Category: Military Action

Trump Claims Iran War Nearing Success Despite Disinformation

Trump stated he is considering “winding down” military operations in the Middle East while the war with Iran continues, claiming the United States is approaching its objectives in the conflict. However, the broader context of Trump’s Iran policy demonstrates a pattern of disinformation about the war’s purpose and progress. Trump previously attacked Israel over strikes on Iran’s energy facilities, revealing internal discord over military strategy even among allies.

Trump has repeatedly lied about the war’s justifications and achievements. He claimed an imminent nuclear threat from Iran, which intelligence officials and counterterrorism experts contradicted. The former director of the National Counterterrorism Center resigned over Trump’s abuse of power in ordering the February 28 airstrikes, after Trump deliberately prevented senior officials from presenting their objections. The Iranian government remains in power unchanged, no nuclear agreement has been negotiated to replace the accord Trump withdrew from under the Obama administration, and no credible imminent threat existed or exists.

Trump’s military decisions abroad have strained relationships with international partners. Trump denounced NATO allies as “cowards” for refusing to deploy troops to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, while his unilateral Iran war has backfired diplomatically. He initiated military strikes without coordinating with partners, then demanded their support for an undeclared conflict.

The war has inflicted human costs that Trump exploited politically. Six U.S. Air Force airmen were killed in a refueling aircraft crash during military operations in Iran. Trump attended their dignified transfer despite families explicitly requesting privacy and barring cameras, converting a solemn military ceremony into a public relations event.

Trump’s claim of meeting objectives lacks credible foundation. The regime he sought to destabilize remains intact, no nuclear threat has been eliminated, and the conflict has cost American lives while destabilizing the Middle East further. His description of progress is a lie designed to justify an endless military commitment that benefits no legitimate national interest.

(Source: https://abcnews.com/video/131285673/)

Trump Threatens Iran 48-Hour Ultimatum on Strait

President Donald Trump issued a 48-hour ultimatum to Iran via Truth Social on Saturday evening, demanding the country “FULLY OPEN” the Strait of Hormuz without threat or face U.S. military destruction of its power plants. Trump stated the United States would “hit and obliterate” Iran’s power infrastructure, beginning with the largest facility, if the demand was not met within the specified timeframe. The threat followed joint U.S. and Israeli strikes that killed Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei three weeks prior, part of an operation dubbed “Operation Epic Fury.”

The war with Iran has severely disrupted maritime commerce through the Strait of Hormuz, a critical shipping corridor through which roughly one-fifth of global oil trades. According to the BBC, maritime traffic through the passage plunged 95 percent in March, dropping from approximately 138 daily ship transits to about 100 since military operations commenced. Trump previously denounced NATO allies as cowards for refusing to deploy troops to reopen the strait, revealing his unilateral approach to the conflict has alienated potential partners.

Oil prices have surged dramatically as a direct consequence of the reduced shipping volume and ongoing military operations. A barrel of crude oil cost $98.09 at the close of Friday trading, representing a 47 percent increase since military strikes against Iran began. This economic disruption stems from Trump’s decision to initiate military action alongside Israel without prior diplomatic coordination with international allies.

Trump previously claimed Iran has “effectively ceased to exist as a threat” while simultaneously requesting $200 billion in additional congressional funding for continued military operations, demonstrating contradictory messaging about the conflict’s status and objectives. When challenged by New York Times reporter David Sanger over unmet war objectives, Trump posted on Truth Social that “The United States has blown Iran off of the map” and claimed success ahead of schedule, dismissing the reporter’s analysis as that of a “lightweight analyst.”

Operation Epic Fury has eliminated dozens of Iranian regime leaders beyond Supreme Leader Khamenei since the initial strikes three weeks ago. Trump stated he is considering winding down military operations in the Middle East while the war continues, claiming U.S. forces are approaching stated objectives, though the pattern of contradictory statements about war progress and outcomes demonstrates systematic disinformation surrounding the conflict’s purpose and accomplishments.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-threatens-iran-you-have-48-hours-to-fully-open-strait-of-hormuz-or-else/)

Trump’s Venezuela Coup Shaped by Chevron Executive

Trump’s military operation in Venezuela, which resulted in the capture of President Nicolás Maduro, was shaped by former Chevron executive Ali Moshiri, according to reporting by The Wall Street Journal. Moshiri advised the CIA months before the Trump administration’s attack and takeover, recommending that Venezuela’s then-Vice President Delcy Rodríguez replace Maduro rather than opposition leader Maria Machado, despite Republican supporters backing Machado as the clear successor.

Hours after Maduro’s capture, Trump dismissed the idea of Machado leading Venezuela, claiming she lacked “support or respect within the country”—a position consistent with Moshiri’s earlier counsel to the administration. Moshiri left Chevron in 2017 and ended his consulting relationship with the company in 2024, yet his influence over Trump’s decision directly affected Venezuela’s political future and economic direction.

Investigative journalists identified a clear conflict of interest in this arrangement. Antonia Juhasz wrote that Moshiri, functioning as a CIA informant, “told Trump to ditch democracy and go for Rodriguez ’cause she’d secure the oil.” Kenneth Vogel of The New York Times noted that the secret CIA assessment backing Rodríguez was based on Moshiri’s advice and that “the oil company stands to profit from Trump’s decision to heed that advice.”

The revelation prompted stunned reactions from major media figures. New York Times columnist Lydia Polgreen described the story as one that “pulls back the curtain on how the world really works,” while journalists compared the arrangement to the 2005 film Syriana, which dramatized corporate manipulation of foreign policy. The disclosure demonstrates how Trump’s abuse of power extends to allowing corporate interests to determine military operations and regime change.

(Source: https://www.rawstory.com/trump-2676159147/)

Trump Assails NATO as Cowards While Deepening Iran War

President Trump denounced NATO allies as “cowards” on Friday for refusing to deploy troops to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a critical shipping corridor through which one-fifth of global oil trades. Trump’s hostility toward allies coincides with his unilateral Iran war that has backfired diplomatically, as he initiated military strikes alongside Israel without coordinating with partners, then demanded their support managing the consequences. The Pentagon is deploying approximately 2,200 additional Marines and three warships to the Middle East, marking the second Marine expeditionary unit sent since the conflict began on February 28.

The war has devastated global energy markets and inflicted heavy casualties on U.S. forces. Brent crude oil surged to $112 per barrel, up from roughly $70 before the conflict, with gasoline prices approaching $4 per gallon. The Pentagon reported 232 American service members injured since the war started, with 10 in serious condition. The Treasury Department temporarily lifted sanctions on Iranian oil at sea in an attempt to ease prices, marking a break from Trump’s stated “maximum pressure” strategy against Iran. Pentagon officials have prepared detailed plans for potential ground troop deployment into Iran, though Trump claims the U.S. is considering “winding down” operations while simultaneously retaining options to strike Iran’s Kharg Island oil terminal.

Trump contradicted his own position by claiming the U.S. does not need the Strait of Hormuz while simultaneously pressuring allies to defend it. He stated Iran’s leadership has been decimated, with “nobody to talk to” remaining, yet Iran’s Revolutionary Guard and military officials continue asserting they are producing ballistic missiles and threatening to target recreational and tourist sites worldwide. The International Atomic Energy Agency told CBS News that securing Iran’s enriched uranium will be “very challenging” even after fighting ends, undercutting Trump and Netanyahu’s stated nuclear prevention objectives.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer authorized U.S. use of U.K. bases to strike Iranian missile sites, prompting Iran’s foreign minister to accuse Starmer of “putting British lives in danger.” NATO relocated its advisory mission from Iraq to Italy after Iranian attacks on allied bases. The humanitarian toll extends beyond military casualties; soaring oil prices are driving up costs across U.S. supply chains, affecting retail prices for consumers nationwide. Former Iran detainee Siamak Namazi warned that Americans held in Iranian prisons face heightened danger amid the escalating conflict.

Trump made a debunked claim about predicting the September 11 attacks while discussing the Strait of Hormuz, part of a pattern of disinformation throughout the conflict. The White House stated Trump “retains all options” militarily but claimed he has “no plans to send troops anywhere,” a contradiction given Pentagon preparations for ground deployment. As the war enters its fourth week with no diplomatic resolution, Trump’s contradictory statements and hostile treatment of allies underscore the absence of a coherent strategic plan.

(Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/live-updates/iran-war-us-israel-gas-and-oil-prices-trump-netanyahu-strait-hormuz/)

Trump Demands Treason Charges Against Media Over Iran War

President Trump demanded that media outlets face treason charges for reporting on military incidents during the Iran war, specifically criticizing coverage of alleged strikes on U.S. naval vessels and air bases. In a Truth Social post on March 15, Trump accused Iran of spreading disinformation through artificial intelligence and claimed that American news organizations knowingly amplified false information about the USS Abraham Lincoln and Air Force refueling planes struck at Prince Sultan air base in Saudi Arabia.

Trump alleged that reports showing the USS Abraham Lincoln on fire were fabricated and generated by AI, stating the carrier was neither burning nor targeted. He wrote that media outlets distributing these false reports “should be brought up on Charges for TREASON for the dissemination of false information,” directly calling for criminal prosecution of journalists and news organizations.

CNN’s Daniel Dale documented that when the White House provided examples of outlets spreading the Lincoln story, none were American—one was Israeli, one Saudi, one Turkish. Trump had strongly suggested he was addressing U.S. media when calling for treason charges, contradicting the White House’s own evidence and demonstrating the false basis for his accusations.

Trump praised FCC Chair Brendan Carr for threatening to revoke broadcast licenses, describing news organizations as “Corrupt and Highly Unpatriotic” and claiming they abuse free airwaves. The attack on media freedom follows recent threats from Carr to strip licenses from broadcasters over war coverage and reflects a pattern of abuse of power against journalists who report on Trump’s military operations.

Trump’s assault on press freedom extends beyond coverage of the Iran conflict. He recently attacked New York Times correspondent Maggie Haberman as a “SLEAZEBAG,” threatened to sue her and “associates,” and previously insulted CNN’s Kaitlan Collins, the Washington Post’s Natalie Allison, CBS’s Nancy Cordes, and others, weaponizing his office to silence critical reporting and establish authoritarian control over information.

(Source: https://people.com/donald-trump-wants-some-media-outlets-face-charges-treason-latest-rant-journalists-11926939)

Trump’s Unilateral Iran War Backfires as Allies Reject Strait Coalition

Trump launched military strikes on Iran alongside Israel without coordinating diplomatically with allies, then scrambled to pressure nations to help manage the fallout. After initiating the conflict unilaterally, he requested roughly a half-dozen countries deploy warships to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a critical shipping passage through which one-fifth of global oil trades. Trump signaled he would leverage his scheduled trip to China to coerce Beijing into joining a coalition to restore tanker traffic, though his treasury secretary later attempted damage control on that statement.

Trump’s pressure campaign has failed to generate commitments from potential partners. China remains noncommittal, France offered conditional participation only when “circumstances permit,” and Britain declined to deploy a warship, instead discussing limited mine-hunting drone assistance. Australia’s transport minister stated the country will not send a ship, and Italy rejected expanding naval missions to include the Strait. Trump’s insistence that the United States does not need the waterway due to domestic oil access contradicted his simultaneous demand that other nations sacrifice resources to secure it.

The oil price surge resulting from Trump’s unilateral war decision has driven up gas prices domestically as midterm election season accelerates. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent downplayed war-related economic disruption and accused media outlets of manufacturing a crisis, claiming prices would stabilize after the conflict concludes. Trump dismissed advisers’ assessments of fuel price duration, stating he relies on personal instinct rather than expert counsel.

Trump’s willingness to delay his late-March summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping to pressure Beijing on the strait situation carries substantial economic risk, as tensions between the world’s largest economies remain strained over tariffs. Bessent explicitly discouraged negative market reaction to a potential postponement, framing any reschedule as logistical rather than strategic. China’s slowed growth projection to 4.5-5% for 2026, the lowest since 1991, means prolonged strait disruptions could inflict long-term damage on Beijing’s economy as well.

Trump’s approach mirrors his pattern of unilateral decision-making followed by attempts to extract concessions from allies. The Republican president previously leveraged tariffs and accusations of NATO freeloading to secure increased defense spending commitments, but global resistance to his Strait of Hormuz coalition reveals limits to coercive tactics when nations perceive no direct benefit or mutual agreement. His administration continues the pressure campaign despite repeated rejections, with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt arguing that securing Iran’s disarmament serves the entire Western world regardless of countries’ voluntary participation.

(Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-suggests-may-delay-china-043633731.html)

Trump Threatens Iran Over Strait Mining

President Trump issued a military threat against Iran on March 10th, 2026, stating that any mining of the Strait of Hormuz would result in consequences “at a level never seen before.” Trump posted on Truth Social that mines must be removed immediately or Iran would face severe military action, claiming his administration had no initial reports of mines being placed but demanded their removal nonetheless.

CNN reported that Iran had begun mining the Strait of Hormuz, with sources familiar with U.S. intelligence stating that a few dozen mines had been laid in recent days. According to CNN’s reporting, Iran retains 80 to 90 percent of its small boats and mine-laying vessels, meaning it could feasibly deploy hundreds of additional mines in the strategic waterway. CBS News separately reported Iran may be preparing to deploy naval mines and possesses between 2,000 and 6,000 mines in its arsenal.

Trump followed his initial threat with a second post claiming the military had destroyed 10 inactive mine-laying boats and ships, with more strikes promised. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters the U.S. had not yet begun escorting oil tankers through the Strait. Trump’s threats came as oil prices fluctuated dramatically, surging to $116 per barrel on Monday before dropping to $86 by Tuesday afternoon, up approximately 28 percent since Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei was killed during Operation Epic Fury.

Trump claimed on Monday that the war was “pretty much” complete and would wrap up “soon,” contradicting the escalating military posture reflected in his threats against Iran. The mining dispute represents a direct confrontation with Iran over control of one of the world’s most critical shipping routes, through which approximately one-third of global maritime oil trade passes. Trump’s pattern of military threats and claims of rapid victory mirrors his approach throughout the broader conflict with Iran.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-threatens-iran-with-never-seen-before-attack-if-it-mines-strait-of-hormuz/)

Trump Threatens Iran If It Mines Strait of Hormuz

President Trump issued a military threat against Iran on March 10th, 2026, demanding the immediate removal of naval mines from the Strait of Hormuz or face military consequences described as “at a level never seen before.” Trump posted on Truth Social that while his administration had no initial reports of mines being placed, any mines must be removed immediately or Iran would face severe military action. He followed this threat with a post claiming the U.S. had destroyed ten inactive mine-laying vessels within hours.

CNN reported Iran had begun mining the Strait of Hormuz, with a few dozen mines laid in recent days according to U.S. intelligence sources, though CBS News indicated mining “may be getting ready” rather than already underway. Intelligence sources stated Iran retained 80 to 90 percent of its mine-laying capability and possessed between 2,000 and 6,000 mines total, meaning hundreds more could be deployed. Trump’s threat came amid his unilateral Iran war that has deepened tensions without coordinating with allies on managing the fallout.

Oil markets reacted volatile to the threat and mining reports, with barrel prices surging to $116 on Monday before dropping to $86 by Tuesday afternoon, representing a 28 percent increase since Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s death. Trump claimed on Monday the war was “pretty much” complete and would wrap up “soon,” contradicting the escalatory nature of his latest threats. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated the U.S. has not yet begun escorting oil tankers through the Strait of Hormuz.

Trump’s demand for mine removal without diplomatic engagement reflects his pattern of issuing ultimatums rather than pursuing negotiated settlements. The threat to deploy military force at unprecedented levels escalates tensions in a region already destabilized by his unilateral military strikes without allied coordination. This approach prioritizes military action over diplomacy, potentially widening the conflict rather than resolving the underlying disputes.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-threatens-iran-with-never-seen-before-attack-if-it-mines-strait-of-hormuz/)

Trump Boasts ‘Great Deal’ After Three Service Members Killed

President Trump responded to the deaths of three U.S. service members killed during Operation Epic Fury against Iran by characterizing their loss as part of a transaction that would ultimately benefit the world. When asked about the casualties on Sunday, Trump stated, “We expect casualties with something like this. We have three, but we expect casualties—but in the end it’s going to be a great deal for the world.” U.S. Central Command confirmed the three deaths and noted that several others sustained minor shrapnel injuries and concussions during the ongoing military operation.

Trump’s framing of military deaths as a favorable outcome demonstrates a pattern of reducing human sacrifice to transactional language. His comment equates the lives of fallen service members to a business negotiation, explicitly describing the cost in lives as producing a “great deal”—language that strips dignity from those who died in combat.

CENTCOM withheld the identities of the deceased service members pending next-of-kin notification, emphasizing respect for affected families. Trump’s immediate pivot to boasting about the deal’s value directly contradicts that respectful stance and reveals his core indifference to the human cost of warfare.

(Source: https://www.rawstory.com/trump-us-deaths-great-deal/)

Trump Uses Iran Strike to Justify Imminent Election Takeover Plan

President Trump authorized Operation Epic Fury, a major military assault on Iran early Saturday, February 28, 2026, justifying the strikes by claiming Tehran refused to renounce nuclear weapons development and posed an imminent threat requiring regime change. Hours after the operation commenced, Trump posted on Truth Social linking to a right-leaning news article alleging Iranian interference in the 2020 and 2024 U.S. elections on behalf of former President Joe Biden, an election Trump has repeatedly lied about as “stolen.”

Multiple analysts and legal experts identified Trump’s election interference claim as the probable actual justification for the military action. Columbia University professor Anthony Zenkus responded with exasperation to the post, while journalist Eva Golinger compared the pattern to previous military interventions in Venezuela and implied Cuba would be next. Florida-based attorney Fernando Antonio argued the election interference narrative served as cover for a larger authoritarian scheme to consolidate federal control over future elections.

Antonio’s analysis detailed the operational sequence Trump appeared to be executing. The strategy involved fabricating an imminent Iranian threat to justify military conflict, weaponizing that conflict to declare an emergency, then exploiting the emergency pretext to seize control of electoral systems under the guise of national security. This pattern aligns with Trump’s documented authoritarian methods of using external crises to expand executive power and dismantle democratic institutions.

The discrepancy between Trump’s stated rationale for war and the election interference post reveals how the administration manufactures justifications for military action. By linking Iran to election interference, Trump created a false premise connecting foreign adversaries to his election losses, then used that fabricated connection to authorize military operations and potentially justify emergency powers that would affect domestic elections.

(Source: https://www.rawstory.com/oh-for-the-love-of-god-overlooked-trump-post-hints-at-justification-for-major/)

1 2 3 4 5 6 … 14