Category: Attack the Press

Trump Demands NBC Fire Seth Meyers in Authoritarian Move

Donald Trump has launched an attack on late-night host Seth Meyers, demanding that NBC fire him for allegedly suffering from “Trump Derangement Syndrome.” This outburst came after Meyers lampooned Trump on various topics, including controversial mentions from Jeffrey Epstein’s emails. In a post on Truth Social, Trump derided Meyers’ talent and ratings, branding them as “a Ratings DISASTER.”

The situation escalated when Brendan Carr, the chair of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and a Trump appointee, echoed Trump by resharing his post without any commentary. Critics have expressed concern over the cozy relationship between Trump and Carr, suggesting it mirrors authoritarian tendencies often seen in regimes that suppress dissenting voices.

Progressives have been particularly vocal against Carr’s resharing of Trump’s demand, with one North Carolina Democrat likening it to North Korean tactics. Former Rep. Justin Amash called for the abolition of the FCC, arguing that governmental pressure on comedy shows undermines free speech rights and the independence of media outlets.

Adding to the controversy, Carr has previously indicated the FCC might take action against late-night hosts over their remarks, which he has characterized as “sick.” This has sparked outrage from various quarters, with suggestions that such interference stifles the freedom of expression that is essential in a democratic society.

Despite the backlash, Trump has reiterated his stance against Meyers and similar comedians, labeling their comments as “100% ANTI TRUMP, WHICH IS PROBABLY ILLEGAL.” His attacks reflect a continuous trend where he seeks to diminish those who criticize him, showcasing an alarming disregard for free speech.

The FBI Attacks Fellow Conservative Tucker Carlson For Disloyalty

The FBI has publicly responded to Tucker Carlson following his accusation that the agency lied about Thomas Crooks, the man who allegedly attempted to assassinate Donald Trump. Carlson’s claims suggested the FBI falsely stated Crooks had no online presence, asserting he could prove this through social media posts. In a viral post, he urged his followers to stay tuned for further details about the alleged deception.

In direct rebuttal, the FBI’s Rapid Response unit stated, “This FBI has never said Thomas Crooks had no online footprint. Ever.” This assertive statement comes after FBI Deputy Director Paul Abbate confirmed in July that the agency had located a social media account linked to Crooks, which reportedly had over 700 comments but lacked sufficient verification details regarding Crooks’ motivations.

Despite positive feedback from some social media users regarding the FBI’s swift clarification, critiques were raised about the agency’s delay in making Crooks’ online activities public. Carlson is known for his persistent criticisms of the FBI, particularly during the tenure of Trump loyalists like Kash Patel and Dan Bongino, both former officials who are now closely linked to Carlson.

The FBI’s establishment of a Rapid Response social media account marks an effort to combat misinformation and negative narratives surrounding its operations and integrity. Through this initiative, the agency aims to enhance direct communication with the public, stating, “The days of bad-faith attacks and fake-news narratives are over.”

Moving forward, the FBI committed to confronting what it characterizes as an “avalanche of lies” that undermine its work and national security. The agency positioned itself as a guardian of truth, declaring a commitment to transparency that challenges the previous trends of misinformation, particularly during the Trump administration.

Trump’s Threat to Sue BBC Sparks International Media Panic

Donald Trump’s threat to sue the BBC has ignited widespread concern among British media commentators, who fear that capitulating to his demands could irreparably damage the broadcaster’s credibility. This situation escalated after the BBC aired an edited segment of Trump’s January 6, 2021 speech in a Panorama documentary, asserting that the clip misrepresented his statements prior to the Capitol riot.

Following an article by The Telegraph that accused the BBC of manipulation, Director-General Tim Davie and News Chief Deborah Turness resigned, prompting Trump to label the network as corrupt on his Truth Social platform for airing “doctored” footage. Trump’s lawyers then issued a letter threatening a lawsuit for $1 billion, which led the BBC Board to convene in response to the mounting pressure.

The impact of this lawsuit threat is significant, as many in the UK media debate the potential outcomes should the BBC choose to back down. Notable figures in media expressed that such a decision would ruin the BBC’s reputation globally, with Channel 4’s Matt Frei asserting it would severely damage the network’s integrity. Andrew Marr echoed this sentiment, stating that backing down would undoubtedly be disastrous.

Currently, the BBC maintains its course, indicating it is reviewing Trump’s letter and will respond accordingly. Trump has a history of coercing American media outlets into settlements, but facing the BBC poses unique challenges. Legal experts have noted that suing a foreign entity involves hurdles such as establishing jurisdiction, especially considering the documentary was primarily viewed outside the U.S.

Moreover, if Trump were to pursue legal action in the UK, he would encounter strict limitations, including a one-year statute of limitations for libel cases and significantly lower damage awards. His pattern of aggressive legal posturing underscores his broader strategy of using litigation as a weapon against perceived opponents, whether domestically or internationally, leaving many to ponder the fate of journalistic integrity should he prevail.

Trump Celebrates BBC Resignations Over Misleading Editing of Speech

Donald Trump took to his platform, Truth Social, to express jubilation following the resignation of two key figures at the BBC, including Director-General Tim Davie, after revelations emerged that the network “doctored” footage of his January 6th speech. Trump’s post referenced a report from The Telegraph that accused the BBC of manipulative editing, which purportedly made it seem like he incited violence during the Capitol riot.

In a post that reflected his characteristic brashness, Trump characterized the BBC officials as “corrupt journalists” who attempted to influence a presidential election. He claimed that their actions were a serious affront to democracy, pointing out that the BBC is based in a country he considers a primary ally. Despite the gravity of the situation, Trump’s focus remained on celebrating the downfall of his perceived adversaries.

The report that triggered the resignations detailed how the BBC’s Panorama program edited Trump’s words to create a misleading narrative. While Trump supposedly encouraged his supporters to “fight,” in actuality, he had urged them to “peacefully and patriotically” voice their opinions. This selective editing has raised significant questions about the integrity of the BBC’s reporting practices and its impact on public perception.

Davie’s resignation statement acknowledged that “mistakes were made” under his leadership, although he refrained from specifically discussing the controversy surrounding the Trump footage. Similarly, Deborah Turness, the BBC News CEO, referred to the ongoing fallout from the Panorama episode as damaging to the institution, asserting that it didn’t indicate institutional bias.

This event underscores how Trump’s narrative continues to influence media discourse in various avenues, often leading to a polarized reception. Despite acknowledging editorial missteps, the BBC’s leadership has attempted to defend the organization’s commitment to balanced journalism amidst a barrage of criticism from influential political figures.

Trump Attacks NBC News for Questioning Thanksgiving Pricing

In a recent press briefing, Donald Trump erupted at an NBC News reporter who questioned his assertions about Thanksgiving dinner pricing. The exchange took place after Trump made dubious claims that Thanksgiving meals were more expensive under former President Joe Biden. When challenged on the details of the lower costs reported by Walmart, Trump dismissed the reporter, shouting, “Fake news!” and further criticizing the media outlet for its decline in credibility.

This confrontation stems from Trump’s attempts to paint a favorable picture of the economy, a narrative at odds with the sentiments of many Americans. When pressed about the apparent disconnect between his economic claims and public concerns, Trump reiterated his belief that job growth and investments are at record levels. His hyperbolic declarations about the economy notably contradict the lived experiences of average Americans facing rising costs of living amidst persistent inflation.

Regarding Thanksgiving dinner, Trump inaccurately insisted that Walmart reported significant price reductions of 25% compared to the previous year. However, reports indicate that the 2025 Thanksgiving meal bundle contains six fewer items than in 2024, illustrating that the supposed savings do not account for less value. This tactic reflects Trump’s tendency to manipulate information to support his narratives.

Trump’s combative rhetoric is emblematic of his broader strategy to undermine the media and deflect accountability by labeling unfavorable reports as “fake news.” By resorting to such attacks, he attempts to rally his base by conjuring an adversarial image of journalists who dare to challenge his claims.

The implications of this behavior are troubling, as it contributes to an environment of distrust towards legitimate journalism, undermining public discourse. Trump’s attacks highlight his disregard for factual accuracy in favor of self-serving narratives, reinforcing concerns over the overall integrity of democratic dialogue in the United States.

Trump Lies on CBS 60 Minutes, Spreading 18 False Claims

In a recent interview on CBS’s “60 Minutes,” President Donald Trump made at least 18 false claims, revealing his ongoing pattern of deception. He reiterated the baseless assertion that the 2020 election was stolen from him, a claim consistently debunked by numerous sources. Trump also falsely claimed grocery prices are declining under his presidency, despite evidence showing they have increased significantly. When confronted by CBS host Norah O’Donnell, he insisted inflation was either non-existent or around 2%, contradicting current figures indicating it is around 3%.

Trump’s fabrications extended to his claims about economic investment, asserting that “$17 trillion” is currently being invested in the U.S. This figure is nearly double the government’s already inflated estimate. He also made outrageous statements regarding the impact of U.S. military actions against drug trafficking boats, claiming they lead to the deaths of 25,000 Americans each, a figure dismissed by experts as nonsensical.

Additionally, Trump falsely stated that he has ended “eight wars,” a gross exaggeration that misrepresents numerous ongoing conflicts. He also inaccurately claimed that former President Joe Biden authorized $350 billion in aid to Ukraine, while the actual figure is significantly lower. These statements are just a few examples of Trump’s tendency to twist facts to fit his narrative, undermining trust and accountability.

Despite being challenged, Trump maintained these false narratives, including exaggerating figures surrounding immigration, repeatedly stating that Biden allowed 25 million migrants into the U.S., a number that is dramatically inflated. Trump’s rhetoric continues to blur the line between fact and fiction, further polarizing political discourse.

Finally, the interview highlighted Trump’s ongoing disputes regarding historical facts, including the Insurrection Act. He incorrectly claimed that it had been invoked 28 times, while historical records confirm it has only been employed a total of 30 times throughout U.S. history. Each of these falsehoods chips away at the foundation of informed political dialogue and raises critical questions about the integrity of those in power.

Trump Rebuts Kaitlan Collins Over Binance Pardon Inquiry

During a recent question-and-answer session at the White House, President Donald Trump confronted CNN journalist Kaitlan Collins regarding his decision to pardon Changpeng Zhao, the founder of Binance. Collins prompted an explanation about the pardon, specifically asking if it was connected to Zhao’s ties to Trump’s family’s crypto business. Trump, in response, suggested Collins was uninformed about cryptocurrency and accused her of spreading fake news.

While Collins attempted to clarify her question, Trump interjected, asserting that Zhao, who pleaded guilty to enabling money laundering, had received strong support and claimed that many viewed him as innocent, stating he was „persecuted by the Biden administration.” Trump emphasized that he had not personally met Zhao but had decided to grant the pardon based on recommendations from supporters.

Binance has faced significant legal challenges, including the $4.3 billion settlement reached with the Biden Department of Justice. Trump’s comments came as part of a larger roundtable discussion focused on issues such as immigration-related crime and human trafficking, attended by several cabinet members and the FBI director.

Critics have linked the Trump family’s crypto venture, World Liberty Finance, to Binance, suggesting potential conflicts of interest that may influence the Trump family through partnerships and financial ties. This connection has raised concerns about the implications of such relationships on political dealings and investments.

In his remarks, Trump defended his decision to pardon Zhao, indicating that he took action at the behest of trusted individuals who believed in Zhao’s innocence. This incident highlights the ongoing scrutiny surrounding Trump’s pardons and the potential intersections between his business interests and political decisions.

Trump Denounces WSJ Report on Ukraine Missile Use as Fake News

President Donald Trump strongly criticized the Wall Street Journal’s report claiming the Trump Administration had lifted a restriction allowing Ukraine to use long-range missiles against Russia, labeling the story as “FAKE NEWS.” He made this assertion shortly after the report’s publication, emphasizing that the U.S. has no involvement with missiles entering Ukraine.

The Wall Street Journal suggested that this unreported action would enable Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to enhance attacks on Russian territory and exert further pressure on President Vladimir Putin to conclude the ongoing conflict. According to the Journal, the missiles were supplied to Ukraine by Western allies.

As part of the report, it was noted that the authority for these military actions had shifted from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to General Alexus Grynkewich, the NATO commander in charge of U.S. military operations in Europe. This transition signifies a potential escalation of military capabilities extended to Ukraine.

Earlier this month, Trump indicated support for supplying Ukraine with Tomahawk missiles. However, reports emerged of a contentious discussion with Zelensky, where Trump allegedly urged him to consider negotiating terms with Russia to avoid destruction of Ukraine.

In addition to his remarks on this military support, Trump is currently pursuing a $10 billion lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal, citing defamation over an unrelated issue involving the publication’s coverage of a past letter to Jeffrey Epstein, which he denies authoring.

Trump Blasts Reporter Over East Wing Demolition Questions

President Donald Trump criticized Reuters White House correspondent Jeff Mason during a live press event at the White House, labeling him a “third-rate reporter.” Trump was addressing a question regarding his transparency on the demolition of the East Wing to construct a new ballroom. Mason pointed out that many viewers were surprised by the extent of the demolition, which Trump initially indicated would not be entirely destroyed.

Trump, responding to Mason’s inquiry, argued that he had been transparent, claiming that pictures of the project had been widely circulated and that he had provided answers to anyone who would listen. He defended the decision to demolish the East Wing, stating that extensive studies and consultations with top architects concluded that the current structure was not salvageable for the planned ballroom.

He also asserted that the new ballroom would not cost taxpayers, as it is being financed through private donations from companies, including major donors like Apple and Amazon. Trump was keen to emphasize his vision for the ballroom, asserting that it had garnered great public reviews and that the construction was a positive reflection of progress.

The White House renovation project has faced criticism from public figures like former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and California Governor Gavin Newsom, who have voiced concerns about the implications of such extensive changes to the iconic building. Clinton stated that Trump was “destroying” the White House, reflecting ongoing controversies related to the renovations.

Trump’s remarks underscore ongoing tensions between the administration and reporters, particularly regarding transparency in government operations and public sentiment toward the modernization efforts at the White House.

Hegseth Defends Pentagon Press Restrictions on Fox News

Pete Hegseth, the Secretary of Defense, defended the Pentagon’s imposition of restrictions on the press during an interview with Fox News’s Peter Doocy, labeling the actions of journalists seeking leaked classified information as “disgusting.” He emphasized that the Department of Defense (DoD) is taking measures to minimize leaks by setting stricter protocols, likening current press restrictions to those of the White House.

Hegseth claimed that the previous allowance for journalists to roam the Pentagon without proper oversight posed a security risk, stating, “We’re not playing games. We’re not allowing everyone to roam around the building.” He presented these changes as necessary to protect national security and maintain order within the military complex, further asserting, “The Pentagon press corps can squeal all they want. We’re taking these things seriously.”

However, journalists covering the Pentagon responded critically to Hegseth’s claims. Dan Lamothe from The Washington Post pointed out that Pentagon reporters have long adhered to strict security protocols and have not roamed freely without badges as Hegseth suggested. Other journalists echoed Lamothe’s sentiments, arguing that Hegseth’s statements were misleading, particularly in comparison to White House press activity where access is also heavily regulated.

The contrast between Hegseth’s portrayal of journalistic practices and the actual conduct was evident when Hugo Lowell of The Guardian called Hegseth’s comments “disingenuous,” highlighting that foreign military officials already navigate unclassified areas of the Pentagon, which do not parallel the restrictions seen at the White House.

This exchange underscores a troubling narrative surrounding the Trump administration’s stated commitment to transparency and media freedom, as the increasing restrictions imposed on journalists reflect a broader trend of authoritarian control over information dissemination in American democracy.

1 2 3 4 … 73