Category: Policies

Pentagon Fires Stars and Stripes Ombudsman Over Editorial Independence

The Pentagon terminated Jacqueline Smith, the ombudsman for Stars and Stripes, the military’s independent newspaper, after she repeatedly flagged efforts to control the publication’s editorial independence. Smith had served in the role since December 2023 and was explicitly tasked by Congress with protecting the paper’s autonomy from Pentagon interference. Her firing, effective April 28, came without explanation and was declared non-grievable.

Smith detailed the abuse of power in an op-ed, stating she had warned the House and Senate Armed Services committees about “attempted control of the newspaper by the Pentagon” in recent months. She characterized her dismissal as occurring “in the coldest way possible,” suggesting deliberate suppression of her oversight role. On the same day as her termination announcement, the Pentagon rescinded the regulatory process that would have provided Stars and Stripes legal protection from interference, according to Smith’s account.

The firing aligns with broader institutional changes at the publication. In January, Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell announced plans to overhaul Stars and Stripes, stating the paper would shift away from “woke distractions that syphon morale” and focus on a “new generation of service members.” Smith noted that Parnell’s social media post signaled serious intent, as the administration routinely reveals policy through such channels.

Stars and Stripes receives partial Defense Department funding but operates as an independent outlet with its own editorial authority. Smith’s removal eliminates the primary institutional check on Pentagon influence over the publication’s newsroom. She urged readers and officials to protect the newspaper from what she characterized as control by “Pentagon brass,” emphasizing the publication’s historical commitment to both military audiences and journalistic standards.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/pentagon-fires-stars-and-stripes-ombudsman-who-warned-of-attempted-control-over-military-paper/)

Donald Trump Rails Against Supreme Court Over Ending His “Liberation Day” Taxes

President Donald Trump attacked the Supreme Court on Friday for its February ruling invalidating his “Liberation Day” emergency tariffs, claiming the court could have prevented a $159 billion refund obligation by including “one little half sentence” in its decision. Trump stated that justices needed only to add language exempting already-collected tariff revenue from repayment, insisting this single phrase would have made the country substantially wealthier and spared companies from receiving refunds on duties he had imposed on nearly every U.S. trading partner.

The Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision determined that Trump’s sweeping tariff action violated constitutional authority, which Congress alone possesses under Article I. Trump mischaracterized the ruling on CNBC, falsely claiming he had lost “by just two votes” when he actually lost by three votes, and incorrectly stating the justices found he had power to unilaterally levy tariffs without congressional approval. He demanded the Court should have simply reworded its opinion to shield the government from repaying collected duties, framing the refund obligation as a preventable loss caused by judicial negligence.

Trump’s complaints reveal his expectation that the Supreme Court should have restructured its legal reasoning to serve his financial interests rather than apply constitutional law as written. His repeated emphasis on a hypothetical “one sentence” fix demonstrates frustration that the judiciary did not accommodate his policy preferences through creative statutory language, and his false characterization of the vote margin and the Court’s reasoning compounds the distortion of what the decision actually addressed.

The tariff ruling stands as a constraint on Trump’s unilateral executive power, requiring him to pursue tariff authority through the different legal mechanisms already available under existing emergency statutes that Congress has delegated. Trump’s public complaints about the Court’s wording rather than its substance underscore his conflation of legal outcomes with personal grievances and his apparent belief that justices should tailor opinions to minimize fiscal consequences for his preferred policies.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-rails-against-supreme-court-over-absence-of-one-little-half-sentence-on-tariffs/)

Navy Chief Phelan Refuses Exit Until Trump Personally Confirms Firing

Navy Secretary John Phelan was forced to resign on Wednesday after Secretary of War Pete Hegseth determined he was not sufficiently committed to building Trump’s proposed “Golden Fleet” of battleships. Rather than accept his termination, Phelan went directly to Trump at the White House that evening to appeal the decision, remaining there until the president personally confirmed his firing face-to-face.

Hegseth and Trump removed Phelan partly because he allegedly failed to push hard enough for the Pentagon’s largest-ever budget request to fund the “Trump-class” vessels. However, retired colonel Mark Cancian of the Center for Strategic and International Studies stated the president’s timeline is impossible, noting the ships would cost $9 billion each, take years to design, and contradict current Navy operational strategy. Cancian predicted a future administration would cancel the program before any ship launches.

Phelan’s departure also reflected conflict over his direct access to Trump. As a longtime Trump donor and Mar-a-Lago neighbor, Phelan frequently bypassed Hegseth to speak with the president, a practice the Secretary of War refused to tolerate. According to reports, Phelan was already being excluded from major meetings before his forced resignation.

Phelan is being replaced by Navy Undersecretary Hung Cao. Hegseth’s removal of Phelan is part of a broader purge across the Pentagon, including the April firings of Army Chief of Staff Gen. Randy George, Gen. David Hodne, and Maj. Gen. William Green Jr., reportedly driven by Hegseth’s personal paranoia about his own position.

This dismissal occurs amid an ongoing naval blockade of Iranian ports, rising gas prices, and declining approval ratings for the administration. Despite these pressures and the documented conflicts within his department, Hegseth has maintained Trump’s confidence and continues to direct military personnel decisions.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/john-phelan-trump-sacked-navy-hegseth-b2964232.html)

Hegseth says Iran war is Trump’s ‘gift to the world’ as he berates Europe and Asia for ‘freeriding’ | The Independent

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth characterized the U.S.-Israeli bombing campaign against Iran as a “gift to the world” during a Pentagon press conference on Friday, while attacking European and Asian allies for declining to participate in the offensive military operations. Hegseth claimed the United States maintains an “ironclad blockade” on Iranian ports and accused Iran of acting as “pirates” and “terrorists” by enforcing its own blockade of the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation for the bombing campaign that began February 28.

Hegseth mocked longtime U.S. allies for what he termed “free riding,” stating that Europe and Asia have benefited from American military protection for decades while avoiding direct involvement in the current conflict. He derided recent diplomatic efforts by the United Kingdom and France, which had convened a 51-country summit announcing plans for a multinational “defensive mission” to protect merchant vessels and clear mines, calling these initiatives “a silly conference” and “not serious efforts” because they excluded offensive operations against Iranian forces.

Hegseth’s disparagement of U.S. allies aligns with President Trump’s repeated attacks on NATO as a “paper tiger” and his claims that member nations “weren’t there for us,” despite NATO’s mutual defense provision having been invoked only to defend the United States following the September 11, 2001 attacks. As Trump has threatened to destroy Iran’s infrastructure, the administration has begun considering punitive measures against allied nations that refuse to join the war effort.

Trump has publicly considered withdrawing the United States from NATO, though a 2021 law authored by Secretary of State Marco Rubio would prohibit such action. A leaked Pentagon memorandum reported by Reuters indicates the administration is exploring retaliation against Britain by “reviewing” British claims to the Falkland Islands, which Argentina also claims and whose libertarian president, Javier Milei, is a Trump ally. A spokesperson for British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer responded by affirming that Falklanders have “overwhelmingly voted in favor of remaining a UK overseas territory” and reaffirmed Britain’s sovereignty position.

Hegseth’s remarks follow a prior Pentagon briefing in which he attacked journalists as possessing “hardened hearts,” claiming the press exhibits “relentlessly negative coverage” and “unpatriotic bias” while refusing to acknowledge what he described as the “historic and important success” of U.S. military operations in Iran.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/hegseth-trump-iran-war-briefing-b2964346.html)

Trump Renovates Lincoln Memorial Pool for $1.5M

President Trump announced plans to renovate the Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool, characterizing it as “filthy” and “dirty” during an Oval Office event about healthcare. Trump stated he inspected the pool with Secret Service members and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, rejecting a contractor’s proposal for a $300 million three-year renovation involving granite removal. Instead, Trump claims he secured a contractor willing to complete the work for $1.5 million to $2 million, citing his experience as a real estate developer who has built over 100 swimming pools.

According to Trump, renovation work began two weeks prior, with the contractor scrubbing the pool’s surface and applying what Trump describes as “industrial grade swimming pool topping” in “American flag blue.” Trump predicted the renovated pool would remain functional for 40 to 50 years without leaks or deterioration, contrasting his cost estimate with the previous 2012 renovation that cost approximately $30 million.

This pool renovation represents one of several initiatives Trump has undertaken to restructure Washington’s appearance and federal infrastructure. Trump has already covered the Oval Office in gold, paved over the Rose Garden grass, and announced plans for a 250-foot “Triumphal Arch” and a National Garden of American Heroes featuring 250 statues.

Trump’s most controversial renovation project involved the sudden demolition of the White House East Wing to make room for a 90,000-square-foot ballroom, a decision that prompted a federal judge to halt the project pending congressional approval. The Trump administration has appealed the judicial order blocking the East Wing demolition.

(Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/23/us/politics/trump-reflecting-pool-renovation.html)

Trump Attacks Supreme Court Wall Street Journal Iran

President Donald Trump launched a series of Truth Social posts on Tuesday evening attacking the Supreme Court, The Wall Street Journal, wind energy, and Iran within 90 minutes. Trump announced Pennsylvania coal plants would remain open instead of being replaced by wind farms, which he called “costly and ineffective” and blamed for harming birds, repeating claims that scientists have disputed.

Trump assailed The Wall Street Journal as having “LOST ITS WAY,” targeting editorial board member Elliot Kaufman for an opinion piece criticizing Trump’s Iran negotiations. Trump accused billionaire owner Rupert Murdoch of directing the negative coverage and called the outlet a “failing political RAG.” This attack followed a federal judge’s dismissal of Trump’s $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the newspaper and journalists who reported on an alleged birthday letter to Jeffrey Epstein.

Trump posted a 340-word assault on the Supreme Court, claiming the justices he appointed have become “politically correct” and disloyal while Democratic appointees show unwavering loyalty. He criticized the Republican-appointed justices for lacking loyalty to him personally and allowing Democrats to “push them around,” referencing the court’s February decision striking down his tariff regime as unconstitutional and its pending ruling on birthright citizenship.

On Iran policy, Trump claimed Iran wants to open the Strait of Hormuz to earn $500 million daily and is only saying otherwise to “save face.” He stated that any deal with Iran would require the U.S. to “blow up the rest of their Country, their leaders included.” Trump’s comments followed his announcement that the U.S. would extend its ceasefire with Iran indefinitely at Pakistan’s request, leaving no timeline for resolving the conflict that began in late February and has caused thousands of deaths and a surge in gas prices.

Senator Elizabeth Warren responded to the ceasefire extension, telling CNN that Trump “has painted himself into a corner and he can’t find an exit,” noting the absence of any timeline on the blockade or war. Multiple recent polls show a majority of Americans oppose the Iran war.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-truth-social-supreme-court-wind-farms-b2962313.html)

‘Political stunt’: Critics slam Trump’s reading of a Bible passage one week after posting AI image of himself as Jesus | The Independent

Donald Trump participated in a Bible-reading marathon on Tuesday, reciting a passage from 2 Chronicles 7:11-22 in a pre-recorded video from the Oval Office as part of the “America Reads the Bible” event. The passage, frequently cited by those claiming the U.S. was founded as a Christian nation, featured Trump seated at the Resolute Desk delivering a roughly three-minute recitation. Critics immediately labeled the reading a “political stunt,” while supporters praised the Republican president for publicly affirming Christian values and American identity.

The scripture reading follows Trump’s posting of an AI-generated image depicting himself as Jesus Christ one week earlier, which he later claimed showed him as a doctor rather than a religious figure. Trump deleted the Jesus image after backlash, falsely claiming it represented medical healing, and the incident sparked criticism from Christian commentators and former Republican allies including Marjorie Taylor Greene, who denounced the post as an inappropriate replacement of Jesus imagery.

The Bible reading occurs within Trump’s broader campaign to integrate Evangelical Christianity into federal governance. Since returning to office, Trump established the White House Faith Office headed by televangelist Paula White-Cain, who has compared him to Jesus, and authorized federal workers to encourage religious expressions in government workplaces. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has explicitly invoked Christian language in military contexts, praying that rounds “find their mark against the enemies of righteousness” during Iran war operations, demonstrating how Trump’s administration has weaponized religious rhetoric to justify military action.

Trump’s emphasis on Christianity has intensified his conflict with Pope Leo, the first U.S.-born pontiff, who has repeatedly condemned the Iran war and rejected the use of faith to justify violence. Trump attacked the pope in a 334-word Truth Social post, branding him “terrible” on foreign policy and falsely suggesting the pontiff accepts Iran possessing nuclear weapons. Pope Leo has refused to remain silent, stating he will continue speaking against war and promoting dialogue to end suffering.

Brian Kaylor, author of “The Bible According to Christian Nationalists: Exploiting Scripture for Political Power,” rejected Trump’s interpretation of the selected passage, telling the Associated Press that the verse represents “a promise made to one particular person in one particular moment” and cannot legitimately be applied to modern U.S. political purposes through decontextualization. Social media responses divided sharply, with supporters viewing the reading as moral leadership while critics questioned whether Trump has ever genuinely engaged with scripture.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-bible-passage-reading-white-house-b2962262.html)

Patel Claims FBI Has Evidence 2020 Election Stolen

FBI Director Kash Patel claimed during a Fox News interview that he possesses evidence supporting Donald Trump’s false assertion that the 2020 election was stolen, promising to reveal information “this week.” Patel stated, “We have the information that backs President Trump’s claim,” without specifying what evidence exists or providing any documentation to substantiate the allegation.

Patel’s statements came as he faced damaging allegations published by The Atlantic regarding his conduct as FBI director, including reports of excessive drinking at Washington, D.C. clubs and his home city of Las Vegas, as well as paranoia about being fired. The article alleged his behavior violates FBI conduct standards and could leave him vulnerable to coercion or exploitation. Patel announced he would file a defamation lawsuit against the magazine and attacked the reporting as “fake news” on social media.

Trump has consistently promoted the lie that he lost the 2020 election to Joe Biden through fraud despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. His former personal attorney Rudy Giuliani lost multiple court cases attempting to prove wrongdoing, and Trump’s lies inspired the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol, during which his supporters attempted to prevent congressional certification of the election results. More than 1,500 insurrectionists were prosecuted, though Trump pardoned them in 2025 after reclaiming office.

Patel’s pattern of weaponizing the FBI against political opponents reflects broader administration efforts to abuse law enforcement institutions. Michigan state officials are currently resisting DOJ attempts to seize Detroit-area ballots from the 2024 election, with Attorney General Dana Nessel accusing the administration of attempting to sow doubt about electoral integrity ahead of midterm elections.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt defended Patel’s leadership, claiming crime has “plummeted to the lowest level in more than 100 years” under his direction and calling him “a critical player on the administration’s law and order team.” Journalist Sarah Fitzpatrick, who authored The Atlantic report, told CNN she stands by her reporting and noted that White House insiders routinely discuss Patel’s potential removal from office.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/kash-patel-2020-election-trump-b2960883.html)

Trump Says Iran Has Committed ‘Serious’ Ceasefire Violation

President Donald Trump accused Iran of committing a “serious violation” of a ceasefire agreement after Iranian forces fired on two Indian vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, according to reporting by ABC News’ Jonathan Karl on Sunday. Trump stated that a peace deal would be reached “one way or another,” claiming the outcome would depend on whether Iran chose the “nice way or the hard way.”

In a Truth Social post following the call with Karl, Trump escalated his rhetoric, characterizing Iran’s actions as a “Total Violation” and threatening military strikes against Iranian infrastructure. Trump wrote that his representatives would travel to Islamabad, Pakistan for negotiations, while simultaneously warning that “if they don’t take the DEAL, the United States is going to knock out every single Power Plant, and every single Bridge, in Iran.”

Trump’s statement contradicted his earlier claim of restraint, as he declared “NO MORE MR. NICE GUY” and framed potential military action as an “Honor” that previous administrations had failed to execute. He falsely claimed the United States had already blockaded the Strait of Hormuz and stood to lose nothing economically from its closure, while Iran stood to lose “$500 Million Dollars a day.”

The Republican president characterized his proposed agreement as “very fair and reasonable” while simultaneously threatening comprehensive destruction of Iran’s power and transportation infrastructure. Trump asserted that military action against Iran was overdue, stating it “should have been done to Iran, by other Presidents, for the last 47 years.”

The ceasefire violation allegation came as Trump’s administration prepared peace negotiations with Iran, though Trump’s public threats of devastating military action directly contradicted diplomatic efforts. Trump’s statements also echoed previous rhetoric from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth characterizing military action against Iran as justified.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/no-more-mr-nice-guy-trump-seethes-at-irans-total-violation-of-ceasefire/)

Trump ICE Detention Crisis Forces Federal Judges to Issue Sanctions

Federal judges across California are confronting a crisis in immigration detention created by the Trump administration’s mandatory detention policy. Since July 2025, the Department of Homeland Security has ordered all arrested immigrants held without bond, a dramatic expansion from the previous policy that applied only to those caught at the border. This change followed Trump’s signing of a spending bill allocating $45 billion to expand federal immigrant detention facilities.

The surge in detentions has overwhelmed California’s federal courts, particularly the Eastern District, which received over 2,700 habeas corpus petitions since January 2026 compared to fewer than 500 the previous year. Chief Judge Troy Nunley declared a judicial emergency in the district and sanctioned a Department of Justice attorney $250 for repeatedly violating court orders to release detained immigrants. Many detainees are longtime U.S. residents with no criminal records who were arrested during routine immigration check-ins, including an Afghan who supported American military efforts and a Cambodian grandmother who fled the Khmer Rouge.

Habeas corpus petitions, once reserved for death row inmates and suspected terrorists, have become the only recourse for immigrants seeking release. Judge Nunley stated that “the majority of the cases that we see are cases where people should not be detained” and emphasized that detainees are entitled to the same due process protections as any other person. However, some government lawyers have argued that the Fifth Amendment does not apply to detained immigrants, contradicting constitutional guarantees of due process.

The Trump administration’s policy has created procedural chaos across federal districts. Judge Sunshine Sykes of California’s Central District issued a decision describing the administration’s enforcement as inflicting “terror against noncitizens,” though the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals blocked her order requiring bond hearings. Federal judges unprepared for the volume of immigration cases are working nights to process emergency motions, while government attorneys claim they are overwhelmed by more than 300 cases assigned in three months.

Nationwide, nearly a quarter of approximately 30,000 active habeas petitions are filed in California courts, with half concentrated in Nunley’s Eastern District. Legal experts anticipate the dispute over mandatory detention will reach the Supreme Court as challenges progress through multiple appellate circuits. Judges across the country have expressed frustration that the Trump administration’s enforcement blitz has created a system that denies detainees the opportunity to gather evidence or consult with lawyers while forcing them to file emergency constitutional petitions instead of receiving standard bond hearings.

(Source: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-04-19/trump-doj-habeas-corpus-immigration-detention)

1 … 11 12 13 14 15 … 366