Category: Anti-Science

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Dismisses Vaccine Advisory Panel in Disturbing Political Move

US Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has undertaken a shocking move by dismissing all members of the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices (ACIP), a critical panel that informs vaccine recommendations for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). In a display of blatant disregard for established public health practices, Kennedy labeled the committee as “plagued with conflicts of interest” and justified his decision through an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal.

The unprecedented decision to replace the entire 17-member committee has drawn concerns from public health experts, who argue that such a sweeping action undermines the integrity of vaccine policy development. Kennedy’s claim that the existing members were “last-minute appointees” of the Biden administration lacks credibility, particularly as ACIP members are intended to be independent experts in fields such as pediatrics and epidemiology.

Kennedy’s actions echo the troubling trend of politicizing science under the Trump administration, a period characterized by disinformation and hostility towards public health. He indicates that the current panel’s removal is necessary for the Trump administration to gain control over the committee before 2028, signaling a clear agenda to reshape immunization policies to align with partisan interests rather than scientific consensus.

The forthcoming ACIP meeting, scheduled for June 25, intends to address major vaccination topics including Covid-19 and HPV, but experts like Dorit Reiss caution that the rushed appointments of new committee members will lead to insufficient vetting and unresolved conflicts of interest. This situation only exacerbates existing eroded trust in vaccine efficacy and safety, which has been weaponized by anti-vaccine rhetoric during the Trump era.

In making these moves, Kennedy exemplifies the broader anti-science stance that is characteristic of the Republican Party, driven by a disregard for empirical evidence and public health ethics. As he attempts to reshape the landscape of U.S. immunization policy, it is critical for the public and policymakers alike to remain vigilant against the dangers posed by this administration’s pursuit of a scientifically compromised health agenda.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/09/health/rfk-cdc-vaccine-advisers-removed?Date=20250609&Profile=CNN,CNN+Politics&utm_content=1749503904&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook)

FEMA Director Ignorant of Hurricane Season, Staff Alarmed

FEMA Director David Richardson’s recent comments about the U.S. hurricane season have left agency staff bewildered. During a briefing on the second day of the season, Richardson claimed he was unaware that the hurricane season had started, raising alarms among employees about his competence and preparedness for their critical work.

The hurricane season officially kicked off on June 1, anticipated to bring up to 10 hurricanes according to forecasts from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Despite expectations for heightened storm activity, Richardson announced no changes to FEMA’s disaster response plans, contradicting earlier indications that updates were forthcoming.

This incident highlights significant internal confusion within FEMA, exacerbated by staff cuts and a dramatic decline in hurricane preparedness measures as aligned with Trump administration policies. Since Trump took office, about one-third of FEMA’s full-time employees have left, raising serious concerns about the agency’s ability to respond to disasters effectively.

Richardson’s leadership style, infused with military references from his past as a Marine artillery officer, has not instilled confidence among FEMA staff. His previous role involved countering threats rather than managing disaster responses, further questioning his suitability for the FEMA head position. This backdrop of continuous leadership instability, marked by the firing of former FEMA Chief Cameron Hamilton for opposing Trump’s agenda, underscores a chronic misalignment between the agency and its mission.

With critical positions filled by individuals with limited disaster response experience and FEMA’s operational capacity diminishes, the future looks grim. The current federal administration’s inclination to downsize FEMA, as articulated by Trump and reinforced by his allies, raises deep worries about the safety and security of communities facing impending natural disasters.

(h/t: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/fema-staff-confused-after-head-said-he-was-unaware-us-hurricane-season-sources-2025-06-02/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR72ksaX8_2PiLakw4rJaSm3l24L2An83Ez5V3nT-nhajCiypHlYOYYH1y5WkQ_aem_7eV0VmiDlnqY7WI7BPq8TQ)

RFK Jr. Declares Autism Epidemic, Shuns Scientific Consensus

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the current Secretary of Health and Human Services, has declared the rising rates of autism in the U.S. an “epidemic.” Speaking at a press conference on April 16, 2025, Kennedy reported a significant increase in autism prevalence, stating it rose from 1 in 36 children in 2020 to 1 in 31 in 2022, as recognized in a recent CDC report. He attributed this alarming uptick to unidentified environmental toxins, vowing to expedite research into these causes, which contrasts sharply with assertions from public health experts.

In his address, Kennedy dismissed the idea that the rise in autism diagnoses is merely a result of improved diagnostic practices, insisting that a genuine epidemic exists. He pledged that within weeks, the HHS will unveil new studies aimed at pinpointing these environmental factors, emphasizing a shift in funding away from genetic research, which he termed a “dead end.” While he claims his approach will yield quick answers, experts have criticized the timeline, arguing that robust research requires comprehensive planning and execution.

Opposition from autism researchers and advocates quickly followed Kennedy’s announcements, as many pointed out that the increase in autism rates can largely be explained by better diagnostics and increased awareness. They stress that autism is influenced by a combination of genetic, biological, and environmental factors rather than a singular cause. Experts like Catherine Lord and Zachary Warren have called attention to the complexity of autism, asserting there is no single factor responsible for its manifestation.

Kennedy’s narrative drew further scrutiny as some of his comments about autistic individuals were perceived as dehumanizing. He suggested that many children diagnosed with autism would never lead typical lives, remarks that critics labeled offensive and stigmatizing. Advocacy groups expressed deep concern over his fear-mongering rhetoric, highlighting that it serves the anti-vaccine agenda rooted in the Trump administration’s policies rather than advancing the well-being of autistic individuals and their families.

The push for research into environmental factors is welcomed by some, yet the prevailing consensus aligns that such projects must be scientifically grounded, without propagating debunked myths linking vaccines to autism. As the HHS prepares to embark on its research initiatives, advocates stress the urgency of focusing on immediate resources and support for autistic individuals, rather than perpetuating harmful stances that undermine public health and basic human dignity.

(h/t: https://www.npr.org/sections/shots-health-news/2025/04/16/nx-s1-5366676/autism-cdc-rates-rfk-research)

FDA Vaccine Official Resigns, Citing Public Health Risks from Kennedy’s Misinformation

The resignation of Dr. Peter Marks, the FDA’s leading vaccine official, highlights the dangerous direction of public health policy under Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Marks characterized Kennedy’s push for vaccine misinformation as a risk to public health, stating, “truth and transparency are not desired by the secretary, but rather he wishes subservient confirmation of his misinformation and lies.” His departure underscores a significant shift in the FDA’s approach to vaccine safety, which has historically been grounded in robust scientific evidence.

Dr. Marks expressed concern about Kennedy’s aggressive anti-vaccine stance, which threatens decades of public health advancements and the safety of vaccines that have been proven to save millions of lives. Since taking office, Kennedy has issued guidelines that not only undermine vaccine trust but also include promoting debunked treatments such as vitamin A for measles, further imperiling public health amid ongoing outbreaks fueled by vaccination hesitancy.

Marks pointed out that the resurgence of measles, linked to decreasing vaccination rates—particularly among unvaccinated children—could have devastating consequences, as echoed by his mentioning the 100,000 children who died from measles in Africa and Asia last year due to lack of vaccinations. His call for public meetings to address vaccine safety concerns was rebuffed, indicating a top-down approach that values political agendas over scientific dialogue.

Kennedy has moved to install staff connected to the anti-vaccine movement within the CDC, potentially distorting the gathering and analysis of vital vaccine safety data. His plans to launch a vaccine injury agency within the CDC only exacerbate fears that he aims to disproportionately emphasize vaccine risks that have been shown to be minimal compared to the benefits of immunization, creating a perilous narrative undermining established medical practices.

The departure of Dr. Marks represents a critical juncture for the FDA, which now faces a profound challenge under Kennedy’s influence as he seeks to dismantle scientific integrity in favor of populist rhetoric. As Marks noted in his resignation, “the unprecedented assault on scientific truth that has adversely impacted public health in our nation” must cease to ensure citizens can fully benefit from advances in medical science.

(h/t: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/28/health/fda-vaccines-rfk-jr-peter-marks.html)

Vaccine skeptic appointed to lead controversial study on autism

A vaccine skeptic with a history of promoting discredited claims linking immunizations to autism has been chosen by the federal government to lead a crucial study on this topic. David Geier, who is known for long-standing false assertions regarding vaccines and autism, is engaged by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) despite widespread scientific rejection of these theories.

Geier, listed as a data analyst within HHS, has previously faced administrative action for practicing medicine without a license and has a dubious track record in public health research. His hiring raises serious concerns among experts that the upcoming study will propagate flawed conclusions that could erode public confidence in vaccines, undermining decades of credible research by credible scientists.

Alison Singer, president of the Autism Science Foundation, articulated the gravity of this appointment, criticizing the administration for seemingly starting with a predetermined conclusion to support the baseless theory that vaccines cause autism. She underscored that this approach completely contradicts the scientific method, which requires evidence to inform conclusions.

Moreover, HHS directives have shifted the oversight of the vaccine-autism study to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) shortly after President Trump made controversial comments linking rising autism rates to vaccinations. The reallocation of responsibility to NIH and Geier’s involvement signifies a troubling trend in health administration that prioritizes speculative assertions over established medical findings, which overwhelmingly dissociate vaccines from autism.

Experts, including public health researcher Jessica Steier, emphasize that employing individuals like Geier undermines the integrity of public health work. Their involvement is seen as deeply damaging to vaccination initiatives at a time when public health is already strained by misinformation and skepticism, especially in the wake of public health crises exacerbated by lies propagated by Trump’s administration and anti-vaccine advocates.

(h/t: https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2025/03/25/vaccine-skeptic-hhs-rfk-immunization-autism/?mc_cid=cb50cb3410&mc_eid=f0ea8849aa)

Trump’s EPA Rollback: Environmental Protections Sacrificed for Oil Industry Profits

Lee Zeldin, the newly appointed head of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under President Donald Trump, has announced a sweeping rollback of environmental regulations that aim to mitigate climate change. This decision comes as part of a larger strategy by the Trump administration to prioritize corporate interests over environmental protections, a common theme in their governance approach.

The EPA’s changes will affect numerous regulations that were established during the Biden administration, which sought to combat climate change through rigorous oversight of greenhouse gas emissions. Zeldin’s agenda largely caters to the fossil fuel industry, significantly benefiting oil companies that contribute heavily to Republican campaigns. This alliance demonstrates a troubling pattern where political power is utilized to dismantle essential environmental safeguards for corporate gain.

Critics, including environmental advocates and public health experts, have denounced Zeldin’s actions as dangerous and irresponsible. They argue that rolling back these crucial regulations jeopardizes public health and exacerbates climate issues, which disproportionately affect lower-income and marginalized communities. This shift signals a blatant disregard for scientific consensus on climate change, revealing the administration’s alignment with corporate donors eager to exploit natural resources without accountability.

Furthermore, Zeldin’s leadership at the EPA coincides with a broader Republican trend of undermining climate action in favor of short-term economic benefits. The administration’s prioritization of deregulation demonstrates an ongoing commitment to fossil fuel reliance, further entrenching the U.S. in environmental practices that are not sustainable for future generations. This poses serious questions about the long-term ecological viability of the policies being implemented.

The implications of these regulatory rollbacks are profound, potentially hindering progress toward significant environmental reforms and jeopardizing the global fight against climate change, underscoring the dangers of allowing profit motives to overshadow critical environmental responsibilities. As Zeldin drives this agenda forward, the consequences will likely resonate far beyond his tenure, affecting climate policy for years to come.

(h/t: https://apnews.com/article/trump-epa-climate-zeldin-power-plants-feb184286a7a9419aefddce293362e6b)

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Debunked Claims on Cell Phone Radiation Risk Mislead the Public

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., currently serving as the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services, has made controversial remarks advocating for the banning of cell phones in schools. Unlike the common concerns centered on distractions or cyberbullying, Kennedy claims that cell phones emit damaging electromagnetic radiation that can cause cancer and neurological damage in children. His stance has drawn widespread criticism and disbelief, as health experts widely debunk such claims.

During recent statements, Kennedy suggested that cell phones pose significant health risks due to their radiation, which he argues affects children adversely when they’re in constant proximity. This assertion has no grounding in scientific evidence; numerous studies confirm that the electromagnetic radiation emitted by cell phones is non-ionizing and not harmful at the levels typically encountered.

The backlash against Kennedy’s remarks reflects a broader concern over misinformation regarding health and safety. Many have pointed out that rather than focusing on unfounded fears about phones, it would be more pertinent to address pressing issues like the dangers posed by gun violence in schools, which have resulted in numerous injuries and fatalities.

Critics have denounced Kennedy’s explanations as illogical, arguing that he is recycling outdated and debunked fears surrounding radiation. In a landscape already fraught with misinformation, his comments only serve to confuse the public and distract from legitimate public health conversations.

The urgency of fostering science-based discourse on health cannot be overstated, especially in a time when misinformation poses real risks to public welfare. Leaders like Kennedy must be held accountable for their statements; spreading unfounded fears only undermines efforts to implement sound health policies and protect the health of our children.

(h/t: https://www.thepoke.com/2025/03/22/rfk-jr-wants-phones-banned-from-schools-iover-radiation/)

CDC’s Controversial Vaccine-Autism Study Risks Public Health Amid Trump Administration’s Anti-Vaccine Rhetoric

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is embarking on a controversial study examining a fabricated link between vaccines and autism, despite overwhelming evidence countering this claim. This decision has raised alarms among public health advocates, given that extensive scientific research has consistently debunked the supposed correlation between vaccinations and autism.

The misinformation surrounding vaccines traces back to a widely discredited study from 1998 by Andrew Wakefield, which falsely linked the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine to autism based on just 12 children. Wakefield’s fraudulent claims led to his medical license being revoked and The Lancet retracting the study in 2010 after concluding that several aspects of his work were inaccurate and based on ethical violations.

Despite the established safety of vaccines, which have saved millions of lives globally, the Trump administration—which includes prominent vaccine skeptics like Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—has continued to promote anti-vaccine narratives. President Trump recently exaggerated autism statistics, framing a need for further research, which ultimately undermines public confidence in critical vaccination efforts.

As the CDC prepares for this study, concerns are mounting that investigating a debunked theory could harm public health initiatives, especially with rising measles cases in the U.S. The cost of this new investigation could strain resources already allocated to autism research, further diverting focus from evidence-based health policies.

In an era where misinformation thrives, the CDC’s decision to pursue this research underlines the ongoing threats to public health championed by Trump and his administration. As scientific consensus overwhelmingly supports vaccination, continuing to question it without substantial evidence could negatively impact efforts to control disease outbreaks, thus posing a significant risk to societal health.

(h/t: https://www.iflscience.com/us-to-spend-money-researching-heavily-debunked-link-between-vaccines-and-autism-78394?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR2MB_yipWEblpP453c_941Mr-7P45hjCdKiKRUY3UQzfkl5UUolkxL4GHI_aem_RxyLLzThM1hOERoFUP-sVw)

RFK Jr. Blamed Measles Deaths on Poor Diet Ignoring Vaccines

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has faced significant backlash after he controversially attributed a measles death in Texas to poor diet and lack of exercise rather than a lack of vaccination. During public remarks, Kennedy claimed that measles is unlikely to be fatal in healthy individuals, suggesting a connection between malnourishment and vulnerability to the virus. His assertions come amid a serious outbreak in West Texas, where vaccination rates have drastically declined.

Critics across social media swiftly condemned Kennedy’s statements, emphasizing that his anti-vaccine rhetoric dangerously undermines public health efforts. Notable figures highlighted the absurdity of linking a preventable disease, which can result in severe complications or death, to dietary choices. Experts have pointed out that the measles vaccine’s effectiveness has led to the disease’s elimination in the U.S. for over two decades, making Kennedy’s claims especially hazardous.

Public health advocates stressed that Kennedy’s comments reflect a disturbing trend of misinformation that contributes to public hesitance toward vaccinations and disregards the clear scientific consensus on vaccine safety and efficacy. Many took to social media to clarify that measles cannot be treated with antibiotics or other unconventional remedies he mentioned, such as cod liver oil.

In response to the widespread criticism, Kennedy’s narrative was described as reminiscent of eugenics, with some commentators accusing him of blaming marginalized communities for health issues exacerbated by systemic inequities. His remarks have been viewed as a callous misrepresentation of the realities faced by families in areas with limited access to nutritious food and healthcare.

This alarming incident highlights not only the dangers posed by Kennedy’s misinformation but also reflects broader issues within the Republican Party regarding public health and science. The government’s ongoing crisis in vaccine trust, exacerbated by leaders who prioritize personal agendas over evidence-based health practices, continues to threaten American democracy and public well-being.

(h/t: https://www.rawstory.com/rfk-measles-2671301777/)

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Dangerous Anti-Vaccine Doublespeak Threatens Public Health Amid Measles Outbreak

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., under President Donald Trump’s administration, has revived his controversial anti-vaccine rhetoric amidst a critical measles outbreak in Texas. His op-ed for Fox News ostensibly promotes vaccinations but subtly undermines the urgency of the issue. Experts have refuted Kennedy’s claims about the normalcy of such outbreaks, pointing out they stem from declining vaccination rates, with some parents refusing to vaccinate their children.

In his op-ed, Kennedy expresses concern over the outbreak that has tragically resulted in a child’s death, yet he conspicuously avoids stating that the deceased child was unvaccinated. Instead, he frames vaccination as a personal choice, sidestepping the public health imperative of vaccination to combat measles, a disease known for severe complications like pneumonia and encephalitis.

Kennedy’s dismissal of vaccine effectiveness, referencing vitamins and ‘clean’ living, mirrors the well-documented tactics of anti-vaccine activists. He offers vague reassurance about community health and personal choices rather than firmly endorsing vaccination or denouncing the misinformation that has fueled the outbreak. Such language creates uncertainty rather than clarity, undermining legitimate public health messages.

Even as Kennedy addresses the outbreak, he fails to renounce his long-held anti-vaccine stance, leaving it unclear whether he truly supports the vaccines he is expected to promote as Secretary of Health and Human Services. The op-ed reads like an effort to placate critics while continuing to foster anti-vaccine sentiments among his followers.

Fox News’ coverage, while embedding portions of Kennedy’s claims, carefully highlighted more definitive messages about the necessity of vaccines. This nuanced editorial choice suggests an underlying recognition of the need to address the threat of vaccine-preventable diseases despite the platform’s typical alignment with anti-vaccine narratives. Ultimately, Kennedy’s continued equivocation poses a real danger to public health, especially as misinformation continues to spread rapidly in the era of COVID-19.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/opinion/rfk-jrs-measles-op-ed-plays-the-same-old-anti-vaxx-games-but-fox-news-threw-their-readers-a-lifeline/)

1 2 3 … 18