Category: Misogyny

Trump Demands Fox News Take Jessica Tarlov off Air

President Donald Trump demanded Fox News remove co-host Jessica Tarlov from the air, calling her “a real loser” and criticizing her voice, statements, and overall presence on the network. Trump posted his demand on Truth Social, claiming Tarlov uses “fake numbers” and “fake polls” while expressing his dislike for her work, though he added he was “sure she’s a lovely person.”

Trump also targeted Fox News Sunday host Shannon Bream, criticizing her interview with Democratic Representative Jake Auchincloss and instructing her to correct Democratic guests when they present what he calls “propaganda and lies.” The president objected to Bream’s characterization of the SAVE Act, insisting it be called the “SAVE America Act,” a distinction he emphasized as significant.

This marks a continued pattern of Trump attacking Fox News personalities who he perceives as insufficiently loyal or critical of his positions. In 2024, Trump accused Bream of conducting an “anti-MAGA” interview with his attorney, and he has repeatedly called Tarlov a “loser” in previous public statements, including during a March appearance on The Five when Tarlov was absent.

Trump’s demand reflects his expectation that media outlets, including Fox News, align with his messaging without independent editorial judgment or hosting of opposing viewpoints. His explicit instruction to “Fox executives” to remove Tarlov demonstrates an abuse of power, using his position as president to pressure media organizations into personnel decisions based on his personal preferences rather than journalistic merit.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump/trump-demands-fox-news-take-host-off-air-a-real-loser/)

Trump Makes Inappropriate Comments About Fox Host During Iran War Discussion

During a Thursday night appearance on Fox News’s “The Five,” President Donald Trump made inappropriate comments toward co-host Dana Perino while discussing the humanitarian situation in Iran. Trump referenced a lunch they had shared years ago at Trump Tower, then stated he was not permitted to compliment Perino’s appearance because doing so would “end my political career,” before proceeding to remark that she “may be even better looking” today.

Trump continued by claiming that women are no longer allowed to be called beautiful in contemporary society, framing his unsolicited personal comments as a restriction on free speech. He then pivoted to discussing Iran, stating that Iranian civilians are “petrified” because armed forces on one side possess weapons and “shoot you,” and that people cannot protest effectively when they witness casualties.

Trump’s behavior drew immediate criticism from political opponents and commentators. Former Republican congressman Joe Walsh, now a Trump critic, condemned the president’s conduct, as did anti-Trump accounts and observers who characterized the remarks as creepy, inappropriate, and disturbing given their context within a discussion about an active conflict and Iranian civilian suffering.

(Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-makes-shocking-fox-news-172907709.html)

Hegseth Removes Black, Female Officers from General Promotion List

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth removed four Army officers from a one-star general promotion list without clear legal authority to do so. Two of the officers are Black and two are women from a list of approximately three dozen officers, predominantly white men. Hegseth had pressured Army Secretary Daniel P. Driscoll for months to strike the names, but Driscoll repeatedly refused based on the officers’ exemplary service records until Hegseth unilaterally removed them this month.

One Black officer was targeted for writing a paper nearly 15 years ago analyzing why African American officers historically pursued support roles over combat positions. A female logistics officer faced removal after serving in Afghanistan during the 2021 withdrawal, which Hegseth has condemned as “disastrous and embarrassing.” The reasons for removing the other two officers, a logistics officer and finance specialist, remain unclear. A fifth officer, Colonel Dave Butler, a white male spokesman for former Joint Chiefs Chairman Mark Milley, resigned in February after repeated demands from Hegseth’s office for his removal.

Hegseth’s chief of staff, Ricky Buria, told Driscoll that President Trump would not want to stand next to a Black female officer at military events, according to three officials familiar with the exchange. Buria denied the account, calling it “completely false” and “made up.” Army Secretary Driscoll responded by telling Buria that Trump is “not a racist or sexist” and raised the issue with a White House official who agreed with his assessment, prompting Hegseth’s office to retreat on that particular case.

Hegseth’s personnel overhaul includes dismantling merit-based promotion safeguards, including shuttering the Command Assessment Program that used peer reviews and double-blind interviews to ensure all officers regardless of race or gender could compete fairly. Senior military officials question whether the officers are being singled out because of their race or gender, eroding confidence in a promotion system designed to be apolitical and merit-based. Military lawyers have debated whether Hegseth possesses legal authority to strike individual names from the list, as regulations allow him only to reject or accept the entire list.

Hegseth has fired or sidelined at least two dozen generals and admirals since taking office, including General Charles Q. Brown Jr., the second African American chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Admiral Lisa Franchetti, the first woman to lead the Navy. Currently, the chairman and vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs, all five service chiefs, and nine of the military’s ten combatant commanders are white men, reversing years of diversification efforts under former Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III.

(Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/27/us/hegseth-promotion-list.html)

Trump Jokes He’ll Face Impeachment Over Women’s Hockey Team White House Invite

President Donald Trump called the U.S. men’s hockey team moments after their Olympic gold medal victory over Canada, during which he joked that inviting the women’s team, who also won gold, to White House celebrations would result in his impeachment. Trump made the remark while discussing plans to bring the men’s team to his State of the Union address on Tuesday and present them with medals at the White House.

When Trump stated “we’re gonna have to bring the woman’s team,” he followed with the quip “I do believe I would probably be impeached,” framing the inclusion of the women’s champions as an obligation he opposed. The male players laughed at the comment, with one shouting “Two for two” to reference both teams’ gold medal wins.

Trump also praised the men’s team during the call, calling their performance “unbelievable” and remarking on goalie Connor Hellebuyck’s clutch saves in overtime. FBI Director Kash Patel, present in the locker room during the celebration, facilitated the call and subsequently assured the president he would arrange logistics for bringing the team to the White House.

Trump’s comment trivializes the women’s team’s equivalent athletic achievement and frames their equal recognition as an unwelcome burden, demonstrating indifference toward women’s sports and their accomplishments at the international level.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/sports/trump-jokes-to-mens-hockey-team-that-hell-have-to-invite-womens-team-to-white-house-or-hell-be-impeached/)

Hegseth Invites Christian Nationalist Wilson to Pentagon Worship Service

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth invited Christian nationalist pastor Doug Wilson to lead a worship service at the Pentagon this week. Wilson has publicly advocated for wives to submit to their husbands, opposed women’s voting rights, and defended Christian enslavers as operating on “firm scriptural ground,” according to his documented statements.

The invitation reflects Hegseth’s alignment with Christian nationalist ideology, which frames American governance through a lens of Christian supremacy and traditional patriarchal structures. Wilson’s presence at the Pentagon, the headquarters of the U.S. military, demonstrates how Trump administration officials are embedding religious extremism into federal institutions responsible for defending constitutional democracy.

Christian nationalism contradicts the constitutional separation of church and state and the principle of equal protection under law. By platforming Wilson at a military facility, Hegseth signals the administration’s intention to weaponize the Pentagon as a venue for advancing sectarian religious doctrine rather than maintaining secular, constitutional governance.

This action parallels broader efforts by the Trump administration to purge the military of independent voices, as evidenced by Hegseth’s removal of Colonel Dave Butler from Army public affairs and the pattern of loyalty-based personnel decisions documented in recent weeks.

The Pentagon event demonstrates how Trump’s second administration is systematically remaking federal institutions to serve authoritarian and theocratic ends, dismantling the secular safeguards that prevent religious extremism from controlling military policy and national security decisions.

(Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/02/18/doug-wilson-pentagon-hegseth-christian-nationalist/?utm_campaign=wp_main&utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&fbclid=IwdGRleAQEi79leHRuA2FlbQExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR6UG5yVkLHtcm12dqTWyaPFpbw9qvVB2OQY2H-GNUEPU36_Ysv_blD-hkWTVw_aem_GreTi7q4vRbeiim7jN7a8Q)

Trump Erupts at ABC’s Mary Bruce Over Epstein Inquiry

During a recent Oval Office event with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, President Donald Trump aggressively confronted ABC News’ Mary Bruce after she questioned him about his family’s business dealings in Saudi Arabia and the congressional vote regarding the release of Epstein files. Bruce’s inquiries, which sought accountability, were met with Trump’s characteristic hostility.

When Bruce asked about the appropriateness of his family’s business ties with Saudi Arabia, given the crown prince’s involvement in Jamal Khashoggi’s murder, Trump dismissed her concerns, asserting that “things happen.” His evasive response reflected a troubling disregard for serious ethical implications, further highlighting his willingness to protect authoritarian allies.

Later in the exchange, Bruce pressed Trump on why he would not preemptively release the Epstein files that his administration has opposed. Trump’s aggressive retort labeled Bruce a “terrible reporter,” claiming her questioning lacked respect and was inherently negative toward both him and MBS. Such remarks signify Trump’s continued effort to vilify journalists who hold him accountable.

In a further display of authoritarian impulses, Trump threatened to revoke ABC’s FCC license, denouncing the network’s coverage as a “hoax” and “fake news.” His comments underscore a dangerous pattern of attacking press freedom, echoing tactics seen in regimes hostile to a free press.

The latest confrontation not only demonstrates Trump’s trademark combative nature but also raises alarms about his relentless pursuit of controlling media narratives. This incident aligns with broader concerns regarding his undermining of journalistic integrity, especially when it conflicts with his administration’s agenda.

Trump Told a Woman, ‘Quiet, Piggy,’ When She Asked Him About Epstein

During a recent interaction on Air Force One, President Donald Trump demonstrated a disrespectful attitude toward female journalists, specifically targeting Bloomberg’s Catherine Lucey. When Lucey inquired about the release of Jeffrey Epstein’s files, Trump’s condescending response included the phrase “Quiet, piggy,” showcasing a pattern of derogatory remarks towards women in the media.

This is not an isolated incident but part of a broader trend where Trump consistently undermines female journalists. His past comments, including vile insults directed at Megyn Kelly and Yamiche Alcindor, further illustrate his long-standing theme of belittling women who challenge him. Such behavior signals not only an attempt to silence dissent but also a perpetuation of misogyny in the highest office of the land.

Trump’s remarks reflect a toxic view of women’s roles in society, implying they should not speak up or question authority. The term “piggy,” used previously to demean Alicia Machado, reinforces his history of sexist language, which is compounded by numerous allegations of sexual misconduct against him that he has vehemently denied.

The Trump administration’s response to Lucey’s question was dismissive, claiming she was “inappropriate” without providing evidence to support such a claim. This narrative promotes a dangerous environment where journalists are bullied for doing their jobs, severely undermining press freedom and democratic values.

Ultimately, Trump’s comments highlight how he degrades not only the dignity of women but also the position of the presidency itself. As public disdain for his methods grows—particularly among educated women—his actions risk tarnishing the integrity of both his administration and the nation’s political discourse.

Sean Duffy Pushes Outdated Gender Roles by Dismissing Women’s Career Aspirations

Sean Duffy, the current U.S. Secretary of Transportation, recently made controversial remarks on a podcast where he labeled the pursuit of career aspirations as a “false promise” for women. Duffy, who succeeded Pete Buttigieg, argued that women should prioritize family over professional advancement, stating, “Get a job, advance your career, your career is the most important thing that you have in your life,” before dismissing those aspirations as unattainable.

Duffy’s statements resonate deeply with traditional and regressive views, suggesting that women’s happiness hinges solely on familial relationships instead of personal fulfillment or career successes. By implying that career pursuits hinder deeper personal connections, he reinforces outdated gender roles dangerously at odds with modern values.

Trump Administration’s Military Leadership Shuffle Undermines Diversity and Inclusivity

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has announced the replacement of Vice Admiral Yvette Davids, the first woman to lead the U.S. Naval Academy, with Marine Corps Lt. Gen. Michael Borgschulte. This decision by the Trump administration is notable as it comes amidst a wider pattern of purging military leadership based on accusations of an excessive focus on diversity.

Since taking office, the Trump administration has systematically removed numerous high-ranking military leaders, particularly women, who were deemed insufficiently aligned with its ideological agenda. The administration’s actions have not only sparked concern over diversity but also raised alarm over the prioritization of loyalty over competence in military appointments.

While Davids’ early removal from the Naval Academy is uncharacteristic—superintendents typically retire after their tenure—she is expected to transition to a role as deputy chief of naval operations overseeing naval strategy and operations. This move, however, is largely considered lateral within military ranks and shrouded in ambiguity regarding whether Davids had any choice in her departure.

Hegseth’s policies, which have included dismantling affirmative action in service academy admissions and scrutinizing educational materials for any hint of ‘wokeism’, reveal a concerning trend toward militarizing education and eradicating diversity standards within the military environment. This shift represents a significant departure from inclusivity efforts and raises serious concerns about leadership preparedness.

As the Naval Academy continues to produce new officers, the ramifications of these appointments and policies will likely echo throughout the ranks, influencing the future state of U.S. military leadership and its commitment to diversity and inclusion in a changing world.

(h/t: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/07/18/yvette-davids-naval-academy-hegseth/?utm_campaign=wp_main&utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR7rs4qKhHPMIqlB985kBviTGojHAVqBJwR5nwne9p-uZiY9mpOSRaKkQ4gbjw_aem_82Qb8SHnav_2SVQeqYxfhw)

Military Dismisses Commander for Criticizing Vance’s Political Agenda Amidst Authoritarian Loyalty Purge

The military recently dismissed Colonel Sussanah Meyers from her position as commander of the Pituffik Space Base in Greenland, following an email she sent that criticized a visit from Vice President JD Vance. This decision came just days after Vance’s remarks, which implied that Denmark was failing in its responsibilities regarding Greenland’s security.

Colonel Meyers’ email sought to clarify that the opinions expressed by Vance regarding Denmark were not representative of the views held at the Space Base. In her message, she emphasized the importance of maintaining nonpartisan conduct within the military, a principle that appears to contradict Vance’s politically charged comments and the agenda of the Trump administration, which has consistently sought to undermine diplomatic relations with allies.

Colonel Kenneth Klock, the commander of Space Base Delta 1, made the decision to relieve Meyers of her command, citing a “loss of confidence.” The Space Force emphasized the necessity of commanders adhering to high standards of conduct and remaining nonpartisan in their duties. This move highlights the increasing scrutiny and pressure military personnel face to align with the political narratives advanced by Trump and his associates.

Defense Department officials, including Joe Kasper, reiterated the principle of civilian control over the military, asserting that any actions deemed as undermining the chain of command or disrupting the administration’s agenda would not be tolerated. This reflects a broader trend within the military under Trump’s administration, where political loyalty is prioritized over the ethical conduct expected of service members.

After the dismissal, Republican Senator Eric Schmitt called for a formal investigation into Colonel Meyers’ actions, reinforcing the idea that military personnel must not engage in political expressions while in uniform. This situation underscores the troubling reality of an authoritarian loyalty purge within the ranks of the U.S. military, where dissenting voices are silenced in favor of a singular, politically driven narrative.

(h/t: https://abcnews.go.com/amp/International/commander-us-base-greenland-fired-email-critical-vance/story?id=120705531)

1 2 3 … 13