Category: Attack the Press

Trump’s Media Ban Met with Judicial Pushback and Criticism

In a tense interview on ABC’s “This Week,” Attorney General Todd Blanche faced heated questioning from Martha Raddatz over President Trump’s controversial ban on three media outlets. A federal judge, Timothy Kelly, recently paused this ban, which targeted CNN, MS NOW, and Politico. The judge noted that Trump’s public reasoning focused more on perceived negativity towards his administration rather than valid national security concerns, which the Department of Justice attempted to defend in court.

Raddatz challenged Blanche on the justification of the ban, which was argued under the guise of national security. Blanche deflected when pressed for specific examples of inaccuracies from the banned networks, asserting that negativity towards the president’s administration amounts to a national security issue. Raddatz countered by highlighting that the judge’s decision did not align with this national security rationale.

The exchange grew more contentious when Raddatz asked whether the administration intended to screen journalists before allowing White House access. Blanche vehemently denied such intentions, accusing Raddatz of putting words in his mouth. He stressed that while the press has the freedom to report, the administration has a duty to ensure accuracy to the American people, even if the news is not favorable to the president.

Raddatz further questioned Blanche on the role of the press and the significance of the First Amendment, suggesting Trump’s motives were politically driven rather than impartial. Blanche defended the administration by accusing Raddatz of selectively quoting the president’s concerns, which he argued were part of a broader context of mainstream media bias.

This confrontation highlights Trump’s ongoing attempts to control media narratives and silence dissenting voices, actions that reflect his broader authoritarian tendencies. The incident underscores the administration’s efforts to delegitimize and vilify media outlets that report critically on Trump’s policies and conduct.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/you-cannot-be-asking-me-that-ag-todd-blanche-erupts-at-abcs-martha-raddatz-in-heated-interview-on-trumps-press-ban/)

Trump Silences Reporter, Contradicts Press Freedom Claims

President Donald Trump once again showed his hostility towards the press during an incident with MS NOW reporter Akayla Gardner. During a tense exchange, Trump criticized Gardner, accusing her of being part of the “fake news,” while simultaneously claiming that he supports an open and free press. This contradictory stance highlights Trump’s ongoing attempts to undermine media organizations that do not align with his views.

The encounter occurred as Trump was departing for a college football game in Tennessee. CNN was scheduled to cover the event, but was replaced by outlets more favorable to Trump, such as LindellTV. This decision is part of Trump’s broader media strategy, where he routinely bars certain media outlets like CNN, MS NOW, and Politico, which he accuses of disseminating false information.

Gardner, who had previously been excluded from White House coverage due to these restrictions, directly questioned Trump on whether he only wanted supportive outlets in the press pool. Trump’s response was to dismiss her outlet as fake news and insist he wanted real news coverage, despite his actions indicating otherwise.

Trump’s maneuver to exclude critical media outlets has already resulted in legal challenges, with judges ordering the reversal of his bans. Despite this, Trump continues to attack the press on social media, further straining relationships with mainstream media and promoting transparency issues in his administration.

Jacob Soboroff of MS NOW criticized Trump’s actions, calling them “incredibly childish” and ridiculing the absurdity of claiming to support press freedom while barring critical outlets. This incident is emblematic of Trump’s ongoing battle with the media and his authoritarian tendencies to silence dissenting voices.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/trump-claims-he-loves-an-open-free-press-while-calling-out-reporter-and-telling-her-to-be-quiet-in-tense-exchange/) silence dissenting voices.

White House Bars CNN, MS NOW From State Dinner

The White House blocked CNN and MS NOW from covering a state dinner hosted by President Donald Trump despite a judicial order restoring their access. This refusal is a blatant defiance of U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly’s temporary restraining order, which was meant to allow these media outlets to cover events on the White House grounds.

At the event, which featured Chinese President Xi Jinping, CNN’s Erin Burnett reported that their media team was denied entry to cover the arrivals. Similarly, MS NOW’s Symone Sanders-Townsend announced the same denial on-air, highlighting the administration’s continued exclusionary practices.

Trump justified this ban by accusing the outlets of spreading false information and signaled potential future bans on other media organizations. Despite the judge’s order, Trump’s administration initially ignored the ruling before eventually restoring access later that day.

The White House defended the ban by claiming it was a “pre-credentialed event” and suggested that not all media had unrestricted access to events. This move underscores the administration’s continuous battle with the press and its attempt to control the narrative.

This incident is part of a broader pattern of Trump’s hostility towards media outlets he deems adversarial, further cementing his authoritarian approach to governance as he continues to undermine democratic institutions and quell dissenting voices.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/breaking-news-denied-white-house-blocks-cnn-and-ms-now-from-covering-state-dinner-despite-judges-ruling/)

Trump Announces Ban on Key Media from White House

President Donald Trump has announced a ban on CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House, intensifying his ongoing war against media outlets he labels as “fake news.” Despite Trump’s declaration on Truth Social, the specifics of how this ban would be implemented remain unclear. Legal precedents suggest such actions are likely to fail in the courts, as past attempts to remove press credentials, such as the case involving CNN’s Jim Acosta, were overturned legally.

Trump’s attack on these news organizations follows a history of legal disputes with media outlets, demanding multimillion-dollar settlements and challenging broadcast licenses of networks airing negative stories about his administration. His administration’s actions have sparked criticism from press freedom advocates, who view these moves as a blatant violation of the 1st Amendment.

Responding to questions at a press briefing, Trump expressed willingness to continue legal battles over restricting press access, disregarding the constitutional right to free speech. Nonetheless, CNN and MS NOW are reportedly continuing their coverage from the White House grounds, as the ban has yet to be enforced.

Press freedom groups, including the Freedom of the Press Foundation, have strongly condemned Trump’s threats, emphasizing the public’s right to independent news coverage. Fox News White House correspondent and president of the White House Correspondents’ Association, Jacqui Heinrich, criticized Trump’s actions as detrimental to the fundamental principles of an independent press.

The moves by Trump’s administration to intimidate and retaliate against news organizations he deems unfavorable reflect an ongoing pattern of authoritarian tactics and decrying critical media as obstacles to his preferred narratives.



(Source: https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2026-09-18/trump-bans-cnn-msnow-politico-from-white-house)

Trump’s Unhinged Attack on Journalist Rachel Scott

Donald Trump, unwavering in his authoritarian tendencies, has once again displayed his contempt for the press by berating ABC reporter Rachel Scott over questions about his extravagant proposal to give every adult American $5,000 if Republicans win the midterm elections. This reckless promise is estimated to burden the U.S. economy with an additional $1.35 trillion debt, further demonstrating Trump’s disregard for fiscal responsibility.

At a sparsely attended Republican convention in Texas, Trump faced scrutiny for his so-called “Trump dividends,” an apparent bribe disguised as a reward for Americans enduring alleged hardships under the Biden administration. When Scott, a female journalist, attempted to question the feasibility and intent behind the staggering proposal, Trump lashed out, refusing to engage and instead opting to intimidate and belittle her.

This episode is consistent with Trump’s troubling history of hostility towards female journalists. His verbal attacks have previously targeted several women in the media, suggesting a pattern of misogynistic behavior. His aggressive reaction to Scott’s reasonable scrutiny exemplifies Trump’s deep-seated disdain for accountability and transparency.

Adding to this disturbing trend, Trump’s reactions to female journalists have included derogatory comments and insults, aimed at undermining their credibility and instilling fear. Scott’s encounter with Trump echoes past incidents where he labeled reporters as “rude” and “obnoxious,” perpetuating a culture of intimidation.

Rachel Scott’s confrontation with Trump reveals not only his volatile temperament but also highlights the broader implications of his authoritarian ambition. By attempting to silence critical voices, Trump threatens the principles of free press and democracy, signaling his relentless pursuit of power without accountability.



(Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/unhinged-trump-lunges-female-reporter-092443686.html)

Jimmy Kimmel Moves Political Interview Online Amid FCC Threats

ABC’s “Jimmy Kimmel Live” decided to move an interview with Texas State Rep. James Talarico, a Democratic Senate candidate, from television to YouTube. This decision came after frequent threats from a politically charged FCC under Chairman Brendan Carr, who has aggressively targeted critics of Donald Trump’s administration. ABC is wary of potential repercussions for its local stations, especially in Texas, stemming from these FCC threats.

Previously, similar tactics were employed against “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert,” where legal concerns prevented the airing of a Talarico interview. This incident ultimately led to significant fundraising and viewership on YouTube for Talarico’s campaign. Kimmel has expressed concern over these developments as traditional editorial decisions are hindered by political pressures, differing from past presidents’ more open stance towards media appearances.

The FCC’s actions are viewed as an extraordinary assault on free speech rights by ABC, which has filed a lawsuit against the commission. This move underscores the growing tension and alleged misuse of regulatory powers to control media narratives that challenge or criticize the Trump administration.

Kimmel’s candid remarks highlight the discrepancy between past and present media relations under Trump. He notes how Trump previously participated in such interviews himself without issue, indicating a shift towards more authoritarian measures as president. These developments emphasize the importance of engaging with alternative media platforms like YouTube in the face of increased governmental interference.

In this polarized political climate, Kimmel emphasizes the importance of staying informed and encourages viewers to register and vote, recognizing these as critical steps to upholding democracy amidst an era marked by Trump’s authoritarian-style governance.



(Source: https://variety.com/2026/tv/news/jimmy-kimmel-live-james-talarico-youtube-fcc-1236856911/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAUP_0BwZG9mBWZkaWQWUOJAaWZZa-ssDhFzBXIVEHv2IERvsGV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR7j6SjTJok0sUVYM5u57GVnL52Z2PUJObe7DaTg5h3gdeKma1_6lZsarVQUNw_aem_H3iPmKflc1gb_T6ZdtGzDw&utm_id=97758_v0_s00_e0_tv4_a1demo0htc1t2h)

Trump Attacks ABC’s Mary Bruce at GOP Convention

Donald Trump lashed out at ABC News reporter Mary Bruce for questioning why some Republican candidates are skipping his midterm convention in Dallas. When Bruce highlighted that not all Republicans in competitive races would be attending, Trump dismissed her query by declaring that the event was “sold out” and criticized ABC News as “fake news,” alleging space limitations as the reason for the absence of certain politicians.

Bruce’s interaction with Trump reflected his ongoing hostility towards ABC, a network he frequently attacks. Historically, Trump pursued legal action against the network, resulting in a $16 million settlement and an apology from George Stephanopoulos following a defamation lawsuit. Trump’s disdain extends to late-night host Jimmy Kimmel, another vocal critic at the network.

Trump continued to boast about the expected turnout at the Dallas convention, asserting a “tremendous crowd” and heralding it as an opportunity to showcase his presidency’s achievements. He insisted that every desired politician would be present, casting doubts on the necessity of attendance for those already dominating their races.

This exchange with Bruce underscores Trump’s strategy of attacking media outlets that challenge him. He uses these confrontations to maintain control over his narrative, even when faced with challenging questions about his administration and its dynamics within the Republican Party.

With the convention in focus, Trump’s rhetoric continues to emphasize his self-styled image as an embattled leader fighting against perceived media bias and institutional adversaries, showcasing his authoritarian tendencies Trump demands NBC ABC license revocation.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/you-are-the-worst-of-all-trump-snaps-at-reporter-asking-about-republicans-skipping-midterm-convention/)

Trump Attacks Haberman and NY Mag Over 9/11 Coverage

Donald Trump has launched a fierce attack on journalist Maggie Haberman and New York Magazine over their reporting on his whereabouts following the September 11 attacks. Trump used his Truth Social platform to demand retractions, dismissing their reports as false and labeling the journalists “liars and scoundrels.” He also insulted Haberman personally, calling her “unattractive both inside and out.”

Trump’s tirade is in response to reports questioning his claims about his presence at Ground Zero after 9/11. These reports suggest a lack of evidence for Trump’s assertion that he was actively involved in recovery efforts shortly after the attacks. Trump shared an archival video from September 13, 2001, showing him at the site, claiming to have workers help with the efforts.

The altercation with Haberman also touched on reports about Trump’s plans for the 25th anniversary of the attacks. According to previous discussions, there were claims that Trump sought to speak at the New York ceremony but was instead attending the Pentagon event after a schedule reorganization. The New York Times has refused to issue a retraction regarding these claims, suggesting it was yet another instance of Trump repudiating unfavorable media coverage.

Haberman and her colleagues’ reporting on Trump’s 9/11 plans indicated that his presence was expected at the Pentagon, not Ground Zero, aligning with a desire to speak at such events. Trump’s assault on media figures has been a significant part of his approach to media criticisms, often resulting in public confrontations.

In response to the ongoing scrutiny, Trump’s defense of his post-9/11 actions emphasizes his narrative but lacks tangible corroboration from witnesses or officials present at Ground Zero. This latest incident underscores Trump’s pattern of attacking media outlets that challenge his narrative, a tactic that has defined much of his public engagements.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump/trump-rages-at-maggie-haberman-and-new-york-mag-over-9-11-reports-liars-and-scoundrels/)

Trump Official Leaks Debunked Censorship Files

A Trump administration official leaked government files to a conservative online data analyst in a failed attempt to prove that the shuttered Global Engagement Center had conducted domestic censorship operations. Sarah Rogers, the State Department’s undersecretary for public diplomacy, provided the documents to Jennica Pounds, known as DataRepublican, who claimed she was being “entrapped.” Rogers then published the files herself, alleging center officials “betrayed their stated mission.”

Two former senior GEC officials, Daniel Kimmage and Carrie Goux, examined the leaked material and concluded it demonstrates nothing. The files contained a 2022 GEC report on “gendered disinformation” and Kimmage’s congressional testimony, which Rogers selectively presented to suggest the center had targeted American speech. Kimmage stated Rogers “tried to twist” his testimony, in which he explicitly said the GEC “did not” take positions on US outlets, into false evidence of domestic censorship.

The GEC, which operated from 2017 until dissolution in 2025, spent nearly a decade tracking foreign influence operations from Russia, China, and Iran under an explicit foreign-facing mandate. During that period, it published eight detailed reports on Russian and Chinese disinformation campaigns, exposed four major Kremlin operations across Latin America, Africa, Moldova, and against RT, and brokered an international pact on countering state disinformation signed by over two dozen governments. A 2022 inspector general review found the center “generally effective,” though it noted weaknesses in internal controls and contractor oversight.

Republicans, including former House Foreign Affairs Committee chair Michael McCaul, attacked the GEC for allegedly stretching the definition of disinformation to suppress conservative speech. The campaign centered on the center’s funding of the Global Disinformation Index, a UK nonprofit that rated media outlets; the GDI’s separate 2022 study of the US media market rated Newsmax, One America News, and the New York Post as high-risk for disinformation, which critics weaponized as evidence of domestic meddling despite the GEC’s foreign mandate.

The State Department is now resuming counter-disinformation work through other offices, including a proposal to pay up to 30 social media influencers across 11 Southeast Asian countries $2,500 each as part of an $11 million campaign to counter Chinese propaganda. The influencer program, operated by the US Mission to ASEAN, includes messaging, training, and studio visits to “intensive collaboration” in Washington and Houston, with recruitment materials citing Pounds as an ideal model. Goux stated the administration is “spending a lot more tax dollars” attempting to reconstruct the GEC’s functions through contractors while the US “has lost their seat at the table” internationally and “losing trust too.”



(Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/aug/30/state-department-global-engagement-center-leaked-documents-foreign-propaganda?utm_term=Autofeed&CMP=fb_us&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwdGRjcAUB2bFwZG9mBWZkaWQWUNhA2nVC-1TIXlpnQcULA8nZq7U7QGV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR4e46YPv-u3jinexDLfVD5pbBRWNKDJWnPzteIVor6UwLqdj-AiK3cye1072Q_aem_qPXIWAbHlImdCnG_ibNBHg#Echobox=1788089080)

Pentagon Stealth Hires Influencers To Pump Up Pete Hegseth

The Pentagon secretly hired conservative military veterans with large social media followings to amplify Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s agenda and attack Trump administration critics, according to The Washington Post. Retired Air Force Colonel Rob Maness (135,000 X followers), retired Army Colonel Kurt Schlichter (620,000 X followers), and retired Army Colonel Thomas Anderson, who writes as Cynical Publius (323,000 X followers), were assigned to the office of Anthony Tata, the undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness, with active civilian government email addresses as of late August 2026.

Pentagon spokesman Joel Valdez refused to disclose whether the three influencers draw taxpayer-funded salaries, their specific roles, or the duration of their assignments, contradicting Trump administration claims of running “the most transparent Defense Department ever.” The secrecy surrounding their placements and compensation demonstrates the administration’s use of government resources to orchestrate propaganda through influencers who then amplify official messaging to civilian audiences without public accountability.

All three individuals declined to comment to The Post about their positions and activities. Tata and Hegseth also refused to respond to questions about the program, leaving no official explanation for how the Pentagon justifies placing active political operatives on the public payroll or what oversight, if any, monitors their work.

The revelation follows reporting that Democratic and Republican politicians pay influencers on TikTok and other platforms to promote their agendas, but the Pentagon’s covert hiring of active-duty adjacent figures represents a direct weaponization of military resources for partisan message amplification by the Trump administration.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/the-pentagon-secretly-hires-conservative-influencers-to-amplify-pete-hegseths-agenda/)

1 2 3 … 80