Category: Policies

NAS Removes Climate Chapter From Judges Manual After Trump Pressure

The National Academy of Sciences removed a climate science chapter from its Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence after pressure from President Donald Trump and Republican officials who falsely characterized the peer-reviewed work as “biased,” “fraudulent,” and “misleading.” The chapter, titled “Reference Guide on Climate Science,” had been included for the first time in the 2025 edition and covered the greenhouse effect, atmospheric cycling, attribution science, and peer-reviewed research to assist judges in reasoning through cases involving complex scientific topics.

Trump and dozens of state attorneys general attacked the chapter in early 2026, prompting the Federal Judicial Center to remove it in February. The NAS subsequently announced the chapter would remain offline pending an “independent review,” claiming questions about development processes warranted examination. This decision subordinates scientific evidence to political pressure, despite the chapter undergoing rigorous peer review from external scientists, judges, and National Academies staff according to the same standards applied to all manual sections.

Authors Jessica Wentz and Radley Horton, both from Columbia University, defended their work as science-based and properly vetted through extensive external review. Their chapter presented established climate science findings to serve the judiciary in complex litigation. The removal demonstrates how Trump’s federal attack on the National Academy of Sciences extends beyond investigation to direct suppression of scientific guidance that contradicts his interests and those of fossil fuel allies.

The action exemplifies Trump’s systematic assault on independent institutions and scientific authority. By weaponizing accusations of bias against peer-reviewed climate science, Trump manufactures pretexts for erasing inconvenient research from judicial reference materials, obstructing judges’ access to credible scientific evidence necessary for sound legal reasoning on environmental cases. The capitulation by the NAS and Federal Judicial Center signals institutional vulnerability to authoritarian pressure campaigns disguised as procedural reviews.



(Source: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/national-academy-of-sciences-pulls-climate-chapter-from-judges-manual/?fbclid=IwdGRjcATrIC1wZG9mBWZkaWQWUMZ6s8by4ageyWFLZJOlZd9RMlUyKmV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR4pJlcKCUmPfRwgQAFhKYQrqASw-byqdNMuOvzpsPkat-GNTLopRJPOkPaenw_aem_0rxQnwFSMEE7-5KTB6PYUw)

We crunched the numbers: Trump devoted 45,000 words to construction like Reflecting Pool, ballroom – PolitiFact

PolitiFact analyzed Trump's public events and speeches from January through July 2026, documenting that he devoted nearly 45,000 words to construction projects including the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool and White House ballroom across 84 events over 66 days. Construction projects consumed more than a quarter of his public speaking time during this period and became his dominant topic when making unprompted remarks, second only to the Iran war when responding to reporters' questions.

Trump's focus on the Reflecting Pool intensified in May as the July 4th anniversary approached, consuming approximately 10% of his speaking time in events where he mentioned it. He made inconsistent cost claims about repairs, initially stating the project would cost $1.5 million to $2 million in April, then raising estimates to $10 million to $16 million by June. Trump cited contradictory figures about predecessor spending, claiming Obama spent either $38 million or $100 million on repairs when records show Obama actually spent $35 million. After a new pool liner began peeling in June, Trump blamed vandals without evidence, but prosecutors led by U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro determined that faulty contractor installation caused the damage and dropped all charges.

Trump's $200 million White House ballroom project, later doubled in size to $400 million at what he claimed was military request, exemplifies how he frames construction through his personal identity. Trump repeatedly asserted no taxpayer funds would be used, claiming wealthy donors including Apple and Microsoft would pay, yet a Washington Post investigation of contractor estimates revealed taxpayers could cover more than half the $600 million projected cost. A federal appeals court blocked the ballroom construction in August, ruling Trump needs Congressional approval, prompting him to announce plans to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Political communication experts identify Trump's construction rhetoric as distinctly narcissistic, transforming projects into extensions of his personal judgment rather than institutional stewardship. Sam Martin, Boise State University associate professor, noted that Trump's framing reflects "a view of presidential power that depends primarily on the judgment, instincts, and abilities of one exceptional individual rather than on constitutional processes or institutional collaboration." Allison Prasch, University of Wisconsin-Madison rhetoric professor, observed that Trump disregards expert recommendations and historical preservation standards to "shape this national narrative" in ways that "his influence and eminence will outlast himself."

Public opposition to Trump's construction agenda contradicts his rhetoric. A July Washington Post/Ipsos poll found nearly two in three Americans dissatisfied or upset with the projects, including 90% of Democrats and 68% of Republicans, though 86% of self-identified MAGA Republicans supported them. Trump's preoccupation with construction projects and the Reflecting Pool during an ongoing Iran war, rising gasoline prices, and accelerated Kennedy Center renovations bypassing federal contracting standards demonstrates his prioritization of monument-building and personal legacy over governance.

(Source: https://politifact.com/article/2026/aug/11/trump-construction-ballroom-reflecting-pool/)

Surprise! Todd Blanche Immediately Breaks His Promises to GOP Senators | The New Republic

Todd Blanche issued a Department of Justice memo on his first day as Attorney General that expands executive privilege protections for President Trump, allowing him to shield communications with private advisers from congressional oversight. The memo extends privilege claims to cover exchanges between the president's advisers and civilians, a significant expansion from traditional interpretations. Senate Democrats, particularly Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, identified the move as evidence Trump is preparing to obstruct potential investigations if Democrats regain House control.

Blanche's immediate action contradicts assurances he provided during his confirmation hearing to Senators Bill Cassidy, John Cornyn, and Tom Tillis regarding limits on presidential immunity and accountability. His memo demonstrates the Attorney General is committed to shielding Trump from legal consequences and blocking government transparency rather than enforcing the law independently. The move directly undermines the stated commitments that secured his confirmation vote.

The administration is simultaneously pursuing aggressive immigration enforcement that targets military families despite ongoing recruitment efforts that promise immigration protections. In April 2025, Immigration and Customs Enforcement reversed longstanding policy treating military service as a mitigating factor in enforcement decisions, leading to detention of over 50 military spouses and relatives. More than 60 congressional Democrats, led by Senators Elizabeth Warren, Tammy Duckworth, and Richard Blumenthal, launched an investigation into whether the Defense Department collaborated with Homeland Security to detain servicemembers and their families, a potential violation of the Posse Comitatus Act.

The administration also announced plans to separate the MMR vaccine into three individual shots, falsely linking the combined vaccine to autism, despite CDC confirmation that no scientific evidence supports splitting the vaccine. Outgoing Senator Bill Cassidy, a physician, directly condemned the executive order as medically unsound and likely to increase vaccine hesitancy among families. Cassidy's criticism carries limited credibility given his decisive confirmation vote for Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an anti-vaccine activist without public health expertise.

Trump nominated Dennis Kirk, a Project 2025 author and former Office of Personnel Management official, as Interior Department Inspector General, positioning a Trump loyalist to oversee ethics investigations and potential probes into the $16 million renovation of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. The nomination drew Democratic opposition, with House Natural Resources Committee ranking member Jared Huffman calling Kirk a "fake and fraudulent watchdog" designed to shield administration officials from accountability. Trump's administration has already defied federal court orders in other contexts, signaling systematic resistance to judicial oversight.

(Source: https://newrepublic.com/post/214186/todd-blanche-breaks-promises-donald-trump?utm_medium=social&utm_source=Facebook&utm_campaign=SF_TNR&fbclid=IwdGRjcAToUhpwZG9mBWZkaWQWUMSMzAgdnNxqwI-26BM6ALF5VHUZa2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR6Q_bhedKdybU3lTo998_TuvOU4ympm8H4ySVS25-LyOmFWhcKbh6WzNuH6MQ_aem_ozjN_-gR48igEMiBuFNGiw)

Trump Won’t Rule Out National Security Emergency to Seize Election Control

Donald Trump declined to rule out declaring a national security emergency to unilaterally impose voting restrictions bypassing congressional approval. When radio host Wayne Allyn Root suggested Trump declare such an emergency to enforce citizenship proof requirements, voter ID mandates, and mail-in ballot restrictions before the midterms, Trump responded: "Let me just say that stranger things have happened, Ok. I'll leave it at that." Trump did not elaborate on the statement, but the remark signals his intent to seize control over federal election administration.

Root explicitly proposed that Trump invoke emergency powers to circumvent Congress, claiming a two-thirds congressional supermajority would be required to overturn such a declaration. However, Trump lacks constitutional authority to alter federal election rules unilaterally. The Constitution grants Congress exclusive power to regulate federal elections. The Center for American Progress documented in March 2026 that no federal executive official possesses authority to change federal election administration rules. Trump's invocation of emergency powers to override this constitutional constraint would constitute an authoritarian seizure of electoral control.

Trump has already attempted multiple times to impose voting restrictions through executive order, each blocked by courts. A federal judge blocked Trump's executive order requiring states to create citizen eligibility lists, despite noncitizen voting being extremely rare according to research. Federal appeals courts also prevented Trump from restricting mail-in voting, ruling his order "directs unprecedented levels of involvement by federal officials in how states administer elections." Trump has recently petitioned the Supreme Court to allow mail-in ballot restrictions after failing to pressure the Senate into passing the unpopular SAVE Act.

Trump's sustained efforts to dismantle voting access mechanisms demonstrate a systematic campaign to consolidate electoral power. Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin has threatened state election officials with imprisonment for refusing to implement Trump's SAVE program. The combination of Trump's refusal to dismiss emergency election takeover, his pattern of blocked executive orders on voting, and his administration's threats against state officials reflects a coordinated effort to subordinate electoral processes to presidential control and permanently entrench one-party rule.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-elections-federal-takeover-national-emergency-b3031294.html?fbclid=IwdGRjcAToUapwZG9mBWZkaWQWUMQwWSFjX2E2GiD0syfI-hK4js4gCGV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR4tJeqGHMvSTn1xbzQyigdGOdaX5dhN3-s7M6f0MjGLJujXV6QqzRFiSn3svg_aem_t-SNyNh-EPPP-9qhMjpc8w)

Trump Orders Cuts to Childhood Vaccines Without Evidence

President Donald Trump signed an executive order Monday establishing the “Gold Standard Childhood Vaccine Recommendations,” which would dramatically reduce federal childhood vaccination guidance by spreading immunizations across separate appointments, splitting the combined MMR vaccine into three individual shots, and reorganizing vaccines into different risk tiers. During the signing ceremony at the White House, Trump claimed the combined MMR vaccine “could” be “quite lethal,” but admitted moments later when pressed by reporters that he had no evidence supporting the assertion.

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. stood alongside Trump during the order signing, advancing the administration’s push to overturn decades of established federal vaccine recommendations. Trump had previously pressured Kennedy during a May lunch to escalate efforts investigating a debunked link between vaccines and autism, criticizing Kennedy for having “the yips” on the vaccine issue despite White House political advisers urging restraint on vaccine-related messaging.

The executive order reflects Trump’s broader effort to reshape federal health policy through vaccine reduction, following a January Department of Health and Human Services study initiated by Trump in December proposing vaccination against only 11 diseases rather than the current comprehensive schedule. The changes would eliminate or defer federal recommendations for vaccines against flu, rotavirus, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, and certain meningitis strains, among others.

Kennedy’s role in overseeing this vaccine overhaul extends beyond childhood recommendations, as he has signaled intent to dismantle and reconstruct the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, the federal committee responsible for recommending disease screening tests and determining insurance coverage for preventive care. The administration’s actions align with efforts to eliminate Pentagon mandatory flu vaccination requirements and pursue changes to longstanding public health protocols across federal agencies.

Trump’s unsubstantiated claim about MMR vaccine lethality contradicts the scientific consensus supporting vaccine safety and reflects the pattern of health misinformation advanced by Kennedy and endorsed by the administration without evidentiary support.



(Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/08/10/trump-administration-order-would-upend-nations-childhood-vaccine-schedule/?utm_campaign=wp_main&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social)

Trump Orders Birthright Citizenship Restrictions, Defies Supreme Court

President Trump signed two executive orders Thursday targeting birthright citizenship and commercial birth tourism, marking his second attempt to circumvent the 14th Amendment after the Supreme Court rejected his broader Inauguration Day order on June 30. The orders narrow citizenship eligibility for children born to foreign diplomatic staff, individuals classified as alien enemies or members of federally declared terrorist groups, those born in U.S. territories if Congress changes the law, and children born to mothers who “deceptively” enter the country specifically to give birth at commercial centers.

Trump’s administration contends these orders operate within existing constitutional exceptions to the 14th Amendment, claiming the Supreme Court’s June 30 decision still permits targeting birthright citizenship under long-recognized categories. The birth-tourism order weaponizes the concept of “fraudulent misrepresentation,” arguing that mothers who expressly and deceptively enter the U.S. for childbirth forfeit birthright protections, similar to revoking naturalized citizenship obtained by fraud. A second order directs the State Department and Department of Homeland Security to issue rules combating birth tourism domestically and abroad, despite U.S. law already prohibiting tourist visas obtained primarily for childbirth purposes.

Congressional Republicans frame birth tourism as a national security threat, with the House Oversight Committee investigating the industry in May and citing concerns that foreign expectant mothers from China and Russia present “potential national security and election integrity threats posed by adversarial nations.” Trump has personalized the issue, attacking wealthy foreign nationals and framing birthright citizenship as an undeserved privilege being exploited for profit, stating on Truth Social that birthright citizenship should not apply to “rich people from China” seeking to make their children U.S. citizens “FOR PAY.”

Legal experts including University of Virginia immigration law professor Amanda Frost rejected Trump’s framing, arguing that if birth tourism represents a genuine policy concern, enforcement of existing regulations suffices without dismantling birthright citizenship protections. The orders face certain legal challenges identical to those that eliminated Trump’s first executive order, as the 14th Amendment’s plain language grants citizenship to all persons born in the United States regardless of parental status. Trump has already demanded the Supreme Court grant him a rehearing after the court rejected his initial birthright citizenship order, exposing his pattern of defying judicial decisions that constrain his authority.

Estimates of children born through birth tourism range from thousands to tens of thousands, though congressional Republicans lack concrete evidence linking the practice to election interference or security breaches. The administration’s targeting of birth tourism through executive order, combined with its resistance to the Supreme Court’s June 30 ruling, demonstrates Trump’s commitment to expanding executive power over citizenship determinations regardless of constitutional limitations.



(Source: https://www.axios.com/2026/08/06/trump-birth-tourism-birthright-citizenship)

Trump Claims, ‘A Bad Judge Declared Sports Unconstitutional’

President Donald Trump made a fabricated claim at a White House celebration for Team USA Olympic athletes on Thursday, stating that “a bad judge declared sports unconstitutional.” Trump provided no evidence or specifics for this assertion, which appears designed to justify his ongoing campaign against transgender athletes in sports.

Trump used the Olympic athletes’ presence to attack transgender participation in women’s sports, claiming his administration has “done a lot to help save women’s sports” and is “saving college sports.” He referenced an unspecified judicial decision and announced efforts to pass legislation reversing what he characterized as damage from this ruling, stating “if it does, we’ll be bringing sports back.”

On the same day, Republican senators Josh Hawley, Jim Banks, and Tommy Tuberville introduced an amendment to the Protect College Sports Act designed to preserve state-level bans on transgender women competing in women’s college athletics. The senators claim the underlying bill could supersede existing state restrictions, while bill supporters argue it establishes uniform national standards for college athletics.

In June, Trump celebrated a Supreme Court decision upholding transgender athlete bans in West Virginia and Idaho, posting on Truth Social that the ruling “takes that ridiculous situation off the table.” Trump’s Thursday comments extend this pattern of weaponizing sports policy to mobilize his political base around restrictions on transgender participation.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-claims-a-bad-judge-declared-sports-unconstitutional/)

Trump Claims US Taking Billions Barrels Oil Venezuela

President Donald Trump declared on Wednesday that the U.S. has extracted "billions and billions of barrels of oil from Venezuela," describing the seizure as payment for a 48-minute military operation that captured then-President Nicolás Maduro in January. Trump justified the resource extraction by invoking the phrase "to the victor belong the spoils," framing the takeover of Venezuela's sovereign oil reserves as a standard practice of war, despite international law explicitly prohibiting such seizures.

Trump's statement follows the January abduction of Maduro by U.S. special forces and his current detention in a New York jail on drug trafficking charges. Vice President Delcy Rodríguez assumed the presidency and has complied with American demands, while Secretary of State Marco Rubio functions as de facto viceroy over the nation, controlling Venezuela's finances, natural resources, and government appointments from Washington. Trump stated the volume of oil extracted has paid for the war "many, many, many times over."

The president applied the same reasoning to Iran, stating "we're doing the same thing, by the way, in the lovely Islamic Republic of Iran. We're knocking the hell out of them." His comments arrive as Iran has closed the Strait of Hormuz, a critical shipping channel controlling roughly 20% of global oil flow, following the commencement of a U.S.-Israeli air campaign against the country in February.

Trump has previously criticized the George W. Bush administration's 2003 invasion of Iraq, specifically objecting to Bush's failure to seize Iraqi oil reserves to offset military expenses. The current president's boasts about extracting Venezuelan resources and applying identical tactics to Iran demonstrate his explicit endorsement of resource confiscation as wartime policy, contradicting international conventions that classify such seizures as war crimes and violations of the laws of occupation.

Under modern international law, seizing another nation's natural resources as "spoils of war" is strictly illegal and constitutes a war crime known as pillage. Frameworks like the Hague Regulations of 1907 and the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 explicitly prohibit the plunder of public or private property during an armed conflict. Furthermore, if a country militarily occupies another, it is legally considered merely a temporary administrator of those resources; it can only use them to support the local population or manage the immediate occupation, not to enrich its own domestic economy or pay for the war. Consequently, forcibly extracting sovereign resources like oil for the victor's profit directly violates the laws of occupation, contradicts the United Nations Charter, and is prosecutable as a war crime under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/trump-brags-hes-taking-billions-of-barrels-of-oil-from-venezuela-because-to-the-victor-belong-the-spoils/)

Trump Attacks Pirro After Pool Charges Dismissed

President Trump publicly attacked U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro on Monday after she dismissed criminal charges against Olympic canoeist David Hearn, who had been accused of vandalizing the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. Trump told reporters Pirro had “choked” and “folded like an umbrella” in dropping the charges, marking his strongest public comments yet on whether her job remains secure.

Pirro appeared at the White House Monday afternoon with a banker’s box of evidence to defend her prosecutorial decision to Trump directly. During the contentious meeting, Pirro lashed out at Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and accused him of misleading the president and covering up mistakes regarding the pool’s damage. National Park Service engineers had privately blamed a private contractor hired through a no-bid Department of Interior contract for the flawed installation, evidence Pirro said emerged after charges were already filed.

Pirro’s 20-page filing stated the damage resulted from “flawed installation by the contractor” rather than vandalism, contradicting Trump’s longstanding public position on the matter. She dismissed not only Hearn’s felony indictment but also misdemeanor cases against three others related to destruction at the pool. Internal National Park Service communications from June 11 raised concerns about the peeling pool liner more than a week before Hearn’s arrest, according to court documents.

Trump did not inform Pirro he intended to fire her during the meeting, nor did she offer to resign, according to sources familiar with the private discussion. However, Trump reiterated late Tuesday that Pirro is “totally wrong” about the pool and said he was “not happy” with his hand-picked U.S. attorney, leaving her employment status unresolved. A White House official confirmed the president was not aware in advance that Pirro would file court papers dismissing the charges.



(Source: https://abcnews.com/Politics/inside-trumps-contentious-oval-office-meeting-jeanine-pirro/story?id=135393382)

Trump Installs Barton as Smithsonian Advisor to Erase Slavery History

President Trump released an executive order last Friday directing officials to install signs at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History warning visitors that exhibits present history inaccurately. This order continues a systematic campaign by the Trump administration to discredit and control the Smithsonian Institution, which includes 21 museums and the National Zoo, citing a 162-page White House report released on July 4 that accuses the institution of “extreme political activism” and “anti-White activism.”

The Trump administration’s assault on the Smithsonian intensified after Trump’s second term began, with an earlier executive order titled “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History” promising to “restore” the institution to “American greatness.” Trump officials have threatened to withhold federal funding, ordered reviews of eight museums, and compiled lists of objectionable exhibits. When questioned by Congress, Anthea Hartig, director of the National Museum of American History, testified that “examining the harder chapters of our history is not the same as hostility toward America” and that “telling our history fully is not anti-American.”

David Barton, a Christian nationalist advocate with no degree in history who founded the advocacy group WallBuilders, and his son Tim have shaped the White House report through their influence on Trump officials. Despite having his work repeatedly rejected by actual historians and having a 2012 book about Thomas Jefferson pulled from shelves for containing distortions and false information, Barton has attended multiple White House meetings during Trump’s second term to discuss what he views as “crazy stuff” in Smithsonian museums. The Bartons champion a “lost cause” framing of American history, arguing that slavery demonstrates “American exceptionalism” and that the founding fathers’ Christian values are underemphasized by historians, claims that directly mirror the White House report’s criticisms.

The Bartons have repeatedly acknowledged their involvement in identifying problematic Smithsonian exhibits for the Trump administration. In a January 2026 podcast episode, Tim Barton stated that the White House had specifically asked him and his father to help identify problematic exhibits, which David Barton confirmed he had delivered to White House officials. Tim Barton later revealed that members of the House Committee on Administration, including Rep. Barry Loudermilk, called the Bartons for advice on questions to pose during congressional hearings about the Smithsonian report.

Since the Smithsonian’s Board of Regents controls museum leadership, Trump and Congressional Republicans are working to stack the board with conservative allies. Vice President JD Vance, a board member, has delayed action on nominations to allow Trump to substitute candidates he favors. Rep. Loudermilk acknowledged on a podcast that he is working with the White House to engineer these leadership changes, even joking that David Barton and “these others” could “run our national museums.”



(Source: https://popular.info/p/the-fake-historian-advising-trumps?fbclid=IwVERFWATXip9wZG9mBWZkaWQWULjODYeBTLKGHK_2VZEeo7ij5xRvV2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR6FOZuJjNKPzwGJUTd9uVuwwRf7m8llDZEcnsU0g_-1aKO59Ilyq-7LGFcXxw_aem_nHGM1UoYu793NYVA92UHcQ)

1 2 3 … 375