minneapolis protesters demonstrating against the fatal shooting of 37-year-old poet and mother Renee Good by ICE officer Jonathan Ross, questioning their grievances during a Monday press gaggle. Leavitt framed the killing as justified self-defense, claiming Good rammed Ross with her vehicle during what she characterized as an organized effort to impede law enforcement operations. Vice President JD Vance has falsely claimed the officer is protected by absolute immunity, a legal assertion that contradicts established law.

Leavitt attacked protesters by asserting they opposed ICE’s removal of individuals she described as “heinous murderers and rapists and criminals,” framing opposition to the agency as protection of “illegal alien pedophiles” rather than engagement with the specific circumstances of Good’s death. She declared ICE performs a critical national security function and pledged the administration’s full support for “the brave men and women of ice, including the officer in Minneapolis.” This rhetorical strategy conflated general immigration enforcement with the narrow question of whether Ross’s use of lethal force was proportional and lawful.

Protesters have explicitly demanded ICE’s removal from their communities, justice for Good, and state involvement in the shooting investigation—specific demands grounded in accountability for the killing itself. President Trump has blocked Minnesota state investigators from the probe, citing the state’s purportedly “corrupt” government, centralizing control over the investigation in federal hands where the Trump administration exercises direct authority over the Department of Justice.

Video evidence of the incident has been widely described as a “Rorschach Test” reflecting observers’ preexisting political positions rather than settling disputed facts about whether Good’s actions constituted a lethal threat requiring deadly force in response. Leavitt’s dismissal of protesters’ concerns sidestepped the substantive questions surrounding the shooting itself, instead reframing the event within an immigration enforcement narrative designed to delegitimize dissent.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/protesting-what-exactly-karoline-leavitt-rages-at-protesters-angry-over-renee-good-shooting/)

Trump Calls Former FBI Agent ‘Dirty Cop’ During Rant in South Korea

President Donald Trump, during a rant on his Truth Social platform, labeled former FBI agent Walter Giardina as a “dirty cop.” Trump’s outburst came while he was in South Korea attending the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit. The comments were part of a broader tirade against various individuals he perceives as enemies, reflecting his ongoing grievances against them.

In his early morning post, Trump named Giardina and other figures including Deranged Jack Smith, and members of the DOJ team such as Lisa Monaco and Andrew Weissmann, calling for their immediate investigation. He claimed these individuals orchestrated what he termed the “corrupt J-6 Witch Hunt,” a reference to the investigation into the January 6 Capitol riot. Trump’s rhetoric emphasizes his belief that these officials are a “disgrace to our Nation.”

Giardina, who was among those who were fired during a wave of dismissals that critics have described as a “campaign of retribution,” reportedly resisted providing names of FBI agents involved in the January 6 inquiries. His termination along with others has raised significant questions about the implications of Trump’s actions on law enforcement and accountability.

At the APEC summit, Trump reportedly made headlines for mimicking Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, showcasing his ongoing controversial engagement with world leaders. The context of his rhetoric and its implications suggests a further entrenchment of divisive political narratives.

This latest tirade reinforces Trump’s pattern of targeting those he feels have opposed him, often utilizing social media to amplify his grievances against the government and judicial figures. The dynamics of his administration’s relationship with various law enforcement and justice entities remain contentious and fraught with accusations.

FBI Agent Fired for Defying Trump’s Perp Walk Order of Comey

An FBI agent has been relieved of duty for refusing to participate in a planned “perp walk” of former FBI Director James Comey, who was federally charged with false statements and obstruction. This action underscores President Donald Trump’s ongoing campaign against those he perceives as political enemies, and marks a notable escalation in his administration’s tactics.

Comey, who has consistently denied any wrongdoing, is set to appear in court in Alexandria, Virginia, after being charged on September 25. The preparations for a public display of his custody were reportedly orchestrated by senior FBI officials, although it’s unclear how or when they intended to execute the plan.

Trump’s vendetta against Comey began when he was fired in 2017, and since then, the former president has relentlessly attacked Comey’s integrity regarding the FBI’s Russia investigation into links between Trump’s campaign and Russian interference in the 2016 election. The indictment of Comey represents a significant move by Trump’s Justice Department, as it targets a prominent figure who has been a vocal opposition to the president’s methods.

The motivation behind this indictment and the push for a perp walk can be seen as part of Trump’s broader strategy of using the justice system to intimidate and undermine his adversaries, a tactic he has hinted at since his presidential campaign launched in 2015. This incident not only highlights Trump’s ongoing political retribution methods but also illustrates the lengths to which he will go to silence his critics.

An attorney for Comey has declined to comment on the case, leaving the motivations and implications of these charges open to interpretation. As Trump’s administration continues to seek retribution against critics like Comey, the dangers to democratic processes and standards of legal accountability are laid bare, revealing a troubling commitment to authoritarian tactics aimed at consolidating power.

DOJ Subpoenas Records from Fani Willis Following Trump Indictment

The Department of Justice has initiated an investigation into Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, who was responsible for the election crimes case resulting in Donald Trump’s notable mugshot. This development arises in the wake of the recent indictment of former FBI Director James Comey, highlighting a potential targeting of Trump’s opponents by the DOJ under his administration. The DOJ has issued a subpoena for records related to Willis’s travel history during the fall of 2024, coinciding with last year’s election.

Despite allegations of Trump attempting to exert influence over the Attorney General to pursue a list of adversaries, his spokesperson has denied any intent to retaliate against investigators. The true motives behind the DOJ’s scrutiny of Willis remain ambiguous, particularly regarding whether she herself is a target of the investigation.

The grand jury proceedings, which are typically shrouded in secrecy, add another layer of complexity to this unfolding scenario. A federal grand jury has requested information that could reflect either the legality of Willis’s actions or possibly undermine her ongoing work in prosecuting Trump, who remains entangled in numerous legal challenges.

Meanwhile, Trump’s defense against the broader allegations is faltering, further complicated by internal conflicts within the DOJ where some prosecutors have questioned the validity of the charges against Comey. This interplay of legal maneuvers illustrates the contentious atmosphere surrounding Trump’s ongoing battles with law enforcement and government officials.

As these events progress, the relationship between Trump and the judiciary continues to be strained, raising serious questions about the integrity of prosecutorial decisions and the extent of political influence in legal matters. The scrutiny on Willis represents an alarming trend where the rule of law comes into question, particularly as it pertains to those opposing Trump’s agenda.

Trump’s Malicious Rant Against Comey Amid Forcing His DOJ To Prosecute Enemies

Amid a series of online tirades, President Donald Trump has escalated his attacks on former FBI Director James Comey following Comey’s recent indictment. Trump’s relentless criticism, deemed by many as self-defeating, could inadvertently arm Comey’s defense against what is perceived as political persecution. Observers note that Trump’s aggressive strategies may backfire, strengthening Comey’s argument of malicious prosecution.

In a display of inherent authoritarianism, Trump has pressured Attorney General Pam Bondi to pursue legal charges against his political enemies, including Comey. Following the indictment announcement, Trump expressed gratitude to the FBI for their “brilliant work” and labeled Comey as a “total SLIMEBALL,” reinforcing his narrative while simultaneously raising eyebrows about the propriety of such attacks.

Trump’s ongoing animosity toward Comey, framed as a corrupt actor in Trump’s worldview, reflects a broader strategy aimed at undermining his political rivals. By casting Comey in a negative light, Trump appears to be pursuing a vendetta rooted deeply in past grievances, particularly related to the investigations surrounding Trump’s own campaign.

Additionally, Trump’s vitriol has extended to other perceived adversaries, with calls for the dismissal of officials like Lisa Monaco, whom he accuses of participating in a “Deep State” conspiracy. This rhetoric exemplifies a dangerous trend of painting law enforcement and legal apparatus as weapons for attacking dissenting voices and political foes.

Despite the backlash, Trump remains undeterred, continuing to wield social media as a platform for his incendiary remarks. He maintains that his actions and statements represent a fight against a corrupt political system, thereby entrenching the narrative of a battle between him and what he deem “enemies” of the state.

FBI Fires 20 Agents for Kneeling at George Floyd Protest

The FBI has dismissed up to 20 agents for participating in a protest in Washington, D.C., following George Floyd’s death in 2020. The agents, primarily from the FBI’s Washington Field Office, were reportedly photographed kneeling at the protest, a symbolic act of solidarity with the Black Lives Matter movement.

Despite the Bureau’s refusal to comment on the specific details of the firings, sources indicate that this decision marks a significant disciplinary action against members of the FBI who engaged in a form of peaceful protest. This event highlights the ongoing tensions within law enforcement regarding issues of race and civil rights.

The recent firings also come amidst a broader context where trust in federal institutions is being actively undermined by figures like Donald Trump, who continuously attacks the FBI and promotes a narrative of corruption within it. Trump’s emphasis on loyalty to partisan interests further complicates the environment in which federal agents operate.

The tumultuous political landscape has fostered an atmosphere where expressions of solidarity or concern for civil rights within law enforcement are met with severe repercussions, reflecting an authoritarian tendency in response to widespread protests against systemic racism.

This incident serves as a troubling reminder of the current administration’s priorities, where acknowledgment of societal issues is deemed unacceptable, contrasting sharply with the needs of the communities these agents serve.

James Comey Indicted in Trump’s Ongoing Legal Vendetta

Former FBI Director James Comey has been indicted by a federal grand jury, marking a drastic move in President Donald Trump’s contentious campaign against his political adversaries. This indictment, possibly spurred by Trump’s relentless vendetta, specifically accuses Comey of providing false statements and obstructing congressional proceedings during investigations tied to Trump’s initial presidential campaign and its alleged collusion with Russia.

Attorney General Pam Bondi, facing pressure from Trump to pursue criminal charges against his foes, released a public statement asserting that “no one is above the law.” This rhetoric, however, is seen as an attempt to leverage the Justice Department for personal vendettas, a tactic consistent with Trump’s efforts to portray his opponents as corrupt while shielding himself from criticism concerning his actions.

Information about the case suggests internal hesitations among prosecutors regarding the legitimacy and strength of the charges against Comey. Notably, Trump has expressed dissatisfaction with the legal system’s handling of his past investigations, demanding that rapid actions be taken against those he deems guilty. “I just want people to act,” Trump stated, indicating his belief that swift justice should be meted out against opponents regardless of detailed legal considerations.

Some observers inside the White House believe the prosecution of Comey may stem from a toxic blend of personal animosity and political ambition, underpinned by Trump’s strategy of retaliating against those who oppose him. Stephen Miller, a prominent Trump aide, has even gone so far as to label Comey as “corrupt” and part of a larger conspiracy against Trump, further fueling the narrative of political weaponization within the Justice Department.

As this indictment unfolds, it exemplifies the increasing polarization of American politics and raises significant concerns about the erosion of judicial independence in favor of partisan objectives. Trump’s method of utilizing legal mechanisms as instruments against opponents signals an alarming trend in undermining democratic institutions in pursuit of personal and political power.

1 2 3 … 21