Category: Military Action

US ‘discussing a range of options’ to acquire Greenland, White House says | CNN Politics

The White House confirmed on Tuesday that President Trump’s administration is “discussing a range of options” to acquire Greenland, with military intervention explicitly stated as a potential tool. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt declared that acquiring Greenland constitutes a “national security priority” and that “utilizing the U.S. Military is always an option at the Commander in Chief’s disposal,” according to her statement to CNN.

Trump has escalated his focus on Greenland in recent days, prompting European leaders to issue a statement of support for Denmark, the NATO ally that holds sovereignty over the Arctic territory. Senior White House aide Stephen Miller reinforced the administration’s intent by telling CNN’s Jake Tapper on Monday that no nation would militarily oppose U.S. acquisition of Greenland, framing the prospect as inevitable.

The White House’s explicit invocation of military options to seize Danish territory represents an unprecedented assertion of force to acquire a foreign nation’s sovereign land. Denmark has already demanded U.S. answers over alleged Trump operations in Greenland, and this statement escalates tensions with a core NATO ally.

Trump’s pursuit of Greenland abandons established international law and diplomatic norms governing territorial acquisition, reversing decades of Arctic policy based on cooperation rather than coercion. The military already dismissed a base commander in Greenland for criticizing Vice President Vance’s political agenda, signaling the administration’s intolerance for dissent within its ranks on this territorial ambition.

Trump’s prior Greenland video masked imperial ambitions and elite interests, and these statements confirm the administration will consider military force to achieve territorial expansion, fundamentally departing from U.S. commitments to international law and alliance partnerships.

(Source: https://edition.cnn.com/2026/01/06/politics/us-options-greenland-military)

U.S. launches military strikes on Venezuela, Trump says Maduro captured and flown out of the country

President Trump announced early Saturday that Delta Force operatives captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, who were then flown out of the country following large-scale U.S. military strikes on Caracas and other locations. Trump confirmed the operation via Truth Social post and scheduled a press conference at Mar-a-Lago for 11 a.m. ET, stating U.S. law enforcement was involved without specifying which agencies. This operation follows Trump’s announcement of a “total and complete blockade” of Venezuelan oil tankers announced just weeks prior.

Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah reported that Secretary of State Marco Rubio indicated Maduro would face criminal charges in the U.S., where he was indicted in 2020 on narco-terrorism allegations. Rubio reportedly told Lee that “no further action in Venezuela” was anticipated now that Maduro was in U.S. custody, and that the military operation was deployed to protect those executing the arrest warrant. The Trump administration has maintained a $50 million bounty for information leading to Maduro’s capture, doubled from $25 million last summer.

U.S. military strikes targeted major installations including Fuerte Tiuna military base, La Carlota airbase, signal antenna at El Volcán, and La Guaira Port on the Caribbean coast. The operation represents the culmination of Trump’s rapid military expansion across Latin America through recent security agreements signed with multiple nations. The FAA banned U.S. commercial aircraft from Venezuelan airspace due to ongoing military activity, effective through Sunday morning Caracas time.

Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodriguez demanded proof of life and Maduro’s location on state television, while Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino López announced military deployment across the country and declared a state of external emergency. The Venezuelan government called supporters to the streets to resist what it termed an “imperialist attack,” though the defense minister made no mention of Maduro’s reported capture.

Democratic Senator Ruben Gallego of Arizona denounced the strikes as “illegal,” calling it the “second unjustified war in my lifetime,” while Republican Senator Mike Lee expressed constitutional concerns about military action absent a declaration of war or authorization for use of military force. Congressional measures to require approval for Venezuelan strikes have been voted down in recent months despite bipartisan pushback against the administration’s military buildup in the region.

(Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/venezuela-us-military-strikes-maduro-trump/)

Trump Doubles Down On Claim U.S. Attacked Inside Venezuela

President Donald Trump claimed on December 29 that the United States struck a facility inside Venezuela, stating during a conversation at Mar-a-Lago that “we hit all the boats and now we hit the area.” Trump declined to specify whether the U.S. military or CIA conducted the operation, saying only that it occurred “along the shore” and that the targeted area is “no longer around.” This assertion followed an earlier radio interview where Trump first mentioned knocking out a “big facility where the ships come from” two nights prior.

The White House, Pentagon, U.S. Southern Command, and CIA have provided no official confirmation or evidence corroborating Trump’s claim. Anonymous American officials told The New York Times that Trump was “referring to a drug facility in Venezuela” but offered no details. Videos circulated online suggesting an explosion and fire at a Primazol chemical plant near Lake Maracaibo matched Trump’s timeline, though the company rejected claims it was attacked. A local journalist cautioned against the connection, noting residents observed nothing unusual. Trump’s statement remains unverified by independent sources or Venezuelan authorities.

Trump’s announcement followed months of escalating military operations in the Caribbean, including a declared “total and complete blockade” of Venezuelan oil shipments and numerous strikes on suspected drug-smuggling vessels that have killed over 100 people. The U.S. military presence has expanded significantly, with satellite imagery documenting doubled deployments of MC-130J transport aircraft, CV-22B Osprey tilt-rotors, MQ-9 Reaper drones, and special operations forces staging at Puerto Rico airports. Personnel have been photographed obscuring fences to conceal military aircraft from public view.

The Trump administration has simultaneously expanded U.S. military presence across Latin America through security agreements, establishing troop deployment rights and operational access across multiple nations under the stated pretext of counter-narcotics efforts. Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova condemned both the blockade and seizures of Venezuelan oil tankers, characterizing the policy as “neo-colonial” and warning of unpredictable consequences for the Western Hemisphere. The proximity of an amphibious ready group and special operations mothership in late December suggests preparations for operations beyond attacks on vessels.

Trump’s unsubstantiated claim of a Venezuelan strike contradicts the established pattern of official silence regarding covert military action, raising questions about the veracity of his assertion and the scope of undisclosed operations in the region. The absence of White House corroboration, military confirmation, or independent verification stands against Trump’s public statements, while escalating military deployments and infrastructure expansion indicate sustained preparations for expanded kinetic operations.

(Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-doubles-down-claim-u-204927819.html)

Trump says US launched strike on ISIS terrorists in Nigeria – ABC News

President Donald Trump announced on social media that the United States conducted military strikes against ISIS operatives in Nigeria on December 25, 2025, characterizing the action as a “powerful and deadly strike” targeting terrorists he claimed were “targeting and viciously killing, primarily, innocent Christians.” Trump stated he had previously threatened the group with consequences if they did not cease violence, declaring “tonight, there was” retribution through what he called “numerous perfect strikes” executed by the Department of War.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth corroborated Trump’s announcement in a separate post, stating the Department of Defense had been “preparing for action” and confirming strikes were carried out. Hegseth indicated additional military operations would follow, writing “there will be ‘more to come,'” and thanked the Nigerian government for its cooperation, concluding with “Merry Christmas!” This followed Trump’s November video threatening to enter Nigeria “guns-a-blazing” in response to violence against Christians.

Trump has a documented history of making false claims about ISIS operations. In previous engagements with Nigeria’s leadership, Trump refused to apologize for calling African nations “shithole countries” and expressed preference for white European immigrants, undermining his stated concern for Nigerian Christians.

As of the announcement, the specific outcome of the strikes and exact targets remain unconfirmed. ABC News requested additional details from the White House, but no clarification on operational success or casualty figures has been provided. The military action was announced on Christmas Day without prior public disclosure of imminent operations.

This military action represents Trump’s use of military force in a sovereign nation without clear public justification or transparency regarding tactical objectives, civilian impact assessment, or coordination with international partners beyond Nigeria itself.

(Source: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-us-launched-strike-isis-terrorists-nigeria/story?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=dhfacebook&utm_content=app.dashsocial.com/abcnews/library/media/624189102&id=128697246&fbclid=IwVERFWAO6sMhleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeIri2ltSpiW2ijbI5_3BKXGc1ILofaQIHuOz0O216QjVACgiInQkujGOTTCw_aem_rM5sZiWG7gjdVK3uNITopg)

‘Gunboat diplomacy on steroids’: US signs security deals across Latin America | US military

The Trump administration is rapidly expanding US military presence across Latin America and the Caribbean through security agreements signed with Paraguay, Ecuador, Peru, Trinidad and Tobago, Guyana, the Dominican Republic, and Panama over recent weeks. These deals authorize US troop deployments, airport access, radar installations, and armed operations under the stated pretext of a “war on drugs,” while simultaneously conducting a four-month military campaign against Venezuela that includes oil tanker blockades, vessel seizures, and airstrikes that have killed over 100 people across the Caribbean and Pacific.

Analysts characterize the strategy as establishing operational infrastructure for a potential larger offensive against Venezuela and potentially other nations including Colombia and Cuba. Jennifer Kavanagh, director of military analysis at Defense Priorities, stated that constructing a network of locations across the region would be necessary for sustaining any expanded military operation, and Jorge Heine, former Chilean ambassador and Boston University researcher, directly contradicted the drug-war rationale by noting that Paraguay and Venezuela are not major drug production or distribution centers, indicating the actions align with Trump’s recently released national security strategy document calling for expanded US military presence in the region.

The Trump administration has reframed the Monroe Doctrine as a “Trump Corollary” explicitly calling for military expansion in Latin America, reversing historical patterns of US restraint. Ecuador rejected foreign military bases in a referendum, yet the US secured temporary air force troop deployment anyway; Peru’s congress authorized armed US military and intelligence operations following White House pressure; and Trinidad and Tobago’s installation of US radar prompted Venezuela’s interior minister to threaten retaliation and the regime to terminate fossil gas supply agreements with the Caribbean nation.

John Walsh, director for drug policy at the Washington Office on Latin America, described the strategy as “gunboat diplomacy on steroids,” designed to reward compliant allies while threatening nations that resist Trump administration objectives. Venezuela’s dictator Nicolás Maduro issued an urgent letter to regional leaders warning that US escalation “threatens to destabilise the entire region,” yet his diplomatic isolation—having had almost no contact with other presidents following his disputed 2024 reelection—limits his ability to mobilize regional opposition, while Trump has explicitly threatened Colombia’s leftwing president Gustavo Petro as a potential next target.

The military buildup leverages existing US infrastructure including bases in Puerto Rico, Honduras, and Cuba, alongside surveillance hubs at airports in El Salvador, Aruba, and Curaçao. For nations refusing to align with the Trump administration, Walsh explained that the visible US military presence nearby functions as an implicit threat designed to ensure compliance with American interests.

(Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/dec/23/us-trump-administration-signs-security-deals-across-latin-america)

Matt Gaetz Attends Pentagon Briefing

Former Congressman Matt Gaetz participated in a Pentagon press briefing, joining various far-right MAGA influencers including Laura Loomer and Jack Posobiec. Credentials for regular reporters were revoked when they refused to sign a pledge to report only on pre-approved materials from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

During the briefing, Gaetz directed questions to Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson, inquiring about the Department of Defense’s role in a post-Maduro Venezuela. Wilson responded that the department has contingency plans and emphasized the importance of their ongoing operations against narco-terrorists, stating each operation saves American lives.

Gaetz pressed further, asking whether the administration views anyone associated with the Venezuelan military or government as automatically a narco-terrorist. Wilson indicated that this determination lies with the President but clarified that targets confirmed as drug traffickers are considered narco-terrorists.

Gaetz, who currently hosts a show on One America News Network, has faced scrutiny for his extreme statements, including anti-Israel rhetoric. His show recently fired a staff member over an anti-Semitic video posted online.

Trump Closes Venezuelan Airspace Amid Maduro Tensions

President Donald Trump announced the complete closure of Venezuelan airspace, warning all parties—including airlines and drug traffickers—via a post on Truth Social. This declaration comes amid escalating threats of military action against the country and its leader, Nicolás Maduro, whom Trump accuses of orchestrating drug smuggling operations. The closure is part of a series of over 20 military operations targeting suspected drug-running vessels linked to Venezuela.

Despite ongoing tensions, Trump’s recent engagement with Maduro included discussions of a potential meeting, although none was scheduled. The strained relations follow the U.S. rejecting Maduro’s offer of a significant stake in Venezuelan oil fields to improve ties. In light of these developments, Trump’s administration has publicly acknowledged plans to strike Venezuelan military sites as soon as deemed necessary.

In alignment with his aggressive approach, Trump has also authorized covert CIA operations in Venezuela and the Department of Justice is offering a $50 million reward for information leading to Maduro’s arrest. While Trump previously underestimated the likelihood of war in Venezuela, discussions among his advisors suggest a land invasion is a possible option.

Fox News contributor Dan Hoffman hinted that Trump shutting down the airspace indicates multiple strategies are being considered for handling Maduro. The overall tone from Trump suggests an escalating rivalry, likely complicating prospects for a peaceful resolution in the region.

Trump’s Ukraine Plan is Admittedly a Russian Wish List

U.S. senators, including Mike Rounds and Angus King, disclosed that Secretary of State Marco Rubio informed them that the recent peace plan proposed by President Donald Trump for Ukraine is nothing more than a “wish list” from Russia, rather than a legitimate framework for negotiations. Rounds emphasized that this assessment pointed to the plan’s significant concessions to Moscow, which Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has consistently rejected.

Despite Rubio’s assertions contradicting the senators’ claims and alleging their misinterpretation of his statements, the confusion surrounding the Trump administration’s approach to the peace plan has deepened. The leaked 28-point plan elicited concerns that it merely rewarded Russian aggression while undermining Ukraine’s territorial integrity.

Senators voiced that rather than advocating for legitimate peace negotiations, the plan might send a troubling message to other aggressors, essentially granting validation to their territorial ambitions. Rubio, under pressure, tried to clarify that the plan sought to be a productive starting point, yet many senators remained skeptical about its ethical grounding.

The unfolding situation highlights the increasing rift between Washington’s stance and the expectations of Ukrainian leadership. The implications of such a proposal raise serious questions regarding U.S. foreign policy and President Trump’s credibility on the international stage, particularly as nations observe the handling of this crisis.

As this scenario plays out, observers anticipate how both Ukraine and Russia will respond, while the Trump administration continues to navigate the backlash from U.S. lawmakers who view the peace plan as detrimental to international law and the sovereignty of nations.

Trump Degrades Reporter Over Afghan Gunman Vetting Query

President Donald Trump lashed out at a reporter during a press conference regarding the shooting of two National Guardsmen in Washington, D.C., calling her a “stupid person.” The incident involved a suspected Afghan national, who reportedly had worked closely with the CIA, prompting the reporter to inquire about the vetting process for such individuals.

Despite assertions by U.S. officials that the suspect underwent thorough vetting by both the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI, Trump insisted that the Biden administration’s policies were to blame. He claimed that many Afghans entered the U.S. unvetted and should not have been allowed in, disregarding the reported vetting process.

During the heated exchange, Trump emphasized his frustration with what he termed “disgraceful” immigration practices. He dismissed the reporter’s claims, asserting that the vetting system was ineffective and that a law made it difficult to remove those who should not be in the country.

Trump announced the death of Guardsman Sarah Beckstrom, 20, due to the shooting, while another Guardsman, Andrew Wolfe, remains critically injured. This event has drawn increased scrutiny on the handling of Afghan nationals in the U.S. amid ongoing public safety concerns.

The press conference illuminated Trump’s aggressive communication style and continued attempts to shift blame for the violence, further exacerbating tensions surrounding immigration policy discussions.

Trump Hints at Ground Invasion of Venezuela Amid Escalation

President Donald Trump has indicated that the U.S. may soon expand military operations in Venezuela, suggesting a possible ground invasion. This statement follows the Trump administration’s ongoing military escalations, including recent strikes on drug-carrying vessels in the Caribbean, which reportedly resulted in the deaths of at least 83 people.

During an address to U.S. troops, Trump highlighted that while Venezuelan drug traffickers are largely being targeted at sea, his administration plans to “start stopping them by land” in the near future. These remarks are the most explicit endorsement of land operations in Venezuela that Trump has made to date.

Republican lawmakers have expressed support for a full-scale invasion, with Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar (R-FL) suggesting it would benefit U.S. oil interests. However, a majority of Americans oppose military action, with a recent YouGov and CBS News poll revealing that 70% of respondents are against a U.S. invasion.

This potential military operation raises significant concerns regarding U.S. foreign policy and its implications, as it demonstrates Trump’s willingness to deepen U.S. involvement in South America amid widespread public disapproval.

Trump’s ongoing rhetoric suggests an aggressive strategy that contradicts public sentiment and raises questions about the motivations behind enhancing military actions, including potential economic advantages for specific sectors.

1 2 3 … 9