Category: Anti-American

Trump Renews Lincoln Bathroom in Marble Amid Public Backlash

President Donald Trump recently showcased a lavish renovation of the Lincoln Bathroom in the White House, claiming it was necessary to reflect an appropriate style for the era of Abraham Lincoln. The bathroom now features white marble with gold accents, which Trump declared suited for Lincoln’s time, even suggesting it could be the original marble that once adorned the space.

Trump’s post on his social media platform, Truth Social, included before-and-after images of the renovation, a part of his broader undertaking to overhaul the East Wing into a $300 million ballroom financed by private donations. This ambitious project has faced backlash, with a significant majority of Americans expressing their disapproval of demolishing the East Wing.

According to a recent ABC News/Washington Post/Ipsos poll, 56% of Americans oppose the East Wing’s demolition for Trump’s ballroom, and only 28% support the project. This growing skepticism reflects how the public sentiment is shifting against luxury renovations that prioritize Trump’s personal aesthetic over historic preservation.

The President’s critique of previous renovations, particularly by Harry Truman, highlights his obsession with recreating aspects of the White House to align with his vision. Truman’s redesign has been dismissed by Trump as “not good,” as he believes it deviates from a style representative of the 1850s and the Civil War era.

This instance marks another moment where Trump uses his presidential position to impose personal preferences and designs on a public space, raising alarms about his intentions to reshape the White House to resemble a private property instead of a national symbol. The implications of such changes could signal a concerning trend toward personalizing the office, disregarding the historical significance of the Presidential residence.

Trump Plans to Name White House Ballroom After

President Donald Trump is expected to name a new ballroom at the White House after himself, with senior administration officials referring to it as “The President Donald J. Trump Ballroom.” The proposed name aligns with Trump’s history of branding his construction projects. Details indicate that the project will cost approximately $300 million.

The entire East Wing of the White House has been demolished to make way for the ballroom, which is set to cover 90,000 square feet. Imagery of the demolition shows some historic magnolia trees and elements of the Kennedy Garden removed from the site. Despite the extensive changes, Trump has not publicly confirmed what he will name the ballroom but has acknowledged ongoing discussions.

During a recent interaction with ABC News, Trump chose not to elaborate on the ballroom’s name but has expressed confidence in the project, stating he would contribute “millions of dollars” towards it. Trump’s commitment is underscored by reported fundraising efforts that have already raised about $350 million, with substantial support from contributors eager to see the project fulfilled.

Trumps’s focus on enhancing the White House with this ballroom has received mixed reactions amid ongoing discussions about budget allocations. Questions remain regarding the utilization of the surplus funds raised beyond the projected construction costs. Currently, the White House remains engaged in the ballroom’s construction, with further updates expected as the project progresses.

Construction activities are ongoing, despite criticisms regarding the historic significance of the buildings being altered. Trump’s renovation efforts, including this ballroom, highlight his broader vision for the White House, which appears closely tied to his personal branding.

Trump Pledges National Guard Deployment to Chicago Amid Protests

President Donald Trump’s escalating confrontation with Chicago’s leadership reached a new level as he ordered the deployment of approximately 500 National Guard troops near the city. This controversial move came despite vocal opposition from both Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson and Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, who condemned the militarization of their city as an unwarranted provocation. In response to their resistance, Trump callously suggested that both officials should face jail time, underscoring his authoritarian tendencies as he targets political opponents.

The National Guard presence, which included soldiers from both Texas and Illinois, was characterized by Trump and his administration as necessary for protecting federal personnel and property, particularly in the context of his aggressive immigration enforcement policies. However, recent protests against immigration actions in Chicago have predominantly been peaceful, contrasting sharply with Trump’s alarmist rhetoric about “violence” and “lawlessness,” which lacks factual backing.

Large protests emerged in Chicago, with many residents expressing rage against the deployment of National Guard troops and the broader implications of Trump’s immigration policies. Protesters chanted in solidarity with a recent victim of ICE violence, signifying community anger towards federal enforcement actions perceived as unjust and harmful. Such demonstrations highlight the divide between Trump’s narrative and the experiences and sentiments of local communities, particularly within Latino neighborhoods.

In an alarming trend, the Constitution is being leveraged by Trump as he threatens to sidestep judicial oversight regarding the National Guard’s deployment, indicating a disregard for checks and balances that are fundamental to American democracy. Legal challenges against these actions are underway, emphasizing the delicate balance of power and the resistance against Trump’s increasingly aggressive tactics, which mimic authoritarian regimes.

The ongoing situation in Chicago is emblematic of Trump’s broader strategy against Democratic leaders who oppose his fascistic agenda. This pivot towards militarization and intimidation reflects a national trend of targeting opposition, indicating a dangerous shift away from democratic norms and a troubling embrace of coercive governance that threatens the very fabric of civil liberties in America.

Trump Threatens to Fire Military Leaders at Quantico Summit

President Donald Trump threatened to fire military leaders during a mysterious military summit in Quantico, Virginia, while addressing top commanders. Trump stated, “I’m going to be meeting with generals and with admirals… if I don’t like somebody, I’m going to fire them right on the spot.” His comments echo an ongoing trend of increasingly authoritarian rhetoric among Republicans, including calls to eliminate “woke” policies from the military.

Pentagon Chief Pete Hegseth supported Trump’s stance, claiming the Defense Department had deteriorated due to “wokeness,” and announced strict new physical fitness directives and grooming standards. Hegseth warned senior officers that if they disagreed with him, they should resign, embracing a culture of intolerance and intimidating leadership.

This unprecedented gathering involved numerous high-ranking military officials, generating significant security concerns and potential logistical issues due to the volume of personnel brought to Quantico. Experts warned that the costs associated with this event could run into the millions, further raising questions about the wisdom and necessity of such a meeting.

Critics, including Democratic senators, condemned the summit as a misuse of resources, noting that it diverts top military commanders from their essential duties and raises security risks. They expressed concern that bringing so many senior officers together could expose vulnerabilities as adversaries could exploit the situation.

The summit exemplifies the Trump administration’s troubling authoritarian tendencies, seeking to reshape military culture through intimidation and threatening the personal careers of those who challenge his vision. Such actions contribute to a growing sentiment of militarization within politics, highlighting a dangerous shift away from democratic principles.

Trump Attacks UN Principles, Urges Halt to Migration and Climate Efforts

During his recent address at the United Nations General Assembly, President Donald Trump controversially challenged the organization’s foundational principles by calling on global leaders to curb migration and disregard climate change initiatives. This rhetoric not only contradicts essential global priorities but also reflects Trump’s inclination to prioritize his domestic agenda over international collaboration.

Trump’s remarks emphasized a perceived urgency to enhance national interests at the expense of collective action. He portrayed global migration as a crisis, which aligns with his history of xenophobic policies, further promoting a narrative that disregards human rights and humanitarian responsibility. His call for reduced migration resonates with his prior attempts to build walls, both physical and metaphorical, that alienate rather than unite nations.

The President’s focus on dismissing climate change efforts starkly contrasts scientific consensus and international commitments, undermining cooperative endeavors essential to future generations. This disregard exemplifies Trump’s consistent pattern of approaching complex global issues with simplistic solutions that neglect the nuances and important contributions of diplomacy and international cooperation.

By framing his domestic priorities as a universal model, Trump positions himself against the fundamental principles of the United Nations, which emphasize collaboration, equity, and sustainability. This stance not only alienates allies but also spurns collective efforts that have been pivotal in addressing pressing global challenges over the years.

Ultimately, Trump’s address exemplified a troubling shift towards isolationism and unilateralism, indicative of a larger trend within the Republican Party that seeks to distance the United States from its role as a multilateral leader. His approach threatens to unravel decades of progress in global governance aimed at fostering peace, security, and common wellness.

Trump Transforms White House Rose Garden into Mar-a-Lago Patio

Donald Trump has replaced the grassy area of the Rose Garden at the White House with stone, mimicking the aesthetic of his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida. This recent renovation, estimated at $1.9 million, showcases a shift away from the traditional landscape established during the Kennedy administration, highlighting Trump’s preference for luxury over historical significance.

Trump justified the transformation by claiming the grass became too soggy for high-heeled shoes, expressing a specific concern for guests’ footwear comfort. With new drainage systems and white grates adorned with Stars and Stripes, the project continues his legacy of prioritizing personal preference and superficiality over the preservation of history and symbolic spaces integral to American culture.

While the flowers remain, the removal of the lawn marks a significant departure from the original design envisioned by President John F. Kennedy and First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy, who focused on creating an outdoor room for events. Critics have noted that the alterations reflect Trump’s inclination to impose personal taste on public spaces, sidelining the historical context and collective memory tied to these iconic sites.

Trump’s ongoing renovations, including plans for a $200 million ballroom, underscore a broader pattern of commodifying presidential attractions and appropriating democratic institutions for personal prestige. The new layout includes patio tables and a speaker system allowing Trump to play music, further infusing the space with his persona rather than adhering to the dignity expected of such locations.

As Trump reshapes the Rose Garden into a reflection of his brand, the American public is left to confront the implications of such changes—not just as renovations, but as a broader statement about the diminishing significance of democratic principles under his administration. Ultimately, this transformation signals a continuing trend of prioritizing personal desires over the national heritage.

(h/t: https://www.npr.org/2025/08/23/nx-s1-5509554/rose-garden-paved)

Trump’s Threat to Federalize D.C. Reveals Authoritarian Agenda and Undermines Local Governance

Donald Trump recently issued a threatening ultimatum to take federal control over Washington D.C., claiming that rising crime rates necessitate it. He described a situation where local youth involved in crime operate with impunity, painting a picture of lawlessness perpetuated by progressive local prosecutors. Trump’s inflammatory words suggest a plan to prosecute minors as adults, stirring a pot of fear and misinformation about crime in the capital.

In a post on his Truth Social platform, he indicated his disregard for the complexities of the justice system, declaring that he would “FEDERALIZE” Washington unless immediate changes were made. This drastic proposal reveals an alarming readiness to bypass democratic processes and local governance in favor of an authoritarian approach. Underlying themes in Trump’s rhetoric echo a long-standing disdain for perceived ‘soft’ prosecution in cities led by Democrats.

This is not the first time Trump has floated the idea of federal intervention. He had previously suggested during a Cabinet meeting that he had the capability to run D.C. more effectively, an assertion that reflects his continuous undermining of local authority. Despite the impossibility of unilaterally imposing such federal power without Congressional approval, Trump’s statements showcase an intent to seize militaristic control, threatening the self-governance of the nation’s capital.

In addition, Trump’s propensity to leverage crime as a talking point is part of a broader strategy to establish a narrative of crisis that justifies authoritarian measures. His public images and statements promote fear and division, framing situations in cities with high crime rates as a justification for extreme measures that would erode civil liberties.

Ultimately, Trump’s latest assertions about taking control of D.C. epitomize a worrying trend towards undermining democratic norms, fueling a culture where strength is equated with federal dominance over local governance. His calls for more severe legal actions and direct intervention speak volumes about the authoritarian direction of his political ideology, leaving democracy vulnerable to fascist overtones.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/federalize-this-city-trump-threatens-to-take-over-washington-dc-to-get-crime-under-control/)

Trump Justifies LA National Guard Mobilization with Paid Protester False Claims

President Donald Trump has justified the mobilization of the National Guard and Marines in Los Angeles by claiming that “violent demonstrators” are financially motivated. This assertion has not been backed by credible evidence, and law enforcement figures, like LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell, have explicitly denied the need for military intervention, stating that the police have adequate resources to handle the protests.

Trump’s comments mirror his historical pattern of labeling protesters as “paid,” a tactic he has employed repeatedly without substantiation. During recent interviews, he referred to the demonstrators as “paid insurrectionists” and indicated that Attorney General Pam Bondi’s staff would investigate these claims. However, this narrative lacks any factual basis, with administration officials failing to provide concrete evidence supporting the idea that large crowds are being compensated to protest.

The alleged connection between the protests and paid actors has attracted attention from Republican officials, including Senator Josh Hawley, who called for information from groups he speculated might be financing civil unrest. However, the supposed claims about “credible reporting” made by Hawley’s office remain unsubstantiated, raising doubts about the legitimacy of these allegations. Meanwhile, civil rights advocates criticize these claims as distractions from legitimate social justice efforts.

As tensions in Los Angeles escalate, Trump’s rhetoric serves to exaggerate the nature of the protests, framing them as organized violence orchestrated by sinister groups. This narrative aims to justify a heavy-handed federal response against demonstrators who are predominantly gathered to voice their concerns over immigration enforcement practices. Critics argue this characterization is both manipulative and incendiary, undermining genuine democratic expressions of dissent.

Overall, Trump’s unfounded assertions about paid protesters and the violence in Los Angeles exemplify a dangerous strategy of conflating legitimate civil unrest with radical, organized aggression. This serves not only to discredit peaceful activism but also to create an environment in which the federal government can exert excessive force, reinforcing authoritarian tendencies in his administration.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/12/politics/trump-paid-protester-claim-analysis)

Trump Calls For Jailing of Gov. Newsom Because He Is A Governor

President Donald Trump has escalated his unhinged rhetoric against California Governor Gavin Newsom, absurdly branding his candidacy for governor as a crime. In a recent media engagement, Trump dismissed inquiries about specific wrongdoing by Newsom, instead claiming that his primary offense lies in his governance, which Trump insists has been disastrous. This baseless attack reflects Trump’s ongoing strategy to vilify political opponents, diverting attention from significant issues facing the nation.

During a White House press session, a reporter pressed Trump on why he believed Newsom should face arrest. Trump’s response was laced with misinformation, particularly regarding California’s response to wildfires, suggesting that Newsom mishandled resources during the crises. Despite Trump’s claims of sending water aid, numerous fact-checks have debunked these statements, indicating that they are not grounded in reality and serve only to fuel Trump’s narrative of political villainy.

Newsom has remained defiant in the face of Trump’s threats, asserting that such actions indicate a troubling shift towards authoritarianism. His comments highlight the alarming nature of Trump’s rhetoric, which seeks to undermine democratic norms by targeting a sitting governor simply for exercising the right to run for office. This situation exemplifies a dangerous precedent where political disagreements devolve into calls for legal repercussions against opponents.

In his remarks, Trump continues to exploit fear and misinformation surrounding immigration, painting an exaggerated picture of the impacts on healthcare and education. These unfounded claims contribute to a divisive political atmosphere that undermines public discourse. Rather than address the real challenges facing communities, Trump resorts to incendiary language that distracts from constructive solutions.

As this conflict unfolds, it serves as yet another reminder of Trump’s authoritarian tendencies and the lengths he will go to maintain power. His willingness to target political adversaries for perceived failures exemplifies a broader trend among Republicans to place party loyalty above democratic principles, revealing the increasingly volatile landscape of American politics.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/trump-asked-why-he-thinks-he-can-arrest-gavin-newsom-says-he-committed-crime-of-running-for-governor/)

Trump Threatens Musk Over Funding Democratic Candidates

In a recent phone interview, President Donald Trump threatened serious repercussions for Elon Musk if Musk chooses to fund Democratic candidates running against Republicans. Trump’s comments indicate a hostile response to Musk’s criticisms of the GOP’s spending bill, where he stated, “If he does, he’ll have to pay the consequences for that,” without elaborating on what those consequences might entail.

Trump’s relationship with Musk appears irreparable, as he stated he has no desire to mend their public feud that escalated recently on social media. When questioned about their relationship, Trump bluntly replied, “No,” indicating a finality to their alliance. He also expressed disappointment in Musk’s criticisms of the Republican spending bill, insisting that Musk, who previously benefited from the president’s administration, knew well the bill’s details.

Musk’s public criticisms included calls for Trump’s impeachment and harsh words about the administration’s tariff policies, which he claims might lead to a recession. Trump retaliated by suggesting the termination of Musk’s government contracts and subsidies, implying that such power lies within his control, though he admitted he hadn’t given much thought to actually following through with that idea.

Despite the escalating tensions, Trump optimistically declared that the Republican Party is more unified than ever, framing Musk’s criticism as ultimately beneficial by drawing attention to the strengths of the spending bill. Trump’s remarks come amid calls from fellow Republicans, like Steve Bannon, to scrutinize Musk’s business dealings, which reflects an increasing alignment among party members against dissenting voices.

Vice President JD Vance weighed in on the feud, labeling Musk’s attacks as “nuclear” and suggesting that reconciliation may be difficult after such a public fallout. He cautioned Musk against criticizing Trump, emphasizing the bureaucratic frustrations often faced by business leaders in Washington.

(h/t: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna211605)

1 2 3 … 19