Category: Normalization of Hate

The US government seems to have a clear message for white nationalists | CNN Politics

The Department of Homeland Security is recruiting immigration enforcement agents using language and imagery tied to white nationalist ideology. A DHS recruiting poster declares "America has been invaded by criminals and predators" and urges applicants to "get them out," while another features a cowboy and bomber jet with the phrase "We'll have our home again"—language documented by the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism as having ties to white nationalist and supremacist groups in the US and Canada, including the Proud Boys.

The phrase "We'll have our home again" echoes replacement theory, the white supremacist belief that white Americans are being displaced, which has been promoted by figures including Elon Musk. Cynthia Mills-Idriss, director of the Polarization and Extremism Research & Innovation Lab at American University, explained that coded language creates "plausible deniability" while signaling to those familiar with extremist terminology that they are welcome to apply for government positions. Right-wing accounts on social media are now amplifying these official DHS posts.

William Galey Simpson’s “Which Way, Western Man?” (especially Chapters 16–17) argues that “civilizational decline” is fundamentally biological and demographic: nations rise or fall based on “breeding stock,” differential birthrates, and the need to preserve a “thoroughbred” in-group against dilution—an explicitly eugenic worldview he even pairs with proposed state machinery like special “Eugenics Courts.”  The Trump-era ecosystem echoes that structure through dog-whistle signaling and rhetoric: official DHS/White House memes using “Which way, ___ man?” are widely analyzed as a deliberate nod to Simpson’s title and its white-nationalist subculture, while Trump’s repeated “blood/genes” language (“racehorse theory,” “bad genes,” “poisoning the blood”) and the Fox/Tucker “replacement” frame translate the same demographic panic into mainstream politics—then operators like Stephen Miller, documented circulating white-nationalist/anti-immigrant material, help turn it into enforcement posture and recruitment culture.

The Trump administration has also officially adopted the term "remigration," which echoes far-right ideologies with roots in Nazi ethnic cleansing. The term describes the administration's mass deportation policy and encourages self-deportation, but borrows directly from white nationalist movements in Europe. The State Department is creating an "Office of Remigration" to implement this framework, according to Wendy Via, CEO and co-founder of GPAHE, who characterized it as "a plan for ethnic cleansing" that has become "normalized" and "commonplace."

The Washington Post reported that DHS plans a $100 million "wartime recruitment" effort including geotargeting attendees at NASCAR, UFC, and rodeo events—venues associated with conservative demographics—and hiring online influencers to spread recruitment messaging. DHS declined to comment on whether the coded language was intentional or whether recruitment content was designed to appeal to white nationalists.

Similar messaging extends beyond DHS: the Department of Labor posted a video featuring a statue of George Washington with the tagline "One Homeland. One People. One Heritage" and the message "Remember who you are." According to critics cited in the article, this "one heritage" being promoted by the Trump administration does not reflect immigrants from the past century or those from non-European backgrounds. Via stated that these are not isolated incidents but "a concerted effort to create these type of recruitment ads" designed to signal to white nationalists that the federal government shares their agenda.

(Source: https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/15/politics/dhs-recruitment-ice-minnesota-noem-images-analysis)

Trump Admin Posts Echo White Supremacist Rhetoric

The Trump administration is deploying recruitment campaigns and official posts across federal departments that incorporate imagery, slogans, and rhetoric linked to white supremacist and extremist movements, according to PBS reporting and analysis by Cynthia Miller-Idriss of American University’s Polarization and Extremism Research Innovation Lab. An ICE recruitment advertisement features the phrase “We will have our home again,” a direct reference to a white supremacist anthem favored by the Proud Boys, while the Department of Labor distributed messaging stating “One homeland, one people, one heritage” alongside heroic depictions of white men. Administration posts also invoke “Trust the plan,” the QAnon conspiracy theory slogan tied to the January 6 Capitol attack, which posits a global cabal of pedophiles and deep state actors that Trump is fighting.

Extremist symbols have surfaced across multiple federal agencies, including the “An Appeal to Heaven” flag, which was carried by January 6 rioters and adopted by evangelical Christian nationalist groups and neo-Nazi organizations. Miller-Idriss identified this pattern as part of a propaganda campaign to reposition ICE operations as serving the public interest while employing dog whistles and explicit racist and conspiratorial messaging. The administration is simultaneously rewriting January 6 history on a newly published website, blaming Democrats for security failures and justifying pardons for over 1,500 defendants involved in the insurrection.

President Trump stated in a New York Times interview that the civil rights movement “hurt a lot of people” and constituted “reverse discrimination” against whites denied college admission or jobs. Billionaire Elon Musk endorsed this framing by endorsing a post claiming “If white men become a minority, we will be slaughtered. White solidarity is the only way to survive”—the Great Replacement Theory, a white nationalist conspiracy falsely asserting intentional replacement of the white population. Miller-Idriss connected this conspiracy theory to terrorist attacks in Pittsburgh, El Paso, Buffalo, Christchurch, and Oslo, resulting in hundreds of deaths.

Miller-Idriss characterized the shift as a “turning point in the propaganda campaign,” driven by ICE’s 57 percent disapproval rating and public awareness of agency abuses circulated through cell phone video. She identified Trump’s statements as an “unedited version” of a longstanding belief system that white men are losing ground, now openly expressed without prior hedging. The administration simultaneously withdrew U.S. support from extremism prevention organizations, cementing its alignment with extremist ideological frameworks.

Miller-Idriss noted that undemocratic leaders employ confusion and propaganda simultaneously to undermine journalism, expertise, and shared truth, citing Hannah Arendt’s analysis of Nazi propaganda: once people stop knowing what is true and false, “it’s very easy for them to stop knowing what’s right and wrong.” The administration’s strategy combines coordinated messaging across departments with high-profile policy actions including ICE deployments, foreign intervention, and territorial threats, designed to normalize extremist rhetoric while obscuring its authoritarian implications through saturation messaging.

(Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/trump-administration-posts-echo-rhetoric-linked-to-extremist-groups?fbclid=IwdGRleAPSxIFleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEegXa-oSnnonxrbxD0HIm8ZOScqBnslIjqqgO-WisqCCJBydQdzzodouEcCt0_aem_45dHLtlY5pgg0gPw_BA6LA)

Trump Suggests Tim Walz Ordered Death of MN Legislator

President Donald Trump amplified a conspiracy theory on social media suggesting that Minnesota Governor Tim Walz ordered the assassination of State Representative Melissa Hortman, who was murdered in summer 2024. Trump “re-Truthed” a post from @LightOnLiberty that falsely connected Hortman’s death to alleged money laundering fraud involving Somali immigrants, despite law enforcement’s clear findings regarding the actual perpetrator.

Hortman and her husband Mark were shot and killed at their home by Vance Boelter, 57, a man posing as a police officer who was indicted on six federal charges of stalking and murder. According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the District of Minnesota, Boelter “embarked on a murderous rampage targeting Minnesota’s elected officials and their families” after extensive research and planning. Trump displayed indifference to the murder while blaming the “radical left” for inciting violence, deflecting responsibility for the actual crime.

Democratic State Senator John Hoffman and his wife Yvette were also targeted in their home by the same suspect and survived after lengthy recoveries. The Department of Justice has never indicated charging anyone other than Boelter for the shootings, yet Trump’s amplification of the baseless conspiracy persists without factual foundation.

Trump’s promotion of this theory fits his pattern of attacking Walz over Somali immigration and alleged fraud. In November, Trump falsely claimed “hundreds of thousands of refugees from Somalia are completely taking over” Minnesota and alleged Somali gangs “roving the streets” looking for prey, while the FBI has investigated such reports for years without substantiating Trump’s inflammatory rhetoric.

On Air Force One in November, Trump defended calling Walz “retarded,” claiming “there’s something wrong with him” for allowing Somali immigrants into Minnesota and stating the U.S. funds Somalia despite his assertion it “doesn’t function like a country.” This pattern demonstrates how Trump leverages baseless conspiracy theories and racist narratives to weaponize tragedy for political gain.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-shares-conspiracy-post-suggesting-tim-walz-ordered-the-assassination-of-minnesota-legislator/)

Trump Tells Child He Wants ‘To Make Sure’ That ‘A Bad Santa’ Doesn’t Enter U.S.

During a Christmas Eve NORAD call with children, President Trump used the Santa tracker conversation to promote misinformation about coal. When a child stated she did not want coal as a Christmas gift, Trump interjected to insist that coal is “clean and beautiful,” contradicting established scientific consensus that coal is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution.

Trump’s remarks about tracking Santa included unsolicited commentary about border security, telling one child that officials monitor Santa “all over the world” to ensure “a bad Santa” does not “infiltrate into our country.” The president connected the fictional scenario to his policy priorities, characterizing national entry oversight through the Santa metaphor.

When asked by another child what present she wanted, Trump engaged in typical gift-discussion banter, offering to help secure a dollhouse. However, his fixation on coal misinformation dominated his interactions, repeatedly correcting the child’s preference and demanding she “remember that at all costs” regarding coal’s environmental properties.

The exchange demonstrated Trump’s pattern of using informal settings with children to advance false or misleading claims about energy policy and security narratives. Similar instances show Trump using holiday events to promote debunked talking points, prioritizing messaging over age-appropriate conversation.

Trump’s insistence that coal is environmentally benign contradicts decades of peer-reviewed research and international climate data. His deployment of misinformation during a family-oriented charitable broadcast reflects his consistent strategy of embedding false claims into casual public appearances to expand their reach and normalize their repetition.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/trump-tells-child-he-wants-to-make-sure-that-a-bad-santa-doesnt-enter-the-country/)

Trump Posts Over 160 Truth Social Messages in Late-Night Spree

President Donald Trump conducted an enormous late-night posting spree on Truth Social, releasing over 160 posts within a five-hour period. He attacked political opponents while promoting conspiracy theories and MAGA-friendly narratives, with many of the posts featuring repetitive clips. This social media blitz occurred late on a Monday night, reflecting a frantic response to ongoing political issues.

Among the targets of Trump’s ire were notable Democrats such as California Governor Gavin Newsom, Rep. Nancy Pelosi, and former President Barack Obama. He also criticized Senator Mark Kelly, labeling him a “traitor,” and pushed for the release of Tina Peters, a Colorado election official imprisoned for her actions related to election security.

Trump’s posts included bizarre claims, such as suggesting that Michelle Obama may have improperly used an autopen during Biden’s presidency. Additionally, he vowed to nullify all executive orders signed by Biden with the device, reinforcing his ongoing battle against the previous administration’s policies.

The president’s engagement with conspiracy theories extended to glorifying extremist figures, sharing clips featuring Alex Jones and bizarre allegations regarding political figures. His behavior reflects a continued effort to energize his base by invoking familiar grievances and conspiratorial rhetoric.

Despite the late hours, Trump boasted about his platform early the next morning, reinforcing his commitment to Truth Social and his followers, who have been central to his political messaging.

Trump’s ‘Third World’ Immigration Ban Threatens Rights

Donald Trump announced a plan to “permanently pause” immigration from what he refers to as “third world countries” following a shooting incident involving National Guardsmen in Washington, D.C. This announcement came just hours after the tragic death of Guardsman Sarah Beckstrom and escalated Trump’s already inflammatory rhetoric on immigration. His proposal includes the “reverse migration” of millions of migrants currently residing in the U.S.

In a lengthy social media post, Trump vowed to eliminate Biden’s immigration policies and deport individuals he deems “non-compatible with Western Civilization.” He specifically indicated that visa issuance for Afghan nationals has been stopped, tying the pause to national security concerns despite the context of ongoing conflicts in those regions.

The president also threatened to strip federal benefits from noncitizens and to reassess the u.s. status of green card holders from 19 countries, particularly focusing on Somalia. Previous remarks directed at the Somali community in Minnesota had incited concern and drawn reactions of criticism from various advocacy groups.

Critics, including U.N. officials and migrant advocacy organizations, have condemned Trump’s actions and rhetoric as harmful and unconstitutional. They warn that using one tragic event to justify a crackdown on all immigrants, especially Afghan refugees, undermines fundamental American values and legal protections. These proposals are likely to face significant legal challenges if pursued.

Trump’s language and policies hark back to previous attempts to ban visas from majority-Muslim countries, which faced substantial opposition and legal scrutiny during his first term. The increasingly aggressive stance against immigrants reflects broader authoritarian tendencies and has sparked alarm among civil liberties organizations.

Trump’s Disturbing Fascist Memes Prime His Base For A Forever Presidency

Donald Trump is mainstreaming extremist imagery and propaganda by sharing fascist-themed memes that portray him as a ruling god-emperor. In a striking image, Trump is depicted in golden armor while prominent Democrats, such as Schumer and Warren, bow in submission. This aesthetic echoes totalitarian propaganda, furthering Trump’s goal of a one-party state.

By leveraging artificial intelligence, Trump promotes content created by right-wing online communities, effectively merging crude, often racist memes with his political narrative. This engagement with fringe influencers not only amplifies their voice but legitimizes harmful ideologies within mainstream political discourse.

The normalization of such imagery and themes raises alarming questions about the trajectory of American politics. Trump’s consistent use of AI-generated content reinforces a dangerous precedent where traditional governance values are overwhelmed by authoritarian aesthetics and messages.

Experts highlight the implications of a sitting president amplifying extremist rhetoric, underscoring the erosion of democratic norms. Trump’s actions are not merely a personal campaign strategy but part of a broader strategy to reshape the power dynamics in America.

This trend marks a significant departure from established political processes, as Trump positions himself as a ruler who could effectively undermine the principles of democracy to entrench himself further in power.

Trump Calls Democrats ‘Little Gnat’ That Have To Be Taken Care Of

President Donald Trump is facing widespread criticism after referring to Democrats as a “little gnat” during a speech onboard a U.S. Navy vessel in Norfolk, Virginia, marking the Navy’s 250th anniversary. In his remarks, Trump accused Democrats of prioritizing illegal immigration over military pay, a comment that many viewed as inappropriate given the military context of the event. Lawmakers from both parties condemned his rhetoric, suggesting it undermined the distinction between military duties and political discourse.

The backlash included comments from Representative Yassamin Ansari, who remarked that Trump’s language blurred the lines between military involvement and political rivalry, labeling it “unacceptable.” Additionally, Gregg Nunziata, a former domestic policy adviser, called Trump’s remarks “repugnant and un-American,” highlighting the harmful implications of such divisive language in a military setting.

Trump’s remarks echo a troubling trend; just days prior at Quantico, he suggested using U.S. cities as military “training grounds” while characterizing domestic opponents as an “enemy within.” This militaristic tone has sparked concerns over the increased politicization of the armed forces, with critics emphasizing the need for a clear separation between military operations and partisan politics.

Supporting his position, Trump defended the deployment of National Guard troops to various U.S. cities while attempting to alleviate concerns about the ongoing government shutdown, which he blamed on Democrats. He affirmed that service members would receive their pay despite the shutdown, aiming to position himself as a protector of military interests amid political strife.

The use of military ceremonies for partisan attacks raises critical questions about the integrity of the armed forces and their role in American society. Trump’s rhetoric serves to reveal the increasing normalization of divisive language in political discourse, prompting calls from civic leaders for all political factions to denounce such destructive narratives in order to safeguard the country’s democratic values.

Vance Threatens Consequences for Celebrating Charlie Kirk’s Death

Vice President JD Vance has intensified his criticism of the left following Charlie Kirk’s assassination, asserting that the First Amendment does not exempt individuals from consequences for celebrating his death. He indicated that those who express joy over Kirk’s murder should face repercussions, especially if they are employed by educational institutions funded by American taxpayers.

During a Fox News interview, Vance stated, “If you are a university professor… celebrating Charlie Kirk’s death, maybe you should lose your job.” This mindset reflects Vance’s intention to use governmental power against those perceived as inciting violence, which critics argue undermines free speech. Vance’s comments are viewed as a significant overreach aimed at stifling dissenting voices.

As discussions within the Trump administration evolve, Vance noted plans to investigate organizations allegedly funding left-wing political violence. He warned that entities encouraging violent acts against political speech would be treated as terrorist organizations. His remarks come amid Trump’s declaration to designate Antifa as a terrorist group, reinforcing a narrative that prioritizes suppressing leftist movements while downplaying right-wing extremism.

The implications of Vance’s threats extend beyond mere rhetoric; they signal a dangerous trajectory toward increased governmental intervention in civil discourse. The administration’s focus on left-wing groups as the instigators of violence starkly contrasts with a lack of accountability for right-wing radicals, revealing a partisan double standard.

Vance’s relationship with Kirk, noted as instrumental to his political rise, adds a layer of personal grievance to his statements. His endorsement of the idea to telecast the trial of Tyler Robinson, the alleged shooter, underscores a broader narrative of seeking justice amid the politically charged aftermath of Kirk’s death.

J.D. Vance on Charlie Kirk’s Show Targets Liberals

During a recent appearance on The Charlie Kirk Show, Vice President J.D. Vance delivered a chilling speech, transitioning from honoring the late Kirk to issuing a stark warning about leftist violence. Vance, speaking from the White House, suggested a significant threat from political extremism on the left, characterizing it as a serious issue of terrorism, and vowed to unify the nation against it.

Vance began the show by praising Kirk’s contributions to the MAGA movement, framing him as an idealist committed to conservative values. However, his tone shifted drastically in his final monologue, where he labeled the left as a singular source of violent extremism. He asserted, “this is not a both-sides problem,” indicating a belief in a uniquely malignant threat posed by liberals and journalists, whom he held partially responsible for Kirk’s death.

As his remarks escalated, Vance hinted at a crackdown on left-wing groups, highlighting a supposed network of NGOs involved in fomenting violence. He claimed there was a coordinated domestic terror movement utilized by the left and suggested that the political climate could justify more aggressive measures against dissenters, conflating critical speech with violence.

Despite the ostensibly respectful tone toward Kirk earlier in the show, Vance’s comments indicated a dangerous intertwining of political rhetoric with threats of violence. He proclaimed that critical voices from the left were creating conditions ripe for killings, using Kirk’s murder as a rallying point to stoke fear and justify potential authoritarian measures against opposition parties and their supporters.

The closing statements made by Vance align with a broader trend among Republican leaders where division is emphasized, and opposition is not only discouraged but framed as a potential justification for violence. This shift towards equating political dissent with domestic terrorism signals a troubling development within the party, posing a potential threat to civil liberties and freedom of expression in the United States.

(h/t: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2025/09/charlie-kirk-jd-vance-show-podcast-death.html?pay=1758030734996&support_journalism=please)

1 2 3 … 37