Category: Vexatious Litigation

DOJ Fails to Indict Six Democrats Over Military Video

The Trump administration’s Department of Justice attempted and failed to indict six Democratic lawmakers who appeared in a November video urging military and intelligence personnel to refuse unlawful orders. The federal grand jury in Washington, D.C., rejected the prosecution’s case on Tuesday, with prosecutors unable to convince even a single juror that probable cause existed for charges, according to sources familiar with the investigation. The video featured Representatives Jason Crow of Colorado, Maggie Goodlander of New Hampshire, Chris Deluzio and Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania, and Senators Mark Kelly of Arizona and Elissa Slotkin of Michigan—all with military or intelligence backgrounds—explaining that service members can refuse orders that are manifestly illegal under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

The prosecution, led by Trump appointee Jeanine Pirro at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, employed political appointees rather than career prosecutors, according to one source. Trump had publicly accused the lawmakers of “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH” on his Truth Social platform following the video’s release. Legal experts widely rejected the prosecution’s theory, citing both First Amendment protections for political speech and the Constitution’s speech-or-debate clause, which grants lawmakers immunity from prosecution for legislative acts.

The failed indictment reflects a broader pattern of weaponizing the Justice Department against Trump’s perceived political opponents. The administration previously dismantled the Public Integrity Section, eliminating standard oversight requirements that normally govern investigations of sitting members of Congress, especially those involving free speech considerations. The Justice Department has also failed to secure indictments against New York Attorney General Letitia James before separate grand juries in Norfolk and Alexandria, and Pirro’s office has struggled to obtain convictions even in cases involving alleged assaults on federal officers.

Senator Kelly stated that the prosecution attempt followed administrative retaliation by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who issued a formal censure and sought to reduce Kelly’s retirement rank to punish his participation in the video. Slotkin condemned the effort as indicative of Trump’s authoritarian approach, declaring that “whether or not Pirro succeeded is not the point. It’s that President Trump continues to weaponize our justice system against his perceived enemies.” Other lawmakers rejected intimidation tactics, with Representative Crow stating that “Americans should be furious that Trump and his goons tried to weaponize our justice system again against his political opponents.”

(Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/doj-fails-secure-indictment-democrats-involved-illegal-orders-video-rcna258385)

Trump Threatens Trevor Noah Lawsuit Over Epstein Grammy Joke

President Donald Trump threatened legal action against comedian Trevor Noah on Monday after Noah joked during the Grammy Awards that Trump spent time on Jeffrey Epstein’s island. Trump denied any connection to Epstein, calling Noah’s performance “lousy” and asserting he has “nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein.” Trump also attacked author Michael Wolff, describing him as a “sleaze bag” who conspired with Epstein to damage his presidency.

The president claimed that newly released Justice Department files containing 3.5 million Epstein-related documents “absolve” him of improper conduct. Trump stated the DOJ should move on from the Epstein matter and asserted the files instead reveal misconduct by Democrats, Bill Clinton, and Bill Gates, but not him. When asked directly by ABC News correspondent Rachel Scott whether he planned to sue Noah, Trump confirmed his intention and elaborated on his grievances.

Trump accused Democrats of weaponizing Epstein allegations against him politically. He stated that Democrats only pushed Epstein-related claims as a strategy to undermine his election chances, saying “The Democrats are pushing it” and “it’s turning out to be the Democrats that were with — and conspired with — Epstein.” Trump referenced emails between Wolff and Epstein obtained from the released files, including a 2016 message in which Wolff offered to “help finish” Trump before the election.

Released Epstein correspondence documented Wolff’s discussions with the deceased sex offender about targeting Trump, with Wolff writing in 2015 that Trump’s denial of visiting Epstein’s properties would give Epstein “valuable PR and political currency” to use against him. Trump claimed this email exchange demonstrated a coordinated effort to harm his political standing. He announced over the weekend his intention to sue Wolff based on these communications.

Trump ended his remarks by celebrating his return to the presidency despite what he characterized as a Democratic conspiracy to prevent his election. He said the released files proved Democrats “were working together to try and help me lose the election,” but acknowledged his presence in the Oval Office indicated that conspiracy ultimately failed.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-thrashes-lightweight-trevor-noah-and-democrats-pushing-epstein-claims-in-oval-office-rant/)

Trump Threatens Lawsuit Against Michael Wolff Over Epstein Emails

President Donald Trump announced plans to sue author Michael Wolff, accusing him of “conspiring” with deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein to damage his political career. Trump made the statement to reporters aboard Air Force One on Saturday night, following the release of additional Epstein documents, claiming that emails between Wolff and Epstein exonerated him rather than implicating him.

Released documents from 2015 and 2016 show Wolff messaging Epstein about obtaining damaging information on Trump before the 2016 presidential election. In one 2016 message, Wolff wrote that Epstein could “help finish” Trump by providing opposition research; in a 2015 exchange, Wolff stated that if Trump denied visiting Epstein’s plane or property, “that gives you valuable PR and political currency. You can hang him.” Trump characterized these exchanges as evidence of a conspiracy against him, calling Wolff a “third-rate writer” engaged in a political attack.

When Wolff released a video response to the emails in late 2024, he avoided addressing his communications with Epstein and instead suggested the correspondence might reveal details about Trump’s relationship with Epstein himself. Trump has previously dismissed Epstein-related coverage as a Democratic diversion and repeatedly sought to strengthen libel laws to restrict press reporting. Trump stated he will “certainly” sue Wolff and may also pursue legal action against the Epstein estate.

Wolff authored the 2018 bestseller “Fire and Fury,” which documented internal dynamics of Trump’s first administration. Trump’s litigation threat follows his pattern of using lawsuits to suppress unfavorable reporting and accounts of his conduct.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-aiming-to-sue-michael-wolff-for-conspiring-with-jeffrey-epstein-to-wreck-his-political-career/)

Trump Sues JPMorgan Chase and CEO for $5B, Alleging They ‘Debanked Him’ After Capitol Riot

Trump filed a $5 billion lawsuit in Florida against JPMorgan Chase and CEO Jamie Dimon on January 22, 2026, claiming the bank “debanked” him for political reasons following the January 6, 2021 Capitol riot. According to the suit, JPMorgan Chase notified Trump in February 2021 that his accounts would be closed within two months. Trump’s legal team, led by attorney Alejandro Brito, alleges the bank made this decision based on “political and social motivations” and “woke” beliefs rather than legitimate business concerns.

JPMorgan Chase rejected the allegations, with a spokesperson stating the bank “does not close accounts for political or religious reasons” and instead closes accounts that “create legal or regulatory risk.” The bank further stated it “regret[s] having to do so but often rules and regulatory expectations lead us to do so.” The bank’s official response to the lawsuit was direct: “While we regret President Trump has sued us, we believe the suit has no merit,” and affirmed its right to defend itself in court.

The lawsuit emerges two months after CEO Dimon publicly declined to fund Trump’s proposed 90,000-square-foot White House ballroom, estimated at $400 million. During a November 2025 CNN interview, Dimon explained that JPMorgan Chase maintains strict policies on government contracts and avoids appearances of “buying favors,” citing concerns about regulatory scrutiny from future administrations. The ballroom is being funded by Trump and other donors including Amazon, Apple, Google, Microsoft, and the Winklevoss twins, but not JPMorgan Chase.

Dimon has previously contradicted Trump’s claims about their relationship. During the 2024 election, Trump falsely claimed Dimon had endorsed him for president, a claim JPMorgan Chase publicly denied. On January 21, 2026, at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Dimon stated, “I don’t like what I’m seeing,” indicating continued skepticism of Trump’s policies and actions.

(Source: https://people.com/trump-sues-jpmorgan-chase-5-billion-11890840?utm_campaign=peoplemagazine&utm_content=photo&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_term=69729ffbffed3f00012671e0&fbclid=IwdGRjcAPgaTVleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeLrOftBb_toUMg2YdBsQXRbIDpfcjXp5Npq52X3y9puC9kMJxCy86kH861ag_aem_b3_ScplyKwJuYqHYFrd_xQ)

Trump: ‘I Hereby Give Myself $1 Billion’ in Taxpayer Money

President Donald Trump announced at a North Carolina rally that he is demanding the U.S. government pay him $1 billion in settlement of a lawsuit he filed against the Department of Justice. Trump claimed he would give the money to charity, then contradicted himself by suggesting he might keep it.

In October 2024, the New York Times reported Trump had filed administrative claims demanding $230 million from the DOJ as compensation for federal investigations into his activities. The claims, filed in 2023 and 2024, reference the FBI’s search warrant execution at his Mar-a-Lago residence in 2022 and the bureau’s investigation into alleged ties between Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russia.

At the rally, Trump stated he is “suing” the United States and simultaneously must “settle” the suit himself as president. He declared, “I hereby give myself $1 billion,” then wavered on whether the funds would go to charity, saying “maybe I shouldn’t give it to charity. Maybe I should keep the money.”

Trump characterized the situation as unprecedented, claiming no president has faced such circumstances. He described the position as “strange” and said he must “negotiate with myself” regarding the settlement terms.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/trump-brags-about-suing-the-government-and-declares-i-hereby-give-myself-1-billion/)

Hegseth’s Authority Targets Senator Mark Kelly Over Dissent

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s so-called “Department of War” has issued a threat to court-martial Democratic Senator Mark Kelly from Arizona. This comes after Kelly’s recent comments on a video where he asserted that U.S. troops have a constitutional duty to disobey unlawful orders. The Department of Defense stated they are investigating allegations of misconduct against Kelly under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, suggesting serious repercussions could follow.

The DOD emphasized that all service members must follow lawful orders, cautioning that personal beliefs cannot excuse disobedience. This punitive response highlights the extreme measures the currently authoritarian Republican leadership is willing to pursue against those who advocate for constitutional rights and refuse unlawful directives.

President Donald Trump has further incited tensions, claiming that Democrats reminding troops of their obligation to resist illegal orders could be guilty of treason and suggesting they could face the death penalty. In response, Kelly defended his stance, stating that standing up for the Constitution is fundamentally American, contrasting it sharply against Trump’s authoritarian and fascistic inclinations.

This alarming sequence of events has raised concerns about rising authoritarianism within military and governmental institutions under Trump. Kelly’s insistence on constitutional duty underscores the essential role of dissent in safeguarding democracy, which is critically under threat from those in power.

The implications of Hegseth’s threats reflect a broader authoritarian push from the Trump administration, seeking to punish dissent and uphold compliance through fear, further undermining democratic principles essential to the U.S. political landscape.

Trump’s $15 Billion Lawsuit Against The New York Times Threatens Free Press Amid Authoritarian Tactics

Donald Trump has initiated a $15 billion lawsuit against The New York Times, accusing the publication of long-standing defamation that he claims serves the “Radical Left Democrat Party.” In a vehement announcement shared via Truth Social, Trump labeled the Times as one of the “worst and most degenerate newspapers” in U.S. history, asserting that its coverage constitutes an illegal campaign contribution, particularly referring to an endorsement of Kamala Harris.

Trump’s angry tirade follows a report by the Times that scrutinized Steve Witkoff, a key envoy in the White House’s Middle East policy, implicating him in dubious business dealings linked to Trump. In his post, Trump suggested a coordinated agenda of misinformation aimed at tarnishing his reputation and the “America First Movement,” presenting himself as the victim of what he calls a malicious media campaign.

Previously, Trump has had notable legal victories against media outlets, including a $16 million settlement from Paramount related to a 60 Minutes segment and a $15 million payout from ABC News over defamation claims. This lawsuit against the Times adds to a growing catalog of litigation targeting various media organizations that Trump claims have defamed him.

Moreover, the timing of this lawsuit coincides with Trump’s ongoing legal battles, including a pending suit against the Wall Street Journal, concerning a letter he allegedly sent to Jeffrey Epstein, which Trump denies writing despite evidence to the contrary. Such actions further shed light on Trump’s contentious relationship with the media and his willingness to use the judicial system to address perceived slights.

Critics argue that Trump’s litigious approach towards media organizations is an alarming tactic that threatens free press principles in America. His repeated claims of defamation and efforts to silence dissent speak to a broader pattern of authoritarian impulses from Trump and his administration, which prioritize loyalty over truthful reporting.

Trump Fights Perkins Coie in Effort to Suppress Legal Dissent

Donald Trump has announced a lawsuit against the Perkins Coie law firm, referencing “egregious and unlawful acts” associated with an unnamed member of the firm, though he provided no further details in his post on Truth Social. This move follows Trump’s broader campaign to undermine legal accountability and autonomy among law firms that have opposed him, revealing a clear pattern of retaliatory actions against dissenting voices.

Trump’s recent executive order mandates the termination of federal contracts held by Perkins Coie’s clients if the firm has engaged in any work concerning those contracts. This aggressive stance not only aims to intimidate legal counsel but also reflects Trump’s authoritarian approach that seeks to undermine the legal system when it does not favor his interests.

Perkins Coie has responded to the executive order with a lawsuit against the Trump administration, arguing that the president’s directive violates constitutional protections. This illustrates the extent to which Trump is willing to disregard legal norms to enforce his will, further solidifying his ongoing attacks on the legal profession and democratic institutions.

The implications of Trump’s actions are troubling, as they threaten the independence of legal practices and foster a culture of fear among attorneys who may wish to represent those opposing his agenda. This form of intimidation is emblematic of Trump’s broader assault on dissent, aiming to solidify his power and stifle criticism.

In this context, Trump’s lawsuit against Perkins Coie is more than just a personal vendetta; it serves as a broader strategy to suppress opposition and manipulate the legal framework to serve his authoritarian ambitions. Such actions endanger the integrity of American democracy and pose significant risks to the rule of law.

(h/t: https://www.usnews.com/news/top-news/articles/2025-04-23/trump-says-he-is-suing-perkins-coie-law-firm)

Disney Faces Government Investigation Over DEI Practices Amid GOP’s Discriminatory Pressure

The U.S. government is investigating Disney’s diversity and inclusion (DEI) practices, as initiated by Brendan Carr, the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). This investigation signifies increasing pressure on media companies to comply with the GOP’s discriminatory regulations aimed at dismantling DEI initiatives. Carr officially notified Disney and its ABC News unit via a letter, expressing concerns that the company may be promoting diversity in ways that contravene established government policies.

A spokesperson for Disney has confirmed the company’s intent to cooperate with the investigation, indicating they are reviewing the details of Carr’s letter. Disney’s ongoing alignment with DEI principles has come under scrutiny during the Trump administration, which has extended its mandate against such initiatives internationally. The American embassy in France recently reached out to French firms with U.S. contracts, mandating their compliance with Trump’s executive order prohibiting DEI programs.

Carr’s letter directly addresses Disney’s CEO, Robert Iger, emphasizing the need for compliance with FCC regulations and the elimination of any discriminatory practices cloaked in DEI terminology. He expressed a particular interest in how Disney has handled diversity within its media content, demanding clarity on their adherence to equitable employment opportunities.

Moreover, Carr has ramped up scrutiny of various media organizations since his appointment by Trump in November 2020. His investigations have targeted institutions like NPR and PBS, along with demands for transparency from tech giants such as Apple and Google regarding their editorial practices. Disney is not the only company facing this molten landscape; other major firms, including Verizon and Comcast, are also under investigation for their DEI policies amid the Republicans’ broader campaign against perceived “woke” ideologies.

This investigation adds to Disney’s existing political woes, notably its recent settlement of a $15 million defamation lawsuit brought by Donald Trump when an ABC journalist inaccurately reported on the former president’s legal issues. Additionally, Disney’s criticisms of Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” law have pitched it against Republican Governor Ron DeSantis, marking it as a persistent target for conservatives. Disney’s trajectory underscores the chilling atmosphere surrounding DEI initiatives under the current Republican regime.

(h/t: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c62k20l5x24o)

Disney Faces Government Investigation Over DEI Practices Amid GOP’s Discriminatory Pressure

The U.S. government is investigating Disney’s diversity and inclusion (DEI) practices, as initiated by Brendan Carr, the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). This investigation signifies increasing pressure on media companies to comply with the GOP’s discriminatory regulations aimed at dismantling DEI initiatives. Carr officially notified Disney and its ABC News unit via a letter, expressing concerns that the company may be promoting diversity in ways that contravene established government policies.

A spokesperson for Disney has confirmed the company’s intent to cooperate with the investigation, indicating they are reviewing the details of Carr’s letter. Disney’s ongoing alignment with DEI principles has come under scrutiny during the Trump administration, which has extended its mandate against such initiatives internationally. The American embassy in France recently reached out to French firms with U.S. contracts, mandating their compliance with Trump’s executive order prohibiting DEI programs.

Carr’s letter directly addresses Disney’s CEO, Robert Iger, emphasizing the need for compliance with FCC regulations and the elimination of any discriminatory practices cloaked in DEI terminology. He expressed a particular interest in how Disney has handled diversity within its media content, demanding clarity on their adherence to equitable employment opportunities.

Moreover, Carr has ramped up scrutiny of various media organizations since his appointment by Trump in November 2020. His investigations have targeted institutions like NPR and PBS, along with demands for transparency from tech giants such as Apple and Google regarding their editorial practices. Disney is not the only company facing this molten landscape; other major firms, including Verizon and Comcast, are also under investigation for their DEI policies amid the Republicans’ broader campaign against perceived “woke” ideologies.

This investigation adds to Disney’s existing political woes, notably its recent settlement of a $15 million defamation lawsuit brought by Donald Trump when an ABC journalist inaccurately reported on the former president’s legal issues. Additionally, Disney’s criticisms of Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” law have pitched it against Republican Governor Ron DeSantis, marking it as a persistent target for conservatives. Disney’s trajectory underscores the chilling atmosphere surrounding DEI initiatives under the current Republican regime.

(h/t: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c62k20l5x24o)

1 2 3 … 6