Category: Education

Trump’s Executive Order Threatens Public Education and Civil Rights in America

The recent executive order signed by President Donald Trump signals an alarming push towards dismantling the U.S. Department of Education, led by Secretary Linda McMahon. The directive, which intends to eliminate the agency, threatens to undermine more than four decades of federal commitment to civil rights and equal access in education. This move aims not just to trim down federal oversight but to fundamentally reshape the education landscape in favor of privatization and the interests of wealthy donors.

With a long history of similar efforts, Trump’s administration is now positioned to facilitate the transfer of authority and resources from the federal government back to states and localities. This shift could lead to severe consequences for public schooling, including the redistribution of funds away from public institutions towards private and religious entities. Despite claims that essential programs like Pell Grants and Title I funding will remain untouched, the potential for considerable disruption in federal support for disadvantaged and disabled students looms large.

Teachers and their unions, already facing marginalization, could see their protections eroded as funding is diverted. Along the way, the civil rights infrastructure that safeguards against discrimination in education is at serious risk. With the legislation purportedly designed to cut half of the Department’s workforce, the efficacy of vital services for millions of American children hangs in the balance, raising immediate concerns among education advocates.

The proposed changes are not mere administrative shifts; they reflect a calculated effort by Republican elites to reduce federal influence over education. Conservative frameworks circulating for years advocate for turning federal education responsibilities over to various other departments, a strategy that many experts warn could compromise oversight and enforcement of civil rights laws in schools.

The potential implications of Trump’s executive order are dire. Without robust federal protections, students in states dominated by right-wing ideologies may find themselves in educational environments governed by fewer regulations and lower standards—the very embodiment of neoliberal education policy. As public education faces unprecedented threats, it is vital to recognize this moment as part of a broader agenda that seeks the commodification of education at the expense of democracy and equality.

(h/t: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/education-department-trump-what-is-next-student-loans-fafsa-rcna197302)

Trump’s Education Department Layoffs Spark Crisis

The U.S. Department of Education has been significantly downsized under the Trump administration, with Secretary Linda McMahon executing layoffs affecting approximately half of its workforce. This drastic reduction is raising substantial concerns among educators in California, particularly regarding the distribution of essential federal funds aimed at supporting disadvantaged students and those with disabilities.

California educators fear that these layoffs will severely impact the management of college financial aid and student loans, as well as civil rights protections in schools. The closure of the regional Office for Civil Rights in San Francisco will exacerbate an already overwhelming backlog of investigations into discrimination in education, leaving many students and families, especially those from marginalized communities, vulnerable and anxious about their educational futures.

Guillermo Mayer, president of Public Advocates, emphasized the adverse consequences of the layoffs, which he argued would bring chaos to public schools and undermine the services provided to millions of students, particularly those requiring additional support. L.A. school board member Kelly Gonez articulated similar concerns, describing the cuts as a direct attack on the diverse populations that constitute the majority of students in the district.

The Department of Education’s budget was approximately $80 billion pre-Trump, but after the layoffs, political maneuvering has raised fears about a future where vital federal financial support might be curtailed or manipulated according to Trump’s ideological agenda. Some federal funding, crucial to programs like Title I for low-income students, is now mired in uncertainty, potentially affecting thousands of California students.

Moreover, the administration’s actions are being interpreted as an effort to control educational content and target institutions that align with what Trump defines as “woke” ideologies. Legal challenges have already arisen, with California joining other states in lawsuits against the federal government’s arbitrary cancellations of grants for teacher training programs aimed at fostering diversity and inclusion.

(h/t: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-03-12/trump-guts-education-department-sending-california-scrambling)

Trump’s Agenda Triggers Massive Layoffs at the Department of Education, Threatening Public Education Support

The U.S. Department of Education is facing drastic workforce reductions, with nearly half of its employees set to be laid off as part of President Donald Trump’s agenda to dismantle the agency entirely. This decision affects around 1,300 workers and follows the administration’s directives that prioritize efficiency and accountability while directly targeting public education resources.

Education Secretary Linda McMahon affirmed that the layoffs signal the first steps toward shutting down the Department of Education, an initiative championed by Trump despite the need for Congressional approval to fully eliminate the agency. During a Fox News interview, McMahon confirmed that the layoffs are indeed a precursor to the department’s closure, framing them as a response to “bureaucratic bloat.”

The implications of these cuts are profound, as they come alongside another round of terminations and voluntary separations from staff looking to escape the turmoil within the agency. Concerns have been raised regarding the capability of the remaining staff to manage essential federal student aid and educational resources following such significant staff reductions.

Unions representing education workers have vehemently condemned these layoffs. Leaders like Sheria Smith of the American Federation of Government Employees emphasized that such drastic measures reflect a disregard for the commitment of public servants while warning of the adverse effects on millions of American students who rely on the department for support and guidance.

The chaotic restructuring is indicative of Trump and the administration’s ongoing efforts to diminish the federal government’s role in education as they push for a radical reshaping of services that cater to the nation’s most vulnerable populations. Experts warn that insufficient staffing may jeopardize crucial educational programs and services, raising alarms about the future viability of public education initiatives.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/11/politics/department-of-education-cuts/index.html)

Trump Threatens Deportation of Students Amid Protests Crackdown

President Donald Trump has escalated his authoritarian rhetoric by threatening federal funding for colleges that allow what he calls “illegal protests.” In a post on Truth Social, Trump declared, “All Federal Funding will STOP for any College, School, or University that allows illegal protests,” targeting institutions which have hosted anti-war protests since the recent Hamas attacks on Israel.

This announcement accompanies a broader crackdown on academic freedom and dissent, positioning the Trump administration as increasingly intolerant of free speech on college campuses. Alongside his threats against universities, he stipulated that “agitators” may face imprisonment or deportation, while American students participating in such protests could be expelled or arrested, exacerbating an environment of fear and intimidation.

Trump’s remarks come in the wake of a new federal task force aimed at investigating antisemitism, which includes site visits to major universities like Harvard, Columbia, and NYU. These institutions have been scrutinized for hosting protests that endorse anti-war sentiments, further aligning with the Republican Party’s trend of targeting academic institutions and repressing dissent under the guise of national security.

Additionally, Trump signed an executive order directing the Justice Department to prosecute “antisemitic crimes” and investigate what he characterizes as “anti-Jewish racism” rampant in leftist colleges. This directive fosters an atmosphere where dissent is equated with criminality, significantly undermining the role of higher education as a forum for diverse viewpoints and critical thought.

Furthermore, the pressure on institutions like Columbia University, which risks losing over $51 million in federal contracts due to accusations of failing to protect Jewish students, exemplifies the problematic nature of his administration’s approach. Education Secretary Linda McMahon highlighted that universities have a responsibility to uphold non-discriminatory practices, a principle that is being weaponized against institutions exercising their right to free speech, ultimately pushing academic discourse towards authoritarianism.

(h/t: https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-american-students-permanently-expelled-162037337.html)

Trump’s Plan to Abolish the Department of Education Threatens Access and Equity for Millions of Students

The White House is moving forward with plans for an executive order to dismantle the Department of Education, a significant step that highlights the ongoing anti-education stance of Donald Trump and his Republican allies. This department, established in 1979, plays a crucial role in serving over 50 million students across more than 98,000 schools and administering essential financial aid to millions of higher education students. Trump’s efforts to abolish it come despite the overwhelming evidence of its necessity in promoting educational equity and access.

This executive order aligns with long-standing Republican goals to dismantle federal education programs. Trump made this pledge during his campaign, claiming that returning control to the states would somehow improve educational outcomes. However, this claim is misleading and ignores the reality that most states lack the resources and infrastructure to effectively support education without federal assistance. Critics, including Becky Pringle, head of the National Education Association, have warned that such a move would disproportionately harm vulnerable populations, disrupt vital student services, and increase class sizes, directly undermining students’ rights and educational prospects.

Historical attempts by Republicans, dating back to Ronald Reagan, to eliminate the Department of Education have failed due to bipartisan opposition. Recently introduced bills in Congress by Republican representatives demonstrate ongoing efforts but face significant hurdles, especially in the Senate, where bipartisan cooperation would be necessary to override a filibuster. Trump’s current push for an executive order is a clear indication of his willingness to bypass legislative processes to impose his radical education agenda, which focuses on the privatization of public education and a drastic reduction in federal oversight.

Trump’s education policies also reflect a toxic mix of misinformation and extremism, such as targeting critical race theory and enforcing civil rights investigations that cater to fabricated grievances rather than addressing real issues within educational institutions. This agenda poses serious threats to diversity and inclusion in American schools, fostering a discriminatory environment that could deepen social divides.

The implications of abolishing the Department of Education extend beyond the federal bureaucracy. It represents a broader assault on the principles that safeguard fair and equitable education for all students, particularly those from marginalized communities. As we witness increasing hostility towards educational institutions and the vital services they provide, it is crucial to advocate for the protection of public education against these regressive policies championed by Trump and his Republican affiliates.

(h/t: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/white-house-preparing-executive-order-abolish-department-education-rcna190205)

Trump Administration’s Assault on Education Threatens Civil Rights and Academic Freedom

The Trump administration is steering the United States toward a disturbing form of educational authoritarianism. The U.S. Department of Education has recently issued new interpretations of civil rights law that effectively redefine discrimination to include perceived biases against white individuals. This alarming shift was highlighted in a letter from the Department’s Office for Civil Rights, which imposes vague guidelines that threaten academic freedom and allow for the censorship of essential historical narratives, particularly regarding systemic racism in American history.

In the February 14 letter, Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Craig Trainor accused educational institutions of “toxically indoctrinating” students by teaching them about systemic racism, which is a crucial aspect of U.S. history. The new directives create a hostile environment for educators who discuss Black or Indigenous histories and challenge students or faculty to rethink perceptions of racism and inequality within American society. The chilling effect of these guidelines cultivates a culture of fear where teachers may refrain from teaching no necessary historical context to avoid retribution.

Trump’s sweeping changes are not limited to individual interpretations of civil rights law. His administration has indicated intentions to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education altogether, as part of a broader agenda to eliminate federal oversight in education. The endeavor includes proposed cuts to critical educational support for low-income students and special education programs—programs that provide vital resources to vulnerable communities across the nation.

Furthermore, the misguided pursuit of “patriotic education” echoes authoritarian regimes that stifle dissent and undermine educational integrity. The current administration’s targeting of institutions like Columbia University under the pretense of addressing antisemitism represents a troubling intersection of educational policy and perceived political alignment. By enforcing a narrow narrative around so-called “aka anti-racism,” the education department seeks to silence discussions that are vital for fostering a comprehensive understanding of America’s complex social fabric.

The transformation of educational policy under Trump signals an impending crisis for civil rights and academic freedom in the U.S. If this trajectory continues, the implications will be disastrous for public education. Citizens, educators, and students must remain vigilant against these authoritarian measures disguised under the guise of civics and patriotism, which ultimately serve the interests of wealthy elites and undermine the foundational values of democracy.

(h/t: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/mar/17/trump-us-path-educational-authoritarianism)

Trump’s Education Secretary Pick Linked to Sexual Abuse Lawsuit

Linda McMahon, the education secretary pick by President Donald Trump, faces serious allegations in a recently filed sexual abuse lawsuit. The lawsuit claims that during her tenure at World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE), McMahon ignored credible reports of sexual abuse involving children at the hands of an employee, Melvin Phillips Jr., who was a ringside announcer and ring crew chief. The plaintiffs, five former ‘ring boys’ from the 1980s, accuse the McMahons of criminal negligence for allowing Phillips to remain at the company despite knowing of the abuse.

The lawsuit was filed in October in Maryland and includes accusations against both Linda and her husband, Vince McMahon, co-founders of the WWE. It highlights a disturbing culture that allegedly permitted the exploitation of vulnerable young boys while they were working for the organization. The claims are supported by a lawyer representing the plaintiffs, who stated that many within the company were aware of the abuse but failed to take action against it.

Despite the severe nature of these allegations, McMahon has not been personally accused of sexual misconduct. However, the lawsuit paints a grim picture of a wrestling empire that prioritized its success over the safety and well-being of its young employees. Critics of the Trump administration will likely view this nomination as indicative of a troubling disregard for accountability and ethical leadership.

As the case unfolds, the implications could extend beyond McMahon’s nomination, potentially impacting the Trump administration’s reputation. The legal proceedings may shine a light on systemic issues within powerful organizations and raise questions about the moral compass of those in leadership positions.

In the face of such serious allegations, it remains to be seen how the Trump administration will respond. The appointment of an education secretary linked to a lawsuit of this nature raises concerns about the values that are being promoted at the highest levels of government.

(h/t: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/21/us/linda-mcmahon-sexual-abuse-lawsuit-trump-education-secretary.html)

Trump Repeats QAnon-Based Lie Schools Are Performing Forced Gender Reassignment Surgery

Donald Trump, during a recent visit to the Bronx, displayed his alarming views on education and gender identity, claiming that schools should not allow transgender identities and asserting that children are being manipulated by schools into changing their gender without parental consent. His statements, which echo far-right conspiracy theories, are not only misleading but also indicative of a dangerous agenda that seeks to undermine LGBTQ+ rights and education.

In a segment aired on Fox News, Trump proposed drastic cuts to the federal Department of Education, suggesting it should operate with minimal staff dedicated solely to teaching English. This radical approach to education reflects a broader Republican strategy aimed at dismantling federal support for public schools, which could severely impact educational quality across the nation.

https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1848349656738066753

Furthermore, Trump’s comments about transgender students reveal an alarming ignorance about the realities faced by these individuals. There is no evidence to support his claim that schools are secretly conducting gender transition procedures without parental knowledge. Such assertions have been debunked and are rooted in the toxic narratives propagated by extremist groups.

Trump’s remarks align with the anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric that has gained traction among conservatives, particularly as they rally against perceived threats to traditional values. This rhetoric not only alienates vulnerable communities but also serves to distract from more pressing issues within public education, such as funding and resource allocation.

As the 2024 election approaches, it is crucial for voters to recognize the implications of Trump’s education policies and the broader Republican agenda that seeks to marginalize LGBTQ+ individuals. Supporting candidates who advocate for inclusive and equitable education is essential to ensuring the rights and dignity of all students.

(h/t: https://newrepublic.com/post/187360/trump-fix-schools-disturbing-answer)

Trump’s Dangerous Lies: Kids Aren’t Having Transgender Surgeries in Schools

Former President Donald Trump has once again propagated the false narrative that children are undergoing transgender surgeries during school hours. In a recent rally, he made misleading claims that schools are facilitating surgical procedures for minors without parental consent, a narrative that has no basis in fact. This rhetoric not only misrepresents the reality of transgender healthcare but also contributes to the stigmatization of LGBTQ+ youth.

Trump’s statements reflect a broader trend among Republicans to misinform the public about transgender issues, often using sensationalized claims to rally support among their base. Medical professionals and credible organizations have refuted these claims, clarifying that gender-affirming surgeries, when appropriate, are typically not performed on minors and require extensive evaluation and parental involvement.

The former president’s comments come in the wake of his administration’s previous attempts to undermine LGBTQ+ rights, including a ban on transgender individuals serving in the military and proposals that would allow healthcare providers to refuse treatment based on gender identity. This pattern showcases a consistent effort to marginalize transgender individuals and restrict their access to necessary medical care.

Moreover, Trump’s rhetoric has serious implications. By spreading misinformation about transgender youth, he further endangers an already vulnerable population, which faces higher rates of mental health issues and discrimination. His statements not only distort the truth but also contribute to a hostile environment for LGBTQ+ individuals.

In conclusion, Trump’s repeated falsehoods about transgender surgeries in schools are a deliberate attempt to mislead the public and incite fear. It is crucial to challenge these lies and promote accurate information about transgender healthcare and rights to ensure the safety and dignity of all individuals.

(h/t: https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/trump-false-claims-schools-transgender-surgeries-rcna170217)

Offensive Emails Among Businessmen, Donald Trump Jr. Spark Fight in Hedge Fund Case – WSJ

Skip to Main Content Explore Our Brands WSJ Barron’s MarketWatch IBD Offensive Emails Among Businessmen, Donald Trump Jr. Spark Fight in Hedge Fund Case Share Resize Listen (2 min) Subscribe Sign In SubscribeSign In English Edition Edition English中文 (Chinese)日本語 (Japanese) Print Edition Video Audio Latest Headlines More MoreOther Products from WSJBuy Side from WSJWSJ ShopWSJ Wine Latest World Topics Africa Americas Asia China Europe Middle East India Oceania Russia U.K. More Science Archaeology Biology Environment Physics Space & Astronomy World Video Business Topics Airlines Autos C-Suite Deals Earnings Energy & Oil Entrepreneurship Telecom Retail Hospitality Logistics Media C-Suite CFO Journal CIO Journal CMO Today Logistics Report Risk & Compliance WSJ Professional WSJ Pro Bankruptcy WSJ Pro Central Banking WSJ Pro Cybersecurity WSJ Pro Private Equity WSJ Pro Sustainable Business WSJ Pro Venture Capital More Heard on the Street Journal Reports Business Video Business Podcast U.S. Topics Climate & Environment Education Law College Rankings 2024 More U.S. Video What’s News Podcast Politics Topics Elections National Security Policy More Politics Video Economy Topics Central Banking Consumers Housing Jobs Trade Global WSJ Professional WSJ Pro Bankruptcy WSJ Pro Central Banking WSJ Pro Private Equity WSJ Pro Venture Capital More Capital Account Economic Forecasting Survey Economy Video Tech Topics AI Biotech Cybersecurity Personal Technology More Christopher Mims Joanna Stern Julie Jargon Nicole Nguyen CIO Journal The Future of Everything Tech Video Tech Podcast Finance Topics Banking Commodities & Futures Currencies Investing Regulation Stocks More Heard on the Street Greg Ip Jason Zweig Laura Saunders James Mackintosh CFO Journal Markets Video Your Money Briefing Podcast Market Data Market Data Home Companies U.S. Stocks Commodities Bonds & Rates Currencies Market Data Mutual Funds & ETFs Opinion Columnists Gerard Baker Sadanand Dhume Allysia Finley James Freeman William A. Galston Daniel Henninger Holman W. Jenkins Andy Kessler William McGurn Walter Russell Mead Peggy Noonan Mary Anastasia O’Grady Jason Riley Joseph Sternberg Kimberley A. Strassel More Editorials Commentary Future View Houses of Worship Cross Country Letters to the Editor The Weekend Interview Potomac Watch Podcast Foreign Edition Podcast Free Expression Podcast Opinion Video Notable & Quotable Arts & Culture Topics Books Film Fine Art Food & Cooking History Music Television Theater Reviews Architecture Review Art Reviews Film Reviews Television Reviews Theater Reviews Masterpiece Series Music Reviews Dance Reviews Opera Reviews Exhibition Reviews Cultural Commentary More WSJ Puzzles What To Watch Arts Calendar Lifestyle Topics Careers Cars Fitness Relationships Travel Workplace More On Wine Work & Life Carry On On The Clock Elizabeth Bernstein Turning Points WSJ Puzzles Recipes Real Estate Topics Commercial Real Estate Luxury Homes Personal Finance Topics Retirement Savings Credit Taxes Mortgages More Jason Zweig Laura Saunders James Mackintosh Health Topics Healthcare Pharma Wellness More Your Health Style Topics Beauty Design Fashion More Off Brand On Trend My Monday Morning Sports Topics Baseball Basketball Football Golf Hockey Olympics Soccer Tennis More Jason Gay English Edition EditionEnglish中文 (Chinese)日本語 (Japanese) Print Edition Video Audio Latest Headlines More MoreOther Products from WSJBuy Side from WSJWSJ ShopWSJ Wine Latest World Topics Africa Americas Asia China Europe Middle East India Oceania Russia U.K. More Science Archaeology Biology Environment Physics Space & Astronomy World Video Business Topics Airlines Autos C-Suite Deals Earnings Energy & Oil Entrepreneurship Telecom Retail Hospitality Logistics Media C-Suite CFO Journal CIO Journal CMO Today Logistics Report Risk & Compliance WSJ Professional WSJ Pro Bankruptcy WSJ Pro Central Banking WSJ Pro Cybersecurity WSJ Pro Private Equity WSJ Pro Sustainable Business WSJ Pro Venture Capital More Heard on the Street Journal Reports Business Video Business Podcast U.S. Topics Climate & Environment Education Law College Rankings 2024 More U.S. Video What’s News Podcast Politics Topics Elections National Security Policy More Politics Video Economy Topics Central Banking Consumers Housing Jobs Trade Global WSJ Professional WSJ Pro Bankruptcy WSJ Pro Central Banking WSJ Pro Private Equity WSJ Pro Venture Capital More Capital Account Economic Forecasting Survey Economy Video Tech Topics AI Biotech Cybersecurity Personal Technology More Christopher Mims Joanna Stern Julie Jargon Nicole Nguyen CIO Journal The Future of Everything Tech Video Tech Podcast Finance Topics Banking Commodities & Futures Currencies Investing Regulation Stocks More Heard on the Street Greg Ip Jason Zweig Laura Saunders James Mackintosh CFO Journal Markets Video Your Money Briefing Podcast Market Data Market Data Home Companies U.S. Stocks Commodities Bonds & Rates Currencies Market Data Mutual Funds & ETFs Opinion Columnists Gerard Baker Sadanand Dhume Allysia Finley James Freeman William A. Galston Daniel Henninger Holman W. Jenkins Andy Kessler William McGurn Walter Russell Mead Peggy Noonan Mary Anastasia O’Grady Jason Riley Joseph Sternberg Kimberley A. Strassel More Editorials Commentary Future View Houses of Worship Cross Country Letters to the Editor The Weekend Interview Potomac Watch Podcast Foreign Edition Podcast Free Expression Podcast Opinion Video Notable & Quotable Arts & Culture Topics Books Film Fine Art Food & Cooking History Music Television Theater Reviews Architecture Review Art Reviews Film Reviews Television Reviews Theater Reviews Masterpiece Series Music Reviews Dance Reviews Opera Reviews Exhibition Reviews Cultural Commentary More WSJ Puzzles What To Watch Arts Calendar Lifestyle Topics Careers Cars Fitness Relationships Travel Workplace More On Wine Work & Life Carry On On The Clock Elizabeth Bernstein Turning Points WSJ Puzzles Recipes Real Estate Topics Commercial Real Estate Luxury Homes Personal Finance Topics Retirement Savings Credit Taxes Mortgages More Jason Zweig Laura Saunders James Mackintosh Health Topics Healthcare Pharma Wellness More Your Health Style Topics Beauty Design Fashion More Off Brand On Trend My Monday Morning Sports Topics Baseball Basketball Football Golf Hockey Olympics Soccer Tennis More Jason Gay Offensive Emails Among Businessmen, Donald Trump Jr. Spark Fight in Hedge Fund Case Share Resize Listen (2 min) Trump’s Legal Woes 2020 Election CaseDocuments CaseGeorgia CaseInvestigation Timeline This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com. https://www.wsj.com/articles/offensive-emails-among-businessmen-donald-trump-jr-spark-fight-in-hedge-fund-case-f14fa05b U.S. Offensive Emails Among Businessmen, Donald Trump Jr. Spark Fight in Hedge Fund Case A judge will decide whether to release unredacted emails that included derogatory remarks about Jews and Mexicans By Corinne Ramey and James Fanelli Updated June 15, 2023 5:39 pm ET Share Resize Listen (2 min) Donald Trump Jr. at a rally held for his father in Ohio last year. Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images The Texas financier Gentry Beach has made no secret of having close ties to Donald Trump Jr., serving as a groomsman at his wedding, fundraising for his father and once boasting to a former boss about his friendship with the former president’s eldest son. Now Beach is seeking to keep the Trump name out of a long and bitter court fight with his former hedge-fund employer, litigation that has spawned a side battle over whether a judge should allow full public access to offensive emails exchanged among a group that included the two men and others who worked at prominent real-estate and financial firms. Copyright ©2023 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8 Continue reading your article with a WSJ subscription Subscribe Now Already a subscriber? Sign In What to Read Next Sponsored Offers TurboTax: Save up to $15 with TurboTax coupon 2023 The Motley Fool: Epic Bundle – 3x Expert Stock Recommendations H&R Block Tax: Get 20% off H&R Block tax software products Top Resume: Top Resume Coupon: 10% off professional resume writing eBay: eBay coupon: Get extra 10% off $50+ Groupon: Up to $50 off any order with Groupon promo code Most Popular news Most Popular opinion Most Popular Opinion Recommended Videos The Wall Street Journal English Edition EditionEnglish中文 (Chinese)日本語 (Japanese) Subscribe Now Sign In Back to Top « WSJ Membership Buy Side Exclusives Subscription Options Why Subscribe? Corporate Subscriptions WSJ Higher Education Program WSJ High School Program Public Library Program WSJ Live Commercial Partnerships Customer Service Customer Center Contact Us Cancel My Subscription Tools & Features Newsletters & Alerts Guides Topics My News RSS Feeds Video Center Watchlist Podcasts Visual Stories Ads Advertise Commercial Real Estate Ads Place a Classified Ad Sell Your Business Sell Your Home Recruitment & Career Ads Coupons Digital Self Service More About Us Content Partnerships Corrections Jobs at WSJ News Archive Register for Free Reprints & Licensing Buy Issues WSJ Shop WSJ Membership Benefits Customer Center Cancel My Subscription Legal Policies Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Podcasts Snapchat Google Play App Store Dow Jones Products Barron’s BigCharts Dow Jones Newswires Factiva Financial News Mansion Global MarketWatch Risk & Compliance Buy Side from WSJ WSJ Pro WSJ Video WSJ Wine Privacy Notice Cookie Notice Copyright Policy Data Policy Subscriber Agreement & Terms of Use Your Ad Choices Accessibility Copyright ©2023 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Back to Top « English Edition EditionEnglish中文 (Chinese)日本語 (Japanese) Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Podcasts Snapchat WSJ Membership Buy Side Exclusives Subscription Options Why Subscribe? Corporate Subscriptions WSJ Higher Education Program WSJ High School Program Public Library Program WSJ Live Commercial Partnerships Customer Service Customer Center Contact Us Cancel My Subscription Tools & Features Newsletters & Alerts Guides Topics My News RSS Feeds Video Center Watchlist Podcasts Visual Stories Ads Advertise Commercial Real Estate Ads Place a Classified Ad Sell Your Business Sell Your Home Recruitment & Career Ads Coupons Digital Self Service More About Us Content Partnerships Corrections Jobs at WSJ News Archive Register for Free Reprints & Licensing Buy Issues WSJ Shop WSJ Membership Benefits Customer Center Cancel My Subscription Legal Policies Google Play App Store Sign In Copyright ©2023 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Copyright ©2023 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com.

What? Donald Trump Jr. sent highly offensive, antisemitic, and racist messages? You don’t say.

[https://www.wsj.com/articles/offensive-emails-among-businessmen-donald-trump-jr-spark-fight-in-hedge-fund-case-f14fa05b]

1 2 3 4 5 6