Category: International Incident

Trump Administration’s Isolationist Shift Threatens Ukraine’s Security and NATO Alliances

In a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth announced that NATO membership for Ukraine is not realistic, and the responsibility for Ukrainian security must largely fall on European nations. Hegseth indicated that amid growing tensions with China, the Trump administration is refocusing its priorities towards securing American borders, effectively sidelining commitments to European allies.

Hegseth’s comments came during a meeting of the Ukraine Defense Contact Group in Brussels, where he also emphasized that U.S. troops would not be sent to Ukraine and that European forces should take the lead in securing the region post-conflict. This statement highlights the Trump administration’s shift towards an isolationist stance, diminishing U.S. involvement in European security matters.

The announcement is likely to alarm Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who has previously expressed that American leadership is essential for any meaningful security guarantees. Hegseth’s assertion that a return to pre-2014 borders is unrealistic further complicates the situation, as it disregards Ukraine’s territorial integrity in the face of ongoing Russian aggression.

Moreover, the implications of Hegseth’s statements highlight a stark contrast to the foreign policy established under President Biden, which centered around strengthening transatlantic alliances and supporting Ukraine against Russian threats. The rhetoric from Hegseth and the Trump administration indicates a dangerous pivot that could leave Ukraine vulnerable to further Russian incursions.

Furthermore, Hegseth’s push for NATO allies to increase their defense spending to 5% of GDP, rather than the current 2%, suggests an attempt to shift financial burdens to European nations while simultaneously diluting U.S. responsibility for international security. This approach not only raises questions about the U.S.’s commitment to NATO but also highlights the ongoing authoritarian and isolationist tendencies within the Republican party, notably reminiscent of the Trump administration’s retreat from global cooperation.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/12/politics/hegseth-ukraine-rules-out-nato-membership/index.html)

Trump’s Dangerous Rhetoric on Ukraine Undermines Sovereignty and Global Security

Donald Trump recently suggested that Ukraine “may be Russian someday,” making this claim just days before a pivotal meeting between U.S. officials and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. In a televised interview with Fox News, Trump hinted at potential negotiations that could result in Ukraine conceding territory to Russia, which is alarming to many who fear that such an outcome would undermine the Ukrainian sovereignty and embolden Moscow’s aggressive expansionism.

During the interview, Trump expressed that the conflict could potentially end with a ceasefire, but underscored his belief that any future U.S. military aid to Ukraine should be tied to access to its valuable natural resources, particularly its rare earth minerals. He disparagingly framed this reliance on Ukrainian resources as a means for the U.S. to recoup its financial investments in Ukraine, totaling over $65 billion since the start of the conflict.

Trump’s remarks echo a concerning transactional mindset that diminishes the longstanding principles of international aid and alliances, instead commodifying support based on economic gain. His comments suggest a willingness to prioritize profitability over the fundamental support for a nation under siege, a dangerous precedent that could undermine U.S. foreign policy and the integrity of NATO alliances.

In contrast, President Zelenskyy has reiterated that while he seeks a partnership with the U.S., he is not willing to concede Ukraine’s sovereignty or its wealth without the assurance of security guarantees such as NATO membership. This stance reflects a commitment to resist Russian occupation and maintain the integrity of Ukraine’s territorial rights, highlighting the stark difference between U.S. diplomatic priorities under the Trump administration and the current Ukrainian leadership.

The implications of Trump’s rhetoric extend beyond mere political bluster; they chart a troubling course that could embolden authoritarian regimes and destabilize global security. By suggesting that Ukraine’s territorial integrity is negotiable based on its natural resources, Trump not only disrespects Ukrainian sovereignty but also risks facilitating a future that favors Russian expansionism and undermines democratic values worldwide.

(h/t: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-ukraine-russia-war-rare-earth-minerals-zelenskyy-vance-meeting/)

Trump’s Controversial Gaza Takeover Proposal Risks Human Rights Violations and Regional Instability

Former President Donald Trump has proposed a controversial plan suggesting that the United States should assume control over the Gaza Strip and force the displacement of approximately two million Palestinians currently residing there. During a joint press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump blatantly declared, “The US will take over the Gaza Strip and we’ll own it,” expressing a desire for Palestinians to relocate to neighboring countries like Jordan and Egypt.

Trump’s rhetoric, which echoes dangerous notions of ethnic cleansing, paints Gaza as a “hellhole” while advocating for its redevelopment under U.S. control. His remarks not only disregard the rights and dignity of the Palestinian people but also provoke widespread condemnation from advocacy groups, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). CAIR’s National Executive Director Nihad Awad condemned Trump’s comments as a “non-starter,” emphasizing that such actions would further exacerbate the humanitarian crisis and violate fundamental human rights.

The reaction from neighboring Arab nations has been overwhelmingly negative, with leaders in Jordan and Egypt rejecting the idea of accepting Gaza’s residents. Trump’s misleading portrayal of his proposal as a pathway to peace fails to address the underlying issues of the ongoing conflict and the suffering of the Palestinian population. Instead, it perpetuates a cycle of violence and displacement that further entrenches systemic inequities in the region.

By promoting this takeover, Trump is not only attempting to impose an unethical solution on a deeply complex situation but also risking the stability of U.S. foreign relations in the Middle East. His comments suggest a lack of understanding or respect for international laws governing territorial integrity and human rights. This plan reflects a broader trend within the Republican Party’s approach to foreign policy, characterized by militarism and disregard for humanitarian norms.

The implications of Trump’s Gaza takeover plan could be devastating, potentially leading to increased violence and further destabilizing the region. As Trump and his allies continue to espouse harmful ideologies that undermine democracy and human rights, the need for accountability and truthful discourse has never been greater.

(h/t: https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2025/02/04/trump-says-us-will-own-and-develop-gaza-strip.html)

Trump’s Gaza Plan Promotes Displacement and Militarism, Threatening Palestinian Rights

During a recent press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former President Donald Trump made alarming statements regarding Palestinians in Gaza, suggesting they should permanently relocate and that the U.S. would take over the Gaza Strip. He claimed, “The US will take over the Gaza Strip and we will do a job with it,” a statement that raises serious ethical and humanitarian concerns about the rights of the Palestinian people.

Trump’s proposal to displace Gazans comes amidst ongoing humanitarian crises and reflects a troubling mindset that prioritizes U.S. ownership over the dignity and rights of vulnerable populations. By asserting that it is better for Palestinians to leave “a big pile of rubble,” Trump perpetuates narratives that echo ethnic cleansing, disregarding the historical and emotional ties of Palestinians to the land.

He suggested that Palestinians could be resettled in neighboring countries, yet both Jordan and Egypt have publicly rejected the idea of accepting new refugees, highlighting the impracticality and insensitivity of his comments. Trump’s characterization of Gaza as “not a place for people to be living” not only dismisses the lived realities of Palestinians, but also blatantly ignores their claims to their homeland.

The implications of Trump’s rhetoric are far-reaching and potentially dangerous, resonating with far-right Israeli factions while also endangering U.S. diplomatic relations in the Middle East. His casual mention of U.S. troops potentially being deployed to fill perceived security gaps adds an alarming militaristic dimension to his plans, raising questions about intervening in regional conflicts that have historically involved complex nuances.

By promoting ideas that suggest a unilateral U.S. takeover of Gaza, Trump’s comments reinforce a pattern of authoritarianism and imperialistic ambition that undercuts the foundational principles of human rights and self-determination. As he continues to advocate for extreme measures concerning foreign policy, it becomes evident that Trump’s vision for the Middle East is not one of peace or diplomacy, but rather one of domination and neglect for the rights of the Palestinian people.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/04/politics/netanyahu-trump-white-house-meeting/index.html)

Trump’s Tariff Suspension Is a False Narrative as Biden’s Border Agreements Take Center Stage

Donald Trump has agreed to temporarily suspend the imposition of 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico for 30 days, portraying it as a diplomatic success despite the reality that both nations had been actively addressing border security and drug trafficking concerns prior to his claims. The false narrative he constructs revolves around negotiations with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, completely disregarding the pre-existing agreements made during Joe Biden’s presidency when Mexico deployed troops to its northern border under Biden’s request.

This suspension of tariffs, which comes after talks with both leaders, is merely a facade to cover Trump’s failure to address the ongoing realities of U.S. foreign trade dynamics. In stark contrast, Trump did not extend the same courtesy to China, where a 10% tariff on imports has taken effect, illustrating a continuation of his reckless trade policies. The resulting retaliatory tariffs imposed by China are a significant escalation, exposing the damaging consequences of Trump’s misguided approach to international trade.

The superficial diplomacy exhibited by Trump does not reflect an understanding of the complex economic environment, as acknowledged by economists who warn that tariffs inevitably raise prices on goods like automobiles and food, adversely affecting American consumers. Trump’s framing of these tariffs as beneficial for American economic growth ignores the reality that they are likely to result in heightened costs of living, exacerbating the strain on everyday Americans already struggling in a post-pandemic economy.

Trump continued to mislead the public by taking credit for certain border agreements that were initiated by the Biden administration. For instance, the Mexican government had previously agreed to send troops to its border to manage migration in 2019, making Trump’s claims of success not only misleading but also indicative of an oppressive regime’s tactics to manipulate public perception.

The aftermath of Trump’s trade decisions has created a climate of uncertainty, as Canadian leaders warn of looming threats despite the brief respite from trade hostilities. Both Canada and Mexico remain vigilant, understanding that Trump’s unpredictable behavior may very well lead to further confrontations down the line. This situation underscores the broader issue of Trump and the Republican agenda, which consistently aligns with the interests of the wealthy elite while undermining the principles of democracy and economic equity in America.

(h/t: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c87d5rlee52o.amp)

Denmark Invests $1.5 Billion in Greenland’s Security Amid Trump’s Imperial Demands

Denmark has announced a significant investment of approximately $1.5 billion to bolster the security of Greenland, a move that coincidentally follows President-elect Trump’s recent outrageous remarks advocating for U.S. ownership of the island. This strategic decision by the Danish government, highlighted by Defense Minister Troels Lund Poulsen, underscores their commitment to enhancing their military presence in the Arctic region amidst growing geopolitical tensions.

Denmark is set to introduce a comprehensive defense package that includes military resources such as patrol boats, drones, and increased personnel deployed in Greenland. Poulsen’s remarks reveal the irony in timing, as the defense initiative was in the works long before Trump’s demands for U.S. control surfaced. This underlines that Denmark values its sovereignty and national security, contrary to Trump’s reckless rhetoric.

Trump’s recent posts on social media, where he asserted that U.S. control of Greenland is an “absolute necessity,” reflect a disturbing trend of entitlement and imperialism. His past attempts to purchase Greenland had already strained diplomatic relations between the U.S. and Denmark, illustrating his complete disregard for the autonomy of other nations. Greenland’s Prime Minister Múte Egede firmly countered Trump’s claims, asserting that “Greenland is ours. We are not for sale.”

This situation starkly illustrates the ongoing power struggle in the Arctic, where climate change is opening new pathways and increasing competition among global powers. The U.S. is scrambling to counteract growing Russian and Chinese influence in the region, and Denmark’s proactive stance serves as a reminder that they are prepared to defend their interests against foreign encroachments.

While Trump continues to portray himself as a peacemaker, his actions and statements reveal a fundamentally aggressive approach to foreign relations. His fixation on controlling territories, such as Greenland and his insistence on the Panama Canal, not only alienates allies but also reflects a deeper authoritarian impulse that threatens to undermine the principles of democracy and self-determination. The laughable notion of Trump’s party as the “party of peace” is overshadowed by their history of fostering division and conflict on the international stage.

(h/t: https://thehill.com/policy/international/5055179-denmark-greenland-security-package/)

Trump’s Threat to Reclaim Panama Canal Reflects Authoritarian Tendencies

Donald Trump has made alarming statements during his recent speech at Turning Point USA’s AmFest 2024 in Phoenix, where he threatened to reclaim the Panama Canal from Panama. This reckless rhetoric stems from his objection to newly imposed fees for ships navigating the canal, which he argues is a form of unfair treatment. Trump’s claims not only distort the historical context of the canal’s transfer to Panama but also reflect a dangerous inclination towards authoritarianism and nationalism.

In his speech, Trump disparaged former President Jimmy Carter, who signed the treaties that led to the U.S. relinquishing control of the canal in 1977. By framing the situation as a theft, Trump is engaging in revisionist history, attempting to rewrite the narrative to fit his agenda. His comments reveal a troubling mindset that prioritizes a false sense of American exceptionalism over respect for international agreements.

Continuing with his aggressive stance, Trump declared, “We’re being ripped off at the Panama Canal, like we’re being ripped off everywhere else.” This rhetoric not only undermines diplomatic relations but also incites a dangerous atmosphere where international norms and treaties are disregarded in favor of Trump’s whims. The Panama Canal, a critical asset for global trade and U.S. military logistics, is not merely a bargaining chip for his political posturing.

Trump’s assertions threaten to reshape U.S. foreign policy into a more isolationist and confrontational approach, aligning with his previous authoritarian tendencies. His willingness to escalate tensions over economic grievances raises concerns about the potential for conflict, reflecting a broader trend of Republican fascism where might is equated with right.

This latest episode underscores the need for vigilance against Trump’s divisive and dangerous rhetoric. His attempts to claim back the Panama Canal are emblematic of a broader authoritarian trend that seeks to dismantle established democratic principles and international cooperation. It is crucial to recognize these actions as not just misguided but as a direct threat to the stability of both American democracy and global order.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/tv/trump-doubles-down-on-his-threat-to-take-back-the-panama-canal-during-wild-tpusa-speech-were-being-ripped-off-everywhere/)

Israeli Antiquities Are Stranded at Trump’s Florida Estate as Authorities Fail to Retrieve Them – Israel News – Haaretz.com

Search Haaretz – back to home page LOG INSUBSCRIBE NOWSUBSCRIBE NOW accessibility Open menu In the News Israel-Hamas War Live Updates Hamas – Israel Netanyahu – Biden Hanukkah Hostages Released Hamas Hostages Israelis Dead Israel Fake News Haaretz | Israel News Israeli Antiquities Are Stranded at Trump’s Florida Estate as Authorities Fail to Retrieve Them Israeli clay lamps, intended for a brief exhibition in Washington D.C. in 2019, got stranded in the U.S. due to the pandemic. Recently, they were found at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida Amir Tibon Nir Hasson Jul 18, 2023 Jul 18, 2023 Share in Twitter Save Save article to reading list Send in e-mailSend in e-mail Share in Facebook Share in Twitter Share in WhatsApp Send in e-mailSend in e-mail Save Save article to reading list Zen Read Print article Amir Tibon Nir Hasson Jul 18, 2023 Jul 18, 2023 Antiquities belonging to Israel have been kept for the past several months at former U.S. President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, and senior Israeli figures have unsuccessfully tried to have them returned to Israel. Comments In the News Gaza War Is a Threat to Israel’s Arab Neighbors, and a ‘Humanitarian Event’ to Gulf States U.S. Blocks UN Security Council Demand for Humanitarian Cease-fire in Gaza Netanyahu and His Allies Are Anti-economic and Anti-Zionist At Defense and Arms Expo, Israeli Cyber Is Out, but Surveillance Tech In Second West Bank Settler Suspected of Attacking Palestinians to Be Held Without Trial Peace Of Mind: Moving To Asssisted Living Paid by Attorney Rakefet Shfaim ICYMI Progressive ‘Freedom Fighters,’ I’m a Palestinian Israeli. I Don’t Need your ‘Liberation’ Hamas’ Campaign of Rape Against Israeli Women Is Revealed, Testimony After Testimony Many Israelis and Palestinians Have ‘Sobered Up’. I Refuse to Do the Same Israel’s Repulsive Embrace of Elon Musk Is a Cynical Betrayal of Jews, Dead and Alive Lost Biblical Monument in Jerusalem Is in Plain Sight, New Theory Claims Masterclass in Manipulation: Exposing Max Blumenthal’s Lies About Israel and October 7 haaretz Facebook Twitter Android Apple Email RSS Subscribe Newsletters Terms Contact Us My Cookies Advertise Accessibility Report an issue Accessibility manifest Download App© Haaretz Daily Newspaper Ltd. All Rights Reserved FAQ Contact us Terms and conditions Privacy policy Cancellation of digital subscriptions Management Editorial Newsletters Accessibility Advertise on Haaretz.com About HaaretzLoad more News Israel News U.S. News Middle East Jewish World World News Tech News Business Life and Culture Archaeology Life Science Sports Culture Books Travel in Israel Television Food Sports Converting to Judaism Columnists and Opinion Chemi Shalev Allison Kaplan Sommer Anshel Pfeffer David Rosenberg Opinion Haaretz Editorial Haaretz Cartoon Letters to the Editor Special Coverage Haaretz Hebrew and TheMarker הר הבית וורדעל מדויקת מבצע השפעה ישראל יאיר גולן יריד נשק סדרות מומלצות סרטים חדשים בקולנוע מפלס הכנרת שמות החטופים Partnerships Haaretz Labels Haaretz.com, the online English edition of Haaretz Newspaper in Israel, gives you breaking news, analyses and opinions about Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World. © Haaretz Daily Newspaper Ltd. All Rights Reserved

@[100044274887410:2048:Donald J. Trump] has boasted many times he is Israel’s best friend, but in reality he used his office to steal Israeli antiques and is refusing to return them.

[https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-07-18/ty-article/.highlight/israeli-antiquities-remain-stranded-at-trumps-estate-as-authorities-fail-to-retrieve/00000189-6448-dc6b-a3f9-ee593e850000]

Trump calls Trudeau “two-faced,” cancels NATO press conference

President Trump called Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau “two-faced” on Wednesday after Trudeau appeared to mock the president during a reception at Buckingham Palace.

The president also canceled a news conference that was scheduled to take place at the conclusion of the NATO summit.

“When today’s meetings are over, I will be heading back to Washington,” Mr. Trump tweeted. “We won’t be doing a press conference at the close of NATO because we did so many over the past two days.” He had previously signaled to reporters he might cancel the news conference, which was slated for 10:30 a.m. Wednesday. 

Mr. Trump has engaged in some tense interactions with fellow world leaders, including Trudeau and French President Emmanuel Macron. During a reception at Buckingham Palace on Tuesday, Macron, Trudeau and British Prime Minister Boris Johnson appeared to joke about Mr. Trump.

“He was late because he takes a 40-minute press conference off the top,” Trudeau can be heard telling Macron and Johnson, adding, “You just watched his team’s jaws drop to the floor.”

When asked by reporters about Trudeau’s comments, Mr. Trump called the Canadian prime minister “two-faced” and suggested Trudeau “wasn’t happy” he was called out by the president for not meeting NATO’s 2% commitment. 

“I’m representing the U.S. and he should be paying more than he’s paying, and he understands that,” Mr. Trump said on Trudeau. “So I can imagine he’s not that happy, but that’s the way it is.”

Earlier, the president criticized Macron for suggesting NATO is experiencing “brain death,” defending the institution he says he has made stronger. 

Meanwhile, across the Atlantic, the House Judiciary Committee is expected to hold its first public impeachment hearing. Mr. Trump continued to blast House Democrats’ impeachment process while in London, even as he said he might like for some of his top aides to testify in any Senate proceedings. 

During his trip, Mr. Trump also announced the U.S. will host the G-7 summit next year at Camp David, a place acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney had previously derided as an undesirable location because no one liked it. Mulvaney announced in a memorable news conference earlier this fall that the G-7 would take place at Mr. Trump’s resort in Florida, before the White House reversed course under intense political pressure. 

[CBS News]

Trump, Macron hold tense meeting: ‘Would you like some nice ISIS fighters? I can give them to you’

President Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron held a tense meeting Tuesday on the sidelines of a NATO summit, with Trump at one point telling the French leader he could send him some “ISIS fighters” if he wanted them.

“Would you like some nice ISIS fighters? I can give them to you,” Trump said with a slight smile at the meeting, which was carried live on cable news. “You can take every one you want.”

“Let’s be serious,” Macron replied sternly, reasoning that most ISIS fighters came from Syria, Iraq and Iran and disputing Trump’s common refrain that the terrorist group had been defeated.

Trump has complained that European countries have been unwilling to accept ISIS fighters the U.S. had captured.

The French president insisted that the number of European ISIS fighters was a “tiny” part of the overall problem of addressing destabilization in the region. He was also adamant that the terrorist group had not entirely been defeated, a break with a common declaration from Trump.

“I think [the] No. 1 priority, because it’s not finished, is it to get rid of ISIS,” Macron said.

“That was one of the greatest nonanswers I ever heard,” Trump said after Macron had concluded. “And that’s OK.”

If the meeting was tense, the days leading up the the one-on-one session were equally so. 

A day before the meeting, the Trump administration announced it was prepared to impose 100 percent tariffs on wine and other products from France in response to complaints about a French tax that has hit U.S. technology companies.

A myriad of disagreements between the two leaders played out in public over the course of the 40 minute meeting, which came hours after Trump called Macron’s comments critical of NATO “insulting.” The icy tone was a far cry from the warm embraces and state visit the two men have shared over the past two years. 

Trump emphasized his “very good relationship” with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan after Macron noted disagreements between Turkey and the rest of the alliance on their definition of terrorism. 

“I can only say we have a very good relationship with Turkey and president Erdoğan,” Trump said when asked about Turkey’s standing in NATO. “We have a very good relationship.” 

Macron interjected shortly thereafter: “We have lost cooperation with Turkey.” 

The French president demanded “clarification” from Ankara on how it could be a member of the NATO alliance and also purchase Russian S-400 missile systems amid NATO opposition. Macron also said Turkey wanted to “blow up” the summit if the other alliance members did not recognize Ankara’s view of groups that are terrorists. 

When Trump suggested that his predecessor, former President Obama, pushed Turkey toward purchasing the Russian missiles by refusing to sell Ankara the Patriot missile, Macron shot back, saying it was Turkey’s “own decision” to purchase the missiles after Europe offered another option that was compliant with NATO.  

Trump was noncommittal on reaching a deal to avert U.S. tariffs set to be imposed on $2.4 billion in French imports. He expressed frustration with the French tax, which he sees as targeting U.S. companies.

“They’re American companies,” he said. “The tech companies you’re talking about, they’re not my favorite people because they’re not exactly for me, but that’s OK. I don’t care, they’re American companies. And we want to tax American companies. We want to tax them. That’s not for somebody else to tax them.”

Tuesday’s icy meeting underscored the evolution of the Trump-Macron relationship.

The two men came into office within months of each other and enjoyed a close relationship. They famously shared a lengthy and intense handshake at one of their first meetings, and Trump later hosted Macron at the White House for a state visit.

But Macron has become more outspoken as he seeks to take the mantle in Europe in the face of changing governments there and Trump’s unpredictability.

On Tuesday, the French president stood by his controversial comments about NATO, Macron said he was a supporter of a stronger European component in the alliance and agreed with Trump that the U.S. was overinvested compared with other countries, but he said there was more to the alliance than discussions about money and burden sharing.

“When you speak about NATO, it’s not just about money,” Macron said. “We have to be clear on the fundamentals of what NATO should be.”

[The Hill]

1 2 3 4 … 7