Category: Crimes Against Humanity

Trump Claims US Taking Billions Barrels Oil Venezuela

President Donald Trump declared on Wednesday that the U.S. has extracted "billions and billions of barrels of oil from Venezuela," describing the seizure as payment for a 48-minute military operation that captured then-President Nicolás Maduro in January. Trump justified the resource extraction by invoking the phrase "to the victor belong the spoils," framing the takeover of Venezuela's sovereign oil reserves as a standard practice of war, despite international law explicitly prohibiting such seizures.

Trump's statement follows the January abduction of Maduro by U.S. special forces and his current detention in a New York jail on drug trafficking charges. Vice President Delcy Rodríguez assumed the presidency and has complied with American demands, while Secretary of State Marco Rubio functions as de facto viceroy over the nation, controlling Venezuela's finances, natural resources, and government appointments from Washington. Trump stated the volume of oil extracted has paid for the war "many, many, many times over."

The president applied the same reasoning to Iran, stating "we're doing the same thing, by the way, in the lovely Islamic Republic of Iran. We're knocking the hell out of them." His comments arrive as Iran has closed the Strait of Hormuz, a critical shipping channel controlling roughly 20% of global oil flow, following the commencement of a U.S.-Israeli air campaign against the country in February.

Trump has previously criticized the George W. Bush administration's 2003 invasion of Iraq, specifically objecting to Bush's failure to seize Iraqi oil reserves to offset military expenses. The current president's boasts about extracting Venezuelan resources and applying identical tactics to Iran demonstrate his explicit endorsement of resource confiscation as wartime policy, contradicting international conventions that classify such seizures as war crimes and violations of the laws of occupation.

Under modern international law, seizing another nation's natural resources as "spoils of war" is strictly illegal and constitutes a war crime known as pillage. Frameworks like the Hague Regulations of 1907 and the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 explicitly prohibit the plunder of public or private property during an armed conflict. Furthermore, if a country militarily occupies another, it is legally considered merely a temporary administrator of those resources; it can only use them to support the local population or manage the immediate occupation, not to enrich its own domestic economy or pay for the war. Consequently, forcibly extracting sovereign resources like oil for the victor's profit directly violates the laws of occupation, contradicts the United Nations Charter, and is prosecutable as a war crime under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/trump-brags-hes-taking-billions-of-barrels-of-oil-from-venezuela-because-to-the-victor-belong-the-spoils/)

Trump Admin Subpoenas NY Times Reporter Over North Korea Story

The Trump administration subpoenaed freelance New York Times reporter Matthew Cole over his reporting on a failed classified military operation in North Korea, according to the Times. Federal Bureau of Investigation agents delivered the subpoena to Cole’s New York home on behalf of prosecutors in Virginia, demanding two years of his contacts and sources. Cole’s attorney, David A. O’Neil, stated the reporter will defend press freedom and the First Amendment against what he characterized as the administration’s direct attacks on journalists.

This subpoena follows the administration’s earlier assault on Times journalists covering Air Force One security vulnerabilities. Prosecutors initially subpoenaed four Times reporters, including Julian E. Barnes, Eric Lipton, and Eric Schmitt, and sought phone records for the journalists and their relatives. U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian questioned whether prosecutors followed legal standards for journalist subpoenas, and the Department of Justice ultimately withdrew those subpoenas under judicial pressure.

Trump claimed the subpoenas targeted “leakers” rather than journalists, stating he did not know “what’s appropriate and what’s not” regarding such legal actions. He framed the pursuit as necessary for national security, saying the administration must compel journalists to identify their sources to find people he described as “cowards,” “unpatriotic,” and “treasonous.” This language demonstrates the administration’s weaponization of the justice system to suppress press freedom and intimidate sources willing to expose government misconduct.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-administration-reportedly-subpoenas-new-york-times-freelancer-over-north-korea-story/)

Trump Dismantles ICC to Shield Netanyahu, Putin From War Crimes

President Trump’s administration has declared official policy to dismantle the International Criminal Court “brick by brick,” targeting the institution that has issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and investigated alleged U.S. war crimes in Afghanistan. The State Department announced it will impose “increased scrutiny” and sanctions on nations that refuse to reject the ICC’s authority, particularly those relying on U.S. military protection, including the UK, France, Germany, and Japan. Sanctions already imposed on ICC judges and officials include freezing personal bank accounts and blocking access to U.S.-based services including Uber, booking.com, Microsoft, and Google.

Trump’s campaign represents an alliance with authoritarian regimes, as the State Department is working with nations outside the ICC framework, suggesting coordination with Russia and China to prevent prosecution of those accused of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and war crimes. This shift abandons decades of U.S. precedent: the nation championed the post-World War II Nuremberg trials, authorized ICC investigation into Darfur genocide in 2005, and encouraged prosecution of Vladimir Putin for Ukraine war crimes under the Biden administration. Trump has consistently opposed the ICC since his first term, when he sanctioned officials investigating alleged U.S. war crimes in Afghanistan, escalating after the court issued the Netanyahu warrant.

The ICC faces internal crises that complicate its defense against Trump’s assault. Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan faces suspension and potential removal following sexual abuse allegations from two women; the court’s governing body voted to suspend him last month, with member states voting Friday on his removal. The institution has also bungled high-profile cases, including prosecutions of Kenyan politicians Uhuru Kenyatta and William Ruto, where witness disappearances and collusion between defendants undermined justice. Staff describe the working environment in The Hague as toxic and increasingly high-pressure.

Despite these weaknesses, the ICC’s existence carries consequences: Netanyahu and Putin remain permanently designated as indicted war criminals with restricted global movement, and former Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte faces trial for crimes against humanity during his “war on drugs.” Luis Moreno Ocampo, the court’s first chief prosecutor, directly attributes Trump’s determination to destroy the ICC to his own exposure: “Trump knows he could be a target after he leaves office. The ICC is a huge obstacle for him.”

The court’s largest donor nations must resist intimidation and maintain support, according to observers and legal experts. UK Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband stated upon appointment that international law faces threats unseen since World War II. Trump’s assault on the ICC enables him to escape accountability while permitting dictators and war criminals to act with impunity, fundamentally dismantling the post-1945 international rules-based order designed to ensure consequences for mass atrocities.



(Source: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jul/24/icc-international-criminal-court-trump-putin-netanyahu?fbclid=IwVERDUATQ0bZwZG9mBWZkaWQWULJ-YpidFfjBPjt05fgN9zBPq04BJGV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR4ILfJkNdN72pcK7L1piyajEfd5Z16OWmoYKkSngDbF6cWfgJpgPIgo6gEutQ_aem_Bp5zpMlYaf63eWIufoz6sA)

Trump Suggests Images of Iran School Bombing Were AI

President Donald Trump suggested during a Fox News interview Tuesday that images documenting a U.S. airstrike on an Iranian school may have been artificially generated, deflecting from mounting evidence that American missiles killed at least 150 people, including approximately 120 children. When confronted with photographic evidence showing fragments consistent with U.S. Tomahawk missiles at the strike site, Trump dismissed the documentation as potentially “AI generated” without providing any basis for the claim.

Trump declined to commit to releasing the findings of his administration’s ongoing investigation into the bombing, telling Fox News chief foreign correspondent Trey Yingst that “I don’t think anybody’s going to ever be able to say what happened there.” When pressed on whether he would eventually disclose the results, Trump offered only a noncommittal “I guess so” and suggested his “military people” might have undisclosed reasons to withhold findings.

Internal administration sources previously told The New York Times that officials believed the school was struck by U.S. missiles, contradicting the initial public claim that Iran was responsible. Trump has explicitly rejected negotiations to end the Iran conflict, stating he does not want to pursue diplomatic solutions while simultaneously obscuring accountability for civilian casualties.

Trump’s dismissal of physical evidence as fabricated and his refusal to guarantee transparency on a catastrophic attack killing over 100 children demonstrates his systematic obstruction of accountability for actions taken under his authority. His administration has escalated military actions against Iran, including reimposing a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, while simultaneously suppressing documentation of civilian harm resulting from those operations.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-suggests-images-of-iran-school-bombing-were-ai-generated-doesnt-commit-to-releasing-results-of-investigation/)neously suppressing documentation of civilian harm resulting from those operations.

Trump Flat-Out Says ‘I Don’t Want To Negotiate’ End To War

President Donald Trump explicitly rejected negotiations to end hostilities with Iran during a Fox News interview on Tuesday, stating “I don’t want to negotiate now.” This declaration came amid renewed U.S. military strikes on Iran, which U.S. officials claim violated a memorandum of understanding designed to pause fighting while both countries negotiated terms.

The conflict centers on control of the Strait of Hormuz, where Iran has attacked and struck tankers transiting through Omani territorial waters. Iran asserts that Article 5 of the memorandum requires vessels to arrange safe passage through Iranian waters; the U.S. has resumed its blockade of Iranian ships in the Gulf of Oman in response. When Fox News correspondent Trey Yingst asked whether Trump was negotiating with the wrong Iranian leadership, Trump doubled down, saying “Three days ago, we had a deal” but refused further discussions.

Trump later threatened Iran with annihilation, stating the country should make a deal or “You’re not gonna have anybody left.” This escalation reflects the trajectory set in February when Trump launched the war in coordination with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who reportedly assured the president that military action could swiftly topple Iran’s government and that the Strait of Hormuz would remain open.

Trump’s refusal to pursue diplomatic resolution contradicts the framework of the existing memorandum and eliminates any immediate path to de-escalation. His explicit rejection of negotiation while simultaneously threatening annihilation demonstrates an intent to prosecute military conflict without diplomatic constraints.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/trump-flat-out-says-i-dont-want-to-negotiate-end-to-war/)rejection of negotiation while simultaneously threatening annihilation demonstrates an intent to prosecute military conflict without diplomatic constraints.

Trump warns he will ‘blow up’ Iran if peace deal not reached | The Independent

President Donald Trump threatened to destroy Iran’s infrastructure, stating the “whole country is going to get blown up” if the nation does not reach a peace agreement with the United States. Trump’s ultimatum comes as a two-week ceasefire expires on Wednesday and follows the collapse of peace talks in Pakistan that Vice President JD Vance led.

The core dispute centers on Iran’s nuclear program, with the U.S. demanding its complete dismantling. The United States has implemented a blockade of Iranian ports to restrict oil sales as leverage in negotiations. Trump framed his threat as a shift in approach, declaring “no more mr Nice Guy” while threatening new military strikes on Iran if a deal is not finalized.

Negotiations are expected to resume with special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, though confusion persists regarding Vice President Vance’s role in future discussions. The escalation reflects Trump’s pattern of issuing inflammatory threats as negotiating tactics, following Pentagon briefings touting military operations against Iran as successful.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/bulletin/news/iran-war-peace-deal-trump-b2960611.html)

Trump Threatens Iran Annihilation by 8 PM Deadline

President Donald Trump escalated threats against Iran on Tuesday, declaring that “a whole civilization will die tonight” if the country does not capitulate to his demands by an 8 p.m. Eastern Time deadline. Trump’s ultimatum requires Iran to agree to a peace deal and reopen the Strait of Hormuz or face bombardment of civilian infrastructure including bridges, power plants, and desalination facilities. Trump stated the U.S. possesses plans to destroy Iran’s infrastructure within four hours and return the country to the “stone ages,” continuing a pattern of threats he first issued on March 21.

Trump has repeatedly extended his original 48-hour deadline while oscillating between apocalyptic threats and claims that negotiations are proceeding well. On Sunday, Trump told ABC News he would “blow up the entire country” if no agreement was reached. On Monday, he told White House reporters the country “could be taken out in one night,” while simultaneously stating “maybe something revolutionarily wonderful can happen” with Iran’s current leadership. When confronted about whether such attacks would constitute war crimes under international law, Trump dismissed the concern and argued that Iran possessing nuclear weapons constitutes the actual war crime.

Negotiations between the U.S. and Iran continued via mediators including Pakistan, with the U.S. attempting to broker a 45-day ceasefire ahead of Trump’s deadline. Iran rejected a U.S.-backed mediator proposal on Monday and offered its own 10-point plan described by a U.S. official as maximalist. The New York Times reported Tuesday that Iran told Pakistan it was no longer engaging in ceasefire talks, though ABC News has not independently confirmed this claim. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt stated that “only the President knows where things stand and what he will do.”

Iran vowed a “regret-inducing” response if the U.S. attacks its energy infrastructure, and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps told neighboring Gulf countries it would no longer exercise “restraint” in selecting regional targets for retaliation. Iran’s deputy minister of sports and youth called for citizens to form human chains around power plants in response to Trump’s threats.

Republican Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin expressed hope that Trump’s threats are “bluster” and stated his opposition to destroying civilian infrastructure, saying “We are not at war with the Iranian people. We are trying to liberate them.” Legal experts have warned that attacks on civilian infrastructure could violate international law and constitute war crimes, though Trump dismissed such concerns as irrelevant.

(Source: https://abcnews.com/Politics/trump-hours-deadline-threatens-irans-civilization-die-tonight/story?id=131797915)

Trump Kicks Off Presser With Haunting Threat Against Iran

During a Monday press conference, President Donald Trump opened remarks about the rescue of two American military pilots by threatening Iran with annihilation, stating the country “could be taken out in one night, and that night might be tomorrow night.” Trump framed the pilot rescue as a major military achievement while escalating his rhetoric about the ongoing conflict with Iran.

Trump claimed the rescue mission represented “one of the largest, most complex most harrowing combat searches” ever attempted, describing U.S. operations in the region as succeeding “at a level that nobody’s ever seen before.” The president also characterized the Easter holiday as “one of our better Easters” partly due to military performance, conflating religious observance with military aggression.

The threat came after Trump posted to Truth Social on Easter Sunday that “Tuesday will be Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day, all wrapped up in one, in Iran,” explicitly targeting civilian infrastructure. Trump’s post included vulgar language directed at Iran and referenced the Strait of Hormuz, demonstrating a pattern of escalating threats against Iranian civilian targets that violate post-World War II international law prohibiting attacks on non-military locations.

Trump’s rhetoric follows previous threats to commit war crimes against Iran at a White House briefing where he falsely blamed American journalists for revealing the downed pilot’s location, despite an Israeli journalist citing Iranian state media breaking the story first. Trump demanded identification and prosecution of the alleged leaker while dismissing concerns about violations of international law prohibiting civilian infrastructure attacks.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei rejected a U.S. ceasefire proposal and stated that Iran is reviewing a Pakistani-authored pause plan ahead of Trump’s deadline. Baghaei emphasized that negotiations are incompatible with ultimatums and threats to commit war crimes, indicating Iran views Trump’s public threats as precluding serious diplomatic engagement.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-issues-haunting-threat-iran-could-be-taken-out-in-one-night-and-that-night-might-be-tomorrow-night/)

Trump Threatens Iran War Crimes, Falsely Blames Media for Pilot Leak

During a Monday White House briefing, Trump used a press conference ostensibly about a successful pilot rescue to threaten extensive war crimes against Iran, including attacks on civilian infrastructure like bridges, power plants, and desalinization facilities. Trump falsely claimed that American journalists had revealed the downed pilot's location to Iran, when an Israeli journalist citing Iranian state media actually broke the story first, then demanded the identification and prosecution of the supposed leaker.

Trump reiterated threats to destroy Iran's civilian infrastructure after an 8 p.m. Tuesday deadline, stating "they're gonna have no bridges, they're gonna have no power plants" and describing the outcome as returning Iran to the "stone ages." When confronted about violations of post-World War II international law prohibiting attacks on civilian targets, Trump dismissed the concern and attacked the New York Times reporter who posed the question rather than address the substance of the war crimes allegation.

Trump claimed he had intercepted communications from Iranians urging the U.S. to continue bombing their neighborhoods, asserting they would "suffer that in order to have freedom" under his campaign to weaken Iran's government. He also proposed that the U.S. could charge "tolls" for shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, framing such extraction as payment for a war he claimed the U.S. had already won, despite ongoing conflict.

CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth spent the briefing praising Trump for ordering a routine rescue mission as if it were an extraordinary achievement, with Hegseth claiming the current bombing campaign represents the "largest volume" of munitions dropped on Iran since the war began. Trump also employed a racist slur during the event, underscoring the press conference's chaotic and inflammatory tone.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei rejected a U.S. ceasefire proposal and stated that Iran is reviewing a Pakistani-authored pause plan ahead of Trump's deadline. Baghaei emphasized that negotiations are incompatible with ultimatums and threats to commit war crimes, and that Iran would release its formal response in due time.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-iran-press-conference-war-crime-threats-b2952604.html)

Trump Threatens War Crimes Of Iran Oil Seizure, Power Plant Destruction

Donald Trump threatened military action against Iran, stating he would “blow everything up and take over the oil” if negotiations for a deal are not completed by Monday. Trump also warned that “bridges and power plants” across Iran would be targeted for destruction if an agreement is not reached quickly, according to remarks made during a Fox News interview on Sunday.

Trump claimed that Iran is currently engaged in negotiations and expressed confidence a deal is possible within the stated timeframe. His threats escalate the military confrontation with Iran that has already destabilized global energy markets, raising the stakes for broader regional conflict and economic disruption.

Trump asserted without evidence that the United States attempted to supply arms to Iranian protesters in January and suggested Kurdish forces may have retained those weapons. These claims lack substantiation and appear designed to justify further military aggression against the nation.

The president’s ultimatum to seize Iranian oil resources constitutes a threat of illegal war of aggression and theft of a sovereign nation’s natural resources. Combined with threats to destroy critical civilian infrastructure including power plants, Trump’s statements describe potential crimes against humanity that have prompted massive nationwide protests under the “No Kings” banner opposing his Iran war policies.

These threats demonstrate Trump’s willingness to pursue unilateral military action and resource seizure to force compliance with his demands, disregarding international law and the sovereignty of Iran.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/bulletin/news/trump-iran-war-oil-deal-b2952169.html)

1 2 3 … 6