Category: Attack the Press

Trump’s Fort Bragg Rally Highlights Dangerous Alliance Between Military and Anti-Press Rhetoric

During a rally at Fort Bragg, President Donald Trump incited military personnel to boo the media, referring to them as “fake news.” This event marks yet another instance of Trump attempting to delegitimize journalistic entities while appealing to his supporters. Accompanying him was Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, signifying a troubling fusion of military and political rhetoric. Trump’s actions are emblematic of the Republican Party’s ongoing assault on the press, undermining democratic principles and fostering a hostile environment for free speech.

The rally also served as a platform for Trump to emphasize his administration’s controversial decision to restore the name “Fort Bragg,” after efforts by a previous administration to rename it “Fort Liberty.” The decision to revert to the original name, associated with Confederate General Braxton Bragg, shows allegiance to outdated and divisive historical figures. The party’s handlers conveniently framed the name change to honor a different soldier, further attempting to sanitize the legacy of racism that permeates their choices.

As Trump mocked the press and amplified the crowd’s jeers, he reinforced a narrative of victimhood, positioning himself as a target of media bias while simultaneously using military personnel as props in his political theater. His dismissive comments, like “what I have to put up with!” illustrate a tactic long employed by right-wing figures to distract from their failures and mobilize support through shared animosity toward a common enemy: the media.

This rally showcases a broader trend within the Republican Party of using military settings to legitimize their messaging. By uniting the armed forces with his anti-press rhetoric, Trump seeks to erase the line between civil discourse and blatant authoritarianism. This relationship reaffirms the dangerous precedent that political leaders can dictate the narrative and mold public opinion by stoking resentment against institutions that are supposed to provide accountability.

Ultimately, Trump’s rally at Fort Bragg exemplifies the troubling trajectory of modern Republican politics. By manipulating the military’s presence and vilifying the press, Trump aims to cultivate a culture of misinformation and control that erodes democratic ideals. The event underscores the need for vigilance against this ongoing assault on the truth and democratic values.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-goads-troops-at-fort-bragg-into-booing-the-media-look-what-i-have-to-put-up-with/)

ABC News Suspends Anchor Terry Moran at the Direction of Trump White House

ABC News has suspended veteran correspondent Terry Moran following a controversial social media post that criticized President Donald Trump and Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller. In a statement, ABC emphasized its commitment to objectivity and impartiality in news coverage, asserting that Moran’s comments did not reflect the network’s views and violated its standards, prompting an evaluation of his actions.

The now-deleted post on Moran’s social media account called Trump a “world-class hater,” suggesting that the former president’s animosity serves only to glorify himself, likening it to “spiritual nourishment.” This bold assertion has sparked reactions from Trump’s allies, who view it as further evidence of bias in mainstream media and are demanding accountability for Moran’s remarks.

Trump, known for his aggressive stance against news outlets he perceives as biased, has been involved in multiple legal actions against the press, including a $20 billion lawsuit against CBS for alleged deceptive editing in a “60 Minutes” interview with Kamala Harris. Moreover, he previously reached a settlement with ABC News after pursuing a libel lawsuit against them.

Miller, who has advised Trump since his first term and is a significant proponent of the administration’s strict immigration policies, responded to Moran’s critique by framing it as indicative of a larger issue within the corporate media, which he accused of adopting a radical stance while masquerading as impartial journalists.

Moran has been with ABC News since 1997 and recently conducted an interview with Trump during the early months of his second term. The fallout from his social media activity underscores the ongoing tensions between the Republican administration and the press amidst claims of bias and attacks on journalistic integrity.

(h/t: https://www.politico.com/news/2025/06/08/abc-correspondent-suspended-post-condemning-trump-00393929)

Trump Has Prepared Stash of Executive Orders to Distract Media

President Donald Trump’s administration consistently relied on a trove of executive orders and proclamations strategically crafted to influence public narrative and deflect from pressing issues. Months before his recent travel ban announcement, Trump’s team had prepped this controversial measure, showing a pattern of planned, reactive governance designed to control headlines and public discourse.

In announcing the travel ban, Trump attempted to link it to a criminal incident involving an Egyptian individual, even asserting that the threat posed by foreign nationals was significant. However, White House officials admitted that the proclamation was not a direct reaction to the event, highlighting the administration’s premeditated intentions rather than genuine response to security concerns.

Throughout his presidency, Trump utilized a plethora of executive actions to impose his priorities, often invoking crises to justify his administration’s decisions. White House personnel indicated that many orders were prepared in advance, waiting to be deployed at the president’s convenience, reflecting a tactical approach to governance that contrasts sharply with conventional legislative processes.

This tactic has led to a significant uptick in executive orders signed by Trump, surpassing the output of past presidents in mere months. In total, Trump has signed more than 150 executive orders in less than five months—a pace unprecedented in modern presidential history and indicative of a governing style focused on unilateral action rather than collaboration with Congress.

Trump’s governance emphasizes bravado over substance, utilizing executive powers swiftly while leaving legislative achievements largely unfulfilled. This pattern persists as he aims to consolidate authority and shape political narratives to favor his administration, revealing an authoritarian tendency that raises profound concerns about the erosion of democratic norms in the United States.

(h/t: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/06/06/trump-executive-orders-strategy/)

Trump’s Frivolous $20 Billion Lawsuit Against CBS Threatens Press Freedom and Journalistic Integrity

Donald Trump is claiming “mental anguish” from his contentious 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris, alleging that CBS News manipulated the footage to disadvantage him politically. This bizarre assertion is part of his ongoing $20 billion defamation lawsuit against CBS, where he argues that the First Amendment is being misused to protect media dishonesty. Trump’s legal team contends that the amended footage caused confusion for consumers and financial harm to his business interests, including Truth Social.

In this legal struggle, Trump’s demands—initially set at $25 million and an apology—show his disregard for journalistic integrity as he attempts to silence critical coverage. This lawsuit has been widely dismissed by legal experts as frivolous, undermining the fundamental principles of free speech and press freedom. Despite Trump’s threats, Paramount Global has shown interest in settling, especially as their merger plans hinge on a favorable relationship with the Trump administration.

Additionally, the pressure from Trump’s lawsuits has led to significant tension within CBS News, resulting in the resignations of high-profile executives, including 60 Minutes’ Bill Owens and CBS News chief Wendy McMahon. These resignations highlight the chilling effect Trump’s legal actions have on editorial independence and truth in journalism. The air of intimidation pursues not only media corporations but threatens the very tenets of journalism.

Amidst stalled negotiations, Trump continues to push the narrative that CBS and its parent company’s alleged editorial choices have maliciously distorted the public’s perception of him. His insistence that “the First Amendment is no shield to news distortion” serves to further erode trust in the media while aiming to establish a precedent where he can effectively weaponize litigation against any critical coverage.

The implications of Trump’s lawsuit extend beyond personal revenge; they threaten the integrity of media organizations. CBS is reportedly acting with caution, fearful of potential anti-bribery investigations if they concede to Trump’s demands. The balance between legal protection against defamation and the obligation to report truthfully is at jeopardy as Trump’s relentless attacks on the press continue to challenge the foundations of democracy.

Trump’s Frivolous $20 Billion Lawsuit Against CBS Threatens Press Freedom and Journalistic Integrity

Donald Trump is claiming “mental anguish” from his contentious 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris, alleging that CBS News manipulated the footage to disadvantage him politically. This bizarre assertion is part of his ongoing $20 billion defamation lawsuit against CBS, where he argues that the First Amendment is being misused to protect media dishonesty. Trump’s legal team contends that the amended footage caused confusion for consumers and financial harm to his business interests, including Truth Social.

In this legal struggle, Trump’s demands—initially set at $25 million and an apology—show his disregard for journalistic integrity as he attempts to silence critical coverage. This lawsuit has been widely dismissed by legal experts as frivolous, undermining the fundamental principles of free speech and press freedom. Despite Trump’s threats, Paramount Global has shown interest in settling, especially as their merger plans hinge on a favorable relationship with the Trump administration.

Additionally, the pressure from Trump’s lawsuits has led to significant tension within CBS News, resulting in the resignations of high-profile executives, including 60 Minutes’ Bill Owens and CBS News chief Wendy McMahon. These resignations highlight the chilling effect Trump’s legal actions have on editorial independence and truth in journalism. The air of intimidation pursues not only media corporations but threatens the very tenets of journalism.

Amidst stalled negotiations, Trump continues to push the narrative that CBS and its parent company’s alleged editorial choices have maliciously distorted the public’s perception of him. His insistence that “the First Amendment is no shield to news distortion” serves to further erode trust in the media while aiming to establish a precedent where he can effectively weaponize litigation against any critical coverage.

The implications of Trump’s lawsuit extend beyond personal revenge; they threaten the integrity of media organizations. CBS is reportedly acting with caution, fearful of potential anti-bribery investigations if they concede to Trump’s demands. The balance between legal protection against defamation and the obligation to report truthfully is at jeopardy as Trump’s relentless attacks on the press continue to challenge the foundations of democracy.

Trump Threatens ABC News Over Boeing 747 Coverage Amid Ongoing Media Lawsuits

Donald Trump has threatened ABC News following its coverage of a $400 million Boeing 747 gifted to the Defense Department by Qatar’s royal family. In a post on Truth Social, Trump claimed the network’s reporting has inaccurately suggested that the plane was intended as a personal gift to him. He warned ABC, labeling its journalists “SleazeBags” and demanding accountability for what he describes as misleading narratives.

Trump’s tirade comes after ABC News was reported to have settled a lawsuit with him for $15 million concerning past defamatory statements, emphasizing the controversial relationship he maintains with media outlets. He claimed, “Why doesn’t Chairman Bob Iger do something about ABC Fake News,” highlighting his ongoing battle against perceived criticism and unfavorable coverage.

During a White House press conference, when ABC’s Rachel Scott questioned Trump about the luxury plane being viewed as a personal gift, he reacted defensively, indicating embarrassment at the question rather than addressing the substance of the claim. His response avoided clarifying whether the lavish aircraft truly had any connection to him personally, leaving the implications of the transaction unclear.

Despite the controversy, Trump asserted that the plane donation was intended to benefit the United States military rather than himself, claiming it would save taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars. However, he failed to provide specific examples of media reports that purportedly misrepresented the intent of the gift.

In parallel, Trump is reportedly pursuing a settlement with CBS News regarding a supposedly edited interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris, illustrating a wider pattern of aggressive legal tactics against media organizations. These actions raise serious ethical concerns about Trump’s approach to handling dissenting opinions and journalistic scrutiny.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/news/trump-threatens-abc-over-coverage-of-qatar-jet-im-warning-these-sleazebags/)

Trump Falsely Claims ‘60 Minutes’ Admitted to ‘Crime’ of Editing Harris Interview

Former President Donald Trump has made false claims regarding CBS’s “60 Minutes,” alleging that the program admitted to a crime by editing an interview with Kamala Harris. This assertion comes alongside his $20 billion lawsuit against Paramount Global and CBS, which he insists is a “true WINNER.” Trump accused the network of deceitfully editing Harris’ response to a question, stating that this act undermined the integrity of the American electoral process and cheated the public.

Both Paramount and CBS have categorically denied Trump’s allegations, labeling his lawsuit as a direct attack on the First Amendment. They argue that Trump’s claims lack any foundation in law or fact. CBS News has stood firm, asserting that the “60 Minutes” broadcast of the Harris interview was neither manipulated nor deceptive.

According to reports, Trump’s legal team is entering mediation with Paramount Global to explore a possible resolution to his lawsuit. Previously, Trump expanded his claims under the federal Lanham Act, demanding at least $20 billion in damages, asserting that the editing of the interview could have affected the outcome of the election.

In a post on his social media platform, Truth Social, Trump claimed that the edited response from Harris was disgraceful, suggesting it would have significantly hampered her electoral performance had it been aired in full. He described the actions of CBS and its parent companies as a “Giant FRAUD against the American People,” insisting they should be held accountable for their alleged misconduct.

The New York Times reported on legal experts regarding the frivolity of Trump’s case, prompting him to lash out at the publication, suggesting it too could face consequences for “tortious interference” in elections. The lawsuit and resulting commentary reveal Trump’s ongoing crusade against media institutions he perceives as adversarial, undermining journalistic integrity while striving to consolidate power and control over the narrative.

(h/t: https://variety.com/2025/tv/news/trump-60-minutes-cbs-admitted-crime-harris-interview-mediation-1236382562/)

Pam Bondi Erodes Press Protections, Reviving Trump-era Threats to Journalism

The U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi has retracted critical protections for journalists put in place during the Biden administration, allowing federal investigators to access communications from media organizations in leak investigations. This move signals a troubling shift in the Justice Department’s stance, corresponding with the Trump administration’s continued hostility towards news outlets it perceives as adversarial.

In a memo obtained by CNN, Bondi claims that the previous administration offered excessive protections to media outlets and accused them of engaging in selective leaking. She stated, “Safeguarding classified, privileged, and other sensitive information is essential to effective government and law enforcement,” further asserting that unauthorized disclosures undermine Trump’s policies and harm the American people.

This policy reversal comes after the Trump administration had previously engaged in aggressive actions against journalists and their sources, signaling a return to tactics reminiscent of that era. Under Bondi, the Justice Department is expected to pursue inquiries into individuals leaking documents to the press, which could further threaten journalistic independence.

While Bondi assures that procedural protections will remain to limit the pursuit of news organization records, the implications of her memo suggest a reinvigorated approach to investigating media leaks. Advocates for press freedom, including the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, emphasize that historical significant journalism depended on the protection of confidential sources, which is now at risk.

Journalistic integrity is under siege as this shift underscores the ongoing struggle between a free press and an administration that seeks to silence dissenting voices and manipulate news coverage to its advantage. The ramifications for investigative journalism and the broader implications for democracy are grave, as trust in the media continues to be undermined by authoritarian tendencies.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/25/politics/justice-department-journalists-leaks/index.html)

60 Minutes Executive Producer Resigns Amid Trump-Driven Press Pressure

The executive producer of 60 Minutes, Bill Owens, announced his resignation, citing a loss of journalistic independence amid Donald Trump’s targeted attacks on the program. In a memo to staff, Owens expressed his inability to continue leading the show in a manner consistent with its long-standing values, stating, “I would not be allowed to run the show as I have always run it.” This resignation comes during a tumultuous time for the program, which has faced increasing pressure since Trump filed a $10 billion lawsuit against CBS News.

Owens’ exit shocked the staff and executives at 60 Minutes, revealing deep concerns within the organization over Trump’s unfounded allegations of “unlawful and illegal behavior.” Sources indicated that there was widespread dismay among employees, as they felt Owens had stood firm against Trump’s pressures, which has only intensified since Trump disparaged the show on social media, claiming its reporting was “fraudulent” without providing any credible evidence.

Trump’s ongoing grievance stems from an interview with Kamala Harris that he deemed unfairly edited, a perspective that many in the network view as an infringement on editorial autonomy. As the situation escalates, controlling shareholder Shari Redstone’s motivations for settling Trump’s lawsuit raised concerns about compromising journalistic integrity and autonomy, as many staff members fear surrendering to Trump’s relentless campaigns against critical media outlets.

Despite Owens’ departure, he assured that 60 Minutes would persist in its mission to cover future administrations with the same commitment to integrity. His resignation is considered both a courageous stand for independent journalism and a troubling sign of the increasing attacks on press freedom. Experts warn that Trump’s actions could embolden his critics and further threaten the independence of media reporting.

Owens’ departure follows a historical precedent in which 60 Minutes, revered for its investigative journalism, now faces the challenge of protecting its editorial mission against the backdrop of increasing political interference. CBS News President Wendy McMahon reiterated her commitment to the program, although uncertainty looms over how the show will navigate its future in the wake of political pressure from powerful figures like Trump.

Trump’s Dangerous Misinformation Campaign Targets Immigrants and Undermines Justice

In a deeply troubling display of misinformation, President Donald Trump recently called for legal repercussions against Democrats and media members who supported Kilmar Ábrego García, a man wrongfully deported to El Salvador. Trump accused those defending García of perpetuating a “dangerous LIE,” branding him as a member of the violent MS-13 gang despite the absence of any substantive evidence supporting this claim. His remarks highlight a dangerous tendency to vilify immigrants and those advocating for human rights.

Trump’s rhetoric demonstrates a blatant disregard for both the facts of García’s case and the judicial processes involved. Two separate courts had explicitly ruled on García’s wrongful deportation, underscoring the administration’s failure to comply with legal guidelines and basic human rights. By framing this situation as an attack on America’s security rather than an injustice, Trump continues his ongoing campaign of fear-mongering, which serves to rally his base while undermining judicial integrity.

His assertive statements suggest a chilling comfort with escalating tensions surrounding immigrants, reflecting a broader Republican strategy that uses immigration as a divisive political weapon. By labeling opponents as “Radical Lunatic Democrats” and dismissing legitimate concerns for García’s rights as “unAmerican,” Trump not only stokes discriminatory sentiments but also reinforces a narrative that prioritizes punitive measures over justice and compassion.

This pattern of disregard extends beyond individual cases, revealing Trump’s administration’s systemic approach to ignoring court orders and promoting xenophobic policies. Such defiance of the judiciary raises serious questions about the administration’s respect for the rule of law and reflects a larger trend of authoritarian governance where dissent is met with aggression rather than reasoned debate.

Ultimately, Trump’s comments appeal to his base while undermining the legal system meant to guarantee justice and fairness for all, especially the most vulnerable. In a democracy, accountability should extend to all, including those at the highest levels of government who perpetuate harmful narratives against marginalized communities.

(h/t: https://www.rawstory.com/trump-held-responsible-court/)

1 2 3 … 68