Category: Terrible Memory

Trump claims he predicted 9/11 but says no one listened to him

Donald Trump claimed on Air Force One that he predicted the September 11 attacks in his 2000 book “The America We Deserve” and warned about Osama Bin Laden, asserting the attacks could have been prevented if U.S. officials had acted on his warning. Trump’s assertion contradicts fact-check findings showing his book contained only a brief, vague reference to Bin Laden as a “shadowy figure” among general security threats, not a specific warning about him or al-Qaeda.

While Trump’s book did reference the possibility of a major terror attack, it neither identified Bin Laden nor al-Qaeda as potential perpetrators. By 2000, concerns about Bin Laden and al-Qaeda were already public knowledge, and U.S. intelligence agencies were actively monitoring both the organization and its leader, meaning Trump’s observations reflected widely available information rather than unique foresight.

Trump’s post-9/11 claim mirrors his pattern of associating himself with 9/11 commemoration events while promoting narratives disconnected from documented fact. His invocation of his own predictive ability, unsupported by the actual text of his book, demonstrates his use of false historical revisionism to construct an image of prescience and leadership.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/bulletin/news/trump-president-bin-laden-al-qaeda-b2895001.html)

Trump Claims Ignorance Over MRI Results Raising Health Questions

President Donald Trump faced scrutiny again when he admitted on Air Force One that he has “no idea” what was analyzed from his recent MRI during a physical examination. This remark raises pressing concerns about the transparency surrounding his health, especially given that an MRI isn’t a typical procedure for a routine check-up.

Trump’s comments came as he flew to his Mar-a-Lago resort, where he attempted to downplay the significance of the MRI by claiming it was part of a “very standard” examination process. However, the vagueness of his statement does little to bolster public confidence in the administration’s willingness to be forthright about the president’s health conditions.

Following Trump’s recent visit to Walter Reed Medical Center for his semiannual physical, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt assured the public that he was in “exceptional health.” However, this assurance contrasts sharply with the lack of clarity regarding the MRI’s necessity, given its unusual nature for physical examinations.

Concerns about Trump’s health transparency have been compounded by a history of ambiguous statements and miscommunications from the administration. Previous medical evaluations have often left the public in the dark about key details, fostering skepticism about the accuracy of health claims made by Trump’s aides.

This latest episode continues a pattern of questionable transparency and raises further questions about Trump’s commitment to being honest with the American public regarding his well-being. The public deserves clear answers about the health of their leader, free from calculated obscurity and vague reassurances.

Trump’s Disjointed Speech Raises Alarming Concerns Over Deteriorating Mental Acuity

During a recent event in Pittsburgh, President Donald Trump delivered a disjointed speech that raised concerns over his mental acuity. At the “Energy and Innovation” summit hosted by Senator Dave McCormick, Trump’s erratic remarks included forgetting the names of attendees and making dubious claims about artificial intelligence, which he initially dismissed as “not [his] thing.” His statements, riddled with inaccuracies, highlighted a troubling forgetfulness and an alarming grasp of factual reality.

Among his more outlandish claims, Trump asserted that his uncle, Dr. John Trump, taught infamous domestic terrorist Theodore Kaczynski at MIT, a fabrication that is starkly contradicted by historical facts. Dr. Trump, a notable physicist, never had the opportunity to teach Kaczynski, who attended Harvard and completed his advanced degrees elsewhere. Such blatant distortion of events not only serves to propagate misinformation but also exemplifies Trump’s apparent confusion and deteriorating cognition as he approaches 80 years of age.

Further compounding the bizarre nature of his speech, Trump confused the whereabouts of attendees, incorrectly stating that they were in Washington, before expressing surprise at their absence. This disoriented behavior is indicative of deeper issues as Trump, now the oldest president in U.S. history, struggles with the demands of public appearances.

His comments about Kaczynski were met with minimal reaction from the audience, likely illustrating their concern or disbelief at Trump’s fabrications about a killer’s academic history. Despite the gravity of the topic, his remarks lacked the anticipated engagement and highlighted his troubled ability to connect with factual narratives.

As former President Joe Biden has faced scrutiny related to age in reference to his own political future, Trump’s evident cognitive decline prompts even deeper questions about leadership capability. With an upcoming second term election, the implications of a president exhibiting such signs of memory loss and confusion cannot be understated, further endangering democratic accountability and transparency in governance.

(h/t: https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-ted-kaczynski-pittsburgh-b2789670.html)

Trump Calls For Iran Nuclear Deal He Killed

Donald Trump has publicly issued threats to Iran, reiterating that a military option remains viable if a nuclear deal is not achieved. During an interview with Fox News anchor Maria Bartiromo, Trump referred to a letter he sent to Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, urging negotiations to prevent a military confrontation. The former president emphasized that while he prefers diplomacy, the possibility of military action is looming if Iran continues pursuing nuclear capabilities.

Trump’s rhetoric reflects a recurrent theme in his foreign policy approach, characterized by a blend of aggressive posturing and attempts at negotiation. He stated, “There are two ways Iran can be handled: militarily, or you make a deal,” underscoring his inclination to use force while simultaneously expressing a desire to reach an agreement. This duality raises concerns among critics about the unpredictability of Trump’s foreign policy and its potential consequences for global stability.

The conversation also highlighted Trump’s view of the Iranian people, whom he described as “great” despite condemning their leadership as “evil.” This simplification of a complex geopolitical issue is symptomatic of Trump’s broader communication style, where nuanced realities are often overshadowed by emotionally charged language. Such comments can foster misinterpretations of the Iranian populace and prioritize military solutions over diplomatic efforts.

Despite Trump’s claims of support for negotiation, his administration previously dismantled structures that fostered diplomatic engagement, notably withdrawing from the landmark Iran nuclear deal orchestrated by President Obama. This decision has been widely criticized as a contributing factor to escalating tensions between the U.S. and Iran, with many experts arguing it undermines future negotiations and jeopardizes regional security.

As tensions mount, Trump’s willingness to resort to military action as a negotiation tactic serves to instill fear rather than foster constructive dialogue. Such threats not only highlight the reckless nature of his foreign policy but also exemplify the broader Republican indifference towards diplomatic resolutions, opting instead for a belligerent approach that could lead to unnecessary conflict.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/news/trump-tells-iran-they-need-to-make-a-nuke-deal-to-avoid-military-solution-im-not-looking-to-hurt-iran/)

Trump Claims Genius While Rambling Nonsense on Fox News

Donald Trump recently took to Fox News to defend what he claims is his brilliant communication style, which he refers to as “weaving.” In a lengthy and disjointed response to a question about foreign policy, Trump insisted he does not ramble, despite his statements being widely recognized as convoluted and nonsensical. His remarks included a reiteration of disproven claims about the 2020 election being rigged, alongside baseless links to international events like the recent terrorism in Israel.

During the exchange with anchor Bret Baier, Trump displayed an alarming tendency to conflate various unrelated issues while portraying a false narrative of coherence and insight. He absurdly suggested that had the election not been “rigged,” troubling global events would not have occurred, exposing his inability to grasp the complexities of international relations. This continued effort to peddle dangerous conspiracy theories reflects a deep-seated disconnect from reality and an unwillingness to accept verifiable facts.

Moreover, Trump’s self-proclaimed title of “the great weaver” not only underscores his delusional state but also reveals his strategy of emotional manipulation. He dismisses criticisms of his communication style as merely the “fake news” narrative. This tactic is characteristic of Trump’s approach to media engagement, where he deflects scrutiny by framing himself as a misunderstood genius rather than addressing his cognitive decline.

His insistence that he is weaving together complex ideas hints at a troubling cognitive impairment. Experts have highlighted that such behavior is often symptomatic of higher-level cognitive difficulties, which many have observed during his public appearances. Rather than demonstrating intelligence, his “weaving” serves merely to obfuscate the truth and mislead his supporters.

Ultimately, Trump’s rambling monologues reveal not only a lack of clarity and coherence but also serve as a dangerous tool for misinformation. By framing his erratic statements as brilliance, he tries to validate his distorted perceptions, which undermine democratic discourse and foster division. This repetitive cycle of delusion and denial epitomizes a growing trend among Trump and his Republican allies, who actively work to dismantle informed dialogue while pushing their anti-democratic agenda.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/tv/trump-says-he-doesnt-ramble-in-rambling-response-about-how-he-speaks-im-the-great-weaver/)

Trump Says He Doesn’t Know Primary Challengers Before Criticizing Them With Very Specific Attacks

President Donald Trump said Monday that he does not know the three men challenging him for the Republican nomination. He then went on to make very specific comments about each of them.

Speaking outside the White House en route to a rally in North Carolina, the president took pointed shots at former Massachusetts governor Bill Weld, former Illinois congressman Joe Walsh, and former South Carolina congressman Mark Sanford.

“I don’t even know who they are,” Trump said. He added, “I don’t know them. I don’t know them.”

Then, “One was a person that voted for Obama, ran as a vice president four years ago and was soundly defeated. Another one got thrown out after one term in Congress, and he lost in a landslide. And the third one, Mr. Tallahassee trail or Appalachian trail … he wasn’t on the Appalachian trail. He was in Argentina.”

Later in the pool spray, Trump defended Kansas, South Carolina, and Nevada for not holding Republican primaries in 2020.

“Three people are a total joke,” Trump said. “They’re a joke. They’re a laughingstock. I have nothing to do [with it] — the four states that canceled it don’t want to waste their money. If there was a race, they would certainly want to do that. But they’re considered to be a laughingstock. They’re considered to be a joke. And those four states don’t want to waste their money.”

[Mediaite]

Trump doesn’t think he’s ‘ever even heard of a Category 5’ hurricane. Four such storms have threatened the US since he took office

President Donald Trump said Sunday that he’s “not sure that (he’s) ever even heard of a Category 5” hurricane, despite four such storms — including Hurricane Dorian — having threatened the US since he took office.

“We don’t even know what’s coming at us. All we know is it’s possibly the biggest. I have — I’m not sure that I’ve ever even heard of a Category 5. I knew it existed. And I’ve seen some Category 4’s — you don’t even see them that much,” Trump said at a briefing with officials at FEMA’s headquarters in Washington, DC.

“But a Category 5 is something that — I don’t know that I’ve ever even heard the term other than I know it’s there. That’s the ultimate, and that’s what we have unfortunately,” he added, in reference to Hurricane Dorian.

The comments from the President came just before Dorian, a dangerous Category 5 storm, made landfall on the Abaco Islands in the Bahamas. The storm is the most recent of four Category 5 hurricanes to endanger parts of the US since Trump assumed the Oval Office. As of Monday morning, Dorian is still battering the Abaco and Grand Bahama Islands. The hurricane — the strongest on the planet anywhere this year — lashed the region overnight and is forecast to continue through much of Monday. The storm is now expected to move northward and possibly bring hurricane-force winds to Florida Monday night before moving up the east coast.

In September 2017, nearly eight months into Trump’s presidency, Hurricane Irma, one of the strongest Atlantic basin hurricane ever recorded outside the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea, affected at least nine US states. That same month, Hurricane Maria devastated the US territory of Puerto Rico, leaving behind an island that is still struggling to recover.

Last October, Hurricane Michael, which was originally designated as a Category 4, barreled into the Florida Panhandle as the third Category 5 hurricane to blast the US since Trump.

Trump has pledged to provide federal assistance to state and local officials to deal with Hurricane Dorian.

Not the first time Trump said he’s never heard of a Category 5

Trump has previously indicated several other times that Category 5 hurricanes are unprecedented weather events that either he or others had never heard of or witnessed.

In the days between the landfalls of Hurricane Irma and Maria, he said he “never even knew” they existed and said days later that “people (in Puerto Rico) had never seen anything like” the storm.

In October 2017, Trump claimed “nobody has ever heard of a (Category) 5 hitting land,” and earlier this year, he again said he had never heard of a hurricane of that intensity.

While the US has seen a number of Category 5 storms in recent memory — including Hurricane Katrina in 2005 — scientists estimate that Atlantic hurricanes could become more common in the coming years. And while researchers can’t definitively say the climate crisis is leading to more intense hurricanes, scientists have found that rising sea levels due to global warming can further exacerbate the impact of Atlantic hurricanes.

[CNN]

Trump vents over Axios report on hurricane nuking idea

President Trump on Tuesday again lashed out at Axios over the outlet’s report that the president suggested using nuclear bombs to stop hurricanes. 

“Axios (whatever that is) sat back and said GEEEEE, let’s see, what can we make up today to embarrass the President? Then they said, ‘why don’t we say he wants to bomb a hurricane, that should do it!’ The media in our Country is totally out of control!” Trump tweeted Tuesday.

The president previously called the report a “phony story” that the “Fake News is still trying to perpetuate.” 

Axios reported Sunday that sources said Trump has suggested the option multiple times to senior Homeland Security and national security officers. 

Axios reported that unnamed sources recalled situations they overheard in meetings or had been briefed on a National Security Council memorandum that recorded the president’s alleged comments about nuking hurricanes.

Axios reporter Jonathan Swan tweeted that he stands by “every word in the story” after the first round of Trump’s pushback. 

At the time of Axios’s report, a senior administration official told the outlet, “We don’t comment on private discussions that the president may or may not have had with his national security team.”

Trump’s latest tweet denying the report came after one of his Republican primary challengers, former Massachusetts Gov. William Weld, sent a campaign email fundraising off of the Axios report.

“We couldn’t believe our eyes, Friend. But yes, this headline was — in fact — real,” the email to supporters said, with an image of Axios’s Sunday headline “Scoop: Trump suggested nuking hurricane to stop them from hitting U.S.”

“How does this make you feel about Donald Trump having his hands on our nation’s nuclear code? Yeah, we don’t feel so great about it either,” he added.

[The Hill]

Reality

And it’s funny that “stable genius” Trump doesn’t know who Axios is, as they were the only media outlet embedded with his 2016 campaign, and he conducted an interview with them just a few short months ago which you can watch in full here:

Trump Asks Woman Where Her Family Is After She Told Him Twice That They Were Killed by ISIS

President Donald Trump asked Nobel Prize-winning activist Nadia Muradwhere her family is now just seconds after Murad told him that they had all been killed by ISIS.

At an Oval Office event this week, Trump met with survivors of religious persecution and had a surreal exchange with Murad, who won a Nobel Peace Prize in 2018 for her activism in preventing sexual assault after her escape from ISIS captivity.

As Murad stepped forward to speak to Trump, Ambassador Sam Brownback told Trump that she was a Nobel Peace Prize winner for a second time during the event, and Murad began to tell Trump the harrowing story surrounding her captivity.

“When ISIS attack us in 2014, they killed six of my brother,” Murad told Trump. “They killed my mom. They took me to captivity with my eleven sister-in-law, with all my sister and my nieces.”

She went on to explain that 3,000 Yazidi women and children are still missing and that the home from which she was abducted remains torn by violence between various factions.

“Now there is no ISIS, but we cannot go back because Kurdish government and the Iraqi government, they are fighting each other who will control my area,” Murad told Trump, and as she asked him to intercede with the factions, Trump interrupted.

“But ISIS is gone?” Trump asked. “And now it’s Kurdish and…”

“And Iraqi. Iraqi government,” Murad replied, then continued to explain her people’s current situation.

“My people cannot go back. We are not millions of people, we are only half million people. And after 2014, about 95 years — 95,000 years, Yazidi, they immigrate to Germany through a very dangerous way. Not because we want to be a refugee, but we cannot find a safe place to live,” Murad said.

“All this happened to me. They killed my mom, my six brothers,” Murad said, and as she continued, Trump interrupted her.

“Where are they now?” Trump asked, seconds after being told for a second time that they were all killed by ISIS.

“They killed them. They are in the mass graves in Sinjar,” Murad replied.

As she continued to explain, Trump interrupted her to claim, “I know the area very well, you’re talking about. It’s a tough — yeah,” then told her, “We’re going to look into it very strongly.”

Murad thanked Trump at which point he noted “And you had the Nobel Prize?”, then asked, “They gave it to you for what reason?”

As Murad explained her activism following her escape, Trump marveled, “Oh really? Is that right?”

[Mediaite]

‘Our recollection keeps changing’: Rudy Giuliani admits Trump may not testify because he can’t tell the truth

Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani revealed on Sunday that President Donald Trump may not agree to testify or be interviewed by special counsel Robert Mueller because his “recollection” of the truth “keeps changing.”

“This is the reason you don’t let the president testify,” Giuliani told ABC host George Stephanopoulos. “Our recollection keeps changing, or we’re not even asked a question and somebody makes an assumption.”

[Raw Story]

Media

1 2 3