Laughing Trump Drops Stunning Admission to Screaming Fans — ‘Sh*thole Countries’ Rant He Denied Was Real

During a recent rally at the Mount Airy Casino Resort, President Donald Trump openly acknowledged his infamous “sh*thole countries” comment, revealing that he still holds disdain for predominantly Black nations while favoring those like Norway and Denmark. Laughter erupted among his supporters as Trump recounted how he questioned the rationale behind accepting immigrants from troubled nations like Somalia and Haiti.

In his speech, Trump faced mounting economic criticism, calling concerns over rising prices a “con job,” and asserted that he had already resolved these issues. The rally was a response to unfavorable polling data that highlighted his declining popularity concerning economic management.

Trump’s emphasis on a permanent pause on immigration from what he termed “hell holes” illustrates his continued focus on anti-immigration rhetoric. This tone has become a hallmark of his public speaking, which resonates with his base but raises alarms regarding his attitudes toward race and immigration.

The event showcased the former president refining his controversial views in front of a supportive crowd, reaffirming his commitment to restricting immigration from certain countries while promoting his narrative of economic recovery. Such language and themes are indicative of his broader attempts to solidify his political base amid ongoing scrutiny.

Trump’s remarks not only reignite the debate over his immigration policies but also reflect his enduring brand of divisive politics, as he leverages humor and inflammatory statements to maintain his support during tumultuous times.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/laughing-trump-drops-stunning-admission-to-screaming-fans-shthole-countries-rant-he-denied-was-real/)

Trump Rejects ASL Access, Claims It’s a Threat to Control

The Trump administration is embroiled in a lawsuit concerning American Sign Language (ASL) interpretation services, which the Department of Justice claims would impede the President’s ability to control his public image. This follows a lawsuit filed by the National Association for the Deaf, arguing that halting ASL interpretation denies the deaf community access to essential information from the White House. The association highlights the ongoing struggle for meaningful communication access, particularly during significant national events.

Government attorneys assert that providing real-time ASL interpretation could disrupt Trump’s carefully crafted image and messaging. They suggested alternative forms of access, such as online transcripts and closed captioning, while questioning whether other government branches would face similar demands for such services. Critics note the lack of a compelling argument for why ASL interpretation might damage Trump’s image.

Despite having begun to provide some ASL interpretation, the White House has appealed a federal judge’s ruling that mandated real-time interpreting for Trump’s comments. The administration’s ongoing refusal to comply fully aligns with its broader trend of dismantling diversity and inclusion initiatives. This effort has been part of Trump’s agenda since returning to office, reflecting an administration characterized by its opposition to inclusivity efforts.

The Biden administration had previously utilized ASL interpretation regularly for press briefings and public communications. By contrast, Trump’s refusal has raised significant backlash from advocates for the deaf community, who argue that the right to access information is fundamental. The criticism highlights a troubling disregard for inclusivity that many see as indicative of Trump’s broader governance style.

In the context of broader cultural changes, Trump’s administration has made headlines for reversing various diversity, equity, and inclusion strategies. These actions extend beyond communication access and reflect a more general trend of retrenchment against modern inclusion standards across federal institutions.

(Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/sign-language-services-intrude-on-trumps-ability-to-control-his-image-administration-says?fbclid=IwdGRleAOqX5BleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeHJfMLdhICo9nd7vHzSUY2cYHrNRToiWt-kC7POMm7phct9AN-695oabeAjw_aem_UWDFChTHUxTGRfUzJy8nAA)

Trump Receives FIFA Peace Prize as Justice Drops Bribery Case

Following President Donald Trump's acceptance of FIFA's inaugural “FIFA Peace Prize,” the U.S. Department of Justice announced it would drop an international bribery case related to soccer, raising eyebrows among observers regarding the timing. The award, presented by FIFA President Gianni Infantino, was celebrated as a recognition of Trump's supposed contributions to peace, despite a notable lack of credible accomplishments in that regard. This ceremony took place soon after Trump was snubbed by the Nobel Peace Prize, which went to Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado.

The bribery case involved former Fox executive Hernan Lopez and the Argentina-based marketing firm Full Play Group, associated with a larger corruption investigation into FIFA's operations. Lopez had previously been found guilty of facilitating bribes to secure broadcasting rights for South American soccer tournaments. The Justice Department's subsequent move to dismiss the case has sparked suspicions of quid pro quo, particularly given the historical context of Trump's administration's treatment of legal matters.

Prosecutors cited that the dismissal was “in the interests of justice,” which many interpret as a misguided attempt to align with Trump's controversial policies and actions around corruption. This development indicates not just a troubling pattern but a dangerous normalization of political favoritism. Trump's record includes dismantling units within the Justice Department that investigate public corruption, rendering the legal framework increasingly tenuous.

The juxtaposition of Trump receiving a "peace prize" while simultaneously walking away from serious corruption prosecutions exemplifies a chaotic administration more concerned with image than integrity. Additionally, the broader implications of such actions reveal a disconcerting trend toward undermining institutional trust and accountability, compounding the internal and external challenges facing the U.S.

In short, this incident exemplifies the administration’s troubling priorities, as it continues to reward loyalty while sidelining legal accountability, revealing a dangerous erosion of ethical standards in political practice.

(Source: https://www.comicsands.com/trump-fifa-doj-bribery?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwdGRleAOpRG9leHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEetak0mC26NZd4OVGItxykKy9HrWqWpMgnKadL5NpKvB26kvnIX0MTIHF1-bs_aem_OfXohv8so-2HnvLtQWCCUw#Echobox=1765563538)

Trump Demands CNN Sale Amid Warner Bros. Discovery Battle

In a recent White House roundtable, President Donald Trump took a bold stance on the future of Warner Bros. Discovery, declaring it is “imperative that CNN be sold.” These comments appear to support Paramount’s hostile bid to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery, which includes CNN, aligning Trump with CEO David Ellison’s plans for sweeping changes at the news network.

Trump has long criticized CNN for its coverage, asserting that the network spreads “poison” and “lies.” His remarks come at a time when concerns are growing among CNN journalists about the potential impact of an Ellison takeover on the network’s editorial independence. This situation is compounded by Ellison’s recent attempt to combine his corporate strategy with support from Trump’s administration.

Despite Trump’s obvious favoritism toward a Paramount takeover, it’s unclear whether such a sale would genuinely enhance CNN’s reporting integrity. Ellen’s ties to Trump, including political donations and promises for substantial changes, have raised eyebrows regarding how CNN’s coverage of Trump might be affected under new ownership.

The ongoing negotiations surrounding Warner Bros. Discovery, which may include a split into two publicly traded entities, further complicate matters. As Netflix also eyes parts of the Warner conglomerate, the results of these bidding wars could reshape the landscape of media coverage significantly.

While Trump has claimed to support a leadership change at CNN, the essential question remains whether any new owner can genuinely guarantee the network’s journalistic independence. The current leadership at Warner Bros. Discovery has emphasized a commitment to maintaining CNN’s editorial autonomy, a promise that may face scrutiny if ownership changes hands amid such politically charged circumstances.

(Source: https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/10/media/trump-cnn-sold-paramount-warner-bros-netflix)

Trump Launches Controversial $1 Million Gold Card Visa Program

Donald Trump has announced a new “gold card” visa program that allows foreigners to gain permanent residency in the U.S. by paying $1 million. The card features Trump’s image alongside national symbols such as the Statue of Liberty and a bald eagle, reinforcing his branding while commodifying immigration. The program aims to fast-track applications for those who can afford it, effectively prioritizing wealth over need.

Trump revealed details about the card on Truth Social, declaring it a direct path to citizenship for qualified individuals willing to make significant financial contributions to the U.S. The initiative requires a $1 million donation for individuals or $2 million for corporate applications on behalf of employees, raising ethical questions about the monetization of citizenship.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick reported a significant success during the program’s rollout, claiming the sale of 1,000 gold cards on its launch day, which supposedly raised $5 billion. Those who hold the gold card may apply for citizenship after five years, creating a fast-track, profit-driven process that undermines traditional immigration pathways and values.

The gold card’s design resembles previous promotional items, featuring Trump’s picture and signature as a central theme, further entrenching his personal brand in governmental functions. Critics argue this move continues a trend of leveraging the immigration system for personal gain, spotlighting the intersection of wealth, privilege, and citizenship.

On top of the gold card scheme, Trump has also hinted at introducing platinum cards, which would provide limited residency without taxation on foreign income, again emphasizing the financial barrier for those seeking to enter the U.S.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-unveils-1-million-gold-card-with-his-mug-and-bald-eagle-for-quickie-visas-so-exciting/)

Trump Claims 6G Lets You See Deeper into Skin

In a recent meeting with business leaders, President Donald Trump made an unusual claim regarding the upcoming 6G cellular networks. He suggested that these advanced networks would allow for a capability to see “a little bit deeper view into somebody’s skin,” a statement that reflects a lack of understanding about the technology.

During this meeting, Qualcomm CEO Cristiano Amon briefed Trump on the developments of 6G technology. Trump, who boasted about his role in promoting 5G, jumped in with his bizarre commentary about viewing people’s skin, highlighting a troubling disconnect from reality. He reminisced about “the cameras from the old days,” failing to provide coherent thoughts on the subjects discussed.

The remarks are yet another example of Trump’s tendency to make unfounded and confusing assertions. His comments have left many questioning his grasp of technological advancements and their implications.

This incident isn’t isolated and adds to the list of surreal statements made by Trump. His fixation on technology often strays into the nonsensical, raising valid concerns about his understanding of significant issues facing the nation.

As Trump continues to make headlines for his unconventional views and statements, his claims regarding 6G serve as a reminder of his unpredictable approach to office and engagement with experts in vital fields.

(Source: https://www.rawstory.com/trump-6g-networks-skin/)

Trump’s Demented Riff on Dolls and Pencils Highlight Cognitive Decline

During a recent rally, President Donald Trump delivered a bizarre monologue regarding pencils and the extravagance of buying “37 dolls for your daughter,” as he attempted to defend his handling of the affordability crisis. Despite numerous polls reflecting a backlash against his economic policies, Trump dismissively labeled concerns over rising prices as a “con job,” insisting that he has already resolved the issue. His remarks came during a lengthy speech at the Mount Airy Casino Resort, where he further discussed the positive impact of his tariffs on U.S. steel production.

Trump’s bizarre comments highlighted his disregard for the economic struggles faced by Americans, as he suggested families could forego excessive purchases of dolls and pencils instead of addressing the root causes of inflation and cost-of-living increases. He claimed that the tariffs have revitalized steel production in the United States, framing this as a national security issue. His cavalier attitude towards essential purchases reflects a profound disconnect from the everyday experiences of ordinary citizens.

Despite his insistence that Americans could sacrifice non-essential items, Trump’s policies have contributed to economic hardship. This was especially evident as he faced criticism for the effects of his tariffs on consumer goods, which have only exacerbated inflation. Rather than taking responsibility for these challenges, he deflected with whimsical suggestions about what families need.

Trump’s rhetoric points to a broader issue within his administration: a failure to engage with the tangible economic realities that most Americans encounter daily. As he continues to downplay the significance of affordability, it becomes clear that his understanding of the economic landscape remains detached from the struggles faced by many.

In the face of a fluctuating economy that threatens livelihoods, Trump’s focus on abstract concepts, like his tariffs and metaphorical suggestions of excess doll purchases, serves as a symptom of his inability to prioritize the actual needs of his constituents, further solidifying his status as a controversial and divisive figure in American politics.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-wanders-through-bizarre-riff-about-not-buying-pencils-or-37-dolls-to-combat-affordability-crisis/)

Trump Claims Acing Three Cognitive Tests Amid Health Scrutiny

During a recent post on Truth Social, Donald Trump claimed he underwent three cognitive tests, boasting about his performance monitored by numerous physicians. His assertions come amidst growing scrutiny regarding his health, including reports of him dozing off during cabinet meetings. Trump responded to these allegations by stating that he participates in extensive medical examinations at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, where he insists he receives “PERFECT marks.”

Trump described these cognitive tests as unique, suggesting that few are capable of passing them successfully, yet his admission raises eyebrows. Commenting on his claims, former Rep. Justin Amash stated that such pronouncements would typically signal mental instability in anyone else, emphasizing Trump’s unusual behavior regarding this matter. Critiques flooded social media, with commentators questioning the validity of his assertions regarding cognitive function.

Trump’s recent declarations appear to be an attempt to counteract rumors about his declining health, particularly in light of his past ridicule of Joe Biden as “Sleepy Joe.” Observers, including commentators from news outlets, pointed out the oddity of a healthy senior requiring three cognitive assessments, implying this raises doubts about his current well-being.

Notably, Trump’s claims seem to conflict with observations of his performance, prompting discussions about the implications of such a state for someone holding the highest office. As reactions mounted online, many speculated that this is an acknowledgment of serious health issues rather than a demonstration of prowess.

The discourse surrounding Trump’s health is significant, considering his history of dismissing public concerns about cognitive decline in others. This new information serves to highlight the paradox between his past derision of opponents and his current situation.

(Source: https://www.rawstory.com/alternet-posts/trump-chris-hayes/)

Trump Calls Health Reports ‘Treasonous’ Following Criticism

Donald Trump criticized The New York Times for reporting on his health, labeling claims about his physical decline as “seditious” and potentially “treasonous.” The article from the Times highlighted his aging signs, including fatigue and physical ailments noticeable during public events. In response, Trump took to Truth Social to defend his health and fitness after undergoing multiple medical exams.

During his rants, Trump boasted about “acing” cognitive tests and criticized the media’s portrayal of him as deteriorating. He claimed that he works harder than ever, dismissing the notion that he is slowing down. Trump expressed disdain for the Times’ coverage, suggesting that the publication touches on “libel” against the office of the presidency.

Despite concerns about his health, including visible symptoms such as a drooping face and bandaged hands, Trump remained adamant about his fitness and effort levels. He argued that the reports constitute a false narrative aimed at undermining his presidency.

Trump’s language reflected the combative style of his administration, where he frequently attacked media outlets that challenged him. His vehement defense of his condition underscores the complexities surrounding the perception of his health as he continues his term.

Ultimately, Trump’s reaction to the health scrutiny reveals both his insecurity about aging as a high-profile leader and his broader strategy of dismissing unfavorable reporting as attacks on his legitimacy. He closed his remarks by suggesting that The New York Times should stop publishing altogether.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump/trump-suggests-its-treasonous-to-report-hes-in-bad-physical-shape/)

Trump’s Rhetoric Fuels Racism at PA Rally Against Ilhan Omar

During a recent rally in Mount Pocono, Pennsylvania, President Donald Trump incited his supporters by making inflammatory remarks about Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN), falsely alleging she is in the U.S. illegally. Trump, who has a history of targeting Omar with derogatory comments, asked the crowd if anyone was from Somalia before ridiculing her background and attire. His comments about Omar included a baseless accusation of her marrying her brother for immigration purposes.

As Trump continued with his tirade, his supporters began chanting “Send her back!”—a phrase that echoes the racist rhetoric he has previously directed at Omar. Trump’s remarks not only perpetuated unfounded claims but also sought to dehumanize a sitting congresswoman and whitewash her contributions to American society. This kind of rhetoric has been criticized for its dangerous implications on racial and immigrant communities.

Ilhan Omar, a Somali immigrant and U.S. citizen who has served in Congress since 2019, continues to be a target for Trump’s vitriol. His previous comments have included suggestions that she doesn’t belong in Congress, reflecting a broader strategy of using fear and division to rally his base. The president’s blatant disregard for fact in this situation demonstrates a commitment to xenophobic and racist attack tactics.

Trump’s statements not only violate the principles of basic decency but also have real-world consequences, as they can stoke hatred and inspire violence against marginalized groups. His rhetoric is frequently criticized as aligning closely with white supremacist narratives that aim to undermine democracy and promote division within the nation.

In addition to this specific incident, Trump’s ongoing efforts to delegitimize and attack prominent figures like Omar reflect a troubling trend in American politics. The normalization of such inflammatory speech poses significant risks to democratic discourse and inclusivity, revealing a growing divide fueled by the pursuit of power through fearmongering.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/send-her-back-maga-crowd-rages-after-trump-claims-house-democrat-is-here-illegally/)

1 2 3 102