Trump Flat-Out Says ‘I Don’t Want To Negotiate’ End To War

President Donald Trump explicitly rejected negotiations to end hostilities with Iran during a Fox News interview on Tuesday, stating “I don’t want to negotiate now.” This declaration came amid renewed U.S. military strikes on Iran, which U.S. officials claim violated a memorandum of understanding designed to pause fighting while both countries negotiated terms.

The conflict centers on control of the Strait of Hormuz, where Iran has attacked and struck tankers transiting through Omani territorial waters. Iran asserts that Article 5 of the memorandum requires vessels to arrange safe passage through Iranian waters; the U.S. has resumed its blockade of Iranian ships in the Gulf of Oman in response. When Fox News correspondent Trey Yingst asked whether Trump was negotiating with the wrong Iranian leadership, Trump doubled down, saying “Three days ago, we had a deal” but refused further discussions.

Trump later threatened Iran with annihilation, stating the country should make a deal or “You’re not gonna have anybody left.” This escalation reflects the trajectory set in February when Trump launched the war in coordination with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who reportedly assured the president that military action could swiftly topple Iran’s government and that the Strait of Hormuz would remain open.

Trump’s refusal to pursue diplomatic resolution contradicts the framework of the existing memorandum and eliminates any immediate path to de-escalation. His explicit rejection of negotiation while simultaneously threatening annihilation demonstrates an intent to prosecute military conflict without diplomatic constraints.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/trump-flat-out-says-i-dont-want-to-negotiate-end-to-war/)rejection of negotiation while simultaneously threatening annihilation demonstrates an intent to prosecute military conflict without diplomatic constraints.

Trump Reignites Blockade Against Iran in Strait of Hormuz

President Donald Trump declared the United States the “Guardian of the Strait of Hormuz” on Monday, announcing a blockade targeting Iranian vessels and a 20% toll on all cargo transiting the waterway. Trump stated that while other nations retain passage rights, Iranian ships and their customers will be barred from entering or leaving, framing the seizure of control over this critical international shipping lane as a matter of “fairness” for American protection costs. The announcement followed retaliatory U.S. military strikes against Iran after Iranian Revolutionary Guard forces attacked a Cyprus-flagged container ship and falsely claimed to have closed the strait.

Trump told Fox News the U.S. will “keep” and “probably run” the strait, extracting substantial revenue from global commerce while positioning American forces as enforcers. He claimed the United States had negotiated “a done deal” with Iran before Iran violated a ceasefire agreement over the weekend, stating “we’re just going to hit them very hard and keep the strait, and probably run it.” Trump asserted that Iran has a pattern of breaking agreements, citing ten previous deals he said the regime had violated.

The unilateral seizure of control over an internationally recognized waterway through which approximately one-third of global seaborne oil passes represents Trump’s assertion of military dominance over a crucial global chokepoint. By imposing a 20% toll and explicitly blocking Iranian commerce, Trump transforms a shared international passage into a revenue-generating American territory, a move that contradicts international maritime law and conventions governing freedom of navigation. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth confirmed U.S. military strikes followed Iran’s attack on the merchant vessel, but Trump’s subsequent assertion of permanent control expands the conflict beyond defensive response.

Trump’s escalation abandons the pretense of negotiation in favor of direct territorial and economic control, structuring the international order around American military power and financial extraction. Trump previously claimed the strait was open following overnight military strikes, but his Monday declarations reveal intent to monopolize control and profit from global energy transit. The president’s rhetoric conflates security provision with commercial exploitation, justifying American toll collection on international commerce as compensation for military operations initiated at his direction.

This consolidation of control over a vital international waterway exemplifies Trump’s model of authoritarian resource extraction, in which the U.S. military apparatus becomes an instrument for enriching American leadership and subordinating global commerce to Trump’s financial interests. The blockade of Iranian vessels and imposition of cargo fees establish a de facto American empire over a region critical to global trade, enforced by military force and defended through nationalist framing that obscures the seizure of international territory.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-dubs-usa-guardian-of-the-hormuz-strait-and-relaunches-blockade-against-iran/)financial interests. The blockade of Iranian vessels and imposition of cargo fees establish a de facto American empire over a region critical to global trade, enforced by military force and defended through nationalist framing that obscures the seizure of international territory.

Trump Claims Strait of Hormuz Open After Iran War

President Trump claimed during a Sunday NBC News appearance that the Strait of Hormuz remains open, contradicting Iran’s assertion that it had closed the waterway. When host Kristen Welker pressed Trump on the conflicting statements following overnight U.S. military strikes on Iranian targets, Trump stated the strait was open but refused further discussion, citing a desire to honor the memory of late Senator Lindsey Graham.

Trump’s account of recent events with Iran contradicts the pattern of escalation documented by U.S. Central Command. Trump asserted that Iran had agreed to a ceasefire deal the previous day before launching a drone attack on a commercial vessel within an hour, describing Iranian officials as “sick people.” According to CENTCOM, the United States completed a third round of strikes against Iran on July 11, targeting approximately 140 Iranian military positions with precision munitions launched from fighter aircraft, drones, and naval vessels.

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth confirmed Saturday that U.S. military strikes followed Iran’s attack on a Cyprus-flagged container ship, which resulted in a missing crew member and significant vessel damage. The escalation marks a third military engagement between the two nations in one week, with Trump ordering strikes after Iran violated a ceasefire agreement.

Trump’s dismissal of substantive discussion about the military conflict and the Strait of Hormuz underscores his pattern of deploying military force while avoiding detailed accountability for the consequences. His refusal to engage with Welker’s direct questions about the strategic waterway’s status and his response strategy reflects his authoritarian approach to governance, where military decisions operate outside meaningful public scrutiny or democratic oversight.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-claims-the-strait-of-hormuz-is-open-in-testy-retort-to-nbcs-welker/)

Rubio Controls Venezuela as De Facto Viceroy

Secretary of State Marco Rubio has established de facto control over Venezuela since U.S. forces captured President Nicolás Maduro in January 2026, functioning as what officials call a “viceroy” over the nation. Rubio oversees Venezuela’s finances, natural resource distribution, government appointments, and foreign policy from Washington without visiting the country in person, maintaining close contact with acting president Delcy Rodríguez through WhatsApp messages where he directs her decisions on defense ministers, business licenses, and public statements.

The U.S. Treasury receives revenue from Venezuela’s oil exports and disburses funds to the country through its banking system, giving Rubio’s team control over spending priorities and conditions. Rubio sets the terms for international business licenses, decides which companies can operate in Venezuela, and has prioritized American oil firms over European competitors while pressuring Rodríguez to abandon partnerships with U.S. adversaries like Russia’s Rosneft. This financial leverage compels Rodríguez to comply with his directives to maintain her government’s ability to pay workers and stabilize the currency.

On taking power, Trump told Rodríguez she could either cooperate with the United States or face attacks on Venezuela’s infrastructure and military bases. When Rodríguez sought assurances after the Justice Department began investigating her, Rubio texted her a Trump social media post praising her performance, then approved her thank-you response before she posted it. The Trump administration halted prosecution of Rodríguez, demanded she extradite Maduro ally Alex Saab for extradition to the U.S., and directed her to remove a foreign minister’s post criticizing the American attack on Iran, effectively stripping Venezuela of independent foreign policy.

Trump has explicitly stated he intends to “run the country” for years and has suggested Venezuela could become the 51st state, framing the arrangement as part of his broader agenda for American expansionism in Greenland, Canada, and the Panama Canal. The administration has deployed 900 military personnel to Venezuela, committed nearly $400 million in aid, and delivered cash following recent earthquakes, using disaster relief to strengthen Rodríguez’s interim government while indefinitely postponing democratic elections.

Rubio has abandoned his previous advocacy for Latin American democracy to enforce what the article describes as “Trump-era American power, in which the winner takes all regardless of sovereignty and international law.” Representative Sean Casten questioned Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent about the constitutional authority for controlling Venezuelan assets, but received no substantive answer, exposing the absence of legal justification for this colonial arrangement.



(Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/11/us/politics/how-marco-rubio-runs-venezuela.html?fbclid=IwVERDUATAoTpwZG9mA2ZkaWQWUKYQUlJUuA-60cymLc92kaDcnOpodWV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR75FDCaExV3rlk91kk5_b8v36cHEzSx3Qwf3JsS6cVvp7BbQIB_JyAgCH6pqQ_aem_WS82o4yXRWvIVoDhBvB24A)

Trump Strikes Back At Iran After Strait of Hormuz Is Closed

Trump ordered U.S. military strikes against Iranian targets in the Strait of Hormuz on Saturday after Revolutionary Guard forces fired on a Cyprus-flagged container ship and declared the strategic waterway closed. U.S. Central Command confirmed the strikes targeted air surveillance radars, missile and drone storage facilities, launch sites, and ground-to-air missile systems, marking the third round of American military action against Iran this week. The attack on the merchant vessel left one civilian crew member missing and caused significant damage, according to CENTCOM.

Iran’s state media claimed the IRGC fired “warning shots” at a vessel traveling an unapproved route, escalating tensions after Trump had threatened to occupy Iran entirely if Tehran did not reopen the strait. The blockade directly threatens global trade and fuel prices, with CNN military analyst Cedric Leighton warning the latest Iranian action could trigger further increases in gasoline costs and disrupt international commerce. Trump has previously threatened Iran with total occupation over the strait closure.

U.S. officials told CNN that diplomatic negotiations cannot resume until the strait is secured, even as mediators attempt to return both nations to the negotiating table. Leighton cited Trump’s past interest in seizing Kharg Island, a major Iranian oil hub, as potential military leverage, though he cautioned such ground operations could trigger broader escalation and economic damage Trump wants to avoid. A senior Iranian lawmaker warned that “not a single American soldier will return alive” if the United States attempted an invasion of the island.

The cycle of attacks underscores Trump’s pattern of military confrontation with Iran, following his earlier threats to annihilate Iran over ceasefire violations and his demands that gas retailers cut prices amid the conflict-driven energy crisis. Trump authorized the strikes directly, positioning himself as commander-in-chief while claiming to avoid economic damage from further escalation. The standoff demonstrates how Trump’s aggressive foreign policy and military orders are directly driving consequences for American consumers and global stability.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-strikes-back-at-iran-after-irgc-declares-strait-of-hormuz-is-closed-again/)

Trump Threatens Iran’s Annihilation Over Ceasefire Violations

President Donald Trump announced on Truth Social that U.S. aircraft struck Iranian missile, drone storage, and coastal radar sites on Saturday in response to Iran violating a ceasefire agreement. Trump stated the United States was prepared to be “forced” to complete military operations against Iran if additional violations occurred, declaring that “the Islamic Republic of Iran will no longer exist” if the country continues its aggression. Trump’s threat escalated rhetoric surrounding the ongoing conflict, as U.S. Central Command confirmed strikes were conducted in direct response to Iranian attacks on commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz.

According to Fox News correspondent Jennifer Griffin, Iranian forces launched one-way attack drones targeting U.S. naval assets, including the Navy’s regional headquarters and the 5th Fleet based in Bahrain. The strikes hit a commercial vessel carrying approximately 200,000 barrels of oil in the Strait of Hormuz early Saturday morning, marking the second ship attacked in two days. Griffin reported the U.S. military response was substantially larger than previous night strikes and included targeting air defense systems, drone storage facilities, cruise missiles, and minelaying capabilities.

Trump has repeatedly employed annihilation rhetoric throughout the conflict with Iran. Previously, Trump threatened that “a whole civilization will die tonight” unless Iran reopened the Strait of Hormuz, following which a two-week ceasefire was announced and Trump withdrew the threat. His pattern of catastrophic ultimatums paired with tactical concessions demonstrates a strategy of escalating military pressure while maintaining negotiating leverage, though his latest statements suggest willingness to pursue total military conquest if Iran continues its maritime operations.

The escalating military exchanges occurred as ongoing negotiations to end the war continued. U.S. officials stated Iran was given an opportunity to honor the ceasefire agreement but “elected not to” when its forces conducted the drone attack. The cycle of Iranian aggression and American military retaliation underscores the fragility of the ceasefire arrangement and the potential for broader regional conflict if either side abandons restraint. Trump’s threats to occupy Iran over the Strait of Hormuz reflect his consistent maximalist positioning in the conflict.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-warns-usa-is-getting-forced-to-wipe-out-iran-once-and-for-all/)

Trump reportedly considers buying Chagos Islands from Mauritius | Donald Trump | The Guardian

Donald Trump is considering purchasing the Chagos Islands from Mauritius to secure US control of the Diego Garcia military base, according to the Telegraph. The proposal would circumvent UK officials by having the US negotiate directly with Mauritius after the islands are first ceded to Mauritian sovereignty, bypassing stalled British plans to transfer the territory. Trump Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent brought the plan to Trump, though it is not described as a leading option among proposals under consideration.

The US previously blocked legislation in April that would have handed the islands to Mauritius, effectively halting the UK’s sovereignty transfer plans. Some Trump administration officials oppose ceding the island to Mauritius due to concerns that China’s alliance with Mauritius could create espionage vulnerabilities. The White House declined to comment on the reported proposal to the Guardian.

The Diego Garcia base, located in the central Indian Ocean approximately 2,360 miles from Iran, houses a US airbase capable of deploying long-range missiles and has been a strategic asset for US-UK security for nearly 60 years. Since the US-Israel war with Iran began in late February, Iran has launched multiple strikes against the joint base, including one in late March that was intercepted by a US warship. In March, the UK authorized the US to launch missile strikes against Iranian targets from Diego Garcia, a decision Trump criticized as “very late.”

A delegation from the Chagos Refugees Group, visiting the UK last week, accused the British government of allowing the issue to be “hijacked within the halls” of UK politics and demanded the right to return to their birthplace. Louis Olivier Bancoult, the delegation leader, stated the government lacks genuine commitment to resolving the displacement of Chagossians, saying “We’re still suffering and our position is clear, we have the right to live in our birthplace.” The refugees expressed support for the UK to finalize an agreement on the islands’ future.

A UK government spokesperson asserted that maintaining operational control of Diego Garcia is essential to prevent adversaries from gaining strategic footing and that the UK-Mauritius agreement was designed to address long-term security risks both nations face. When asked whether the UK would proceed without US support, a government source confirmed: “We’ve always bee

(Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/07/trump-deal-chagos-islands-mauritius-uk?utm_term=Autofeed&CMP=fb_us&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwdGRleAST2hBleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeHcaW3WDWvK8WxGqhkbE9bFsD-8EJdB_Ez3Hb_ltxfL4i85NkOIwJTm_2HI0_aem_AfM_4giNmngx1uXos9_gaw#Echobox=1780860392)n clear we wouldn’t go ahead without US support,” effectively giving the Trump administration veto power over the islands’ sovereignty transfer.

Trump administration mulls payments to sway Greenlanders to join US | Reuters

The Trump administration is actively exploring direct cash payments to Greenland’s 57,000 residents, ranging from $10,000 to $100,000 per person, totaling nearly $6 billion, to induce them to secede from Denmark and potentially join the United States, according to four sources familiar with internal White House deliberations. White House officials, including national security aides, have intensified these discussions following Trump’s recent capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro, with staff seeking to carry momentum from that operation toward Trump’s stated geopolitical objectives. Trump has publicly insisted the U.S. needs Greenland for national security and mineral resources critical to military applications.

Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen explicitly rejected the scheme in a Facebook post, stating “Enough is enough … No more fantasies about annexation,” after Trump again told reporters the acquisition was necessary. A joint statement from France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, Britain, and Denmark asserted that only Greenland and Denmark can decide matters concerning their relationship, directly rebuking Trump’s territorial ambitions. The statements reflect the alliance’s disapproval despite NATO’s mutual defense obligations binding the U.S. and Denmark.

The White House is considering multiple mechanisms to acquire the island, including military intervention, though officials claim to prefer purchase or diplomatic acquisition. One option under discussion is a Compact of Free Association (COFA), a governance model previously extended only to Micronesia, the Marshall Islands, and Palau, which would require Greenland’s independence from Denmark and grant the U.S. military operational freedom in exchange for essential services and duty-free trade. Payments could theoretically be deployed to manipulate Greenlanders into voting for independence or accepting a COFA agreement post-separation.

While surveys indicate overwhelming Greenlandic support for independence, most residents oppose U.S. affiliation, and economic concerns about severing ties with Denmark have prevented legislative calls for an independence referendum. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt acknowledged that Trump and national security officials were “looking at what a potential purchase would look like,” and Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced plans to meet Denmark’s foreign minister in Washington. The proposal exposes Trump’s willingness to treat sovereign populations and their self-determina(Source: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/trump-administration-mulls-payments-sway-greenlanders-join-us-2026-01-08/)tion as commodities available for purchase.

US claims it has sank six Iranian boats targeting civilian ships as Trump moves to reopen Strait of Hormuz | The Independent

The U.S. military announced it sank six Iranian boats in the Strait of Hormuz as Trump initiated “Project Freedom,” an operation to escort commercial vessels through waters Iran has blockaded since February 28. U.S. Central Command Admiral Brad Cooper claimed Iran targeted commercial and military ships with cruise missiles, though Iran’s military denied the reports and accused the U.S. of fabricating incidents to justify military action.

Trump threatened Iran would be “blown off the face of the Earth” if they attacked U.S. vessels executing Project Freedom, declaring the operation a “humanitarian” mission to free trapped ships. In a Truth Social post, Trump framed the operation as rescuing neutral parties and innocent bystanders, stating the U.S. would “guide their Ships safely out of these restricted Waterways.” Trump had rejected Iran’s 14-point peace proposal, stating Tehran had “not yet paid a big enough price.”

Iran’s military leadership directly warned the U.S. that any involvement in managing Strait of Hormuz shipping violates the ceasefire and threatened to attack foreign armed forces entering the waterway. Ali Abdollahi, head of Iran’s unified command, declared that vessel passage “needs to be coordinated with the armed forces” and that the strait’s security remains under Iranian control. Senior Iranian lawmaker Ibrahim Azizi dismissed Trump’s initiative as delusional, rejecting the idea Washington could direct the waterway.

The UAE reported coming under Iranian attack for the first time since the April ceasefire, with its defense ministry engaging 15 missiles and four drones; one drone caused a fire at an oil facility, injuring three Indian nationals. The UK Maritime Trade Organization reported two cargo vessels ablaze off the UAE, and multiple commercial ships remain stranded in the Strait of Hormuz with dwindling supplies.

Trump has reportedly received a one-month negotiation deadline from Iran regarding its proposed deal to reopen the strait. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent called on China to increase diplomatic pressure on Iran t(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/us-military-iran-warship-missiles-strait-of-hormuz-b2970104.html)o end the blockade, signaling Washington will monitor Beijing’s response.

The Latest: Trump sending Witkoff and Kushner to Pakistan for talks with Iran’s foreign minister | The Independent

Trump is deploying private envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner to Pakistan to participate in a second round of ceasefire negotiations between the United States and Iran, the White House announced Friday. Witkoff and Kushner lack formal government positions and operate as Trump’s personal representatives, following Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi’s arrival in Islamabad for preliminary talks with Pakistani officials. Vice President JD Vance will not attend the negotiations.

The Trump administration simultaneously announced economic sanctions targeting a major China-based oil refinery and approximately 40 shipping companies and tankers transporting Iranian oil as leverage in negotiations. This action implements the administration’s threat of secondary sanctions on entities conducting business with Iran, designed to eliminate Iran’s oil export revenue. Trump previously claimed the outcome of Iran negotiations makes “no difference” to American interests, while also accusing Iran of committing a “serious violation” of ceasefire terms.

Pakistan’s capital Islamabad entered near-lockdown conditions Saturday as security forces established checkpoints, road closures, and diversions throughout the city in preparation for the high-level talks. Hundreds of thousands of residents faced disrupted commutes, with soldiers and police stationed at intersections and helicopters circling overhead, particularly near the airport where Iran’s delegation arrived. Pakistan is hosting the negotiations as part of mediation efforts between the United States and Iran.

Iran executed another man Saturday over alleged ties to Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency and participation in anti-government protests, continuing a pattern of executions following the conflict. Human rights advocates have documented that Iran conducts closed-door trials without permitting defendants adequate legal defense, with recent executions targeting alleged spies, protesters, and members of Iranian opposition groups in exile.

Germany announced plans to deploy minesweeper ships to the Mediterranean with potential transfer to the Strait of Hormuz following hostilities, pending parliamentary approval. Pakistan’s President Asif Ali Zardari is traveling to China for a week-long visit to discuss economic cooperation and the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, with discussions expected to include Pakistan’s role in facilitating U.S.-Iran negotiations.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/pakistan-iran-islamabad-jared-kushner-jd-vance-b2964803.html)

1 2 3 5