Category: Forever Presidency

Trump primes supporters for a third term and beyond.

Trump admin says White House ballroom ‘beyond the point of no return’ in Supreme Court appeal – ABC News

Trump administration officials filed an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court on Friday seeking to overturn a lower court injunction that would halt construction of a White House ballroom and helipad. Solicitor General John Sauer, invoking six alleged assassination attempts against Trump, claimed the project is essential to presidential security and that halting work would endanger Trump’s life. The administration asserts it has authority to conduct the renovation without congressional approval, citing precedent for presidential alterations to the executive residence.

A federal district court and divided appeals court determined Trump lacks authority to overhaul the White House without congressional approval, prompting the administration’s Supreme Court intervention. The injunction is scheduled to take effect August 21 unless the Court grants the emergency stay. Sauer argued the district court would improperly elevate a single judge as arbiter of presidential security decisions, framing the matter as one of executive power rather than institutional oversight.

The administration claims the project is 65 percent complete with $200 million spent or committed, operating with a 250-person crew working 20 hours daily seven days a week. White House director Joshua Fisher declared in a sworn statement that stopping construction would be “a disaster” because the concrete-and-steel structure is now “beyond the point of no return” and cannot be safely altered or dismantled. The filing asserts the project operates “on time” and “under budget” with “zero taxpayer dollars” required, though this omits reference to a $1 billion White House hardening request to Congress widely tied to the ballroom project.

The administration’s filings include declarations from the secretary of state, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, FBI director, and Secret Service director defending the project on national security grounds. The National Trust for Historic Preservation, which challenged the construction as destructive to the building’s historic integrity, will have the opportunity to respond to the Supreme Court within the coming week. Trump devoted nearly 45,000 words across 84 public events to construction projects including this ballroom during the first seven months of 2026.

Senate Democrats requested the Government Accountability Office audit the project, citing the unusual scale, destruction of historic architecture, opaque funding mix of public and private sources, and absence of standard federal review processes. The Supreme Court is expected to decide whether to grant the emergency stay and potentially expedite oral arguments on the merits of presidential renovation authority versus congressional oversight.



(Source: https://abcnews.com/Politics/trump-appeals-supreme-court-white-house-ballroom-construction/story?id=135642539)de whether to grant the emergency stay and potentially expedite oral arguments on the merits of presidential renovation authority versus congressional oversight.

We crunched the numbers: Trump devoted 45,000 words to construction like Reflecting Pool, ballroom – PolitiFact

PolitiFact analyzed Trump's public events and speeches from January through July 2026, documenting that he devoted nearly 45,000 words to construction projects including the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool and White House ballroom across 84 events over 66 days. Construction projects consumed more than a quarter of his public speaking time during this period and became his dominant topic when making unprompted remarks, second only to the Iran war when responding to reporters' questions.

Trump's focus on the Reflecting Pool intensified in May as the July 4th anniversary approached, consuming approximately 10% of his speaking time in events where he mentioned it. He made inconsistent cost claims about repairs, initially stating the project would cost $1.5 million to $2 million in April, then raising estimates to $10 million to $16 million by June. Trump cited contradictory figures about predecessor spending, claiming Obama spent either $38 million or $100 million on repairs when records show Obama actually spent $35 million. After a new pool liner began peeling in June, Trump blamed vandals without evidence, but prosecutors led by U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro determined that faulty contractor installation caused the damage and dropped all charges.

Trump's $200 million White House ballroom project, later doubled in size to $400 million at what he claimed was military request, exemplifies how he frames construction through his personal identity. Trump repeatedly asserted no taxpayer funds would be used, claiming wealthy donors including Apple and Microsoft would pay, yet a Washington Post investigation of contractor estimates revealed taxpayers could cover more than half the $600 million projected cost. A federal appeals court blocked the ballroom construction in August, ruling Trump needs Congressional approval, prompting him to announce plans to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Political communication experts identify Trump's construction rhetoric as distinctly narcissistic, transforming projects into extensions of his personal judgment rather than institutional stewardship. Sam Martin, Boise State University associate professor, noted that Trump's framing reflects "a view of presidential power that depends primarily on the judgment, instincts, and abilities of one exceptional individual rather than on constitutional processes or institutional collaboration." Allison Prasch, University of Wisconsin-Madison rhetoric professor, observed that Trump disregards expert recommendations and historical preservation standards to "shape this national narrative" in ways that "his influence and eminence will outlast himself."

Public opposition to Trump's construction agenda contradicts his rhetoric. A July Washington Post/Ipsos poll found nearly two in three Americans dissatisfied or upset with the projects, including 90% of Democrats and 68% of Republicans, though 86% of self-identified MAGA Republicans supported them. Trump's preoccupation with construction projects and the Reflecting Pool during an ongoing Iran war, rising gasoline prices, and accelerated Kennedy Center renovations bypassing federal contracting standards demonstrates his prioritization of monument-building and personal legacy over governance.

(Source: https://politifact.com/article/2026/aug/11/trump-construction-ballroom-reflecting-pool/)

Surprise! Todd Blanche Immediately Breaks His Promises to GOP Senators | The New Republic

Todd Blanche issued a Department of Justice memo on his first day as Attorney General that expands executive privilege protections for President Trump, allowing him to shield communications with private advisers from congressional oversight. The memo extends privilege claims to cover exchanges between the president's advisers and civilians, a significant expansion from traditional interpretations. Senate Democrats, particularly Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, identified the move as evidence Trump is preparing to obstruct potential investigations if Democrats regain House control.

Blanche's immediate action contradicts assurances he provided during his confirmation hearing to Senators Bill Cassidy, John Cornyn, and Tom Tillis regarding limits on presidential immunity and accountability. His memo demonstrates the Attorney General is committed to shielding Trump from legal consequences and blocking government transparency rather than enforcing the law independently. The move directly undermines the stated commitments that secured his confirmation vote.

The administration is simultaneously pursuing aggressive immigration enforcement that targets military families despite ongoing recruitment efforts that promise immigration protections. In April 2025, Immigration and Customs Enforcement reversed longstanding policy treating military service as a mitigating factor in enforcement decisions, leading to detention of over 50 military spouses and relatives. More than 60 congressional Democrats, led by Senators Elizabeth Warren, Tammy Duckworth, and Richard Blumenthal, launched an investigation into whether the Defense Department collaborated with Homeland Security to detain servicemembers and their families, a potential violation of the Posse Comitatus Act.

The administration also announced plans to separate the MMR vaccine into three individual shots, falsely linking the combined vaccine to autism, despite CDC confirmation that no scientific evidence supports splitting the vaccine. Outgoing Senator Bill Cassidy, a physician, directly condemned the executive order as medically unsound and likely to increase vaccine hesitancy among families. Cassidy's criticism carries limited credibility given his decisive confirmation vote for Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an anti-vaccine activist without public health expertise.

Trump nominated Dennis Kirk, a Project 2025 author and former Office of Personnel Management official, as Interior Department Inspector General, positioning a Trump loyalist to oversee ethics investigations and potential probes into the $16 million renovation of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. The nomination drew Democratic opposition, with House Natural Resources Committee ranking member Jared Huffman calling Kirk a "fake and fraudulent watchdog" designed to shield administration officials from accountability. Trump's administration has already defied federal court orders in other contexts, signaling systematic resistance to judicial oversight.

(Source: https://newrepublic.com/post/214186/todd-blanche-breaks-promises-donald-trump?utm_medium=social&utm_source=Facebook&utm_campaign=SF_TNR&fbclid=IwdGRjcAToUhpwZG9mBWZkaWQWUMSMzAgdnNxqwI-26BM6ALF5VHUZa2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR6Q_bhedKdybU3lTo998_TuvOU4ympm8H4ySVS25-LyOmFWhcKbh6WzNuH6MQ_aem_ozjN_-gR48igEMiBuFNGiw)

Trump Won’t Rule Out National Security Emergency to Seize Election Control

Donald Trump declined to rule out declaring a national security emergency to unilaterally impose voting restrictions bypassing congressional approval. When radio host Wayne Allyn Root suggested Trump declare such an emergency to enforce citizenship proof requirements, voter ID mandates, and mail-in ballot restrictions before the midterms, Trump responded: "Let me just say that stranger things have happened, Ok. I'll leave it at that." Trump did not elaborate on the statement, but the remark signals his intent to seize control over federal election administration.

Root explicitly proposed that Trump invoke emergency powers to circumvent Congress, claiming a two-thirds congressional supermajority would be required to overturn such a declaration. However, Trump lacks constitutional authority to alter federal election rules unilaterally. The Constitution grants Congress exclusive power to regulate federal elections. The Center for American Progress documented in March 2026 that no federal executive official possesses authority to change federal election administration rules. Trump's invocation of emergency powers to override this constitutional constraint would constitute an authoritarian seizure of electoral control.

Trump has already attempted multiple times to impose voting restrictions through executive order, each blocked by courts. A federal judge blocked Trump's executive order requiring states to create citizen eligibility lists, despite noncitizen voting being extremely rare according to research. Federal appeals courts also prevented Trump from restricting mail-in voting, ruling his order "directs unprecedented levels of involvement by federal officials in how states administer elections." Trump has recently petitioned the Supreme Court to allow mail-in ballot restrictions after failing to pressure the Senate into passing the unpopular SAVE Act.

Trump's sustained efforts to dismantle voting access mechanisms demonstrate a systematic campaign to consolidate electoral power. Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin has threatened state election officials with imprisonment for refusing to implement Trump's SAVE program. The combination of Trump's refusal to dismiss emergency election takeover, his pattern of blocked executive orders on voting, and his administration's threats against state officials reflects a coordinated effort to subordinate electoral processes to presidential control and permanently entrench one-party rule.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-elections-federal-takeover-national-emergency-b3031294.html?fbclid=IwdGRjcAToUapwZG9mBWZkaWQWUMQwWSFjX2E2GiD0syfI-hK4js4gCGV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR4tJeqGHMvSTn1xbzQyigdGOdaX5dhN3-s7M6f0MjGLJujXV6QqzRFiSn3svg_aem_t-SNyNh-EPPP-9qhMjpc8w)

Trump Orders Birthright Citizenship Restrictions, Defies Supreme Court

President Trump signed two executive orders Thursday targeting birthright citizenship and commercial birth tourism, marking his second attempt to circumvent the 14th Amendment after the Supreme Court rejected his broader Inauguration Day order on June 30. The orders narrow citizenship eligibility for children born to foreign diplomatic staff, individuals classified as alien enemies or members of federally declared terrorist groups, those born in U.S. territories if Congress changes the law, and children born to mothers who “deceptively” enter the country specifically to give birth at commercial centers.

Trump’s administration contends these orders operate within existing constitutional exceptions to the 14th Amendment, claiming the Supreme Court’s June 30 decision still permits targeting birthright citizenship under long-recognized categories. The birth-tourism order weaponizes the concept of “fraudulent misrepresentation,” arguing that mothers who expressly and deceptively enter the U.S. for childbirth forfeit birthright protections, similar to revoking naturalized citizenship obtained by fraud. A second order directs the State Department and Department of Homeland Security to issue rules combating birth tourism domestically and abroad, despite U.S. law already prohibiting tourist visas obtained primarily for childbirth purposes.

Congressional Republicans frame birth tourism as a national security threat, with the House Oversight Committee investigating the industry in May and citing concerns that foreign expectant mothers from China and Russia present “potential national security and election integrity threats posed by adversarial nations.” Trump has personalized the issue, attacking wealthy foreign nationals and framing birthright citizenship as an undeserved privilege being exploited for profit, stating on Truth Social that birthright citizenship should not apply to “rich people from China” seeking to make their children U.S. citizens “FOR PAY.”

Legal experts including University of Virginia immigration law professor Amanda Frost rejected Trump’s framing, arguing that if birth tourism represents a genuine policy concern, enforcement of existing regulations suffices without dismantling birthright citizenship protections. The orders face certain legal challenges identical to those that eliminated Trump’s first executive order, as the 14th Amendment’s plain language grants citizenship to all persons born in the United States regardless of parental status. Trump has already demanded the Supreme Court grant him a rehearing after the court rejected his initial birthright citizenship order, exposing his pattern of defying judicial decisions that constrain his authority.

Estimates of children born through birth tourism range from thousands to tens of thousands, though congressional Republicans lack concrete evidence linking the practice to election interference or security breaches. The administration’s targeting of birth tourism through executive order, combined with its resistance to the Supreme Court’s June 30 ruling, demonstrates Trump’s commitment to expanding executive power over citizenship determinations regardless of constitutional limitations.



(Source: https://www.axios.com/2026/08/06/trump-birth-tourism-birthright-citizenship)

Trump Posts AI Image Claiming Four-Star General Rank Never Earned

President Donald Trump posted an AI-generated image depicting himself in a military uniform adorned with medals he never earned, standing alongside artificially rendered versions of Generals George S. Patton and Douglas MacArthur. In the fabricated image, Trump appears as a four-star general while both Patton and MacArthur are depicted with two-star ranks, contradicting historical fact: Patton held four stars and MacArthur was one of only nine officers to achieve five-star rank.

Trump has never served in the armed forces despite attending a private military academy as a teenager. During the Vietnam War, he obtained five deferments from the draft: four for college enrollment and one citing bone spurs in his heels. Trump later told radio host Howard Stern that avoiding sexually transmitted diseases constituted his “personal Vietnam.”

This image represents an escalation in Trump’s pattern of posting AI-fabricated military fantasies. Earlier this week, he shared another AI image depicting himself as a Revolutionary War military leader. Trump has repeatedly mused about awarding himself the Medal of Honor, the nation’s highest military decoration, despite his complete absence from military service.

Critics characterized the image as stolen valor, accusing Trump of falsely claiming military honors and rank he neither earned nor deserves. The deliberate misrepresentation of actual military heroes with inferior ranks to his own fabricated rank particularly amplified the backlash, as Trump positioned himself above legitimate military legends in an entirely fictional context.

This post continues Trump’s documented pattern of normalizing false narratives through AI-generated imagery to craft an authoritarian persona disconnected from reality, including his use of executive power to reward loyalists and his unsubstantiated claims of fraud.



(Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/stolen-valor-trump-ripped-over-082259489.html)

Trump Posts 2028 Memes Normalizing Unconstitutional Third Term

Donald Trump has escalated his persistent efforts to normalize a third presidential term by posting a series of AI-generated memes on Truth Social depicting himself with “Trump 2028” campaign imagery, including images of him wearing branded hats and smoking cigars. These posts represent Trump’s continued public messaging around a 2028 run despite the 22nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibiting any person from being elected president more than twice.

Trump has repeatedly made statements suggesting he intends to run again, recently telling press that he would like to be “the next president,” and previously hinting at potential candidacies in 2026 or 2032. He has distributed “Trump 2028” campaign merchandise for months, embedding this messaging into his political brand while technically circumventing constitutional restrictions through ambiguous language about future office-holding.

The meme spree drew immediate criticism on social media, with journalist Harry Sisson characterizing Trump’s posting activity as “a mental health episode,” while the Trump Lie Tracker account described his behavior as that of an “immature bully.” Critics highlighted the disconnect between Trump’s actions and constitutional norms, with one commenter invoking historical comparison to underscore the severity of the messaging.

Trump’s normalization strategy extends beyond social media antics into judicial appointments, where a Trump-nominated judge recently refused to answer basic questions about presidential eligibility, signaling potential willingness within his administration to undermine constitutional term limits through the judiciary. This pattern connects to Trump’s broader history of making unsubstantiated claims about election integrity and testing constitutional boundaries.

The accumulation of these actions represents a systematic effort to desensitize the public to the prospect of unconstitutional continuity in office, leveraging memes and casual statements to erode the finality of constitutional term limits while maintaining plausible deniability about explicit intent to subvert the Constitution.



(Source: https://www.indy100.com/politics/trump/trump-memes-2028-presidency)

Trump Jokes About Fourth Presidential Run, Third Term at Press Dinner

President Donald Trump attended the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner in Washington on Friday, July 25, 2026, where he joked about seeking a fourth presidential run to achieve a third term in office. Trump announced his intention to run for president again while wearing a “Trump 2028” red cap, framing the comment as a “scoop” for the assembled press corps. The constitutional amendment limiting presidents to two terms makes a third term legally impossible, yet Trump has repeatedly made comments hinting at extending his tenure beyond constitutional limits.

Trump delivered an hour-long speech at the event, striking a lighter tone than his typical media criticism while still attacking what he calls the “fake news media” and taking swipes at journalists and political rivals in attendance. He made crude jokes about health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., quipping that Kennedy had run over a cow with his car to provide beef for the dinner and suggested Kennedy wanted to serve roadkill as an appetizer. Trump also joked with journalists about bulletproof vests, saying they worried the protective gear made them look heavier.

The dinner, which celebrates press freedom, was relocated to the Waldorf Astoria hotel under heightened security after being suspended in April following an alleged attempted assassination on Trump. Weijia Jiang, the outgoing president of the White House Correspondants’ Association, stated the event’s return sent a message: “We are back. We will not be intimidated.” Trump later echoed this sentiment, declaring “We do not yield to political violence… No deranged loser with a gun will ever change that.”

This marked the first time Trump, who has frequently clashed with the press, attended the correspondents’ dinner. Trump’s appearance included attacks on journalists and media outlets while he made jokes that largely fell flat. His repeated references to a potential third term continue a pattern of comments normalizing the idea of extending presidential power beyond the constitutional two-term limit.



(Source: https://news.sky.com/story/donald-trump-jokes-hell-run-for-president-again-at-white-house-correspondents-dinner-13566802)

Trump EEOC Kills 60-Year Demographic Data Collection Rule

The Trump administration’s EEOC, controlled by a Republican majority, voted Tuesday to eliminate a 60-year-old federal requirement mandating that tens of thousands of private employers submit annual workforce demographic reports. The data collection, known as the EEO-1 form, has been mandatory since 1966 for companies with at least 100 employees and covers more than 50 million workers across 73,000 employers nationwide, tracking representation of women and racial minorities across job categories from executive positions to service roles.

EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas, who has promoted complaints from white men and opposed diversity initiatives, justified the elimination by falsely claiming the reporting requirement costs employers “hundreds of millions of dollars” and encourages racial discrimination. Lucas argued companies use demographic data to justify discriminatory hiring practices, despite lack of evidence supporting this claim. Former Democratic EEOC commissioners directly contradicted Lucas, stating there is “little evidence that companies are routinely using employment data to engage in quotas or race-based hiring” and calling her justification “simply inaccurate and unsupported speculation.”

The data reveals white men hold 52.7% of executive and senior management roles despite comprising one-third of the overall workforce, while Black and Hispanic women remain drastically underrepresented in senior positions. Women hold 34.5% of executive roles, up from 29.2% a decade earlier. The EEOC has used this data for 60 years to identify discrimination patterns, guide enforcement priorities, and inform investigations into the 88,000 workplace discrimination complaints it receives annually. The Trump administration did not publicly release the 2024 data it collected and has blocked collection for 2025.

The move, recommended by Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation’s authoritarian policy blueprint, dismantles a civil rights tool that survived 10 consecutive administrations. Democratic EEOC Commissioner Kalpana Kotagal, the sole Democrat remaining after Trump’s loyalty purges, voted against elimination, warning the commission was “turning back time to a period before the civil rights movement” and stripping the agency of its ability to protect workers. Kotagal signaled the data collection could be reinstated under future leadership.

Some large companies have already begun withdrawing their own diversity disclosures. Twenty-four companies in the S&P 100 stopped disclosing EEO-1 data in 2025 after releasing it previously, though 60 S&P 100 companies still chose transparency. Companies remain legally required under Title VII to retain demographic records subject to EEOC demand during discrimination investigations, and employment discrimination lawsuits continue regardless of federal reporting requirements.



(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-donald-trump-democratic-new-york-republican-b3019049.html)

Trump Appointees Dismantle Historic Preservation Rules

Trump’s appointees at the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation are moving to dismantle Section 106 regulations, a foundational federal rule protecting historic sites, to expedite construction of a 250-foot “Triumphal Arch” near Arlington National Cemetery. According to The Atlantic, the proposed amendments would grant federal agencies broader discretion to override preservation standards, prioritize damage mitigation over preventing harm to historic places, and eliminate requirements to evaluate alternative designs or locations before proceeding with projects.

Vice Chair Travis Voyles instructed council members to vote on the revisions by July 17, with at least seven of 24 members appointed by Trump. The arch, estimated to cost $100 million and featuring a golden winged figure flanked by gilded eagles, would require 20-hour construction workdays over two to three years. The National Capital Planning Commission, chaired by Trump appointee William Scharf, has already voted to advance the project, bringing it closer to breaking ground despite Trump’s rejection of the need for congressional approval.

Three Vietnam War veterans filed suit in February to block the arch’s construction, contesting whether Trump obtained proper authorization. Commission staff acknowledged significant gaps in the project plan requiring additional details before final approval, yet the administration has continued advancing it without addressing those deficiencies.

A Washington Post/ABC News/Ipsos poll from April found 52 percent of Americans opposed the arch compared to 21 percent in favor, yet Trump administration officials maintain they are “following all legal requirements.” The administration’s pattern of bypassing competitive bidding for rush projects has extended to recent contracts, including a $5 million no-bid agreement to gild statues near the Lincoln Memorial.

Trump’s Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool renovation, which ballooned from $1.8 million to $13.1 million, developed algae problems shortly after completion, exemplifying the administration’s hasty approach to federal monument projects. The arch represents another instance of the administration weaponizing federal agencies stacked with loyal appointees to bypass regulatory oversight and democratic process.



(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-arch-washington-historic-preservation-council-b3018493.html)

1 2 3 … 8