Category: Loyalty Purge

White House proposes NDAs for federal workers to crack down on leaks to journalists | Trump administration | The Guardian

The Trump administration's Office of Personnel Management released a draft nondisclosure agreement on Tuesday requiring federal employees to sign NDAs designed to prevent them from sharing information with journalists. The proposed agreement allows the government to pursue civil and criminal penalties against employees who disclose information deemed confidential, and grants the administration rights to all royalties employees receive from such disclosures. Former government employees would need written permission from an authorized agency official to speak to journalists about confidential information after leaving their positions.

This proposal is part of Trump's broader campaign to control the flow of information from federal agencies. Since taking office, Trump has attacked news outlets as "fake news," filed lawsuits against media organizations, banned the Associated Press from the White House press pool, and restricted reporter access at the Pentagon. The administration also enacted a September media policy requiring Pentagon reporters to sign pledges to report only officially released information.

Federal employee unions directly oppose the NDA proposal. Steve Lenkart, executive director of the National Federation of Federal Employees, stated the move is part of an effort to weaken unions that function as internal accountability mechanisms and to silence dissent within government. Everett Kelley, national president of the American Federation of Government Employees, characterized the proposal as an attempt to purge career civil servants and replace them with political loyalists unwilling to report waste, fraud, and abuse. Both union leaders emphasized that federal employees retain constitutional rights and protected whistleblower protections under existing federal law, including the ability to report misconduct to Congress and inspectors general.

The draft NDA explicitly states it would not apply to lawful disclosures of fraud, abuse, and misconduct to internal government watchdogs and Congress, as prohibited by federal law. However, legal experts and union leadership argue that agreements designed to suppress lawful disclosures lack legitimate governmental purpose and are constitutionally suspect. Federal employees do not surrender First Amendment rights upon accepting government employment, according to union statements.

The OPM spokesperson McLaurine Pinover justified the proposal as addressing concerns that unauthorized disclosures disrupt agency operations, but the timing aligns with Trump's pattern of attacking press freedom and independent government institutions. Trump has previously attempted to silence government insiders through litigation, using legal threats against former officials who published accounts of his conduct, illustrating the administration's longstanding hostility toward public disclosure of government activities.

(Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/may/26/federal-workers-ndas?utm_term=Autofeed&CMP=fb_us&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwdGRjcASC05NleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEe5Rmh4RqgHIrUPmZ6FJZ2vQkc06d102xkDcnGTwBel7cXhDDcM71T8WPqHAo_aem_F2rmbphOg6PMqplupHvCBw#Echobox=1779812330)

Trump Targets Late-Night Hosts Using FCC Regulatory Power

President Donald Trump declared victory over Stephen Colbert's departure from CBS, stating on Truth Social that the late-night host's firing marked the "Beginning of the End" for late-night television and predicting others would follow. Trump has systematically pressured the Federal Communications Commission to strip broadcast licenses, directly called on Disney to fire ABC host Jimmy Kimmel, and demanded NBC terminate Seth Meyers, making clear his intent to eliminate critical voices from television.

CBS cancelled Colbert's top-rated show last year citing financial reasons, but the timing exposed the administration's pattern of regulatory retaliation. The cancellation occurred days after Paramount settled a $16 million lawsuit Trump filed against CBS over editing of a "60 Minutes" interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris, and immediately preceded FCC approval of Paramount's $8 billion Skydance merger, leading critics to identify the decision as quid pro quo silencing of political satire in violation of First Amendment protections.

FCC Chairman Brendan Carr has weaponized his regulatory authority against networks that air criticism of Trump. Carr ordered an unusual early license review of ABC's eight television stations after Trump cited a Kimmel joke as grounds for his dismissal, and in September 2025 pressured broadcasters to remove Kimmel entirely after comments about conservative activist Charlie Kirk. When Trump demanded Meyers' firing in November, Carr reposted the demand on X, demonstrating direct coordination between the executive branch and the FCC to suppress dissent.

Democratic FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez documented the administration's systematic assault on free speech, stating that Trump cannot tolerate critics and is deploying "every regulatory lever" to target content he dislikes, from late-night comedy to political programs. Trump has publicly attacked multiple late-night hosts as "deranged" and "untalented" while simultaneously using state power to force them from the air, treating television criticism as a threat requiring government elimination rather than democratic discourse.

Colbert responded by naming the threat directly, stating that "Donald Trump's administration wants to silence anyone who says anything bad about Trump on TV, because all Trump does is watch TV." The coordinated campaign against late-night hosts represents authoritarian suppression of political speech through regulatory capture and merger leverage, dismantling constitutional protections for satire and criticism that have defined American media since the 1950s.

(Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-says-more-night-talk-154303498.html?link_source=ta_first_comment&taid=6a10cd35c6ff4c00012b7467&fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQKNjYyODU2ODM3OQABHu9KHF8av5yRtOq_NNxcMcNficKGS5jg4DreLVWYgXOWETNQ-oTh8Bt-tMTj_aem_SzS3k30dy53tiPTZv2_Zcw&guccounter=1)

Gabbard Forced Out as Trump Intelligence Director After Policy

Tulsi Gabbard, Director of National Intelligence, resigned from her position effective June 30, citing her husband Abraham Williams' recent diagnosis with a rare form of bone cancer. In her resignation letter, Gabbard stated she could not "in good conscience" ask her husband to face the illness alone while remaining in the demanding role. Trump publicly accepted the resignation on Truth Social, saying Gabbard had done "a great job" and that her decision to prioritize her husband's health was appropriate.

Multiple sources told Reuters that Gabbard was forced out by the White House rather than departing voluntarily. A source familiar with the matter stated "She was pushed out by the White House" and that "The White House has been unhappy with her for quite some time." Trump had previously expressed displeasure with Gabbard in recent months, and in April, he reportedly asked allies for names of potential replacements for his intelligence chief.

Friction between Gabbard and Trump's team stemmed from her leadership of the Director's Initiatives Group, which worked to declassify documents related to President John F. Kennedy's death, investigate election machine security, and probe COVID-19 origins. In August, Gabbard revoked security clearances for 37 current and former U.S. officials, an action that exposed the name of an undercover intelligence officer serving overseas. Trump had also hinted at policy disagreements, saying in March that Gabbard was "softer" than him on curtailing Iran's nuclear program.

Gabbard's absence from key national security deliberations signaled deepening White House displeasure. She was excluded from discussions between Trump and his top national security advisers regarding the U.S. military operation that ousted Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, Iran strategy, and Cuba policy. Aaron Lukas, Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence, will serve as acting director.

Senator Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, stated that the position had become "too politicized" under Gabbard's tenure. Warner said the next intelligence leader should be "an independent, experienced intelligence professional" focused on foreign intelligence, not domestic election matters, directly addressing Gabbard's involvement in the Georgia election hub investigation and her management of classified intelligence reports.

(Source: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/gabbard-resigns-trumps-national-intelligence-director-fox-news-digital-reports-2026-05-22/)

Trump Attacks Massie, Backs Challenger Gallrein in Kentucky Primary

President Donald Trump launched a rare public attack on Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky on Tuesday, his first tweet in months, demanding the congressman withdraw what Trump called a “fraudulent” endorsement statement from years prior. Trump endorsed Ed Gallrein, Massie’s primary challenger, declaring Massie “the Worst Congressman in the History of our Country” and calling him a “Weak and Pathetic RINO” hours before primary election results were expected.

Massie has emerged as one of Trump’s most frequent targets within the GOP, drawing the president’s wrath for opposing Trump on multiple fronts including Epstein files transparency and foreign policy matters. Trump’s Sunday Truth Social post escalated the assault, accusing Massie of voting against tax cuts, border wall funding, and law enforcement while supporting transgender healthcare and transgender athletes in sports.

Gallrein, whom Trump backed as(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-fires-off-first-tweet-in-months-to-excoriate-republican-nemesis/) “a Navy SEAL, Army Ranger, and Fifth Generation Kentucky Farmer,” represents Trump’s preferred alternative in the race. Trump’s endorsement of Gallrein signals the president’s expectation of absolute alignment with his agenda, positioning the primary as a test of loyalty to Trump’s policy positions and worldview.

The intensity of Trump’s public denunciation reflects Massie’s pattern of independence on key issues, particularly his isolationist foreign policy stance and his willingness to break ranks on votes Trump considers essential. Trump’s framing of the race as a choice between Massie’s alleged betrayals and Gallrein’s America First commitment underscores how dissent from Trump’s positions within the Republican Party carries severe political consequences.

Trump Demands Thune Fire Parliamentarian Blocking Ballroom Funds

President Donald Trump demanded that Senate Majority Leader John Thune fire Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough after she blocked $1 billion in taxpayer funding for Trump’s ballroom project from a budget reconciliation bill. MacDonough determined that the ballroom funding violated the Byrd Rule, which prohibits non-budgetary items from passing with a simple majority vote. Trump called Thune to pressure him into removing MacDonough, but Thune refused, stating he would not fire her and noting that both sides of contentious reconciliation debates routinely criticize the parliamentarian.

Trump’s ballroom project has destroyed significant portions of the White House, including the entire East Wing, contradicting his initial assurances that construction would not interfere with existing structures. Initial claims that private donors would fund the project proved murky, and the endeavor has violated ethics standards regarding conflicts of interest. After an attempted shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, Trump and Republicans pivoted to demanding $1 billion in taxpayer funding for the ballroom’s “modernization” and security upgrades as part of a Secret Service budget.

The Senate Parliamentarian is a nonpartisan official tasked with interpreting and applying Senate rules. MacDonough’s Saturday ruling followed standard parliamentary procedure and reflects the institution’s established constraints on reconciliation bills. Republicans indicated they would revise the provision to comply with the Byrd Rule, a standard procedural response when proposals fail initial review.

This is not the first time Trump has pressured Thune to remove MacDonough. Trump has a documented pattern of threatening institutional measures when he does not get his way. Last year, when MacDonough stripped Medicaid provisions from a tax bill during reconciliation, Trump allies demanded her removal. Thune rejected that demand as well, maintaining that he would not overrule or fire MacDonough for doing her constitutional job.

The White House declined to confirm whether Trump made the call to Thune, offering only a statement that it does not comment on private conversations. Thune’s refusal to cave to presidential pressure demonstrates that Senate leadership remains bound by institutional constraints, though Trump’s attempt to weaponize the parliamentary process for personal projects demonstrates his contempt for constitutional limits on executive power.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-is-reportedly-trying-to-badger-senate-leader-into-firing-official-who-nixed-ballroom-funding/)

Trump Attacks Cassidy as ‘Disloyal’ Over 2021 Impeachment Vote

President Donald Trump attacked Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana on Saturday, calling him a “disloyal disaster” and “sleazebag” while urging voters to support Cassidy’s primary challengers, Representative Julia Letlow and state Treasurer John Fleming. Trump posted on Truth Social that Cassidy campaigned on loyalty to Trump in 2020 but then voted to convict him during the 2021 impeachment trial, accusing the senator of betrayal and claiming Cassidy is “BAD FOR LOUISIANA.”

Cassidy is facing his first primary challenge since the impeachment vote, with Trump endorsing Letlow as “a winner who will NEVER let you down.” In the post, Trump emphasized his electoral dominance in Louisiana, stating he won the state three times and “got the most votes in its history, by far,” framing the primary as a test of loyalty to his political movement.

When CNN’s Manu Raju asked Cassidy last month about Trump’s repeated accusations of disloyalty, the senator deflected multiple times before stating he is “loyal to the United States of America” and committed to working with the president “whenever we’re working for the best of the U.S.” Cassidy’s careful distinction between loyalty to the country and loyalty to Trump reflects the tension between institutional duty and party demands for personal allegiance.

Saturday’s primary election in Louisiana determines whether Cassidy advances or faces a runoff in late June if no candidate secures a majority vote. Trump’s full-throated intervention exemplifies his pattern of targeting Republicans who defy his directives, using inflammatory language and endorsements to remove party members he views as insufficiently loyal to his leadership.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/disloyal-disaster-trump-trashes-sleazebag-republican-senator-battling-primary-challengers/)

Trump-Backed Candidates Purge Indiana Republicans Over Redistricting

President Donald Trump’s endorsed candidates won five of seven primary races in Indiana’s state Senate elections, defeating Republican incumbents who had opposed his redistricting push in December 2025. Trump had publicly threatened primary challenges against the 21 Republicans who voted against a measure that would have redrawn congressional maps to eliminate the state’s two Democratic seats, calling them “losers” and demanding they be “primaried.” The results demonstrated Trump’s continued ability to enforce absolute loyalty within the Republican Party by punishing dissent.

Indiana Republican Governor Mike Braun and Senator Jim Banks, both Trump allies, framed the victories as validation of the President’s influence and described the winners as “America First conservatives” aligned with Trump’s agenda. Trump himself declared the races a test of his power over the party, stating on the eve of the election that Republicans should support “great patriots” running against “long seated RINOS,” using the derogatory term for Republicans deemed insufficiently loyal to him. One incumbent Republican senator, Travis Holdman, warned that the $13.5 million in spending on the primaries signaled that “D.C. politics” had arrived in Indiana.

The December redistricting vote had unified Democrats and a supermajority of Republicans against the proposal despite Trump’s pressure, with 21 Republicans joining all 10 Democrats in opposing the map redraw. The measure would have given Republicans an advantage across all nine congressional districts while eliminating the only two Democratic seats, yet the Republican-controlled state Senate rejected it. Trump responded by targeting the disloyal Republicans with primary challengers, establishing a pattern of abuse of power to enforce conformity.

Trump has made gerrymandering central to his political strategy for the 2026 midterms, pressuring Republican-led states including Texas, Missouri, North Carolina, and Ohio to redraw maps in his favor. Trump publicly demanded GOP legislatures maximize racial gerrymandering following a Supreme Court decision that gutted voting protections, falsely claiming such efforts would net Republicans 20 additional congressional seats. The Indiana results mark the opening of a stretch of primary contests where Trump intends to test his control over the Republican Party by targeting other longtime critics.

The heightened spending and focus on Indiana’s state Senate races underscore how Trump’s demand for absolute loyalty has reshaped Republican primary politics. Trump’s coordinated campaign used dehumanizing language, labeling opposing Republicans as “RINO” politicians and treating the elections as a referendum on party obedience. The victories signal that Republican voters rewarded candidates willing to submit to Trump’s redistricting agenda, regardless of broader constitutional or democratic concerns.

(Source: https://time.com/article/2026/05/06/indiana-elections-redistricting-trump/)

Acting AG Blanche Defends Weak Comey Indictment

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche defended the second indictment of former FBI Director James Comey on NBC’s Meet the Press on Sunday, claiming the prosecution extends beyond Comey’s Instagram post displaying seashells arranged as “86 47” from November 2025. Blanche asserted that career prosecutors, FBI agents, and Secret Service agents investigated the case thoroughly, though he refused to disclose what additional evidence exists. Experts and even some Republicans have declared the case meritless, and Judge Colm Connolly previously dismissed Comey’s first indictment in September 2025 for lying to Congress, ruling that Trump’s appointee leading that prosecution was illegally appointed.

Comey’s second indictment violates prosecutorial norms by following Trump’s direct demand for indictments posted on Truth Social in September 2025. Trump publicly ordered his then-Attorney General Pam Bondi to indict Comey, Adam Schiff, Letitia James, and others, describing them as “guilty as hell.” This represents an unprecedented weaponization of the Justice Department as Trump’s political enforcement mechanism. Comey’s second indictment stems from allegations that his social media post suggested harm to Trump, though Comey removed the post and apologized months before charges were filed.

Senator Adam Schiff, a former prosecutor with nearly six years of experience, stated directly that he had never encountered such a weak case and predicted dismissal before trial. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell cited Trump’s unprecedented legal assault against him, along with political investigations targeting Schiff and New York Attorney General Letitia James, as justification for remaining on the Federal Reserve board until the investigation concluded transparently. The Trump Justice Department ended its investigation into Powell last month to secure a key Republican senator’s vote for Powell’s replacement, demonstrating the politicized nature of these prosecutions.

Blanche’s defense of the indictment occurred within Trump’s documented pattern of using the Justice Department to target political enemies, following the framework established by Trump’s personal attorneys now leading the DOJ. Career attorneys and officials have departed the Justice Department in significant numbers due to its increased political manipulation, undermining the agency’s prosecutorial capacity. Comey responded via Substack video, stating he expects further Trump administration attacks but remains convinced of his innocence and an independent justice system’s eventual restoration.

Blanche acknowledged on Sunday that thousands of Americans who have used the phrase “86 47,” widely available on Amazon merchandise, should not face prosecution, directly contradicting the reasoning behind Comey’s indictment and exposing the selective, politically motivated nature of the prosecution. The Trump administration has already fired prosecutors who refused to pursue the Comey prosecution, illustrating the coercive pressure within the Department of Justice to secure convictions against Trump’s identified enemies regardless of evidence quality.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/todd-blanche-nbc-comey-indictment-b2969764.html)

Navy Chief Phelan Refuses Exit Until Trump Personally Confirms Firing

Navy Secretary John Phelan was forced to resign on Wednesday after Secretary of War Pete Hegseth determined he was not sufficiently committed to building Trump’s proposed “Golden Fleet” of battleships. Rather than accept his termination, Phelan went directly to Trump at the White House that evening to appeal the decision, remaining there until the president personally confirmed his firing face-to-face.

Hegseth and Trump removed Phelan partly because he allegedly failed to push hard enough for the Pentagon’s largest-ever budget request to fund the “Trump-class” vessels. However, retired colonel Mark Cancian of the Center for Strategic and International Studies stated the president’s timeline is impossible, noting the ships would cost $9 billion each, take years to design, and contradict current Navy operational strategy. Cancian predicted a future administration would cancel the program before any ship launches.

Phelan’s departure also reflected conflict over his direct access to Trump. As a longtime Trump donor and Mar-a-Lago neighbor, Phelan frequently bypassed Hegseth to speak with the president, a practice the Secretary of War refused to tolerate. According to reports, Phelan was already being excluded from major meetings before his forced resignation.

Phelan is being replaced by Navy Undersecretary Hung Cao. Hegseth’s removal of Phelan is part of a broader purge across the Pentagon, including the April firings of Army Chief of Staff Gen. Randy George, Gen. David Hodne, and Maj. Gen. William Green Jr., reportedly driven by Hegseth’s personal paranoia about his own position.

This dismissal occurs amid an ongoing naval blockade of Iranian ports, rising gas prices, and declining approval ratings for the administration. Despite these pressures and the documented conflicts within his department, Hegseth has maintained Trump’s confidence and continues to direct military personnel decisions.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/john-phelan-trump-sacked-navy-hegseth-b2964232.html)

Kash Patel Says He’s Suing Over Report Claiming He’s Repeatedly Been Intoxicated in Public While FBI Director – Yahoo News UK

FBI Director Kash Patel announced plans to sue The Atlantic after the publication reported that he had struggled to log into a computer system on April 10, initially believing he had been fired by President Trump. According to the article by Sarah Fitzpatrick, Patel panicked and frantically contacted aides and allies about his supposed termination, with nine sources describing his behavior and two characterizing it as a “freak-out,” though the lockout was later determined to be a technical issue unrelated to any personnel action.

The Atlantic’s report also detailed allegations that Patel had been intoxicated in public at restaurants in Washington, D.C. and Las Vegas. The publication claimed that members of his security detail had experienced difficulty waking Patel on multiple occasions due to excessive alcohol consumption, and that a request for breaching equipment typically used by SWAT teams was made after Patel became unreachable behind locked doors.

Patel’s response came through FBI spokesperson Erica Knight, who dismissed the reporting as “fabricated” and announced a lawsuit would be filed. Patel himself posted on X stating he would meet the outlet “in court” and accused it of producing “fake news,” suggesting the actual malice standard required in defamation cases would favor his legal position.

FBI Assistant Director Benjamin Williamson released a statement calling the article “one of the most absurd things” he had read, characterizing it as “completely false reporting at a nearly 100% clip” despite a tight two-hour deadline provided to the publication for response. The statement was included in Patel’s social media post as supporting documentation for his claims of inaccurate reporting.

(Source: https://uk.news.yahoo.com/kash-patel-says-suing-over-031725423.html)

1 2 3 … 19