Category: Unpresidential

Trump’s $5K Checks Defy Congress and Reality

Donald Trump has claimed that his proposal to distribute $5,000 checks to every American does not require Congressional approval. During a speech at the GOP midterm convention in Dallas, Trump unveiled this plan, which he conditioned on Republicans maintaining control of Congress. The plan, is criticized across the political spectrum, with some Democrats calling it “socialism for the rich” and fiscal conservatives worrying about its $1.3 trillion cost.

Trump, in an interview with CBS News, insisted that the U.S. had generated trillions from tariffs and investments, suggesting such efforts funded his proposal without Congress. However, Trump’s statements faced scrutiny as fact-checkers, like CNN’s Daniel Dale, revealed inaccuracies, noting tariffs generated far less revenue. Additionally, Trump’s claim of over $20 trillion in new investments is unsubstantiated, with federal data indicating much lower figures.

A review found that the purported $11.2 trillion in investments touted by the White House was exaggerated. The administration counted vague pledges rather than actual investments, lessening the reliability of these numbers. Fact-checkers assert Trump frequently makes these exaggerated claims, despite lacking evidence from government sources.

Overall, Trump’s proposal to unilaterally issue $5,000 checks underlines his authoritarian tendencies aiming to bypass institutional checks like Congress. His unchecked assertions fuel skepticism regarding the feasibility and legality of such financial distributions without legislative backing.

This proposal aligns with Trump’s history of making untenable financial promises, reflecting a pattern of disinformation that misguides the public on economic realities, raising serious concerns about governance under his leadership.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump/just-in-trump-claims-his-5k-check-proposal-wont-need-congressional-approval/)

Jimmy Kimmel Moves Political Interview Online Amid FCC Threats

ABC’s “Jimmy Kimmel Live” decided to move an interview with Texas State Rep. James Talarico, a Democratic Senate candidate, from television to YouTube. This decision came after frequent threats from a politically charged FCC under Chairman Brendan Carr, who has aggressively targeted critics of Donald Trump’s administration. ABC is wary of potential repercussions for its local stations, especially in Texas, stemming from these FCC threats.

Previously, similar tactics were employed against “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert,” where legal concerns prevented the airing of a Talarico interview. This incident ultimately led to significant fundraising and viewership on YouTube for Talarico’s campaign. Kimmel has expressed concern over these developments as traditional editorial decisions are hindered by political pressures, differing from past presidents’ more open stance towards media appearances.

The FCC’s actions are viewed as an extraordinary assault on free speech rights by ABC, which has filed a lawsuit against the commission. This move underscores the growing tension and alleged misuse of regulatory powers to control media narratives that challenge or criticize the Trump administration.

Kimmel’s candid remarks highlight the discrepancy between past and present media relations under Trump. He notes how Trump previously participated in such interviews himself without issue, indicating a shift towards more authoritarian measures as president. These developments emphasize the importance of engaging with alternative media platforms like YouTube in the face of increased governmental interference.

In this polarized political climate, Kimmel emphasizes the importance of staying informed and encourages viewers to register and vote, recognizing these as critical steps to upholding democracy amidst an era marked by Trump’s authoritarian-style governance.



(Source: https://variety.com/2026/tv/news/jimmy-kimmel-live-james-talarico-youtube-fcc-1236856911/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAUP_0BwZG9mBWZkaWQWUOJAaWZZa-ssDhFzBXIVEHv2IERvsGV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR7j6SjTJok0sUVYM5u57GVnL52Z2PUJObe7DaTg5h3gdeKma1_6lZsarVQUNw_aem_H3iPmKflc1gb_T6ZdtGzDw&utm_id=97758_v0_s00_e0_tv4_a1demo0htc1t2h)

Trump’s $5,000 Payout Promise Lacks Foundation

Donald Trump’s promise to give $5,000 to every adult American if Republicans win the midterms reeks of a classic bribe. The outlandish proposal was announced during a speech at a Texas Republican convention, where he declared this “Trump Dividend” would only happen if his party took control of both the House and Senate. This outrageous claim seems less like a policy proposal and more like an empty attempt to sway voters.

This isn’t the first time Trump has made such hollow promises. Previously, he teased $5,000 “DOGE dividends” and $2,000 tariff rebates—none of which came to fruition. His latest proposal would require congressional approval and is financially baseless, considering such a payout would cost $1.2 trillion, far exceeding any tariff revenues they could boast about collecting.

Vice President JD Vance attempted damage control by suggesting the payment wouldn’t target wealthy Americans and could be funded through tariff revenues. However, Erica York from the Tax Foundation quickly debunked this, pointing out that a one-time payment of this magnitude would drain a decade’s worth of tariff collection, a revenue stream already dented by required refunds following a Supreme Court ruling.

The administration’s net tariff revenue stands substantially lower than the proclaimed payout requirements, signifying an insurmountable financial gap. With legal rulings mandating refunds of tariffs collected, Trump’s grand promise falls flat amid fiscal impracticalities. Like previous claims, this could be just another ploy to energize his voter base as his own presence on the ballot won’t be available to sway Republican turnout through traditional means.

The enormous financial shortfall, coupled with Trump’s history of broken promises, underlines the improbability of this proposal coming to light. The Republican effort to leverage flashy promises for election gains once again illustrates the extent Trump is willing to go to keep himself and his party in power without real deliverables for the American public.



(Source: https://www.wired.com/story/trump-offers-every-american-5000-if-republicans-win-the-midterms/?utm_brand=wired&utm_campaign=aud-dev&utm_medium=social&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwdGRjcAUPsnZwZG9mBWZkaWQWUOJzt1WwOC9vFfAQAzs7BfBz9L6i5mV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR6Gtmij4Ozi5oR7c3Wsa1mi6Q1SO7aAwNAkR9YA-WX_bOR0cYw4KCAxP44bAA_aem_CfEq949-BU5lbYl3tCJwVw)

Trump Attacks ABC’s Mary Bruce at GOP Convention

Donald Trump lashed out at ABC News reporter Mary Bruce for questioning why some Republican candidates are skipping his midterm convention in Dallas. When Bruce highlighted that not all Republicans in competitive races would be attending, Trump dismissed her query by declaring that the event was “sold out” and criticized ABC News as “fake news,” alleging space limitations as the reason for the absence of certain politicians.

Bruce’s interaction with Trump reflected his ongoing hostility towards ABC, a network he frequently attacks. Historically, Trump pursued legal action against the network, resulting in a $16 million settlement and an apology from George Stephanopoulos following a defamation lawsuit. Trump’s disdain extends to late-night host Jimmy Kimmel, another vocal critic at the network.

Trump continued to boast about the expected turnout at the Dallas convention, asserting a “tremendous crowd” and heralding it as an opportunity to showcase his presidency’s achievements. He insisted that every desired politician would be present, casting doubts on the necessity of attendance for those already dominating their races.

This exchange with Bruce underscores Trump’s strategy of attacking media outlets that challenge him. He uses these confrontations to maintain control over his narrative, even when faced with challenging questions about his administration and its dynamics within the Republican Party.

With the convention in focus, Trump’s rhetoric continues to emphasize his self-styled image as an embattled leader fighting against perceived media bias and institutional adversaries, showcasing his authoritarian tendencies Trump demands NBC ABC license revocation.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/you-are-the-worst-of-all-trump-snaps-at-reporter-asking-about-republicans-skipping-midterm-convention/)

Trump Attacks Haberman and NY Mag Over 9/11 Coverage

Donald Trump has launched a fierce attack on journalist Maggie Haberman and New York Magazine over their reporting on his whereabouts following the September 11 attacks. Trump used his Truth Social platform to demand retractions, dismissing their reports as false and labeling the journalists “liars and scoundrels.” He also insulted Haberman personally, calling her “unattractive both inside and out.”

Trump’s tirade is in response to reports questioning his claims about his presence at Ground Zero after 9/11. These reports suggest a lack of evidence for Trump’s assertion that he was actively involved in recovery efforts shortly after the attacks. Trump shared an archival video from September 13, 2001, showing him at the site, claiming to have workers help with the efforts.

The altercation with Haberman also touched on reports about Trump’s plans for the 25th anniversary of the attacks. According to previous discussions, there were claims that Trump sought to speak at the New York ceremony but was instead attending the Pentagon event after a schedule reorganization. The New York Times has refused to issue a retraction regarding these claims, suggesting it was yet another instance of Trump repudiating unfavorable media coverage.

Haberman and her colleagues’ reporting on Trump’s 9/11 plans indicated that his presence was expected at the Pentagon, not Ground Zero, aligning with a desire to speak at such events. Trump’s assault on media figures has been a significant part of his approach to media criticisms, often resulting in public confrontations.

In response to the ongoing scrutiny, Trump’s defense of his post-9/11 actions emphasizes his narrative but lacks tangible corroboration from witnesses or officials present at Ground Zero. This latest incident underscores Trump’s pattern of attacking media outlets that challenge his narrative, a tactic that has defined much of his public engagements.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump/trump-rages-at-maggie-haberman-and-new-york-mag-over-9-11-reports-liars-and-scoundrels/)

Trump Fabricates Ground Zero Rescue Story Again

Donald Trump, marking the 25th anniversary of the September 11 attacks, once again attempted to place himself at the heart of the tragedy’s immediate aftermath. Speaking at the Ellipse near the White House, Trump recounted a questionable story of being carried by firefighters at Ground Zero, a claim that has been debunked by first responders who were present at the time.

Trump utilized the solemn occasion not only to reminisce inaccurately about his whereabouts during the crisis but also to tout his administration’s economic achievements. He misleadingly asserted that America is stronger now under his leadership, citing improved stock market performances and inflated labor participation statistics without substantiating evidence.

This isn’t the first time Trump has falsely claimed involvement in the 9/11 recovery efforts. During his 2016 campaign, he similarly boasted about being on the scene with firefighters, promoting an image of heroism despite lacking any credible substantiation. His narrative clashes with reports from actual rescuers who have consistently refuted his presence.

In conjunction with his Ground Zero narrative, Trump plans to speak at a commemoration ceremony at the Pentagon, opting out of attending the annual event at the World Trade Center site in New York. Instead, Vice President JD Vance will represent the administration alongside other former presidents.

Trump’s consistent attempts to rewrite his history with the 9/11 attacks reveal a pattern of manipulating public memories to enhance his image disconnected from reality, highlighting his authoritarian tactics aimed at self-aggrandizement rather than honoring the victims and first responders of the tragedy.



(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-9-11-ground-zero-rescue-b3046756.html?fbclid=IwdGRjcAUNRzlwZG9mBWZkaWQWUOCyxDxFBCl6843mp4WdMfizcVEflWV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR7xHZIhkahnVFzxiTsK_F-397CjvscjjLwLgjmRYZDOQyCPz1exNnn46I8WZw_aem_fuiKR13RH-x_99ILOhVB4Q)

Trump’s Oil Deal in Venezuela Sparks Dictatorship Concerns

President Trump has secured a controversial oil deal with Venezuela, sparking outrage over the lack of democratic elections in the country. The deal, which gives a U.S. company control over a significant portion of Venezuela’s oil reserves for 100 years, has been criticized as a maneuver that entrenches the unelected interim government led by Delcy Rodríguez. Critics argue that Trump’s actions prioritize resource acquisition over democratic principles, raising concerns about an emerging dictatorial regime.

Despite Trump’s assurances of future elections, the indefinite timeline and his dismissive remarks about Venezuela’s readiness for democracy have led to skepticism among Venezuelans and international observers alike. Many believe that the oil pact does not facilitate democratic restoration but rather solidifies U.S. influence and control over Venezuela’s resources. This deal is perceived as blatant pillaging, neglecting the pressing need for free elections and legitimate government representation.

In the U.S., while some Republican lawmakers support the oil agreement, they also express distrust in Rodríguez’s leadership. Notably, Venezuelan opposition leaders like María Corina Machado criticize the deal for bolstering an “illegitimate” government. They emphasize the importance of establishing strong democratic institutions and highlight the absence of elections as a fundamental breach of international norms and democratic values.

The situation has led to widespread disillusionment among Venezuelans. Citizens feel trapped by a cycle of foreign intervention and unfulfilled promises of democracy, with many viewing the deal as a continuation of undemocratic rule rather than a path to reform. The oil agreement is seen as a tool for the U.S. to assert control, echoing historical patterns of exploitation rather than contributing to national rebuilding efforts.

Amidst these developments, Trump administration officials depict the deal as a critical step towards economic recovery, proposing that it will pave the way for eventual elections. However, the skepticism remains high, with former and current officials wary of the U.S. becoming too entangled with a government deemed undemocratic. For many, the oil deal marks a troubling precedent, blurring the lines between legitimate foreign policy and blatant resource exploitation under the guise of aiding a nation.



(Source: https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2026-09-07/fg-us-venezuela-oil-over-democracy)

Trump Celebrates Supreme Court Ballroom Win as Construction Resumes

President Donald Trump declared victory Wednesday after the Supreme Court cleared his administration to resume construction on a $400 million White House ballroom complex, which he announced via Truth Social as “a gift to America.” Trump celebrated “hundreds of happy construction workers” beginning work on the project, claiming it represents “the finest Ballroom/Military complex anywhere in the World” and that victory came only after a “long, hard fight in the Court System.”

The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 Monday to block lower court decisions halting construction, allowing work to proceed while the National Trust for Historic Preservation’s lawsuit continues. The group contends Trump lacks authority to undertake the sweeping construction without congressional approval. The Court’s majority did not address the project’s ultimate legality, instead finding the preservation group “lacks standing” to challenge it and that lower courts had “likely exceeded” their authority in ordering construction stopped.

Chief Justice John Roberts, a conservative, joined the Court’s three liberal justices in dissent, stating the “decision is no victory for the separation of powers.” Roberts argued that “construction is likely unlawful” because Congress has not approved the project, directly contradicting the majority’s position and signaling deep institutional concerns about executive overreach.

Trump demolished the historic East Wing of the White House last fall to make way for the ballroom, an action that preceded any judicial approval of the undertaking. This construction pattern aligns with Trump’s documented focus on construction projects, which consumed over a quarter of his public speaking time during early 2026, dominating his messaging across dozens of events.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/online/trump-takes-court-victory-lap-as-construction-resumes-on-ballroom/)ss dozens of events.

Trump Mint Coins Violate Federal Law Banning Living Presidents

The U.S. Mint announced Wednesday that $1 coins bearing President Donald Trump’s image have entered circulation and are available for purchase on its website. This action violates federal law prohibiting living presidents from appearing on U.S. coinage under 31 U.S. Code § 5112 and the Circulating Collectible Coin Redesign Act of 2020, which mandates at least two years must pass after a president’s death before their likeness can be depicted on coins.

Trump’s administration has repeatedly exploited federal currency laws to enrich itself and promote the Trump brand. The Treasury Department previously violated law with a presidential gold coin, and the administration has signaled willingness to change legislation to enable a $250 bill featuring Trump if Congress acts. This pattern reflects Trump’s weaponization of government agencies to advance personal financial interests and perpetuate his political brand.

The coin release follows Trump family cryptocurrency ventures designed to extract wealth from supporters. Trump’s sons and associates have already partnered with UFC to sell commemorative coins ranging from $250 to $12,000, and UFC pays fighters in Trump crypto through World Liberty Financial, a Trump family cryptocurrency operation launched in 2024. These schemes demonstrate how Trump uses his position to convert government resources and public platforms into direct profit.

The Mint’s action exemplifies the systematic dismantling of institutional safeguards against authoritarian abuse of power. By openly violating established law without consequence, Trump normalizes executive lawlessness and signals that government agencies exist to serve his personal enrichment rather than the public interest. The story remains developing.



(Source: https://abcnews.com/amp/Politics/trump-1-coins-circulation-us-mint/story?id=136142051)

Army Secretary Driscoll Resigns After Hegseth Personnel Purge

Army Secretary Dan Driscoll resigned Monday evening after mounting tensions with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, according to a U.S. official who confirmed the departure to ABC News. President Trump accepted the resignation, with White House spokesperson Anna Kelly issuing a statement praising Driscoll as “highly effective” in advancing Trump’s agenda at the Department of the Army.

Driscoll and Hegseth clashed repeatedly since both assumed their positions in 2025, with disagreements centered on military personnel decisions. Hegseth fired or sidelined multiple senior officers eligible for promotion to general rank, actions Driscoll opposed. Most significantly, Hegseth terminated Gen. Randy George, the former Army Chief of Staff, in April without explanation; Driscoll had maintained a close working relationship with George and stated at a congressional hearing that he was unaware of the rationale for George’s removal.

Driscoll held unusual influence within Trump’s administration beyond typical Army Secretary responsibilities. Trump assigned him to lead diplomatic efforts to restart Ukraine-Russia peace negotiations in late 2025, a task outside the normal scope of a service secretary’s duties to train and equip military forces. His diplomatic role placed him at odds with Hegseth’s command of military strategy, creating friction over competing priorities within the Pentagon.

Driscoll had built significant political capital on Capitol Hill and maintained direct White House access through a prior relationship with Vice President JD Vance, whom he met while both attended Yale Law School following Driscoll’s service as a cavalry officer in the 10th Mountain Division. This connection and legislative support distinguished him from other service secretaries and may have contributed to the power struggle with Hegseth over Pentagon direction and personnel decisions.



(Source: https://abcnews.com/Politics/army-secretary-dan-driscoll-resigns-amid-tensions-hegseth/story?id=136101175)

1 2 3 … 479