Category: National Security

Trump Demands Jail for Noem Critics, Attacks Protest ‘Scam’

President Donald Trump defended Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on Friday via Truth Social, attacking protesters and Democrats as “Radical Left Lunatics” and “Insurrectionists” while demanding they be imprisoned. Trump claimed Noem is being targeted “because she is a woman” and credited her with fixing “the Border disaster” he inherited, asserting the murder rate reached a 125-year low under his administration.

Trump characterized protests in Minnesota and major cities as a “SCAM” designed to obscure what he labeled “CRIMINAL ACTS of theft and insurrection” by Democrats. He accused Democrats of “stealing Billions of Dollars from Minnesota, and other Cities and States” and instructed Republicans not to be “pushed around” by what he termed aggressive protest manipulation.

The president reiterated his campaign platform of “Strong Borders, and Law and Order” and separately praised Border Czar Tom Homan, whom Trump appointed this week to oversee the immigration enforcement crackdown in Minnesota. The operation has deployed approximately 2,100 federal agents to the Minneapolis area in what officials characterize as the largest immigration enforcement operation ever conducted.

Trump’s remarks come amid DOJ investigations into Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey over allegations they conspired to impede Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations through public statements. Trump’s invocation of imprisonment for political opponents and protesters aligns with his broader pattern of weaponizing federal authority against critics.

The late-night posts demonstrate Trump’s willingness to criminalize dissent and attribute federal policy failures to Democratic sabotage while absolving his administration of responsibility for enforcement outcomes.

(Source: https://www.rawstory.com/trump-ice-protest/)

DOJ Investigates Walz, Frey Over ICE Criticism Allegations

The Department of Justice has initiated an investigation into Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey regarding allegations they conspired to impede Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations through public statements. Federal prosecutors are examining whether their criticism of the deployment of nearly 3,000 ICE and Border Patrol agents to the region violates 18 U.S.C. § 372, a statute that criminalizes conspiracies to obstruct federal officers through force, intimidation, or threats, according to CBS News sources.

The investigation follows an ICE agent’s fatal shooting of Minneapolis resident Renee Nicole Good, which triggered local protests and confrontations between demonstrators and federal law enforcement. Walz and Frey have publicly stated that the federal operation fuels instability rather than enhancing public safety, with Frey warning the situation was “not sustainable,” while both leaders repeatedly called for peaceful demonstrations.

Public criticism of federal policy typically receives constitutional protection unless prosecutors demonstrate coordination or direct incitement to physically obstruct law enforcement. CBS News noted that the rare statute under review requires evidence of conspiracy to use force, intimidation, or threats—a high legal threshold that distinguishes criminal obstruction from protected speech.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem accused Walz and Frey on social media of “encouraging impeding and assault against our law enforcement,” characterizing their statements as federal felonies. Noem’s public allegation preceded the DOJ inquiry by one day, linking criticism of the federal operation to an incident in which an ICE agent fired a weapon after being attacked by three individuals with snow shovels and broom handles.

A DOJ spokesperson declined to comment on the investigation to CBS News. Trump has previously amplified unfounded conspiracy theories targeting Walz, establishing a pattern of using federal agencies to pursue political opponents.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/doj-reportedly-investigating-tim-walz-and-jacob-frey-over-alleged-conspiracy-to-impede-federal-agents/)

Trump Admin Posts Echo White Supremacist Rhetoric

The Trump administration is deploying recruitment campaigns and official posts across federal departments that incorporate imagery, slogans, and rhetoric linked to white supremacist and extremist movements, according to PBS reporting and analysis by Cynthia Miller-Idriss of American University’s Polarization and Extremism Research Innovation Lab. An ICE recruitment advertisement features the phrase “We will have our home again,” a direct reference to a white supremacist anthem favored by the Proud Boys, while the Department of Labor distributed messaging stating “One homeland, one people, one heritage” alongside heroic depictions of white men. Administration posts also invoke “Trust the plan,” the QAnon conspiracy theory slogan tied to the January 6 Capitol attack, which posits a global cabal of pedophiles and deep state actors that Trump is fighting.

Extremist symbols have surfaced across multiple federal agencies, including the “An Appeal to Heaven” flag, which was carried by January 6 rioters and adopted by evangelical Christian nationalist groups and neo-Nazi organizations. Miller-Idriss identified this pattern as part of a propaganda campaign to reposition ICE operations as serving the public interest while employing dog whistles and explicit racist and conspiratorial messaging. The administration is simultaneously rewriting January 6 history on a newly published website, blaming Democrats for security failures and justifying pardons for over 1,500 defendants involved in the insurrection.

President Trump stated in a New York Times interview that the civil rights movement “hurt a lot of people” and constituted “reverse discrimination” against whites denied college admission or jobs. Billionaire Elon Musk endorsed this framing by endorsing a post claiming “If white men become a minority, we will be slaughtered. White solidarity is the only way to survive”—the Great Replacement Theory, a white nationalist conspiracy falsely asserting intentional replacement of the white population. Miller-Idriss connected this conspiracy theory to terrorist attacks in Pittsburgh, El Paso, Buffalo, Christchurch, and Oslo, resulting in hundreds of deaths.

Miller-Idriss characterized the shift as a “turning point in the propaganda campaign,” driven by ICE’s 57 percent disapproval rating and public awareness of agency abuses circulated through cell phone video. She identified Trump’s statements as an “unedited version” of a longstanding belief system that white men are losing ground, now openly expressed without prior hedging. The administration simultaneously withdrew U.S. support from extremism prevention organizations, cementing its alignment with extremist ideological frameworks.

Miller-Idriss noted that undemocratic leaders employ confusion and propaganda simultaneously to undermine journalism, expertise, and shared truth, citing Hannah Arendt’s analysis of Nazi propaganda: once people stop knowing what is true and false, “it’s very easy for them to stop knowing what’s right and wrong.” The administration’s strategy combines coordinated messaging across departments with high-profile policy actions including ICE deployments, foreign intervention, and territorial threats, designed to normalize extremist rhetoric while obscuring its authoritarian implications through saturation messaging.

(Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/trump-administration-posts-echo-rhetoric-linked-to-extremist-groups?fbclid=IwdGRleAPSxIFleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEegXa-oSnnonxrbxD0HIm8ZOScqBnslIjqqgO-WisqCCJBydQdzzodouEcCt0_aem_45dHLtlY5pgg0gPw_BA6LA)

Trump Imposes 25% Tariff on Iran Trading Nations

President Trump announced a 25 percent tariff on all nations conducting business with Iran, declaring the measure “final and conclusive” via Truth Social without providing legal justification or implementation details. The White House offered no official documentation of the policy, declined to clarify its legal authority, and did not respond to requests for comment regarding scope or enforcement mechanisms.

Iran’s major trading partners—including China, Turkey, Iraq, the United Arab Emirates, and India—would face the tariffs under Trump’s declaration. China’s embassy immediately rejected the measure, stating it opposes “indiscriminate imposition of tariffs” and warning it would take “all necessary measures” to protect its interests, noting that “tariff wars and trade wars have no winners.”

The announcement coincides with Iran’s largest anti-government demonstrations since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, driven by economic collapse and calls for systemic change. The U.S.-based rights group HRANA documented 599 deaths—510 protesters and 89 security personnel—since protests began on December 28, with Iran experiencing its gravest challenge to clerical rule in decades.

Trump has threatened military action against Iran while claiming to maintain diplomatic channels with opposition figures and Tehran’s leadership. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt stated diplomacy remains “the first option,” though Trump authorized U.S. military airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities in June and supported Israeli military strikes on Iran in 2025.

Trump’s tariff authority faces legal scrutiny as the U.S. Supreme Court considers whether to overturn broad sections of his existing tariffs. Iran exported goods to 147 trading partners in 2022 according to World Bank data, suggesting the tariff threat would disrupt extensive global commerce networks.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-iran-tariffs-china-trade-b2899268.html)

FEMA Chief Karen Evans Cuts Funding, Targets Muslim Groups

Karen Evans, the new FEMA chief, previously served as a senior adviser tasked with tightening spending controls at the agency. Known as the “terminator,” she has gained a reputation for slashing grants, contracts, and staff, often prioritizing budget alignment with the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) agenda over community needs. Critics have described Evans’ oversight as excessively rigid, hampering the agency’s ability to respond to emergencies effectively.

Evans has been accused of orchestrating the removal of numerous FEMA staff members, including seasoned emergency management experts, thus enabling DHS to consolidate power over the agency. Her approach reportedly involves significant delays in fund approvals and fostering a toxic work environment marked by conflict with personnel. This management style raises questions about the agency’s capability to handle disaster response adequately.

Moreover, she has been linked to controversial efforts to strip funding from Muslim organizations deemed problematic by the DHS. Initial proposals suggested broadly banning these groups from receiving security grants, driven by concerns over their perceived connections to terrorism. Although a blanket ban was ultimately not implemented, many Muslim groups were still disqualified from receiving federal assistance under her influence.

Evans’ lack of experience in emergency management, coupled with her DHS loyalty, has led to skepticism regarding her capacity to lead FEMA effectively during significant crises. The agency’s future remains uncertain, particularly with ongoing debates about its oversight and operational structure in relation to DHS.

Amid criticisms of delayed funding and response efforts, many within and outside FEMA view Evans as a figurehead, executing the directives of DHS leadership rather than serving as an independent decision-maker for disaster relief efforts. With growing calls from lawmakers for FEMA to operate independently, Evans’ role may be pivotal in shaping future agency dynamics.

Marco Rubio Confirms Leaked Ukraine Peace Plan Not Trump’s

U.S. Senators, including Mike Rounds and Angus King, reported that Secretary of State Marco Rubio informed them that the leaked 28-point peace plan for Ukraine is not a proposal from President Donald Trump but rather a “wish list” from Russia. Rounds clarified that the document was delivered to a U.S. representative, emphasizing that it did not originate from lawmakers but was leaked to the press.

At the Halifax International Security Forum, Rounds noted that the plan allows for the opportunity for both sides to respond but is not a recommendation from the U.S. government. King echoed this sentiment, asserting that the proposal represents Russian interests and not the formal position of the U.S. administration.

In response, Rubio defended the plan’s credibility via social media, claiming it was authoritatively drafted in consultation with the U.S. and based on input from both Russia and Ukraine. However, recent reports from Axios indicated that the Trump administration has secretly collaborated with Russia to create this peace framework.

The plan reportedly entails significant territorial concessions from Ukraine, including substantial reductions in military strength. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has indicated hesitations about the proposal, and Trump’s comments to reporters suggested a lack of strong backing for the deal, implying it was not a final offer.

This incident underscores ongoing tensions and skepticism regarding Trump’s influence in shaping foreign policy, particularly in relation to Russia’s intentions in the Ukraine conflict, reflecting fears of authoritarian governance under his administration.

Hegseth Launches Southern Spear Against Narco-Terrorists

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth unveiled “Southern Spear,” a military operation aimed at dismantling “narco-terrorists” throughout the Western Hemisphere. This initiative exemplifies the Trump administration’s aggressive stance on drug trafficking while claiming to safeguard American security. According to Hegseth, the mission is under the Joint Task Force Southern Spear and U.S. Southern Command (Southcom), emphasizing the need to protect the homeland from drug-related harms.

At a Thursday evening announcement, Hegseth stated that the Western Hemisphere is essentially America’s neighborhood, advocating for intervention to remove narco-terrorists from the region. The Pentagon’s response, merely redirecting inquiries back to Hegseth’s social media, highlights a concerning level of detachment from the gravity of U.S. military actions in such a volatile context.

This announcement follows military briefings earlier in the week, where top leaders, including Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Dan Caine, discussed potential military strategies for the region, including possible land strikes against Venezuela. Such aggressive posturing raises fears of further escalation in U.S. involvement in Latin America, especially as Trump’s administration intensifies its military influence in a manner reminiscent of historical imperial interventions.

Since launching its counternarcotics campaign in September, the U.S. military has reportedly killed downwards of 80 individuals, claiming to target illegal drug operations. However, when discussing these strikes, it is crucial to query the moral ramifications and the extent to which these actions genuinely address the root causes of drug trafficking.

The recent deployment of military assets, including the arrival of the USS Gerald R. Ford, underscores the administration’s prioritization of a heavy-handed approach over diplomatic solutions. These developments continue to reflect a troubling trend of militarization under Trump’s leadership, reinforcing concerns regarding the long-term implications for both U.S. foreign policy and regional stability, particularly in relation to leaders like Nicolás Maduro, described as illegitimate.

FBI Informant Alexander Smirnov Released Amid Trump Pardon Fears

Alexander Smirnov, an FBI informant previously jailed for lying about a bribery scheme involving the Biden family, has been mysteriously released from prison after serving only a few months of his six-year sentence. Smirnov’s sentence was a result of fabricating evidence linking former President Joe Biden and his son Hunter to corruption related to Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company. His preposterous claims were a critical component of unfounded Republican impeachment inquiries against Biden.

The circumstances of Smirnov’s release raise serious alarm about potential political maneuvering by Donald Trump, with many speculating that a pardon could be in the works. Despite being considered a flight risk due to his ties to Russian intelligence, Smirnov has been on furlough for the last several months, defying expectations of his confinement at FCI Terminal Island, a low-security prison in Los Angeles.

The U.S. Department of Justice has remained conspicuously silent regarding the details surrounding Smirnov’s absence and the nature of his furlough. Inquiries to the DOJ about possible pardon negotiations have been met with a curt “no comment,” fueling fears that the Trump administration could be enabling a corrupt ally. Smirnov’s connections to Trumpworld are undeniable, including business ties to Trump associates and an investment in a company that competed for an app contract ultimately awarded to Trump’s Truth Social.

Legal experts have noted the unusual nature of the DOJ advocating for Smirnov’s release pending appeal, a position that has raised questions about the integrity of the justice system under Trump’s influence. This unexpected and unexplained furlough has led some legal analysts to propose that this could be a calculated move to facilitate an imminent pardon.

While Smirnov’s legal representatives claim the furlough is medically motivated, doubts have been cast on this justification given the extraordinary length of time he has spent away from prison. The lack of transparency surrounding his current status reflects broader concerns about the manipulation of legal processes for political gain, creating a troubling precedent for the Trump administration’s governance.

Trump Administration Defies Congress on Military Drug Strikes

The Trump administration has signaled it will continue conducting lethal strikes against alleged drug traffickers in Latin America without seeking Congressional approval, challenging longstanding legal protocols. A high-ranking Justice Department official conveyed to lawmakers that this policy effectively circumvents the War Powers Resolution, demonstrating a blatant disregard for checks and balances. This decision appears to be part of Trump’s broader agenda to wield military force in a unilateral manner.

Critics of this strategy, including lawmakers from both parties, have raised alarms over the implications for U.S. foreign relations, especially with Latin American nations. The administration’s push for aggressive military actions seems to disregard essential diplomatic channels and raises questions about the legal ramifications of directing military operations independently of Congress. This raises significant issues regarding accountability and oversight.

Trump’s framing of the situation as a war against “narcoterrorism” perpetuates the narrative of painting adversaries as existential threats, allowing him to use military action as a tool for political leverage. His administration’s willingness to engage in such actions reflects an authoritarian inclination, reminiscent of tactics deployed by autocratic leaders. Engaging in military action without respecting legal processes risks normalizing the violation of international law.

Lawmakers who challenge this militaristic approach have underscored the necessity for a transparent dialogue around national security and military engagement. The administration’s penchant for unilateral strikes threatens to compromise not only U.S. interests abroad but also its credibility on the international stage.

The ramifications of Trump’s escalating military tactics against drug cartels could lead to unintended consequences, potentially destabilizing the region further while alienating allies. The repercussions of these decisions could echo for years, as an unfettered military policy undermines both democratic principles and international cooperation.

US Troop Withdrawal from Romania Undermines NATO Commitment

The U.S. military is withdrawing some troops from Romania along NATO’s eastern flank, a decision linked to a strategic shift toward improving homeland defense and increasing focus on Latin America. The Pentagon’s decision involves sending home the 2nd Infantry Brigade Combat Team of the 101st Airborne Division and will not be replaced, signaling a significant change in U.S. military posture. This move comes despite rising threats from Russia, including multiple drone incidents in Poland and airspace violations in Lithuania.

According to U.S. Army Europe and Africa, the adjustment in troop levels is part of Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s initiative to create a balanced military force posture. Official statements clarify that this is not an indication of American withdrawal from Europe or a reduced commitment to NATO commitments, reflecting a shift towards bolstering European defense capabilities.

Romania’s Ministry of Defense acknowledged the troop withdrawal, indicating that while American forces are reducing, around one thousand U.S. personnel will remain within the country. This adjustment reflects the Biden administration’s evolving priorities concerning military deployments, as tensions with Russia escalate, particularly in light of ongoing conflicts in Ukraine.

The decision has sparked criticism from key Republican figures, including Senator Roger Wicker and Representative Mike Rogers, who believe it could embolden Russia at a critical juncture in diplomatic relations. They have denounced the decision, asserting that Congress should have been consulted prior and calling for clarity from the Pentagon regarding its impact on NATO’s defense dynamics.

Despite the troop withdrawals, NATO officials note that the U.S. maintains more military personnel in Europe than before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022. However, NATO planners are closely monitoring the situation to assess the implications for allied forces and troop deployments across Europe, indicating the complexity of maintaining security on the continent amidst shifting military strategies.

1 2 3 … 9