Category: Forever Presidency

Trump primes supporters for a third term and beyond.

Trump considering pardon for P. Diddy and other high-profile figures to mark America’s 250th: report | The Independent

President Donald Trump is reportedly considering a pardon for Sean “P. Diddy” Combs, the music mogul currently imprisoned in federal prison in New Jersey for prostitution-related crimes, according to CBS News sources. Trump is also weighing clemency for Prakazrel “Pras” Michel of The Fugees, who is serving time for foreign lobbying violations. These potential pardons would reportedly be part of a White House effort to issue “250 pardons for 250 years” to mark America’s 250th anniversary during Independence Day celebrations.

Trump denied considering Combs’ pardon request in January, telling the New York Times he was not granting the alleged request, and the White House similarly dismissed pardon speculation last year. Trump and Combs, both New York-based businessmen with reality television backgrounds, previously knew each other socially, but Trump stated in May that he had not seen or spoken to Combs in years, attributing the relationship’s end to his entry into politics. Combs and Michel are both currently appealing their convictions and sentences.

Trump has deployed the pardon power to benefit political allies, business associates, celebrities, and white-collar criminals. He has pardoned rapper NBA YoungBoy, crypto executive Changpeng Zhao, former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernández (a convicted drug trafficker), and more than 1,000 January 6 Capitol rioters. On Friday, Trump announced six pardons for individuals he falsely described as persecuted by the Biden Administration for “fixing their car,” mischaracterizing violations of the Clean Air Act involving tampering with vehicle emissions monitoring devices.

In November, Trump pardoned a Wyoming diesel mechanic who pleaded guilty to violating environmental law by disabling emissions monitors on commercial trucks. The president’s extensive use of pardons has reportedly generated million-dollar lobbying campaigns directed at Trump and his associates. Former crypto executive Sam Bankman-Fried is among high-profile figures pursuing a pardon from Trump, according to Justice Department records.



(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-pardoning-p-diddy-america-250th-july-4-b3008891.html)cutive Sam Bankman-Fried is among high-profile figures pursuing a pardon from Trump, according to Justice Department records.

Trump Vows 100-Year GOP Electoral Lock Via Voter ID Bill

President Donald Trump declared at an Independence Day rally in South Dakota on Friday that Republicans will not lose elections for 100 years if Congress passes the SAVE America Act, which mandates voter identification and proof of citizenship to register. Trump railed against what he called “the communist menace” while pressuring Senate Republicans to eliminate the 60-vote filibuster threshold to pass his legislation, stating “if we terminate the filibuster as we should do and immediately vote for the SAVE America Act, then we will not lose an election for a hundred years.”

Trump has repeatedly demanded Senate Republicans dismantle the filibuster, a procedural tool requiring 60 votes to end debate on legislation. The GOP controls the Senate 53-47 and possesses the votes to eliminate the rule unilaterally, yet Senate Majority Leader John Thune has acknowledged insufficient support among Republicans to do so. Trump’s ultimatum follows his earlier threat that he will be the “last Republican president” if the party fails to pass his voter ID legislation and removes the filibuster.

The president tied passage of the SAVE America Act to his baseless claims that the 2020 election was rigged against him, falsely asserting Democrats can only win through fraud. In his February State of the Union address, Trump declared Democrats “the only way they can get elected is to cheat,” weaponizing the legislation as a tool to entrench Republican electoral advantage while attacking the legitimacy of Democratic victories without evidence.

Trump’s vow of uninterrupted Republican dominance reflects his stated ambition for indefinite presidential power, consistent with earlier threats to be the last Republican president unless his demands are met and his promotion of merchandise bearing “Four more years” slogans. The centurial guarantee mirrors authoritarian tactics of consolidating institutional power to eliminate competitive elections and opposition.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/trump-vows-republicans-will-not-lose-an-election-for-a-hundred-years/)

‘They Tried to Kill Him’ Wild Trump Intro Says God Saved Him

Faith and Freedom Coalition Chairman Ralph Reed introduced President Donald Trump at the Faith and Freedom Policy Conference in Washington, DC on Friday with inflammatory rhetoric depicting Trump as a divinely protected figure under siege. Reed claimed Trump alone accomplished conservative achievements including appointing conservative Supreme Court justices, securing the border, enacting tax cuts, and directing military action against Iran, while listing a series of legal and political challenges Trump faced: “They impeached him! They indicted him! They tried to imprison him! They tried and knock him off the ballot! And then they tried to kill him!”

Reed attributed Trump’s survival of these challenges to divine intervention, stating “it all failed because God has a purpose for this man. And it is to save our nation.” This characterization mirrors earlier remarks Reed made at a leaked spring event and frames Trump’s legal jeopardy as persecution rather than accountability for conduct.

The introduction employed language consistent with authoritarian personality cults, positioning Trump as uniquely targeted and supernaturally protected while consolidating support among evangelical voters who form a crucial political base. Reed’s framing of indictments, impeachments, and assassination attempts as evidence of persecution rather than legitimate legal process normalizes rejection of institutional constraints on executive power.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/they-tried-to-kill-him-wild-trump-intro-goes-right-into-god-saved-him-territory/)mpts as evidence of persecution rather than legitimate legal process normalizes rejection of institutional constraints on executive power.

Trump, 80, Wants to Run for President Again | The New Republic

At a Pennsylvania rally on June 23, 2026, President Donald Trump publicly floated running for a third presidential term, stating “Maybe we should run again” and “I’d like to do it,” despite the Constitution explicitly prohibiting more than two terms. Trump has repeatedly referenced third-term ambitions, previously stating he is “not joking” about the prospect, and has discussed the scenario with his lawyer Alan Dershowitz, who is writing a book exploring that outcome. The Trump Organization capitalizes on this messaging by selling “Trump 2028” hats for $55, up from $50 the previous year.

Trump’s claims about his military achievements and Iran’s capabilities directly contradict statements he made days earlier. At the same Pennsylvania rally, Trump declared that the U.S. had left Iran with “no Navy, no Air Force, no antiaircraft, no missile capability, no nuclear program,” and claimed Americans could “fly over Tehran just at will.” However, Iran maintains active naval units controlling the Strait of Hormuz, retains its nuclear energy program and development capacity, operates aging aircraft, and possesses substantial ballistic missile capabilities, according to New York Times reporting from May 2026. Trump himself acknowledged Iran’s missile arsenal at the G7 summit the previous week, stating other nations have missiles and questioning why he should disarm Iran while allowing Saudi Arabia to retain its arsenal.

Indian billionaire Gautam Adani, facing federal fraud and bribery charges in Brooklyn under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, met privately with Donald Trump Jr. in November 2024 in Ahmedabad, India. Seven months later, in May 2025, the Department of Justice abruptly dropped all charges against Adani, with prosecutors citing prosecutorial discretion in a brief filing. Trump Jr.’s spokesperson denied the meeting had “zero to do” with the DOJ’s decision, though the substance of their discussion remains undisclosed. The dismissal triggered an immediate market surge in Adani’s companies, temporarily elevating him to Asia’s wealthiest person.

Federal law enforcement deployed AI-powered surveillance towers at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in response to Trump’s unsubstantiated vandalism claims. Trump has alleged that vandals inflicted a progressively enlarging gash on the pool’s floor, expanding his claims from 250 feet on Saturday to 300 feet by Monday to 350 feet by Tuesday, yet has refused to provide photographs or evidence despite claiming the Interior Department possesses video documentation. CBS News inspectors found no evidence of any such damage, and Trump has directed over $16 million in renovations to the pool, which deteriorated again within days, now requiring additional drainage and repairs at unknown cost to taxpayers.

Trump has ordered the arrest of six individuals accused of vandalizing the pool, deploying sophisticated surveillance infrastructure including AI-powered audio alerts, strobes, and spotlights that automatically detect and deter alleged threats. The escalation at the memorial follows Trump’s contentious history with the landmark, including blaming vandalism and ABC News reporter Jonathan Karl for pool deterioration and self-congratulating the renovation project while concealing structural failures underlying its rapid decline.



(Source: https://newrepublic.com/post/212242/trump-80-third-term-president-pennsylvania-lehigh-valley?utm_campaign=SF_TNR&utm_medium=social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwdGRleASpSJxleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeQasl5O59yGmesAb4GJZyNREQYGh2KBJBS2Rgp-wAMsFgdw_cmcIWqqCwul4_aem_Q1yHw0AWtEyNN97VXNycRA)elf-congratulating the renovation project while concealing structural failures underlying its rapid decline.

Trump Family Backs $12,000 UFC Coins at White House

President Trump and his sons Eric and Donald Jr., through the Trump Organization, partnered with UFC to sell commemorative coins ranging from $250 to $12,000 ahead of a UFC event scheduled for June 14 at the White House during Trump’s birthday celebration. The coins, branded “Freedom 250” and featuring Trump’s and UFC promoter Dana White’s likenesses, launch Tuesday and are marketed as commemorating both America’s 250th anniversary and what the marketing describes as a “defining patriotic moment” between Trump and the UFC.

Trump Coins, the vendor, claims the Trump Organization does not manufacture or directly sell the medallions despite the partnership, leaving the financial benefit to Trump’s organization unclear. The website asserts Trump “designed” the coins, though Trump has publicly backed the merchandise while his likeness is cleared for commercial use. The timing positions the coin sales days before the White House UFC event, which will air on a streaming platform operated by a Trump-aligned executive.

The merchandise rollout exemplifies Trump’s use of official government events and venues to benefit himself and his business interests. The UFC Octagon construction on the White House South Lawn for the June 14 event timed to Trump’s birthday demonstrates the overlapping commercial and governmental promotion that has become routine under his administration. A watchdog group lawsuit seeking to block the event remains under judicial review.

This scheme mirrors Trump’s pattern of leveraging his presidency for personal and family financial gain. Earlier in 2026, Trump awarded a $5 million no-bid contract to gild statues near the Lincoln Memorial, bypassing competitive bidding for a July 4 deadline, further demonstrating how he converts public resources and national celebrations into vehicles for self-promotion and enrichment.

The coin sales proceed as Trump’s unpopular military action in Iran has driven gas prices upward and eroded economic confidence among Americans facing financial strain. His promotion of high-priced merchandise bearing his image while economic conditions deteriorate underscores his indifference to constituents’ material circumstances.



(Source: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-organization-ufc-selling-freedom-250-coins_n_6a26db25e4b0626f4fe031e5?ncid_tag=fcbklnkushpmg00000013&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&utm_campaign=us_politics&d_id=12028784&fbclid=IwdGRjcASVAWpleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeHrD_hYJhv2SCWlEdkt9rJrGbH2llUjXajLTPNiEKqByXuf2aDfPjfHib3WU_aem_DUZAMzFk8FZV3-TD8lSSyg)

Trump Demands Thune Fire Parliamentarian Blocking Funds

President Donald Trump attacked Senate Majority Leader John Thune on Truth Social Monday, demanding he fire Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough and accusing her of treating Republicans “horribly” while favoring Democrats. Trump’s post also targeted Senator Mitch McConnell, describing him as “very disloyal” to Thune and claiming McConnell allowed MacDonough to remain in her position to direct “trillions of dollars to the Democrats.” Trump has rarely attacked McConnell during his second term, making this public strike notable.

MacDonough blocked $1 billion in taxpayer funding for Trump’s ballroom project from a budget reconciliation bill, determining it violated the Byrd Rule prohibiting non-budgetary items from passing with a simple majority vote. Trump framed her ruling as evidence of bias, claiming she would have approved the proposal “easily” and that her continued tenure prevents passage of his “SAVE AMERICA ACT.” Trump previously demanded Thune fire MacDonough after she blocked the ballroom funds, threatening Republicans they would be “looking for a job much sooner than you thought possible” if they refused.

McConnell recently contradicted Trump by denouncing his anti-weaponization fund as “morally wrong,” directly criticizing acting Attorney General Todd Blanche for requesting a “slush fund to pay people who assault cops.” McConnell, who announced last year he would not seek reelection, has positioned himself as an occasional check on Trump’s most extreme demands, though he served as Senate leader while MacDonough worked under Democratic leadership and Trump has repeatedly pressured Republicans to remove her.

The demands to remove MacDonough represent Trump’s ongoing pressure on Republican leadership to eliminate institutional guardrails protecting the budget process. MacDonough, appointed during the Obama administration, has functioned as an independent arbiter applying the Byrd Rule to both parties’ proposals. Trump’s insistence that she be replaced with someone “favorable to his agenda” directly attacks the parliamentary independence designed to maintain legislative integrity.

Government watchdog reports show donors to Trump’s ballroom project secured over $50 billion in new or expanded federal contracts within six months, demonstrating the scale of personal enrichment at stake in removing budget constraints. Trump’s personal financial interest in the ballroom funding conflicts directly with his authority over federal spending, yet he demands loyalty from Senate Republicans to override parliamentary safeguards that prevent his self-dealing.(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-takes-a-swing-at-mitch-mcconnell-in-fiery-call-for-gop-to-fire-senate-parliamentarian/)

DOJ argues Trump could ‘bulldoze’ Statue of Liberty during White House ballroom hearing – ABC News

The Justice Department defended the Trump administration’s White House ballroom project before a federal appeals court on Friday, arguing that the judiciary cannot block the construction and that no court could stop the president from demolishing any historic site, including the Statue of Liberty. Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Yaakov Roth told the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit that the project, which has already demolished the White House East Wing and installed over 3 million pounds of steel rebar, cannot be enjoined because moving fast enough prevents plaintiffs from establishing legal standing to challenge government action. When Judge Patricia Millett posed a hypothetical about the Statue of Liberty, Roth acknowledged the same logic applied: if the administration moved quickly enough to demolish it, the injury would become “non-redressable” and no lawsuit could proceed.

Judge Millett rebuked what she termed the administration’s “move fast and break things” approach, questioning whether speed alone could foreclose judicial review. Roth affirmed that doctrine explicitly, stating that rapid action rendering harm impossible to undo eliminates standing. The panel also heard arguments about national security, with Roth framing the ballroom as essential protection for the president against modern threats like drones, though this claim contradicts the statutes the administration initially cited, which authorize only maintenance and upkeep of the White House, not demolition and reconstruction.

The National Trust for Historic Preservation brought the lawsuit to block construction, citing its congressional charter to protect historic sites. Judge Millett appeared skeptical of the government’s position that the organization lacked standing, noting that Alison Hoagland, a National Trust board member involved in the case, had a legitimate interest in preserving the architectural integrity of the White House complex. Trump attacked Hoagland directly overnight in response to her courtroom testimony about the harm the ballroom would cause to historic design principles.

U.S. District Judge Richard Leon had halted construction in late March, finding Trump exceeded his authority in authorizing the ballroom. However, the appeals panel administratively stayed Leon’s order on April 17, allowing work to continue while the court considered the case. During oral arguments, Judges Bradley Garcia and Neomi Rao questioned whether the statutes cited by the administration actually granted the president power to demolish and replace structures, with Garcia noting the relevant law permits only maintenance, not improvements or reconstruction.

The case hinges on whether Trump possesses unilateral authority to modify the White House complex without congressional approval and whether courts retain power to review such decisions. The administration’s theory that rapid execution of government(Source: https://abcnews.com/amp/US/appeals-court-hear-arguments-trumps-ballroom-plans-continue/story?id=133589066) projects eliminates judicial oversight entirely represents an unprecedented assertion of executive immunity from legal challenge, one the appellate panel appeared divided on accepting.

Donors won $50B in contracts after giving to Trump ballroom project, report says – The Washington Post

More than half of the identified donors to President Donald Trump’s White House ballroom project secured new or expanded federal contracts totaling over $50 billion within six months, according to a government watchdog report released Thursday. The pattern demonstrates Trump’s systematic use of federal procurement to reward financial backers, directly linking private donations to government spending decisions that benefit the donors themselves.

Trump’s ballroom project, housed in the White House East Wing, has become a vehicle for channeling taxpayer money to his political allies. The $50 billion in contracts awarded to ballroom donors represents a direct return on investment for those who funded the construction, establishing a quid pro quo arrangement between private contributions and federal contracts that contradicts basic principles of competitive procurement.

The watchdog group’s findings document how Trump weaponizes federal contracting authority to consolidate loyalty and enrich his network. This contracting pattern follows Trump’s demand that Senate Majority Leader John Thune fire Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough after she blocked $1 billion in taxpayer funding for the ballroom project from a budget reconciliation bill, indicating Trump’s willingness to attack institutional independence when it impedes his financial interests.

Trump has repeatedly misrepresented the ballroom project’s cost and scope. While Trump claimed the $400 million project would be completed ahead of schedule and under budget, Senate Republicans simultaneously requested $1 billion in additional taxpayer security funding tied to the construction, exposing the gap between Trump’s public statements and the actual financial burden on taxpayers.

The $50 billion in contracts awarded to ballroom donors exemplifies how Trump transforms the executive branch into a personal enrichment apparatus. By funneling federal money to those who fund his projects, Trump corrupts the procurement process, ensures absolute loyalty through financial dependency, and establishes the institutional mechanisms necessary for perpetuating his control beyond a single term.(Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/06/04/donors-won-50b-contracts-after-giving-trump-ballroom-project-report-says/)

White House proposes NDAs for federal workers to crack down on leaks to journalists | Trump administration | The Guardian

The Trump administration's Office of Personnel Management released a draft nondisclosure agreement on Tuesday requiring federal employees to sign NDAs designed to prevent them from sharing information with journalists. The proposed agreement allows the government to pursue civil and criminal penalties against employees who disclose information deemed confidential, and grants the administration rights to all royalties employees receive from such disclosures. Former government employees would need written permission from an authorized agency official to speak to journalists about confidential information after leaving their positions.

This proposal is part of Trump's broader campaign to control the flow of information from federal agencies. Since taking office, Trump has attacked news outlets as "fake news," filed lawsuits against media organizations, banned the Associated Press from the White House press pool, and restricted reporter access at the Pentagon. The administration also enacted a September media policy requiring Pentagon reporters to sign pledges to report only officially released information.

Federal employee unions directly oppose the NDA proposal. Steve Lenkart, executive director of the National Federation of Federal Employees, stated the move is part of an effort to weaken unions that function as internal accountability mechanisms and to silence dissent within government. Everett Kelley, national president of the American Federation of Government Employees, characterized the proposal as an attempt to purge career civil servants and replace them with political loyalists unwilling to report waste, fraud, and abuse. Both union leaders emphasized that federal employees retain constitutional rights and protected whistleblower protections under existing federal law, including the ability to report misconduct to Congress and inspectors general.

The draft NDA explicitly states it would not apply to lawful disclosures of fraud, abuse, and misconduct to internal government watchdogs and Congress, as prohibited by federal law. However, legal experts and union leadership argue that agreements designed to suppress lawful disclosures lack legitimate governmental purpose and are constitutionally suspect. Federal employees do not surrender First Amendment rights upon accepting government employment, according to union statements.

The OPM spokesperson McLaurine Pinover justified the proposal as addressing concerns that unauthorized disclosures disrupt agency operations, but the timing aligns with Trump's pattern of attacking press freedom and independent government institutions. Trump has previously attempted to silence government insiders through litigation, using legal threats against former officials who published accounts of his conduct, illustrating the administration's longstanding hostility toward public disclosure of government activities.

(Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/may/26/federal-workers-ndas?utm_term=Autofeed&CMP=fb_us&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwdGRjcASC05NleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEe5Rmh4RqgHIrUPmZ6FJZ2vQkc06d102xkDcnGTwBel7cXhDDcM71T8WPqHAo_aem_F2rmbphOg6PMqplupHvCBw#Echobox=1779812330)

Trump Sells ‘Four More Years’ Merchandise, Promotes Extended Presidency

President Donald Trump promoted merchandise bearing the slogan "Four more years" at a rally in Rockland County, New York on Friday, declaring the merchandise "drives the radical left lunatics crazy." Trump used the event to repeat claims about economic performance, including stock market figures, and to attack Democratic positions on taxes, immigration, and transgender athletes in sports.

During his remarks, Trump made explicit references to serving multiple presidential terms, stating "we're a three-term president" and "my first term of numerous terms," language consistent with his prior promotion of a third presidential term despite the constitutional ban imposed by the 22nd Amendment. The crowd responded with repeated chants of "Four more years" to his statements about extended tenure.

Trump attributed tax deductions to Republican legislation, claiming New Yorkers saved between $10,000 and $40,000 annually and that over one million New Yorkers claimed the deduction that year. He stated the deduction averaged $22,000 per filer and characterized Democratic opposition to these tax cuts as uniform.

Trump continued attacking Democrats on border policy, wall construction, and regulations on transgender participation in women's sports. He recounted an anecdote about a male athlete competing in women's weightlifting to illustrate what he described as the "ridiculous" nature of transgender sports participation policies.

The rally merchandise and Trump's repeated invocations of extended presidential terms align with prior Trump Organization efforts to secure trademark rights on property bearing his name, extending his commercial exploitation of the presidency to political merchandise and branding infrastructure.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-crows-about-his-4-more-years-merch-drives-radical-left-lunatics-crazy/)

1 2 3 … 7