Category: Corruption

Trump Pushes Controversial F-35 Sale to Saudi Arabia

The Trump administration’s decision to sell nearly 50 F-35 jets to Saudi Arabia has sparked controversy, reflecting ongoing debates over foreign policy and national security. This move comes as a significant shift for the U.S., raising concerns in Congress about the implications of such a deal. Specifically, lawmakers like Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi worry that the sale could potentially place sensitive military technology within the reach of China, given Saudi Arabia’s ties with the country.

Despite these concerns, the State Department defends the transaction by asserting that it aligns with U.S. foreign policy and national security goals and will not disturb the military balance in the region. However, key concerns revolve around Saudi Arabia’s potential sharing of the technology with China, exacerbating tensions within the U.S. government regarding the implications for regional stability and global security.

The current arrangement is reminiscent of the relationship between Trump and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. Their previous dealings, including a $142 billion arms agreement, underline a continued U.S. commitment to backing Saudi Arabia despite its controversial human rights record. This connection has been characterized by critics as prioritizing military contracts over ethical considerations.

This deal comes at a time when Saudi Arabia is actively engaged in conflict with Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen, ultimately involving regional dynamics that the U.S. supports through arms sales. This backdrop illustrates the intricate web of geopolitical strategies and conflicts influencing U.S. arms dealings in the Middle East.

In light of prior arms deals and the murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, Congress has previously questioned weapon sales to Saudi Arabia. The Trump administration’s current decision reflects ongoing partnerships and strategic priorities which have alarmed certain U.S. lawmakers concerned about regional stability and human rights.



(Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/why-us-plan-sell-f-004217035.html?link_source=ta_first_comment&taid=6aad9139566c320001c789e6&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwcGRvZgVmZGlkFlDq21aMFtdw9uu2ihJuAMnZeMCSX-JleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeUQLWtYWz1fGd9jCjz24ywe10xIkd7–N90T7teGQBzAVDJIW6C5YGl183P0_aem__4kxpS7FDsK-gyEFJG4A4g)

Trump’s EPA Scraps Power Plant Emissions Rule, Ignoring Climate Crisis

The Trump administration’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has taken another step to dismantle environmental regulations by eliminating a rule that limits emissions of planet-warming greenhouse gases from power plants. This regressive move undoes the previous protections aimed at curbing harmful emissions, signaling a blatant disregard for environmental science and the escalating climate crisis.

EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler argued that the previous rule was too restrictive and hindered economic growth, echoing Trump’s broader agenda of prioritizing corporate interests over environmental health. This decision aligns with Trump’s authoritarian approach that dismisses the urgent and scientifically-backed need for emissions control to mitigate climate change impacts.

Critics, including environmental groups and scientists, have decried the rule’s elimination as a dangerous step backward in the fight against global warming. They warn that increased emissions from power plants will exacerbate climate change, further endangering public health and the planet’s future.

This act of environmental sabotage fits Trump’s established pattern of ignoring or undermining scientific expertise and prioritizing short-term economic gains over long-term sustainability. His administration has consistently placed fossil fuel industry interests above environmental protection, reflecting a reckless disregard for planetary well-being.

As the global community continues to confront the realities of climate change, the Trump administration’s actions stand in stark contrast to international efforts to curb emissions and protect the environment. This decision not only undermines progress but also highlights the urgent need for leadership that respects science and prioritizes sustainable policies.



(Source: https://apnews.com/article/epa-power-plants-trump-coal-gas-climate-cac1c2c75f8656d8eaf5f0a240edae15?utm_campaign=TrueAnthem&utm_medium=AP&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwdGRjcAUVVrpwZG9mBWZkaWQWUOZ9nXXGhNLXlHwKPj8ipzXP7OafgmV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR7WTYTrh3K_esxfN1sqau0ZhTTQpWmZjlff-zW8nWq9GBhl4o1kcBr8Yjk1kA_aem_AZJcYfMJ5GNWaovRvGRaxw)

Trump’s $5K Checks Defy Congress and Reality

Donald Trump has claimed that his proposal to distribute $5,000 checks to every American does not require Congressional approval. During a speech at the GOP midterm convention in Dallas, Trump unveiled this plan, which he conditioned on Republicans maintaining control of Congress. The plan, is criticized across the political spectrum, with some Democrats calling it “socialism for the rich” and fiscal conservatives worrying about its $1.3 trillion cost.

Trump, in an interview with CBS News, insisted that the U.S. had generated trillions from tariffs and investments, suggesting such efforts funded his proposal without Congress. However, Trump’s statements faced scrutiny as fact-checkers, like CNN’s Daniel Dale, revealed inaccuracies, noting tariffs generated far less revenue. Additionally, Trump’s claim of over $20 trillion in new investments is unsubstantiated, with federal data indicating much lower figures.

A review found that the purported $11.2 trillion in investments touted by the White House was exaggerated. The administration counted vague pledges rather than actual investments, lessening the reliability of these numbers. Fact-checkers assert Trump frequently makes these exaggerated claims, despite lacking evidence from government sources.

Overall, Trump’s proposal to unilaterally issue $5,000 checks underlines his authoritarian tendencies aiming to bypass institutional checks like Congress. His unchecked assertions fuel skepticism regarding the feasibility and legality of such financial distributions without legislative backing.

This proposal aligns with Trump’s history of making untenable financial promises, reflecting a pattern of disinformation that misguides the public on economic realities, raising serious concerns about governance under his leadership.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump/just-in-trump-claims-his-5k-check-proposal-wont-need-congressional-approval/)

Jimmy Kimmel Moves Political Interview Online Amid FCC Threats

ABC’s “Jimmy Kimmel Live” decided to move an interview with Texas State Rep. James Talarico, a Democratic Senate candidate, from television to YouTube. This decision came after frequent threats from a politically charged FCC under Chairman Brendan Carr, who has aggressively targeted critics of Donald Trump’s administration. ABC is wary of potential repercussions for its local stations, especially in Texas, stemming from these FCC threats.

Previously, similar tactics were employed against “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert,” where legal concerns prevented the airing of a Talarico interview. This incident ultimately led to significant fundraising and viewership on YouTube for Talarico’s campaign. Kimmel has expressed concern over these developments as traditional editorial decisions are hindered by political pressures, differing from past presidents’ more open stance towards media appearances.

The FCC’s actions are viewed as an extraordinary assault on free speech rights by ABC, which has filed a lawsuit against the commission. This move underscores the growing tension and alleged misuse of regulatory powers to control media narratives that challenge or criticize the Trump administration.

Kimmel’s candid remarks highlight the discrepancy between past and present media relations under Trump. He notes how Trump previously participated in such interviews himself without issue, indicating a shift towards more authoritarian measures as president. These developments emphasize the importance of engaging with alternative media platforms like YouTube in the face of increased governmental interference.

In this polarized political climate, Kimmel emphasizes the importance of staying informed and encourages viewers to register and vote, recognizing these as critical steps to upholding democracy amidst an era marked by Trump’s authoritarian-style governance.



(Source: https://variety.com/2026/tv/news/jimmy-kimmel-live-james-talarico-youtube-fcc-1236856911/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAUP_0BwZG9mBWZkaWQWUOJAaWZZa-ssDhFzBXIVEHv2IERvsGV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR7j6SjTJok0sUVYM5u57GVnL52Z2PUJObe7DaTg5h3gdeKma1_6lZsarVQUNw_aem_H3iPmKflc1gb_T6ZdtGzDw&utm_id=97758_v0_s00_e0_tv4_a1demo0htc1t2h)

Trump Celebrates Supreme Court Ballroom Win as Construction Resumes

President Donald Trump declared victory Wednesday after the Supreme Court cleared his administration to resume construction on a $400 million White House ballroom complex, which he announced via Truth Social as “a gift to America.” Trump celebrated “hundreds of happy construction workers” beginning work on the project, claiming it represents “the finest Ballroom/Military complex anywhere in the World” and that victory came only after a “long, hard fight in the Court System.”

The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 Monday to block lower court decisions halting construction, allowing work to proceed while the National Trust for Historic Preservation’s lawsuit continues. The group contends Trump lacks authority to undertake the sweeping construction without congressional approval. The Court’s majority did not address the project’s ultimate legality, instead finding the preservation group “lacks standing” to challenge it and that lower courts had “likely exceeded” their authority in ordering construction stopped.

Chief Justice John Roberts, a conservative, joined the Court’s three liberal justices in dissent, stating the “decision is no victory for the separation of powers.” Roberts argued that “construction is likely unlawful” because Congress has not approved the project, directly contradicting the majority’s position and signaling deep institutional concerns about executive overreach.

Trump demolished the historic East Wing of the White House last fall to make way for the ballroom, an action that preceded any judicial approval of the undertaking. This construction pattern aligns with Trump’s documented focus on construction projects, which consumed over a quarter of his public speaking time during early 2026, dominating his messaging across dozens of events.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/online/trump-takes-court-victory-lap-as-construction-resumes-on-ballroom/)ss dozens of events.

Trump Mint Coins Violate Federal Law Banning Living Presidents

The U.S. Mint announced Wednesday that $1 coins bearing President Donald Trump’s image have entered circulation and are available for purchase on its website. This action violates federal law prohibiting living presidents from appearing on U.S. coinage under 31 U.S. Code § 5112 and the Circulating Collectible Coin Redesign Act of 2020, which mandates at least two years must pass after a president’s death before their likeness can be depicted on coins.

Trump’s administration has repeatedly exploited federal currency laws to enrich itself and promote the Trump brand. The Treasury Department previously violated law with a presidential gold coin, and the administration has signaled willingness to change legislation to enable a $250 bill featuring Trump if Congress acts. This pattern reflects Trump’s weaponization of government agencies to advance personal financial interests and perpetuate his political brand.

The coin release follows Trump family cryptocurrency ventures designed to extract wealth from supporters. Trump’s sons and associates have already partnered with UFC to sell commemorative coins ranging from $250 to $12,000, and UFC pays fighters in Trump crypto through World Liberty Financial, a Trump family cryptocurrency operation launched in 2024. These schemes demonstrate how Trump uses his position to convert government resources and public platforms into direct profit.

The Mint’s action exemplifies the systematic dismantling of institutional safeguards against authoritarian abuse of power. By openly violating established law without consequence, Trump normalizes executive lawlessness and signals that government agencies exist to serve his personal enrichment rather than the public interest. The story remains developing.



(Source: https://abcnews.com/amp/Politics/trump-1-coins-circulation-us-mint/story?id=136142051)

Trump White House Spends $250K on Bowling Alley

The Trump White House is spending more than $250,000 on renovations to its private bowling alley, a project that echoes Republican attacks on similar spending during the Obama administration. The General Services Administration awarded a nearly $253,000 contract in July to Charles Mann Enterprises for lighting work at the two-lane Harry S. Truman Bowling Alley, with an additional $8,800 contract in August for escort services to accompany workers through secure areas.

In 2014, the GSA proposed a far more extensive bowling alley renovation under President Barack Obama, which the agency determined was necessary because the lanes were “irreparable.” The project faced swift Republican backlash and was canceled within 90 minutes of public reporting, with the GOP-controlled House passing an amendment to block federal funding. Former Representative Pat Meehan (R-PA) argued the renovation was a “want,” not a “need,” comparing it to ice cream.

The current renovation stands in stark contrast to the Republican position on taxpayer spending for the same facility just 12 years ago. While First Lady Melania Trump led a restoration of the bowling alley’s wooden lane in 2019 during Trump’s first term, that project was funded by the Bowling Proprietors’ Association of America rather than federal dollars.

On the same day as the escort services contract, the GSA awarded Charles Mann Enterprises an $878,000 contract for an “EEOB basement studio project,” though the agency provided no details on whether the two projects are connected. The bowling alley is located in the EEOB basement, which houses executive offices. Neither the White House nor the GSA responded to requests for comment on the renovation work.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump/trump-white-house-plans-250k-bowling-alley-renovation/)

Donald Trump Slams Judge Deciding Kennedy Center’s Fate

Trump continues his campaign to rename and renovate the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, attacking the federal judge overseeing the legal challenge to his efforts. On Truth Social, Trump called the building “old and decrepit” and accused the judge of being “highly conflicted” for blocking his plan to inscribe his name on the structure. In May, a federal judge ruled that only Congress holds authority to rename the institution, which was built to honor President John F. Kennedy.

Trump violated federal law by adding his name to the building’s facade without authorization, then had the sign covered with a tarp in June to conceal the violation. Rather than comply with the court’s ruling, Trump’s Justice Department lawyers have argued that blocking his $250 million renovation project would render the building so unsafe it would require demolition, a threat designed to pressure Congress into allowing the rename. Trump’s allies are attempting to circumvent Congressional approval by proposing an inscription reading “Renovated and Restored by President Donald J. Trump.”

Rep. Joyce Beatty, a Democrat from Ohio and ex officio member of the Kennedy Center’s Board of Trustees, characterized Trump’s renovation and renaming scheme as “very childish” after an emergency court hearing held Thursday. Beatty invoked Trump’s controversial alterations to the White House as evidence of his destructive approach to historic institutions, stating “We’ve seen what he’s done, in the most embarrassing ways, to the White House.”

The Kennedy Center, a storied performing arts venue, has faced significant operational challenges since Trump assumed his chairmanship. Artists have withdrawn from performances, and ticket sales have declined sharply, though Trump blamed the downturn on the need for renovations rather than acknowledging his role in driving away performers and audiences.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/donald-trump-takes-a-shot-at-highly-conflicted-judge-deciding-the-decrepit-kennedy-centers-fate/) than acknowledging his role in driving away performers and audiences.

Trump Official Leaks Debunked Censorship Files

A Trump administration official leaked government files to a conservative online data analyst in a failed attempt to prove that the shuttered Global Engagement Center had conducted domestic censorship operations. Sarah Rogers, the State Department’s undersecretary for public diplomacy, provided the documents to Jennica Pounds, known as DataRepublican, who claimed she was being “entrapped.” Rogers then published the files herself, alleging center officials “betrayed their stated mission.”

Two former senior GEC officials, Daniel Kimmage and Carrie Goux, examined the leaked material and concluded it demonstrates nothing. The files contained a 2022 GEC report on “gendered disinformation” and Kimmage’s congressional testimony, which Rogers selectively presented to suggest the center had targeted American speech. Kimmage stated Rogers “tried to twist” his testimony, in which he explicitly said the GEC “did not” take positions on US outlets, into false evidence of domestic censorship.

The GEC, which operated from 2017 until dissolution in 2025, spent nearly a decade tracking foreign influence operations from Russia, China, and Iran under an explicit foreign-facing mandate. During that period, it published eight detailed reports on Russian and Chinese disinformation campaigns, exposed four major Kremlin operations across Latin America, Africa, Moldova, and against RT, and brokered an international pact on countering state disinformation signed by over two dozen governments. A 2022 inspector general review found the center “generally effective,” though it noted weaknesses in internal controls and contractor oversight.

Republicans, including former House Foreign Affairs Committee chair Michael McCaul, attacked the GEC for allegedly stretching the definition of disinformation to suppress conservative speech. The campaign centered on the center’s funding of the Global Disinformation Index, a UK nonprofit that rated media outlets; the GDI’s separate 2022 study of the US media market rated Newsmax, One America News, and the New York Post as high-risk for disinformation, which critics weaponized as evidence of domestic meddling despite the GEC’s foreign mandate.

The State Department is now resuming counter-disinformation work through other offices, including a proposal to pay up to 30 social media influencers across 11 Southeast Asian countries $2,500 each as part of an $11 million campaign to counter Chinese propaganda. The influencer program, operated by the US Mission to ASEAN, includes messaging, training, and studio visits to “intensive collaboration” in Washington and Houston, with recruitment materials citing Pounds as an ideal model. Goux stated the administration is “spending a lot more tax dollars” attempting to reconstruct the GEC’s functions through contractors while the US “has lost their seat at the table” internationally and “losing trust too.”



(Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/aug/30/state-department-global-engagement-center-leaked-documents-foreign-propaganda?utm_term=Autofeed&CMP=fb_us&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwdGRjcAUB2bFwZG9mBWZkaWQWUNhA2nVC-1TIXlpnQcULA8nZq7U7QGV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR4e46YPv-u3jinexDLfVD5pbBRWNKDJWnPzteIVor6UwLqdj-AiK3cye1072Q_aem_qPXIWAbHlImdCnG_ibNBHg#Echobox=1788089080)

Pentagon Stealth Hires Influencers To Pump Up Pete Hegseth

The Pentagon secretly hired conservative military veterans with large social media followings to amplify Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s agenda and attack Trump administration critics, according to The Washington Post. Retired Air Force Colonel Rob Maness (135,000 X followers), retired Army Colonel Kurt Schlichter (620,000 X followers), and retired Army Colonel Thomas Anderson, who writes as Cynical Publius (323,000 X followers), were assigned to the office of Anthony Tata, the undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness, with active civilian government email addresses as of late August 2026.

Pentagon spokesman Joel Valdez refused to disclose whether the three influencers draw taxpayer-funded salaries, their specific roles, or the duration of their assignments, contradicting Trump administration claims of running “the most transparent Defense Department ever.” The secrecy surrounding their placements and compensation demonstrates the administration’s use of government resources to orchestrate propaganda through influencers who then amplify official messaging to civilian audiences without public accountability.

All three individuals declined to comment to The Post about their positions and activities. Tata and Hegseth also refused to respond to questions about the program, leaving no official explanation for how the Pentagon justifies placing active political operatives on the public payroll or what oversight, if any, monitors their work.

The revelation follows reporting that Democratic and Republican politicians pay influencers on TikTok and other platforms to promote their agendas, but the Pentagon’s covert hiring of active-duty adjacent figures represents a direct weaponization of military resources for partisan message amplification by the Trump administration.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/the-pentagon-secretly-hires-conservative-influencers-to-amplify-pete-hegseths-agenda/)

1 2 3 … 53