Category: Authoritarian

Donald Trump tells House Republicans: SAVE America Act will ‘guarantee the midterms’

President Trump demanded House Republicans pass the SAVE America Act, claiming the voting restrictions bill will “guarantee the midterms” and threatening to block all other legislation until it passes. The measure requires proof of citizenship to register and photo ID to vote, cleared the House in February with a 218-213 vote, and stalled in the Senate where Democrats oppose it as voter suppression. Trump instructed Republicans to expand the bill with provisions banning mail-in voting except for illness, disability, military service, or travel, and prohibiting transgender athletes from women’s sports.

Trump declared at the House GOP annual conference in Florida that supporters demand the bill, stating “The people are demanding it. Every time I go out, save America! Save America!” He added that passage will secure Republican victories in midterms and future elections. Trump refused compromise, instructing Republicans to “go for the gold” and reject any watered-down version, saying “I’m not going to sign anything until this is approved.”

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer characterized the measure as “Jim Crow 2.0” that would disenfranchise tens of millions, stating Senate Democrats will not support it under any circumstances. Senate Majority Leader John Thune previously warned that forcing a voting rights blockade would derail government funding legislation and bipartisan housing affordability bills. On Monday, Thune called a talking filibuster “much more complicated and risky than people are assuming.”

Trump and Republican allies have pressured Thune to invoke a talking filibuster to bypass Democratic opposition, which would require continuous floor speeches before allowing a 51-vote passage. Trump stated Monday the Senate must approve the bill, saying “they’re going to have to go the filibuster, and maybe it’s going to be the talking filibuster.” This demand weaponizes the legislative process to strip voting protections after Trump previously threatened to bypass Congress on voter identification.

(Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5776058-trump-republicans-save-america-act-midterms/?fbclid=IwdGRleAQdsa1leHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEex7bhCMsV80DMDXzu1ndC-egejwQFV_z_eaV5pIVsdL5gPPCq6huJMQLeWng_aem_5W7f_iWpLLaUtqGIKFSOyA)

Trump Attacks Reporter for Citing Bill Barr’s Election Fraud Findings

President Donald Trump attacked PBS reporter Liz Landers as “rotten” on Wednesday after she confronted him with facts contradicting his false claims about the 2020 election. When Landers noted that his former attorney general Bill Barr found no widespread fraud in the 2020 election despite FBI seizures of Arizona and Georgia election records, Trump responded defensively and refused to acknowledge Barr’s documented conclusion.

Landers directly stated that Barr, Trump’s own attorney general in 2020, determined there was no measurable voter fraud capable of changing the election outcome. Trump rejected this fact, insisting the election was rigged while offering no evidence when pressed by the reporter. Rather than provide documentation or reasoning, Trump labeled Landers “rotten” for disagreeing with his false narrative.

Trump and Barr have a documented history of conflict over election fraud claims. Barr told NBC News in 2022 that he confronted Trump directly, calling his fraud allegations “bulls**t” and stating Trump’s team was wrong to promote them. Trump reacted with rage to this confrontation, according to Barr’s account.

When Barr endorsed Trump for president in 2024, Trump responded by mocking him publicly and attacking his record as attorney general. Trump posted on Truth Social that Barr “let a lot of great people down by not investigating Voter Fraud,” despite having previously called Barr weak and gutless. Trump’s attack on a reporter for citing his own attorney general’s findings demonstrates his pattern of weaponizing language against those who contradict his false claims, whether journalists or former officials.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-blasts-rotten-reporter-after-she-reminds-him-his-own-ag-contradicted-his-election-claim/)

Trump Administration Pushes Gun Ban for Marijuana Users

The Trump administration urged the Supreme Court to uphold a 1968 law denying gun rights to habitual users of illegal drugs, including marijuana. The case, U.S. v. Hemani, centers on Ali Hemani, a Texas man whose federal gun possession charge was dismissed by lower courts on Second Amendment grounds, though agents found a handgun and marijuana in his home during an FBI search in 2020.

Most justices expressed skepticism toward the administration’s position, with Justice Neil Gorsuch questioning why marijuana was chosen as a test case when Trump himself signed an executive order reclassifying marijuana as a lesser controlled substance. Justice Amy Coney Barrett challenged the government to provide evidence that occasional marijuana use makes someone dangerous enough to deny firearms.

Deputy Solicitor General Sarah Harris argued Congress determined mixing firearms with controlled substances is dangerous and that temporarily disarming habitual marijuana users does not violate the Second Amendment. However, Second Amendment advocate Erin Murphy countered that millions of Americans could face criminal prosecution under this interpretation, particularly since the government has not clearly proven marijuana itself is addictive and dangerous in the way Congress designated controlled substances.

The American Civil Liberties Union defended Hemani, stating that tens of millions of Americans own handguns for self-defense while also using marijuana occasionally, and the government’s broad interpretation would criminalize ordinary conduct without requiring proof of actual impairment or danger. The ACLU warned the ruling threatens to extend criminal law’s reach against lawful gun owners engaging in activities millions of Americans undertake.

The Supreme Court will decide the case by the end of June 2024, determining whether habitual marijuana use can strip individuals of Second Amendment rights despite questions from the bench about marijuana’s actual danger and the legal inconsistency created by Trump’s own drug reclassification effort.

(Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/supreme-court-questions-denying-gun-182308900.html?link_source=ta_first_comment&taid=69a608723ff5b100011ec72f&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQKNjYyODU2ODM3OQABHr8kJUJkbOhk4MtkRmbQUbj9aitfL78h0BG8FPURzD2ex_yWCpzIJ9lW_PdY_aem_vViPdaoCIp7vbssTt-0Y5w)

Trump Uses Iran Strike to Justify Imminent Election Takeover Plan

President Trump authorized Operation Epic Fury, a major military assault on Iran early Saturday, February 28, 2026, justifying the strikes by claiming Tehran refused to renounce nuclear weapons development and posed an imminent threat requiring regime change. Hours after the operation commenced, Trump posted on Truth Social linking to a right-leaning news article alleging Iranian interference in the 2020 and 2024 U.S. elections on behalf of former President Joe Biden, an election Trump has repeatedly lied about as “stolen.”

Multiple analysts and legal experts identified Trump’s election interference claim as the probable actual justification for the military action. Columbia University professor Anthony Zenkus responded with exasperation to the post, while journalist Eva Golinger compared the pattern to previous military interventions in Venezuela and implied Cuba would be next. Florida-based attorney Fernando Antonio argued the election interference narrative served as cover for a larger authoritarian scheme to consolidate federal control over future elections.

Antonio’s analysis detailed the operational sequence Trump appeared to be executing. The strategy involved fabricating an imminent Iranian threat to justify military conflict, weaponizing that conflict to declare an emergency, then exploiting the emergency pretext to seize control of electoral systems under the guise of national security. This pattern aligns with Trump’s documented authoritarian methods of using external crises to expand executive power and dismantle democratic institutions.

The discrepancy between Trump’s stated rationale for war and the election interference post reveals how the administration manufactures justifications for military action. By linking Iran to election interference, Trump created a false premise connecting foreign adversaries to his election losses, then used that fabricated connection to authorize military operations and potentially justify emergency powers that would affect domestic elections.

(Source: https://www.rawstory.com/oh-for-the-love-of-god-overlooked-trump-post-hints-at-justification-for-major/)

Trump Orders U.S. Agencies to Stop Using Anthropic AI Tech After Pentagon Standoff – The New York Times

Trump ordered federal agencies to cease using Anthropic’s artificial intelligence technology on Friday, attacking the company as “radical Left” and claiming its leadership lacks understanding of reality. Within 13 minutes of Trump’s announcement, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth formally designated Anthropic a “supply-chain risk to national security,” barring any military contractor from conducting business with the company, a designation previously reserved for foreign adversaries rather than American firms.

Anthropic had resisted Pentagon demands for unfettered access to its AI systems without safety guardrails, citing two specific concerns. The company refused to allow its AI models to be deployed in autonomous weapons systems, arguing current models are unreliable and would endanger American troops and civilians, and rejected use of its technology for mass domestic surveillance, which it characterized as violating fundamental rights.

Legal experts characterized the Pentagon’s action as unprecedented and legally vulnerable. Anthropic stated it would challenge the designation in court, calling it historically reserved for U.S. adversaries and warning the move establishes a dangerous precedent for American companies negotiating with the government. The company had attempted good faith negotiations with the Pentagon over acceptable uses of its AI technology for national security purposes.

The confrontation reflects Trump’s pattern of weaponizing government authority against corporations that resist his demands, consistent with his broader efforts to remake federal institutions and eliminate independence from executive control. Hours after Anthropic’s designation, OpenAI announced a deal with the Defense Department to provide AI technology for classified military systems, demonstrating Trump’s preference for companies willing to comply without restrictions.

(Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/27/us/politics/anthropic-military-ai.html)

USDA Sells South Building, Scatters Staff Nationwide

The U.S. Department of Agriculture announced plans to sell its flagship South Building on Washington’s National Mall and relocate remaining staff to regional hubs in North Carolina, Missouri, Indiana, Colorado, and Utah by year’s end. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins described the 1930s-era building as “a shell of what it once was,” citing $1.6 billion in delinquent maintenance costs and approximately 80% office vacancy rates, according to GSA Administrator Edward Forst.

The sale is framed as a cost-cutting measure under Republican President Donald Trump’s broader push to downsize the federal government. However, thousands of USDA employees have already departed through buyout programs as the administration dismantles the agency’s workforce and institutional capacity.

The building will be transferred to the General Services Administration for sale, with Iowa Senator Joni Ernst displaying a “For Sale By Owner” sign during the announcement. This disposal of a historic federal property reflects the administration’s agenda to strip down government operations and eliminate institutional presence in the nation’s capital.

(Source: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/usda-selling-its-flagship-south-building-washington-relocating-staff-2026-02-25/?link_source=ta_first_comment&taid=699fb068781ea000015a4217&utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Trending+Content&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwdGRleAQNyFxleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEehS9gM5eu0uQrXX6WzQUEG50zlvWA7TTJIpkxBzU7CsYspzuboaAdlIWlqMI_aem_0ubKb2BcEiwMxC9E186dlA)

Hegseth Pressures Scouting America to Ban Transgender Youth

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced Friday that Scouting America will implement policy changes targeting transgender youths at the Pentagon's direction, requiring members to use their "biological sex at birth and not gender identity" on applications and prohibiting opposite-gender individuals from sharing bathrooms, tents, and similar spaces. Hegseth stated the Pentagon will "vigorously review" the organization's compliance and withdraw support if it fails to comply, declaring his intent to restore the organization to its original purpose of developing "boys into men."

The policy changes include discontinuing the Citizenship in Society merit badge, introducing a Military Service merit badge, and waiving registration fees for military children's families. Scouting America acknowledged the need to comply with Trump's executive order targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion programs but avoided explicitly addressing the transgender youth restrictions in its public statement. The organization emphasized maintaining its 2024 rebrand name and service to over 200,000 girls in its programs.

Hegseth's Pentagon campaign against diversity efforts extends beyond Scouting America, including ending military training partnerships at Harvard and removing what he calls "woke distractions" from the military newspaper Stars and Stripes. The Pentagon previously stated the organization had "lost its way" and violated administration values through DEI initiatives and "gender-fluid ideological stances," demanding rapid implementation of what it termed "common-sense, core value reforms."

Scouting America's historical evolution toward inclusion, including accepting gay youths in 2013, ending the blanket ban on gay adult leaders in 2015, and accepting transgender students in 2017, directly conflicts with Hegseth's vision. The organization began accepting girls as Cub Scouts in 2018 and into the Boys Scout program in 2019, reaching approximately 1 million members last year with minimal membership growth of about 16,000 new scouts.

The military has maintained a century-long partnership with Scouting America, providing logistical support for the National Boy Scout Jamboree since 1937 and maintaining strong relationships with Eagle Scouts, who frequently enlist. Hegseth's personnel decisions at the Pentagon demonstrate his broader effort to reshape military institutions and remove individuals perceived as opposing his ideological direction.

(Source: https://abcnews.com/US/wireStory/scouting-america-alter-policies-maintain-support-us-military-130562779?fbclid=IwdGRleAQOr69leHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEePjcVZKq_PzycLSnX56qyK1Zgn8TeDkzmaHWkJfSBIL5cWCIMk7OnTEA8c-M_aem_8JHDpUpUVTXIyaqAj3xXsw)

Trump Claims He’s Entitled to Illegal Third Term

President Donald Trump declared Friday that he is “entitled” to an unconstitutional third term, stating at a Texas port event, “Maybe we do one more term…we are entitled to it.” This assertion follows his State of the Union address Tuesday, where he repeated his false claim that Democrats stole the 2020 election and characterized a third term as rightfully his, contradicting the 22nd Amendment, which limits presidents to two terms.

Trump has repeatedly alluded to extending his presidency beyond constitutional limits, admiring authoritarian leaders like Chinese President Xi Jinping, who eliminated term limits in 2018. Republican allies including Senator Lindsey Graham and convicted fraudster Steve Bannon, whom Trump pardoned, have publicly backed a third term for Trump’s administration. A constitutional amendment enabling a third term remains impossible by 2028, forcing Trump and his allies to pursue alternative strategies centered on voter suppression.

Right-wing activists are drafting an executive order granting the president “extraordinary power over voting,” according to reporting by The Washington Post. The draft order, published by Democracy Dockets in April 2025, contains numerous errors and falsely cites Chinese election interference as justification, despite the Office of the Director of National Intelligence concluding no such interference occurred. National security expert Marc Polymeropoulos characterized the draft order as “authoritarian.”

The effort to suppress voting ahead of the 2026 midterm elections demonstrates Trump’s systematic abuse of power to manipulate electoral outcomes rather than pursue legitimate constitutional amendments. Trump’s cabinet meetings have showcased alarming acceptance of authoritarian governance, while banners displaying Trump’s image on federal buildings signal his control over government institutions. These actions construct the infrastructure for permanent authoritarian rule.

(Source: https://www.rawstory.com/trump-2675435238/)

Tom Homan Lectures Pope on Immigration, Faces FBI Bribery Investigation

Border Czar Tom Homan, a Trump loyalist facing an FBI investigation into accepting a $50,000 bribe from undercover agents in 2024, publicly lectured Pope Leo XIV on Catholic doctrine regarding immigration. In a Wednesday interview with Letters from Leo Substack, Homan claimed the pontiff misunderstood Church teachings and declared that “Catholic faith is always in support of law enforcement,” asserting the pope should align with the Trump administration’s mass deportation campaign.

Homan, citing his credentials as a “life-long Catholic,” dismissed the pope’s criticism of Trump’s immigration crackdown and told the Vicar of Christ to focus on “fixing the Catholic Church” instead. He then listed statistics about assaults on migrant women, sex trafficking, and fentanyl deaths as justification for the Trump administration’s enforcement operations, which have deployed federal agents across the country to round up and deport undocumented immigrants.

Homan further claimed that Vatican security protocols impose harsher penalties for unauthorized border crossing than the U.S. immigration system applies to undocumented migrants. This public rebuke of Pope Leo XIV, the first American pope, marks the latest instance of Trump administration officials dismissing the pontiff’s calls for compassionate immigration policy in direct contradiction to Church teachings on welcoming foreigners.

The incident follows House Speaker Mike Johnson’s similar lecture to the pope earlier this month, in which Johnson argued that the Bible mandates “assimilation” and defended his interpretation across social media in a post exceeding 1,300 words. Pope Leo XIV has emerged as a vocal critic of Trump’s policies, and multiple administration officials have now publicly attempted to reframe Catholic doctrine to align with Trump’s hardline stance on immigration.

Homan’s credibility is further compromised by allegations that he accepted a $50,000 cash bribe from FBI agents posing as businessmen seeking government contracts during the previous Trump administration. His lecture to the pope about law enforcement and Catholic values occurs while Trump’s mass deportation agenda operates through facilities designed to detain thousands of migrants, contradicting the humanitarian principles the pontiff has consistently articulated.

(Source: https://www.thedailybeast.com/another-trump-goon-tom-homan-mansplains-religion-to-pope-leo-xiv/)

Trump Purges Indiana Republicans Opposing His Gerrymandering

President Donald Trump launched a coordinated campaign on Truth Social endorsing six candidates while attacking six Indiana State Senate members who voted against his redistricting plan in December 2025. Trump used dehumanizing language, labeling the opposing Republicans as “RINO” (Republican in Name Only) politicians and claiming their refusal to gerrymander endangered Republican control of the House ahead of the 2026 midterms. The president explicitly tied the purge to his gerrymandering agenda, stating that Indiana could have “easily picked up two seats” had redistricting passed.

Trump targeted State Senator Travis Holdman, Jim Buck, Spencer Deery, Greg Goode, Greg Walker, and Eric Bassler with hostile posts, using epithets such as “pathetic,” “ineffective,” “LOSER,” and “pawn.” He endorsed Blake Fiechter, Tracey Powell, Paula Copenhaver, Brenda Wilson, Michelle Davis, and Jeff Ellington as replacements, branding them as “America First Patriot” and “REAL Republican” candidates loyal to his political agenda. This abuse of power demonstrates Trump’s weaponization of the presidency to eliminate Republican legislators who refuse to abuse the redistricting process for partisan gain.

The Indiana State Senate voted 31-19 against Trump’s redistricting proposal in December, prompting his threat of a “MAGA primary” to purge dissident Republicans. Trump previously threatened primary challenges against Indiana Republicans who rejected his gerrymandering demand, and his latest endorsement blitz executes that threat by channeling his presidential platform directly into state-level electoral interference. Indiana Governor Mike Braun subsequently aligned with Trump’s gerrymandering push, illustrating the authoritarian consolidation of party loyalty around Trump’s demands.

Trump’s coordinated posting spree violates foundational democratic norms by using the presidency to punish legislators for voting independently on redistricting matters. His language dehumanizes Republican opponents and frames partisan gerrymandering as a patriotic duty, conflating electoral manipulation with loyalty to him personally rather than to constitutional governance. The Supreme Court rejected the Independent State Legislature theory that Trump promoted to justify similar gerrymandering schemes, yet Trump continues leveraging executive authority to coerce state-level compliance with his redistricting agenda regardless of legal and ethical constraints.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-pushes-rino-purge-with-endorsement-spree-against-republicans-who-opposed-his-redistricting-plan/)

1 2 3 … 162