Trump Lies About Charlie Kirk Spurring Religious Revival

During his State of the Union address on February 27, 2026, Trump falsely claimed that a “tremendous renewal in religion, faith, Christianity and belief in God” occurred during his presidency, specifically attributing this supposed revival to Charlie Kirk. Trump stated Kirk was instrumental in driving religiosity among young people, describing him as “my great friend” and “great guy.” This lie contradicts extensive polling and survey data spanning years.

Multiple independent sources directly contradict Trump’s claim. The General Social Survey, conducted biennially over decades, shows young Americans have become consistently less likely to attend religious services, not more. Comparing 2016 to 2024 data, the percentage of every age group reporting never attending services increased during Trump’s first term. Pew Research Center analysis reinforces this finding, with researcher Gregory Smith explicitly stating that “our recent polls, along with other high-quality surveys we have analyzed, show no clear evidence that this kind of nationwide religious resurgence is underway.” Church attendance among young Americans aged 18 to 24 remained statistically flat from 2020 to 2025.

Trump appears to have distorted a report from Barna Group and Gloo published before Kirk’s death, which identified marginal increases in church attendance among Generation Z males. However, both organizations have financial interests in promoting religious engagement. Additionally, only about one quarter of adults under 30 were very familiar with Kirk, according to YouGov polling. Given that younger Americans skew politically left and Kirk’s work was explicitly political rather than religious, the notion that he drove any meaningful religious resurgence is unsupported.

Trump’s false claim serves multiple propaganda functions. First, it reinforces his campaign narrative that he is America’s savior, particularly for conservative white voters anxious about Christianity’s declining cultural influence. Second, it weaponizes Kirk’s death by reframing him as a martyr “murdered for his beliefs” while advancing Christian nationalist grievance narratives that position religious conservatives as oppressed and in need of Trump’s protection.

The lie exemplifies Trump’s pattern of fabricating national triumphs to justify his continued grip on power. By claiming a religious revival that data categorically disproves, Trump manufactures false evidence that his leadership benefits the Christian voters whose electoral support he depends on, regardless of measurable reality.

(Source: https://www.ms.now/opinion/trump-charlie-kirk-religion-church-attendance)